Apple iPad marketshare drops to 52%, Androids on the rise


Recommended Posts

pew-infographic.png

It shouldn't come as much of a surprise that more Americans than ever now own tablets, but if you'd ever wanted some quantifiable data to go along with that homespun wisdom, then the Pew Research Center is glad to help. According to its latest report, 22 percent of US adults now own a tablet of some form. While the iPad remains the dominant player in the space with a 52 percent market share, this figure starkly contrasts the 81 percent share that Pew reported in 2011. As you might expect, Android tablets have made significant inroads and now account for 48 percent of the overall tablet space. Leading the Android charge is the Kindle Fire, which alone accounts for 21 percent of all tablets sold. It's worth pointing out that Pew's survey was conducted before the release of either the Nexus 7 or the Kindle Fire HD, which means that even the most recent information is a bit behind the curve.

http://www.engadget....nership-report/

Also.. more data

20121002_pewtabletshare_2.jpg

20121002_pewtabletshare_1.jpg

  • Like 3

Didn't realize that Apple iPad was an OS or that Android was a device. Can we compare things that actually makes sense? I would figure a techsite like engadget could tell the difference between an OS and a device.

This is a pew study, as noted on the graphs. They make perfect sense. What other OS ships on an iPad? Its the same as every other survey that breaks down iphone v android v Microsoft v RIM etc. iPhone isn't an OS, but you know what OS they're talking about. It's not like they didn't break it down by OEM as well.

  • Like 3

Didn't realize that Apple iPad was an OS or that Android was a device. Can we compare things that actually makes sense? I would figure a techsite like engadget could tell the difference between an OS and a device.

What other apple product class' itself as an tablet besides the iPad?

It would seem "flamboyant" to just list as iOS, whilst Andriod have quite a number of tablet devices to list all.

Thats my only conclusion as to why a tech giant would do that, I guess you didn't figure that out ;)

This is a pew study, as noted on the graphs. They make perfect sense. What other OS ships on an iPad? Its the same as every other survey that breaks down iphone v android v Microsoft v RIM etc. iPhone isn't an OS, but you know what OS they're talking about. It's not like they didn't break it down by OEM as well.

So according to that, we are now comparing the iPad line to all Android devices? Obviously not. According to the data, iOS and Android wiped every other tablet os off the market. There are Windows tablets out there, yet according to this, they don't exist as of 2012. That's funny considering I have a Samsung Windows 7 tablet next to me that I have been testing for work. According to this, it is a figment of my imagination.

What other apple product class' itself as an tablet besides the iPad?

It would seem "flamboyant" to just list as iOS, whilst Andriod have quite a number of tablet devices to list all.

Thats my only conclusion as to why a tech giant would do that, I guess you didn't figure that out ;)

Well there is the iPad 1, iPad 2, and the iPad. But hey, lets just focus on a useless number like market share and ignore not compare something that actually matters, like say, the top selling Android device vs the top selling iPad.

I love my Android tablet and I would buy another. I think Android may do in tablets what they did in phones, unless Windows 8 is a deciding factor.

Maybe Android will do as good with tabs as phones, but the tab success is slow and not nearly as fast and their phones were.

iPad had a pretty big drop tho over the past year.

Can we compare things that actually makes sense?

Apple and iFans loooove to compare useless numbers as long as it makes them look better, this here is actually a quite reasonable comparison all things considered. Also since when is market share useless? Oh yeah, since Apple is losing it.

  • Like 2

And people keep saying Android is failing in the tablet market lol. Even if we exclude Amazon's offerings, Android is doing well and growing year on year.

This research didn't even include Nexus 7 which is estimate to be sold in about 10 million units.

Well there is the iPad 1, iPad 2, and the iPad. But hey, lets just focus on a useless number like market share and ignore not compare something that actually matters, like say, the top selling Android device vs the top selling iPad.

he he.. you do realize that we are looking at the same exact scenario with phones.. Android open system will work the same way every time. With a lot of choices you have a strong competition so not all sales will go to one company. That's perfectly natural and good for consumers. But eventually, as we have seen with phones, Android manufacturers will start selling individually more tablet than Apple.. it's inevitable.

