Lance Armstrong stripped of all seven Tour de France wins by UCI


Recommended Posts

remixedcat

He was still a damn good person and role model. The people that wanna shame him should be ashamed of themselves for being such pitiful jealous babies that throw a fit when someone is better then them.

Link to post
Share on other sites
ahhell

He was still a damn good person and role model. The people that wanna shame him should be ashamed of themselves for being such pitiful jealous babies that throw a fit when someone is better then them.

LOL WAT?

He was a ****ty person and a fraud. How exactly does that make him a good role model? :s

Link to post
Share on other sites
Chicane-UK

A pretty sad story all round :(

Link to post
Share on other sites
PGHammer

He was still a damn good person and role model. The people that wanna shame him should be ashamed of themselves for being such pitiful jealous babies that throw a fit when someone is better then them.

And that's what the whole thing comes down to, remixed - jealousy.

Does anyone remember Greg LeMond (if anything, the original inspiration for Americans in world-class cycling in Europe)? HE was accused (roundly) of cheating, and it was the investigation of him that originally caught all those teams in that massive doping scandal that forced one European superteam to disband entirely - and he was merely the first American to win back-to-back Tours.

Bicycle road racing is as bad (easily) as F1 racing in Europe, and there's ALWAYS been a strong sense of "Europe over all" in both sports (the Italians tried to "claim" Mario Andretti when he won his first F1 driving title, despite there being plenty of evidence that he had never raced in Italy outside of F1 AND that his racing career began in Pennsylvania - Emerson Fittipaldi got HIS share of jeers, because he was from SOUTH America).

And it really does NOT help that the United States (and especially our bureaucracies) have their share of Europhiles.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
MDboyz

He is still the winner at this point for me. They have to release the physical evidents that he used drugs. I don't care that because all his team mates were cheated and they said he did it too. Who knows all his team mates may have the issue with him, and wanted to pull him down with them.

Link to post
Share on other sites
theyarecomingforyou

He was still a damn good person and role model. The people that wanna shame him should be ashamed of themselves for being such pitiful jealous babies that throw a fit when someone is better then them.

Cheating and fraud are characteristics antithesis to the concept of being a "good person" and a "role model". Further, it's unfathomable that you could suggest people are jealous when it is patently apparent people are outraged that he defrauded the sport and brought shame to the US. You are clearly not being objective or rational. However, I cannot stop people deluding themselves as to his innocence and if people can't look at the situation objectively then I think that reflects poorly on them. It's no different to the people who believe who 9/11 was an inside job, that the moon landings were faked, that climate change isn't real or who believe Obama isn't really a US citizen - people would rather believe in a massive conspiracy than an inconvenient truth.

There seems to be a disconnect when it comes to people's opinions of celebrities and common sense. People invest emotionally in a brand and refuse to accept anything that tarnishes that image for embarrassment that they were deceived, that their judgement isn't perfect. The evidence strongly points to his guilt, hence why he was stripped of the medals - this isn't just the word of a few people against him. Could it all be an elaborate and extremely well orchestrated conspiracy against him? Sure, but there is no evidence to suggest that and evidence should always be the basis for a belief. If people are so outraged at the idea of eyewitness testimony then it may be time to petition the government for a complete overhaul of the criminal justice system, as I hear it's occasionally used in a court of law.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
remixedcat

hey they are just overclocking thier systems... just like hardcore gamers do... it's thier body so whatever... if they wanna do that and possibly **** themselves over but still win... that's fine.... all the hardcore gamers that have overclocked systems still are good gamers, they just are smarter for overclocking and getting the extra FPS to do better.

Link to post
Share on other sites
ahhell

hey they are just overclocking thier systems... just like hardcore gamers do... it's thier body so whatever... if they wanna do that and possibly **** themselves over but still win... that's fine.... all the hardcore gamers that have overclocked systems still are good gamers, they just are smarter for overclocking and getting the extra FPS to do better.

