Very Interesting Book on The Truth About UFOs and NASA


Recommended Posts

Newly released UFO files from the UK government

http://ufos.nationalarchives.gov.uk/

And now you are conflating ufo with alien spacecraft. Oh and still more evidence for my "make the truthers run around like headless chickens looking for aliens instead of at our secret project" hypothesis

And now you are conflating ufo with alien spacecraft. Oh and still more evidence for my "make the truthers run around like headless chickens looking for aliens instead of at our secret project" hypothesis

Believe what you want. I honestly don't care. I believe what I believe and I have my reasons why. You have yours for not believing. End of story.

Believe what you want. I honestly don't care. I believe what I believe and I have my reasons why. You have yours for not believing. End of story.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3IiGCjGWXs&feature=player_detailpage#t=4680s

replace aliens with god, the bible with this book and her response is almost word for word the same :rolleyes:

And if you read the bible and take everything "on faith" you will learn that the earth is 6000 years old, Donkeys and Snakes sometimes talk and all life originated from a drunkards boat.

The above isn't impressive.

Stop hiding the truth, NASA! I want to believe in the talking donkeys!

  • Like 2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3IiGCjGWXs&feature=player_detailpage#t=4680s

replace aliens with god, the bible with this book and her response is almost word for word the same :rolleyes:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JkIYpWtpLs8

Are there any "UFO cover ups" from other countries?? I only ever seem to see ones from USA, Surely the aliens have contacted/crashed in to other countries too.

Yes -- other countries have also hidden alien contacts.

Date: March, 1968

Location: Berezovsky , Russian Federation

The details of a Russian UFO crash on or about 1969 are sketchy and somewhat suspect. This case comes from the so-called "Secret KGB Files," which were reportedly smuggled out of the former Soviet Union. Reportedly, $10,000 was paid for the information. The details of these secret files were first offered to the general public on 9-13-98 as part of a TNT special titled "The Secret UFO Files of the KGB." The show featured extraordinary film and still photographs of the UFO recovery, and also a portion of autopsy film on part of an alien body.

http://ufoevidence.o...es/case1138.htm

Russian crash from many years ago:

post-37120-0-56606400-1350865098.jpg

post-37120-0-56886100-1350865168.jpg

post-37120-0-51751900-1350865354.jpg

Yes -- other countries have also hidden alien contacts.

Date: March, 1968

Location: Berezovsky , Russian Federation

The details of a Russian UFO crash on or about 1969 are sketchy and somewhat suspect. This case comes from the so-called "Secret KGB Files," which were reportedly smuggled out of the former Soviet Union. Reportedly, $10,000 was paid for the information. The details of these secret files were first offered to the general public on 9-13-98 as part of a TNT special titled "The Secret UFO Files of the KGB." The show featured extraordinary film and still photographs of the UFO recovery, and also a portion of autopsy film on part of an alien body.

http://ufoevidence.o...es/case1138.htm

Russian crash from many years ago:

There are other images of this scene, what's funny is the other photos are shown from further back. Why this is important is one, the angle of how the so called craft is in the ground. The other is that none of the trees are disturbed, none of them show signs of burn, cutting, broken or any other aspects that you would expect. Specially from a object coming in at such high velocity that it would embed itself half way into cold ground. It's leaning up against a tree that should have snapped it in half and damaged others around it. The ground is also ONLY disturbed just at where the craft is embedded in the ground, not around it.

Fake stuff is fake.

11y6n.jpg

ecttu.jpg

L8WsZ.jpg

Fake stuff is fake.

Oh comeon you act as if aliens being able to fly trillions of miles in space but having a worse flight to crash ratio than the 747 are somehow in conflict :rofl:

  • Like 2

If it's all being covered up, there's no chance of such a book being released in the first place.

As General Hammond (Stargate SG1 put it)

Plausible deniability, if someone did leak something real they could just point at material like this and call it fake/hoax etc

The tin foil hat / UFO revealing people actually do a good job of creating their own smoke screen that the government(s) can use to hide behind if aliens are real and if something is leaked

Hum, you can't seriously believe those photos... can you?

Why is that ?

These photos were printed in magazines, long before there was a 'Photoshop'.

It's not impossible for other intelligent life to visit Earth.

Or you can dream up some other explanation -- you decide. ;)

ah, beliefs. The one single thing that can prevent one from taking any other views into perspective. Its like a roadblock in your brain, "stop: no information shall pass".

i prefer to have a sign in my brain that says "welcome all, retards: keep to the right and take first exit please"

Why is that ?

These photos were printed in magazines, long before there was a 'Photoshop'.

It's not impossible for other intelligent life to visit Earth.

Or you can dream up some other explanation -- you decide. ;)

old magazine? then it must be true

fake_ghost_by_ripplin-d4rc9qf.jpg

Why is that ?

These photos were printed in magazines, long before there was a 'Photoshop'.

It's not impossible for other intelligent life to visit Earth.

Or you can dream up some other explanation -- you decide. ;)

You don't need photoshop to fake everything, props work pretty good to, specially back then. Being printed in a magazine doesn't equate to being real. I like how you ignore the points I brought up earlier.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I'm not unblocking my camera for this crapola. Sorry, Google.
    • Ummmm that is what is it supposed to do. Just turn if off in settings if you do not want it analyzing your open tabs. Chrome does the same thing with Gemini. Sarfari will do the samething after Apple's AI and even more so with the release of their 27 versions that is now powered by Googles LLM/ML models. Understanding why it is doing it and how it can help you vs jumping to some conspiracy theroy is a much better approach. As long as it can be turned off, all is good. Yes the default should be off but the a lot of people would never discover these features.
    • Just another reason (aside from many others) not to use Edge. Firefox 153.0b5 DEx64 has a similar feature added recently in prior builds that I will turn off at some point when I get around to it. It's the new "Something looks suspicious" page that pops up here and there. It cleverly hides itself between web pages that I've actually visited; as a result, you know, of selecting a web page and telling the browser where to go. The interesting thing is that it does not produce these warnings from pages that I, as the only intelligent user of the browser in my system, have ever directed the browser to open! What seems to be happening is that the browser looks at all the goofy ad links on a web page I do actually open and selects one that "looks suspicious" and then creates the "something looks suspicious" web page, which is neatly inserted, as mentioned, between web pages my RB ("real brain") has directed the browser to load in a session. The thing is, I usually look at links I am considering to follow before I ask the browser to load them, and in cases I have noticed where the link does indeed look suspicious, most of the time I will choose to not follow the link at all. Doesn't everyone do this or something similar? I am picky about what I voluntarily load... (I don't like links that start off fine, with a site designaiton that seems normal enough but then is followed by indecipherable alphanumeric strings many, many lines long, etc. I tend to reject those because they look suspicious. They may not be, but I don't care... I'll stay with Firefox, of course, if for no other reason than they usually let you turn off the junk you don't like. And because it isn't Edge... But at some point Microsoft will come to realize that putting your bookmarks on the left side is a Good Thing for a lot of people, just as Microsoft discovered when it had the bright idea of nailing the Windows taskbar to the bottom of the screen, when for decades Microsoft browsers had left that placement up to the user. They have finally reversed the obscenity of that decision. Finally.
    • Google was using the old CATPCHAs data to train their LLMs. What is the say they won't use this camera data of users to train their LLM? these companies need some strict regulations!
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      259
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      94
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!