Apple explains purple flare issue affecting camera on iPhone 5 and other ph


Recommended Posts

The purple flare phenomenon you're seeing in certain photos taken with the iPhone 5 is perfectly normal, according to Apple, and it's an issue that affects the cameras found in nearly all smartphones. The company today posted a support article seeking to eliminate concerns that the problem is inherent to its latest handset, explaining that the purplish light can in fact be replicated with every prior iPhone model.

Apple says the issue arises when users take pictures with a light source that's just outside the frame. This light "causes a reflection off the surfaces inside the camera module and onto the camera sensor" that results in an unwelcome flare or haze. Apple's suggestion is to simply recompose your shot slightly until the issue disappears or shield the camera with your hand to minimize any flaring.

Immediately after the iPhone 5 launched, users were quick to voice concerns over the device's susceptibility to scratches, scuffs, and other hardware blemishes ? some even arrived with physical flaws out of the box. Apple's response to the purple haze "controversy" is likely an attempt to head off further doubts about its new flagship hardware. In this case, though, the company's explanation checks out with photo experts. For example, in their quick review of the iPhone 5's camera, the folks at Digital Photography Review told buyers "not to worry" about the issue and to merely avoid composing shots with bright lights at the edge of your frame.

http://www.theverge.com/2012/10/7/3468538/apple-explains-purple-flare-iphone-5-camera

funny NONE of my phones have had this purple flare problem

You can quite easily get a purple flare effect by taking a really badly shot photo. I demonstrated it in the comments on the Neowin news article a few days back.

Here's the photo I took. On a Galaxy Nexus.

http://localhostr.com/file/930/DxUyk0rapWUp/IMG_20121003_101616.jpg

You would get a light flare which would kinda ruin the photo with any camera, just not a purple one. Not sure why it really matters what colour the flare is! Take better pictures.

This one actually IS user error.

pretty much apples view is people are using the camera wrong

No, the company explains what happens and how you can avoid it. That said, if for whatever reason you feel unhappy about the purchase you made nothing is preventing anyone from simply returning the product. I understand however this level of rational thinking can't be expected, so let's just be completely irrational about it instead.

  • Like 1

done at the right angle, all cameras do... sorry bud

Do you own an iPhone by any chance ?

I`m not saying I couldn't create the same effect as +jamesyfx but I've have never had that happen with any photo I've taken with my phone yet

  • Like 2

I`m not saying I couldn't create the same effect as +jamesyfx but I've have never had that happen with any photo I've taken with my phone yet

All cameras can do it at the right (or should that be wrong?) angle. This is what lens hoods prevent on DSLRs.

However, my understanding is that the angle at which it occurs or the "range" of angles could differ from camera to camera. I know I had lots of flare issues with a LG feature phone camera, but my Canon 600D has had no issues so far when used without a lens hood. Someone with more experience than me may be able to clarify this.

All cameras can do it at the right (or should that be wrong?) angle. This is what lens hoods prevent on DSLRs.

However, my understanding is that the angle at which it occurs or the "range" of angles could differ from camera to camera. I know I had lots of flare issues with a LG feature phone camera, but my Canon 600D has had no issues so far when used without a lens hood. Someone with more experience than me may be able to clarify this.

I probably just use my hand to block the sun thinking about it

any point and shoot can do this. I can dupe this on my Nikon 8100 and 8200 plus my original Droid. some lens have more flare up than others though. So while it can be in any phone it seems to be much worse in the Iphone 5 because of the type of lens they used.

Seems to me that that is literally the issue here. As soon as Apple is concerned though, all common sense goes out the window.

Yep, apparently people think you can just take photos of the sun almost directly and it won't affect the photo in the slightest, even though it will affect a camera sensor in a similar way to what it would an eye.

It's dark here now, but I`m gonna take a few photos with my phone tomorrow and purposely try to get a purple lens flare

Pretty sure I have taken photos directly at the sun to see how they turned out and not ended up with a purple anything on them, just dark with a bright spot where the sun is, but I`ll have a go tomorrow

Yep, apparently people think you can just take photos of the sun almost directly and it won't affect the photo in the slightest, even though it will affect a camera sensor in a similar way to what it would an eye.