:o

Link to post
Share on other sites
Anibal P

Till I see actual PROOF that he doped and not the tainted "testimony" of other cheaters then it still boils down to jealousy, if the French who took pints of his blood could not find anything and I guarantee you they tested for every conceivable thing you could possibly test blood, then it's still a witch hunt, and Lance just giving up because he's tired of the BS proves nothing other than harassing a person will make them eventually give up

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
theyarecomingforyou

hey they are just overclocking thier systems... just like hardcore gamers do... it's thier body so whatever... if they wanna do that and possibly **** themselves over but still win... that's fine.... all the hardcore gamers that have overclocked systems still are good gamers, they just are smarter for overclocking and getting the extra FPS to do better.

And if Lance Armstrong had set up his own cycling league for cheats then it wouldn't have been an issue. However, he broke the rules of the sport and committed fraud by misrepresenting his business dealings. He tried to pass himself off as a legitimate sportsman when the evidence overwhelmingly points to the contrary. Your excuses are getting pretty desperate.

Till I see actual PROOF that he doped and not the tainted "testimony" of other cheaters then it still boils down to jealousy, if the French who took pints of his blood could not find anything and I guarantee you they tested for every conceivable thing you could possibly test blood, then it's still a witch hunt, and Lance just giving up because he's tired of the BS proves nothing other than harassing a person will make them eventually give up

They have more evidence that the testimony of others:

USADA said the evidence includes "direct documentary evidence including financial payments, emails, scientific data and laboratory test results that further prove the use, possession and distribution of performance enhancing drugs by Lance Armstrong and confirm the disappointing truth about the deceptive activities of the USPS Team, a team that received tens of millions of American taxpayer dollars in funding."

It's also worth pointing out that his teammates went through the same drug testing and managed to avoid detection, so the lack of a positive result is not proof of his innocence. It's naive - and verging on delusional - to believe that 'passing' the drugs tests in any way supports his innocence. Further, the idea that it's a massive conspiracy against him just isn't plausible and there isn't any evidence to support that. We have testimony from a dozen of his teammates implicating him; financial payments; emails; drug tests (yes, they went back and found evidence he was using hormones and EPO). It was grounds enough to strip him of his titles, so it's more than just a few unreliable people making baseless claims.

One aspect that doesn't seem to have got much attention is that the team received millions of dollars from the US government. It seems Americans are always whining about wasteful government spending yet nobody seems to be criticising the giving of millions of dollars to a team full of cheats.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Astra.Xtreme

Don't forget that the Livestrong Foundation has raised about $500 Million so far. Whether or not you respect the guy as an athlete anymore, you have to respect that he has helped tens or hundreds of thousands of people due to his foundation efforts.

I've worn the yellow band and I've participated in his fundraising events, so he'll always be a hero in my book.

  • Like 3
Link to post
Share on other sites
Nerd Rage

A cheater won in the age of cheating. He will still be the winner of those races in my book...just like Barry Bonds is the home run king in my book.

Link to post
Share on other sites
theyarecomingforyou
Don't forget that the Livestrong Foundation has raised about $500 Million so far. Whether or not you respect the guy as an athlete anymore, you have to respect that he has helped tens or hundreds of thousands of people due to his foundation efforts.

While I don't have any respect for him as a sportsman or as an individual he has obviously done a lot for charity and that should certainly be recognised. He still has the potential to be a good role model for people but - assuming he is guilty as the evidence suggests - he can only do that by admitting that he cheated and asking for forgiveness from his fans and his country. My concern is that the arrogance that lead him to cheat in the first place will prevent him from admitting his guilt. He has already been stripped of his medals and titles, so there really isn't any point protesting his innocence any more.

A cheater won in the age of cheating. He will still be the winner of those races in my book...just like Barry Bonds is the home run king in my book.

Trying to rationalise cheating is irrational.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Nerd Rage

While I don't have any respect for him as a sportsman or as an individual he has obviously done a lot for charity and that should certainly be recognised. He still has the potential to be a good role model for people but - assuming he is guilty as the evidence suggests - he can only do that by admitting that he cheated and asking for forgiveness from his fans and his country. My concern is that the arrogance that lead him to cheat in the first place will prevent him from admitting his guilt. He has already been stripped of his medals and titles, so there really isn't any point protesting his innocence any more.

