Very Interesting Book on The Truth About UFOs and NASA


Recommended Posts

Newly released UFO files from the UK government

http://ufos.nationalarchives.gov.uk/

And now you are conflating ufo with alien spacecraft. Oh and still more evidence for my "make the truthers run around like headless chickens looking for aliens instead of at our secret project" hypothesis

And now you are conflating ufo with alien spacecraft. Oh and still more evidence for my "make the truthers run around like headless chickens looking for aliens instead of at our secret project" hypothesis

Believe what you want. I honestly don't care. I believe what I believe and I have my reasons why. You have yours for not believing. End of story.

Believe what you want. I honestly don't care. I believe what I believe and I have my reasons why. You have yours for not believing. End of story.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3IiGCjGWXs&feature=player_detailpage#t=4680s

replace aliens with god, the bible with this book and her response is almost word for word the same :rolleyes:

And if you read the bible and take everything "on faith" you will learn that the earth is 6000 years old, Donkeys and Snakes sometimes talk and all life originated from a drunkards boat.

The above isn't impressive.

Stop hiding the truth, NASA! I want to believe in the talking donkeys!

  • Like 2

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=f3IiGCjGWXs&feature=player_detailpage#t=4680s

replace aliens with god, the bible with this book and her response is almost word for word the same :rolleyes:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JkIYpWtpLs8

Are there any "UFO cover ups" from other countries?? I only ever seem to see ones from USA, Surely the aliens have contacted/crashed in to other countries too.

Yes -- other countries have also hidden alien contacts.

Date: March, 1968

Location: Berezovsky , Russian Federation

The details of a Russian UFO crash on or about 1969 are sketchy and somewhat suspect. This case comes from the so-called "Secret KGB Files," which were reportedly smuggled out of the former Soviet Union. Reportedly, $10,000 was paid for the information. The details of these secret files were first offered to the general public on 9-13-98 as part of a TNT special titled "The Secret UFO Files of the KGB." The show featured extraordinary film and still photographs of the UFO recovery, and also a portion of autopsy film on part of an alien body.

http://ufoevidence.o...es/case1138.htm

Russian crash from many years ago:

post-37120-0-56606400-1350865098.jpg

post-37120-0-56886100-1350865168.jpg

post-37120-0-51751900-1350865354.jpg

Yes -- other countries have also hidden alien contacts.

Date: March, 1968

Location: Berezovsky , Russian Federation

The details of a Russian UFO crash on or about 1969 are sketchy and somewhat suspect. This case comes from the so-called "Secret KGB Files," which were reportedly smuggled out of the former Soviet Union. Reportedly, $10,000 was paid for the information. The details of these secret files were first offered to the general public on 9-13-98 as part of a TNT special titled "The Secret UFO Files of the KGB." The show featured extraordinary film and still photographs of the UFO recovery, and also a portion of autopsy film on part of an alien body.

http://ufoevidence.o...es/case1138.htm

Russian crash from many years ago:

There are other images of this scene, what's funny is the other photos are shown from further back. Why this is important is one, the angle of how the so called craft is in the ground. The other is that none of the trees are disturbed, none of them show signs of burn, cutting, broken or any other aspects that you would expect. Specially from a object coming in at such high velocity that it would embed itself half way into cold ground. It's leaning up against a tree that should have snapped it in half and damaged others around it. The ground is also ONLY disturbed just at where the craft is embedded in the ground, not around it.

Fake stuff is fake.

11y6n.jpg

ecttu.jpg

L8WsZ.jpg

Fake stuff is fake.

Oh comeon you act as if aliens being able to fly trillions of miles in space but having a worse flight to crash ratio than the 747 are somehow in conflict :rofl:

  • Like 2

If it's all being covered up, there's no chance of such a book being released in the first place.

As General Hammond (Stargate SG1 put it)

Plausible deniability, if someone did leak something real they could just point at material like this and call it fake/hoax etc

The tin foil hat / UFO revealing people actually do a good job of creating their own smoke screen that the government(s) can use to hide behind if aliens are real and if something is leaked

Hum, you can't seriously believe those photos... can you?

Why is that ?

These photos were printed in magazines, long before there was a 'Photoshop'.

It's not impossible for other intelligent life to visit Earth.

Or you can dream up some other explanation -- you decide. ;)

ah, beliefs. The one single thing that can prevent one from taking any other views into perspective. Its like a roadblock in your brain, "stop: no information shall pass".

i prefer to have a sign in my brain that says "welcome all, retards: keep to the right and take first exit please"

Why is that ?

