• 0

question about capacity planner output and setting cpu


Question

Hello

So , I have ESXi with the following

Available CPU # core Logical proccessor 4 8 64

and have Capacity Planner output

for example

whzhi.png

So could you please show how to calculate and Decide CPU fits this Host

is it 1.98 % of CPU used at peek as per the output ?

how to determine number of virtual sockets and cores per virtual soccets ?a

nd what about memory ?

is it maximum having 22.16 of total ?

So also if setting reservations

please advise about suggested values

please advise

0 answers to this question

Recommended Posts

There have been no answers to this question yet

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hello, For those that are interested, here are direct downloads to both the Game Ready and the Studio Driver versions: v577.00 (WHQL) Game-Ready Drivers Desktop - us.download.nvidia.com/Windows/577.00/577.00-desktop-win10-win11-64bit-international-dch-whql.exe SHA-1 hash: 0BD5CAD40D7BCC5D482BBFED435163A7CF209647 Notebook - us.download.nvidia.com/Windows/577.00/577.00-notebook-win10-win11-64bit-international-dch-whql.exe SHA-1 hash: 0BD5CAD40D7BCC5D482BBFED435163A7CF209647 v577.00 (WHQL) Studio Drivers Desktop - us.download.nvidia.com/Windows/577.00/577.00-desktop-win10-win11-64bit-international-nsd-dch-whql.exe SHA-1 hash: D9DF82C08F95A83BDE6E9FC43524236ECF8509B0 Notebook - us.download.nvidia.com/Windows/577.00/577.00-notebook-win10-win11-64bit-international-nsd-dch-whql.exe SHA-1 hash: D9DF82C08F95A83BDE6E9FC43524236ECF8509B0 For those that may intend to download all four of these drivers, Note that the SHA-1 hashes for each both of the desktop and notebook Game-Ready drivers as well as both of the desktop and notebook Studio drivers are the same, meaning that you do not need to download both the desktop and notebook versions of each driver, just one of the Game-Ready and one of the Studio drivers. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky
    • far from? it was the biggest issue in browser news when the change was announced. The lead up was months of Google/MS going back and forth on fix-break repeatedly and it being found that Google was specifically breaking YouTube based on the browsers userstring.
    • As a person that had moved from Chrome to Old Edge I disagree. It was very quick, and its built-in PDF handling was amazing. New Edge/Chrome is still catching up to it in that regard. It also used a LOT less memory than Chrome did.
    • I still really miss set tabs aside in legacy Edge and full screen of thumbnails for open tabs from (I think) later releases of IE.
    • The catch is you have to get it to actually install first. We still have a few machines in our environment that just refuse to install it, via WU, the KB's or an ISO, it just always fails.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      SmileWorks Dental earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Community Regular
      vZeroG went up a rank
      Community Regular
    • Collaborator
      Snake Doc earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Snake Doc earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Johnny Mrkvička earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      589
    2. 2
      Michael Scrip
      199
    3. 3
      ATLien_0
      195
    4. 4
      +FloatingFatMan
      133
    5. 5
      Xenon
      122
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!