Trying to rationalise cheating is irrational.

I'm not trying to rationalize cheating, I'm just saying that it happened on a wide scale and we can't turn back the clock. Take the wins for what they are, tainted wins. All my opinion of course.

Link to post
Share on other sites
ahhell

Don't forget that the Livestrong Foundation has raised about $500 Million so far. Whether or not you respect the guy as an athlete anymore, you have to respect that he has helped tens or hundreds of thousands of people due to his foundation efforts.

I've worn the yellow band and I've participated in his fundraising events, so he'll always be a hero in my book.

About that....

http://www.outsideonline.com/outdoor-adventure/athletes/lance-armstrong/Its-Not-About-the-Lab-Rats.html

Link to post
Share on other sites
theyarecomingforyou

I'm not trying to rationalize cheating, I'm just saying that it happened on a wide scale and we can't turn back the clock. Take the wins for what they are, tainted wins. All my opinion of course.

No, you should take the wins for what they were: invalid. It has been determined that he cheated and he has been stripped of the titles. You can't simply make up your own version of the results when you don't agree with the real results.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Shadrack

He was probably competing against other folks who were all doping. But that doesn't really matter. He deserves to be made an example of. What's more disgraceful is that he is still denying the overwhelming evidence against him.

  • Like 2
Link to post
Share on other sites
Praetor
Well if he was so doped, then they could've easily came up with actual proof. it's all bs.

they said it was the worlds most sophisticated doping environment ever, so it's most likely they were a few steps ahead of current dope detection methods.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
Nerd Rage

No, you should take the wins for what they were: invalid. It has been determined that he cheated and he has been stripped of the titles. You can't simply make up your own version of the results when you don't agree with the real results.

Exactly. And the real results are that Lance Armstrong crossed the finish line first. Now all of these agencies are trying to make up their own version of the results because they don't agree with how the real results were attained.

  • Like 1
Link to post
Share on other sites
The Laughing Man

I feel as if I have no reason to look up to any athlete anymore. Time to become fat!

Link to post
Share on other sites
seta-san

I'm starting to think he doesn't even deserve the millions of dollars he got from cycling. . . . Hm.

what about the fact that he generated interest and funding and advertising in what was otherwise a sport no one cared about.

Link to post
Share on other sites
DrJohnSmitherson

He still crossed that finish line first.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Calum

He was still a damn good person and role model. The people that wanna shame him should be ashamed of themselves for being such pitiful jealous babies that throw a fit when someone is better then them.

A cheater is not a good role model. I'm pretty sure that most people who are shaming him aren't jealous.

Link to post
Share on other sites
theyarecomingforyou
And the real results are that Lance Armstrong crossed the finish line first. Now all of these agencies are trying to make up their own version of the results because they don't agree with how the real results were attained.

Cheating is against the rules and the organisations involved have the power to strip competitors of fraudulently earned titles - in fact they are obligated to. They certainly aren't trying to "make up their own version of the results" and you know that.

If you refuse to accept the official results then that's up to you but as you can see here Lance Armstrong at no point won the Tour de France. The reality is that doping is endemic in US cycling and Lance Armstrong certainly isn't the first US cyclist to be stripped of a title.

Link to post
Share on other sites
remixedcat

*in cris crocker voice*

LEAVE LANCE ALONE!!!!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    No registered users viewing this page.

  • Similar Content

    • By Sir Topham Hatt
      Anyone into cycling?
       
      I used to be quite into it but then as life went on, I just got out of it.
      Then the stomach blobbed out a little, so I want to get back into it to help me get a bit fitter.
       
      I didn't really realise there were a few different types of bikes.  I thought you got BMX style, racing style or mountain bike.  However as I would be cycling on roads pretty much exclusively then a Hybrid bike might be a lot better for my needs.  Come to think of it, my last bike may have been a hybrid but I didn't realise.
       
      I have been astonished at the price of bikes, but I am a bit of a snob so want a fairly good one so I can have great quality from the off.  I don't want ot end up purchasing a bike then not using it that often because it's not a very pleasurable experience.
       