I think it's funny. Where are all those Apple fans who were telling me that iPad will go even higher than 68% they had? As far as I can, they are dropping so fast in marketshare that they are taking a nose dive. I am pretty sure they will be below 50% when Nexus 7 numbers are counted.

he he.. you do realize that we are looking at the same exact scenario with phones.. Android open system will work the same way every time. With a lot of choices you have a strong competition so not all sales will go to one company. That's perfectly natural and good for consumers. But eventually, as we have seen with phones, Android manufacturers will start selling individually more tablet than Apple.. it's inevitable.

I think it's funny. Where are all those Apple fans who were telling me that iPad will go even higher than 68% they had? As far as I can, they are dropping so fast in marketshare that they are taking a nose dive. I am pretty sure they will be below 50% when Nexus 7 numbers are counted.

Since you know the numbers, tell everyone how much the sales of each model of iPhone and iPad decreased as upgrades came. That is my point. Unless the market is fully saturated, it is a useless number when it comes to making a decision as a business, which is the only entity that would make any decision based on number of units out there anyway. Anyone else, they are following a fad, which according to most people hear, that is a bad thing.

This is a pew study, as noted on the graphs. They make perfect sense. What other OS ships on an iPad? Its the same as every other survey that breaks down iphone v android v Microsoft v RIM etc. iPhone isn't an OS, but you know what OS they're talking about. It's not like they didn't break it down by OEM as well.

No, the above article if noone actualy read it is saying that Android is gaining ground in the below $199 value tablets. Nook, Kindle, etc...

This is the same like comparing the sale of $300 netbooks with the sale of $1000 utlrabooks. Their main functionality and usage is different as so is the market they are after.

I think it's funny. Where are all those Apple fans who were telling me that iPad will go even higher than 68% they had? As far as I can, they are dropping so fast in marketshare that they are taking a nose dive. I am pretty sure they will be below 50% when Nexus 7 numbers are counted.

I am not sure about the apple fans, but if you talk to any normal person he/she will tell you the same thing. Apple owns more than 68% of the tablet market at the price range of $499 and above.

I am not sure about the apple fans, but if you talk to any normal person he/she will tell you the same thing. Apple owns more than 68% of the tablet market at the price range of $499 and above.

And that number is now obviously 52% and dropping.

Android gods have some people researching this stuff 24/7, must be exhausting.... in the end, no one cares except executives and stock holders of said particular stock... use what you like and DON'T use what you don't like. Some people seem to NEVER grasp that concept.

Apple. Carefully cutting up and dividing the market as necessary to make their numbers look good.

When all tablets are over $499, it's just "the tablet market".

When tablets start competing on price, ignore all tablets cheaper than the iPad and it becomes "the premium tablet market".

When OS vs. OS numbers aren't on Apple's side anymore, it's the "OEM vs. OEM premium tablet market".

And if Amazon Android devices start outselling iPads, it'll become the "specific model vs. specific model" market, guaranteeing that, as long as the Kindle Fire HD 4G 64GB in white sells less than the iPad 4G 64GB in white, Apple fans can cheer.

Android might be gaining market share, but their eco-system is horribly fractured.

Here I sit with a Samsung Galaxy Tav 8.9 LTE on Android 3.2 and can't even install Chrome on it because it requires 4.0.

Half of the applications I want to install, I can't. Yay market share!!

  • Like 2

And that number is now obviously 52% and dropping.

Is that iPad falling or the market expanding though? I see no demand for Android above the $99-$199 cheapo tablet markets. The success of Android phones is down to cheap or free-on-contract phones (You notice this once you look outside the US bubble). So far they don't have any market in $400+ tablets (see Amazon vs Samsung in that chart). It is also amusing to see people clubbing Kindle etc. i.e. non-PlayStore tablets to inflate Android numbers. They don't add to the ecosystem and hence no point in counting them under Android.

I think it's funny. Where are all those Apple fans who were telling me that iPad will go even higher than 68% they had? As far as I can, they are dropping so fast in marketshare that they are taking a nose dive. I am pretty sure they will be below 50% when Nexus 7 numbers are counted.

I think it was always fairly obvious that Android tablets would brute force the market just like Android phones.

Anywho, both iOS and Android are excellent products and it's good to see competition :D

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • All these CEOs got the biggest boners thinking about firing employees for AI. Turned out it was just a wet dream.
    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!