Recommended Posts

Wanna hear it? :woot:

http://screen.yahoo....d-30859114.html

A research team at the University of Newcastle examined brain activity as subjects listed to 74 different sounds, from running water to a fork scraped over glass, to determine what sounds humans find most unpleasant.

Fingernails on a chalkboard, screeching tires and an animal crying are not as unpleasant to your ears as the sound of a knife sliding against a glass bottle, a new study finds.

A research team at the University of Newcastle examined brain activity as subjects listed to 74 different sounds, from running water to a fork scraped over glass, to determine what sounds humans find most unpleasant.

The sharp side of a knife on a bottle came out on top.

?Subjects were informed that they would be listening to unpleasant sounds in the MRI scanner but were not told about the type of unpleasant sounds or the overall aim of the study,? researchers said.

Scientists wanted to pinpoint how the ear transmits sound to the brain, that then codes that sound as unpleasant. They also needed to make these links separate from any emotional or cultural associations with a certain sound ? like a baby crying or the sound of someone vomiting.

The most ?dissociable? sounds had high frequencies, which is tough for the human ear to tolerate, the study concluded.

From here scientists were seeking to learn how the sounds ? acoustics ? affect the auditory cortex of the brain and also the amygdala, a primitive region that processes emotions.

The amygdala helps define the sounds as unpleasant, linking them to the physical and emotional reactions to sounds, like a high pitch wail, experts explain .

The reaction might also be there to alert humans to potential danger, the study found.

?For example, an animal cry (signaling the presence of a dangerous animal) may have different time and frequency domain structure related to the size of the animal.?

The results of the study were published in the Journal of Neuroscience.

source

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1112135-worlds-worst-sound/
Share on other sites

According to http://newsfeed.time.com/2012/10/11/listen-the-five-worst-sounds-in-the-universe/

The worst five are:

Knife Bottle;

Fork Glass;

Blackboard Chalk;

Blackboard Nails;

Ruler Bottle;

Although I have to say I've listened to all 5 and none of them bother me, though someone that continually sips their tea all day and makes the noise of getting things out their teeth really do annoy me though :p

That sound is nowhere near as horrifying as the alarm clock buzz.... It signifies the worst part of my day, and makes me want to hurt things.

this is funny cuz at an apartment complex I lived in there was like 5 alarm clock radios thrown out the windows.. I'd see at least 4 or 5 of them out the windows at any given time.,...

Knife on a bottle, very similar to knife grinding on a plate which I have always thought to be one of the most unpleasant. I can't stand people that have to cut their food with the force of an elephant and try to grind grooves into the plate making a very similar sound.

The fork-on-teeth thing is awful, can't stand the sound or the feel, gives me chills.

Although someone had their kid in here earlier and it reminded me of probably my #1, the sound of kids whining/crying/squealing. Gets on every last effing nerve I have :s

  • 2 weeks later...

Sorry i have to....

Funny thing about this...it was totally ad-libbed. Look at number 31 on this page: http://www.rankopedia.com/Best-Unscripted-Movie-Scene,-Moment-or-Line/CandidateData/21547/.htm

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I have a Motorola, one of the lower end ones, it works fine. It is possible to get rid of the Gemini app and also to disable googles assistant , but A.i is still apps. I try to avoid all LLM A.I, is i can, I use no Ai duck duck go.
    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!