The thing is on the iPhone 5 it happens on all light sources, and while you can get a flare on every camera, the iPhone 5 has a huge range of effect where's most others have much smaller ranges, and can perfectly fine take pictures with light sources and even the sun in angles the iPhone 5 can't without the purple haze.

Also it's not simply about a flare. It's a flare plus the purple haze, if it had been just a flare it wouldn't have been an issue

Plastic vs Glass.

Most above average camera phones, iPhone included afaik uses glass not plastic lenses and covers.

It's dark here now, but I`m gonna take a few photos with my phone tomorrow and purposely try to get a purple lens flare

Pretty sure I have taken photos directly at the sun to see how they turned out and not ended up with a purple anything on them, just dark with a bright spot where the sun is, but I`ll have a go tomorrow

I shot a video of my dog running around the other day, several time he was running towards the sun. While I did get a flare, never did I get the purple hazing, in or outside the flare.

The thing is on the iPhone 5 it happens on all light sources, and while you can get a flare on every camera, the iPhone 5 has a huge range of effect where's most others have much smaller ranges, and can perfectly fine take pictures with light sources and even the sun in angles the iPhone 5 can't without the purple haze.

Also it's not simply about a flare. It's a flare plus the purple haze, if it had been just a flare it wouldn't have been an issue

You're right, there's a purple haze when I take a picture with my living room light just out of the frame, and that's not really that bright.

Can't think of a time I'd ever need to take such a photo though so I guess I'll live with it :p

Some people have speculated it's the Sapphire coating on the lens cover.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • I'm not unblocking my camera for this crapola. Sorry, Google.
    • Ummmm that is what is it supposed to do. Just turn if off in settings if you do not want it analyzing your open tabs. Chrome does the same thing with Gemini. Sarfari will do the samething after Apple's AI and even more so with the release of their 27 versions that is now powered by Googles LLM/ML models. Understanding why it is doing it and how it can help you vs jumping to some conspiracy theroy is a much better approach. As long as it can be turned off, all is good. Yes the default should be off but the a lot of people would never discover these features.
    • Just another reason (aside from many others) not to use Edge. Firefox 153.0b5 DEx64 has a similar feature added recently in prior builds that I will turn off at some point when I get around to it. It's the new "Something looks suspicious" page that pops up here and there. It cleverly hides itself between web pages that I've actually visited; as a result, you know, of selecting a web page and telling the browser where to go. The interesting thing is that it does not produce these warnings from pages that I, as the only intelligent user of the browser in my system, have ever directed the browser to open! What seems to be happening is that the browser looks at all the goofy ad links on a web page I do actually open and selects one that "looks suspicious" and then creates the "something looks suspicious" web page, which is neatly inserted, as mentioned, between web pages my RB ("real brain") has directed the browser to load in a session. The thing is, I usually look at links I am considering to follow before I ask the browser to load them, and in cases I have noticed where the link does indeed look suspicious, most of the time I will choose to not follow the link at all. Doesn't everyone do this or something similar? I am picky about what I voluntarily load... (I don't like links that start off fine, with a site designaiton that seems normal enough but then is followed by indecipherable alphanumeric strings many, many lines long, etc. I tend to reject those because they look suspicious. They may not be, but I don't care... I'll stay with Firefox, of course, if for no other reason than they usually let you turn off the junk you don't like. And because it isn't Edge... But at some point Microsoft will come to realize that putting your bookmarks on the left side is a Good Thing for a lot of people, just as Microsoft discovered when it had the bright idea of nailing the Windows taskbar to the bottom of the screen, when for decades Microsoft browsers had left that placement up to the user. They have finally reversed the obscenity of that decision. Finally.
    • Google was using the old CATPCHAs data to train their LLMs. What is the say they won't use this camera data of users to train their LLM? these companies need some strict regulations!
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      259
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      94
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!