MS hints at the death of Windows Service Packs toward 'constant updates


Recommended Posts

Microsoft hints at the death of Windows Service Packs toward 'constant updates'

Microsoft's first-time move Tuesday to update Windows 8 before the OS launches is a sign of the company's continued edging toward practices long held by rivals Apple and Google, analysts said today.

On Tuesday, alongside the usual Patch Tuesday security updates, Microsoft shipped four non-security updates specific to Windows 8, which doesn't go on sale until Oct. 26.

Steven Sinofsky, the executive who leads the Windows division, said that the biggest of the updates -- a massive 170MB download for Windows 8 x64 -- targeted performance, power management, media playback and compatibility issues which company developers uncovered and/or addressed since early August, when Microsoft tagged Windows 8 with the RTM, or "release to manufacturing," label.

In Microsoft's terminology, RTM designates the point at which it considers the code completed, and ready to ship to computer makers for installing on new PCs.

Microsoft has never updated a version of Windows between RTM and when the OS hits retail and PCs powered by it reach stores.

"Very interesting," said Jason Miller, manager of research and development at VMware, and a frequently-cited source on patching. "We've never seen them do something like this before. They're definitely changing how they do things to add more features on the fly."

Others also applauded. Andrew Storms, director of security operations at nCircle Security, called it a "welcome change" and added, "End users should be happy knowing they are going to get the latest advancements in their Windows 8 install."

Typically, Microsoft has reserved most major changes for what it calls "Service Packs," collections of previously-released security patches, non-security bug fixes, and new features or improvements of existing ones. Service packs are usually issued every 18 months or so; Windows 7, for example, has seen only one such upgrade in the three years since its Oct. 2009 launch, Service Pack 1 (SP1), which shipped in Feb. 2011.

Source and full article: PCWorld

Companies still need service packs, even normal customers. I rather not reinstall Windows 8 after a year and have 100+ updates to download and install. They should keep the service packs but only limit them to security updates and bug updates.

Companies still need service packs, even normal customers. I rather not reinstall Windows 8 after a year and have 100+ updates to download and install. They should keep the service packs but only limit them to security updates and bug updates.

This, one thing I cannot stand is a fresh install with hundreds of updates. Think of the time span of XP, without SP3 I'm guessing there would be about 600-900 updates from day one. Possibly more due to ranging hardware configurations

Companies still need service packs, even normal customers. I rather not reinstall Windows 8 after a year and have 100+ updates to download and install. They should keep the service packs but only limit them to security updates and bug updates.

They could just make a "yearly update pack" for offline install, containing updates from january to desember, and release them in January the next year.

Companies still need service packs, even normal customers. I rather not reinstall Windows 8 after a year and have 100+ updates to download and install. They should keep the service packs but only limit them to security updates and bug updates.

Nothing prevents Microsoft from releasing a combo updater similar to what Apple does with OS X.

They could just make a "yearly update pack" for offline install, containing updates from january to desember, and release them in January the next year.

Yeah... and they could call this "yearly update pack"... a Service Pack...
  • Like 3

I recently had to reformat my machine and I couldnt be bothered slipstreaming SP1....bad move hehe sure on a 18-20mbit dsl connection it downloaded all the updates quick engough, however installing the 139 updates took over an hour!

Learnt from that and downloaded the SP1 replacement windows 7 installer fo rmy version of windows for next time :)

It still has a purpose and I use manual network Service Pack Redists all the time, but im a touch impatient, time is money when in work :)

So what you are trying to say is that there won't be a Service Pack 1 for Windows 8 when it is released on sale at the end of this month.

Well now when you buy Windows 7 Service Pack 1 is already included so you don't have to install it. But if you bought your copy of Windows 7 before 2011 then you do have to reinstall Service Pack 1 every time you reinstall Windows.

But where did you read this anyway? I thought what happens is that you buy Windows 8 and about a year later Microsoft release the first Service Pack . That's what they do with the other versions of Windows. Andrea Borman.

MS do what you want but get some .ISO?s from time to time with full updates. People pay the software they dont want to keep waiting and installing updates.

Kill the SP or not, most importantly make new ways for paid users get their updated images. If i buy a windows8 key im expecting to download the .ISO in some private account, and if i go there 2 years from now i expect to have the updated Windows8 .ISO, not the same 2 years old .ISO :(

i'm sure there'll be cumulative packages (to be honest i think the terminology 'service pack' will be around just for the sake of the press and users who are used to it) but anyone who is a hardcore tester/rig builder or just a simple idiot and needs to reinstall windows frequently should be able to use WAIK and make an own ISO

But where did you read this anyway?

Here.

Source and full article: PCWorld

---

On topic, it ain't as bad as it looks. Yes, people who are not going to uppdate to 8 on release, will definitely find it prett difficult to install mulitple updates at a time

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Didn’t Dbrand once complain that Casetify was ripping off their designs a well? seems pretty bad of them to try and get around Valve’s copyright this way with that in mind.
    • Dbrand thought they could get away with this Steam Machine case, Valve disagreed by David Uzondu Image via Dbrand Dbrand has cancelled its highly anticipated Companion Cube enclosure for the Valve Steam Machine, which it teased back in November of last year with a concept render and sign-up page, because it did not ask Valve for permission first before manufacturing the case. According to Dbrand, it took the "backwards approach" of building the product first before asking for permission from the copyright holder. Seven months of work went into the project, requiring over a thousand engineering hours from the design team. Workers developed forty-four sets of injection molding tools, making a unique mold for each sub-component of the crate. When the Companion Cube went live on Monday last week, it, according to Dbrand, quickly became the second-fastest-selling product in the company's fifteen-year history, racking up orders for hundreds of thousands of units. Customers eagerly bought the $129.95 deluxe edition or the bare-bones $99.95 version, which the manufacturer cheekily branded as the "Poverty Cube". It was around this time that the legal eagles at Valve descended on the accessory maker with a formal demand. The developer pointed out that the iconic block design remains protected intellectual property from the game Portal, so unlicensed sales had to stop. Dbrand said that all its pleas to salvage the project with the Valve team, including proposals to run a properly licensed release under official terms "with their blessing", fell on deaf ears, so it had no choice but to obey and remove every trace of the product from the internet. If you bought the enclosure, the company said that banks will process your refund by the end of this week, but if it still hasn't arrived in your account by then, you should not hesitate to contact support. The Steam Machine itself is a high-performance console that Valve designed directly to bring PC gaming into the living room. It was announced on 12th November 2025 (the same day Dbrand announced the Cube) and runs on the Linux-based SteamOS, the same OS that powers the Steam Deck. As for the price, due to the shortage of memory and storage chips, the hardware cost landed much higher than people were expecting, starting at $1,049 for the 512 model (without a controller) or $1,128 with the new gamepad. The premium 2 TB model pushes those prices even higher, selling at $1,349 for the standalone console and hitting $1,428 if you want the bundle.
    • It's listed #399.99 on Amazon, per your link. It's not $299.99.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Rookie
      Almohandis went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Apprentice
      jahara21 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      534
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      263
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      148
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      97
    5. 5
      macoman
      59
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!