These photos were printed in magazines, long before there was a 'Photoshop'.

It's not impossible for other intelligent life to visit Earth.

Or you can dream up some other explanation -- you decide. ;)

old magazine? then it must be true

fake_ghost_by_ripplin-d4rc9qf.jpg

Why is that ?

These photos were printed in magazines, long before there was a 'Photoshop'.

It's not impossible for other intelligent life to visit Earth.

Or you can dream up some other explanation -- you decide. ;)

You don't need photoshop to fake everything, props work pretty good to, specially back then. Being printed in a magazine doesn't equate to being real. I like how you ignore the points I brought up earlier.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • This looks awesome, I will request access via Steam later this afternoon!
    • Personally, I’ve found that it’s usually worth investing in the infrastructure you don’t want to replace later, especially cabling. Running Cat6A (or better, depending on your needs) during an upgrade is relatively inexpensive compared to having to re-cable a few years down the road. For switches I try to balance current specs with realistic growth. If my budget allows it Ill choose switches with higher uplink speeds which leaves room for expanding later on, but I don’t necessarily overspend on access ports if the endpoints won’t benefit from them anytime soon. One lesson I’ve learned is that planning for scalability pays off. It’s much easier to add devices, VLANs, or higher-bandwidth workloads when your network infrastructure already supports it than to replace hardware later.  What is your budget like?
    • I hate the term, "future-proof." We saw it back in the 90's / 2000's, if not before. You cannot future-proof anything, since there is no definition of how far into the future you plan on prepping for. Best idea is to tell us what you currently have and what its use is at the moment, and we can then offer ideas about some areas that might need an upgrade and other areas that can be left alone.
    • I can agree that it is being used in a small capacity. I worked for a company where their engineers still used XP, and when asked why it was because their sensor software wasn't compatible with newer operating systems and the software was discontinued so they couldn't upgrade the software. Given that the sensors were still in use by companies, they had to continue using XP to support the sensor, otherwise the price to the company would have gone into the millions or billions. Our response was simple: Ok, you can keep the XP machine. But we're removing it from the network. "But then it can't access the Internet or folder shares!" Yup, kinda the point. If someone wants to continue using an unsecure OS they can do, I have no problem with that. But it should be isolated. Simple. I had a fight with a guy in the engineering department for weeks before he finally relented. But we digress.   What do I plan on doing to commemorate the anniversary? Nothing. I have fond memories of the OS, but at the end of the day it's just an OS. If I had some time I might see if I could install it on my Raspberry Pi for a laugh. But my reflex memory with today's OS ideas would probably get me frustrated and I'd uninstall it after 5 mins.
    • Shutter Encoder 20.2 by Razvan Serea Shutter Encoder is one of the best video converter software and image, audio available today. It has been designed by video editors in order to be as accessible and efficient as possible. It is one of the few free professional tools. Based on FFmpeg, it has the largest codec library available. You can thus convert your files into many different formats. Complete settings for the most advanced Shutter Encoder has a panel containing a large number of settings, in order to define your own choices based on your files and perfect your video or audio output. Well-thought-out settings, with parameters predefined to create files quickly and easily. List of functions Without conversion: Cut without re-encoding, Replace audio, Rewrap, Conform, Merge, Extract, Subtitling, Video inserts Sound conversions: WAV, AIFF, FLAC, MP3, AAC, AC3, OPUS, OGG Editing codecs: DNxHD, DNxHR, Apple ProRes, QT Animation, GoPro CineForm, Uncompressed YUV Output codecs: H.264, H.265, VP9, AV1, OGV Broadcast codecs XDCAM HD422, AVC-Intra 100, XAVC, HAP....and much more. Shutter Encoder 20.2 changelog: Added "Intel Quick Sync" hardware acceleration for Linux Added 'Identify speakers' option for "Audio transcription" function Improved installer package Improved video player performance Improved timecode display with drop-frame videos Improved naming convention for surround audio files Fixed splash screen freeze Fixed bug with file hanging Fixed bugs with presets loading Fixed bugs with video player's buffer Fixed bug with 'Total length of file' option Fixed bugs with 'Record screen/device' option Fixed bug with "XAVC" & "XAVC Long GOP" functions Rollback to XPDF tool for PDF conversion Removed unused binary architecture for Mac Various corrections Various improvements Download: Shutter Encoder 20.2 | 166.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Shutter Encoder Portable | 185.0 MB Links: Shutter Encoder Home Page | FAQ / Tips | macOS | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      534
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      265
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      152
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      99
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!