      THIS is the one I was looking at:
       

       
      However at ?499, it's more than I really wanted to pay.
      But I "save" ?100, would get ?14 from cashback and they have a deal on until Wednesday to get ?40 off too.
       
      Any thoughts or advice?
    • By Atomic Wanderer Chicken
      http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/23/justice/justice-case-armstrong/index.html
      I think Lance should start selling off his 'Tour de France' bikes!
    • By einsteinbqat
      The Head of USADA tells CBS that Lance Armstrong lied to Oprah, and gives him a date by which he has to tell the truth!
      Source: CBS News
    • By +Frank B.
      Lance Armstrong: Usada report reveals doping evidence
      Cycling legend Lance Armstrong's team ran "the most sophisticated, professionalised and successful doping programme the sport has ever seen" according to a report by the United States Anti-Doping Agency.
      Usada says it will deliver the full report in the doping case against Armstrong, 41, later on Wednesday.
      It contains testimony from 11 of his former US Postal Service team-mates.
      He has always denied doping allegations but has not contested Usada's charges.
      Usada chief executive Travis T Tygart said there was "conclusive and undeniable proof" of a team-run doping conspiracy.
      The organisation will send a "reasoned decision" in the Armstrong case to the International Cycling Union (UCI), the World Anti-Doping Agency and the World Triathlon Corporation.
      The UCI now has 21 days to lodge an appeal against Usada's decision with Wada or they must comply with the decision to strip Armstrong, who now competes in triathlons, of his seven Tour de France titles and hand him a lifetime ban.
      Armstrong, who overcame cancer to return to professional cycling, won the Tour from 1999 to 2005. He retired in 2005 but returned in 2009 before retiring for good two years later.
      In his statement, Tygart said the evidence against Armstrong and his team - which is in excess of 1,000 pages - was "overwhelming" and "and includes sworn testimony from 26 people, including 15 riders with knowledge of the US Postal Service Team and its participants' doping activities".
      Tygart revealed it contains "direct documentary evidence including financial payments, emails, scientific data and laboratory test results that further prove the use, possession and distribution of performance enhancing drugs by Lance Armstrong and confirm the disappointing truth about the deceptive activities of the USPS Team, a team that received tens of millions of American taxpayer dollars in funding".
      He also claimed the team's doping conspiracy "was professionally designed to groom and pressure athletes to use dangerous drugs, to evade detection, to ensure its secrecy and ultimately gain an unfair competitive advantage through superior doping practices".
      Among the former team-mates of Armstrong's to testify were George Hincapie, Tyler Hamilton and Floyd Landis, who was stripped of his 2006 Tour de France title for failing a dope test and was recently found guilty in a Swiss court of defaming the International Cycling Union for alleging they had protected Armstrong from doping claims.
      Tygart said: "The riders who participated in the USPS Team doping conspiracy and truthfully assisted have been courageous in making the choice to stop perpetuating the sporting fraud, and they have suffered greatly.
      "I have personally talked with and heard these athletes' stories and firmly believe that, collectively, these athletes, if forgiven and embraced, have a chance to leave a legacy far greater for the good of the sport than anything they ever did on a bike.
      "Lance Armstrong was given the same opportunity to come forward and be part of the solution. He rejected it.
      "Instead he exercised his legal right not to contest the evidence and knowingly accepted the imposition of a ban from recognised competition for life and disqualification of his competitive results from 1998 forward."
      Usada confirmed that two other members of the US Postal Service team, Dr Michele Ferrari and Dr Garcia del Moral, also received lifetime bans for their part in the doping conspiracy.
      Three further members, team director Johan Bruyneel, a team doctor Dr Pedro Celaya and team trainer Jose Marti, have chosen to contest the charges and take their cases to arbitration.
      Tygart also called on the UCI to "act on its own recent suggestion for a meaningful Truth and Reconciliation programme".
      "Hopefully, the sport can unshackle itself from the past, and once and for all continue to move forward to a better future," he added.
      Source: BBC Sport
    • By Damo R.
      http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/08/23/lance-armstrong-banned-from-cycling_n_1826642.html