Recommended Posts

As much as trailers told us before, that's their new best idea of in-game freedom :D

Though I'm kind of ok with that this time. Note that I'm usually not ok even with slightest cuts. However, old Most Wanted was the first and the last one being ok, with Sergeant Cross keying the car and all, everything after that story-wise was a let down, Undercover being total shyte and The Run having a great potential that was wasted. So, if they suck at it, why not just concentrate on the driving? :D

That's the trouble, the game feels like a rebadged Burnout, but without the Burnout fun. Even the take downs aren't as fun as they are in Burnout Paradise, which I thought was one of Criterion's best games.

Agreed. But is it actually better if story is there, only as an excuse to do something? And I say this as a question I'm truly not sure about, not as a statement.

Me, I am a kind of a completionist. I do not go for all achievements usually, but win all the races, get all the cars, stuff like that - I'd do that anyway. A couple of AAA shooter campaigns now want to tell a story and are reasonably successful with it, but for many it's mostly an excuse (a bad excuse at times) to shoot all the people and blow all the stuff up. In multiplayer nobody ever needs an excuse. If Codemasters invented some sort of story in their next Dirt, how much better it would be? Or I guess it depends on the story...

  • Like 1
  • 4 weeks later...

So no one has posted in this thread for quite some time, but I basically got addicted to playing this game over the holiday.

Think I am around 65% done with the SP, have just one most wanted race left.

So I am currently doing the cars I have not done the events for left, and after that, what else needs to be done to complete SP? Billboards and all of that? Is there an easy way in game to know which ones you have not yet done?

Also, has anyone purchased the DLC pack? The Ultimate Speed Pack? I am strongly considering it is I like the game so much, but unless I am mistaken, I have already pretty much gotten those cars through the Most Wanted Events, so are the new events the DLC offer good enough to warrant a purchase?

This was definitely one of my favorite games for the holiday season. Truly enjoyed the hell out of it, the driving in it was perfect for my tastes, I prefer a more arcadey racer myself, and there was enough variation in the handling and feel of the different types of cars.

I did end up getting this game for Xbox 360. Haven't done too many races yet, been driving around the vast environment.

The game is absolutely incredible. Graphics are phenomenal. There's just so much to it, Just wow. Love it!!

I haven't played online though, never actually do, don't know why I pay for Live subscriptions, lol.

So no one has posted in this thread for quite some time, but I basically got addicted to playing this game over the holiday.

Think I am around 65% done with the SP, have just one most wanted race left.

So I am currently doing the cars I have not done the events for left, and after that, what else needs to be done to complete SP? Billboards and all of that? Is there an easy way in game to know which ones you have not yet done?

Also, has anyone purchased the DLC pack? The Ultimate Speed Pack? I am strongly considering it is I like the game so much, but unless I am mistaken, I have already pretty much gotten those cars through the Most Wanted Events, so are the new events the DLC offer good enough to warrant a purchase?

This was definitely one of my favorite games for the holiday season. Truly enjoyed the hell out of it, the driving in it was perfect for my tastes, I prefer a more arcadey racer myself, and there was enough variation in the handling and feel of the different types of cars.

The cars in the DLC are new. I'm picking it up soon, I've been ignoring DLC while I catch up on other games.

I think you only need to find all the jackspots and do all the races for the SP meter, but I couldn't tell you for ure.

I didn't like this game at all. I thought it would be fun from watching videos on the internet, but this game controls horribly. The controls are sluggish so when I hit left or right it takes a while before the car will turn. The lack of storyline didn't really give me any motivation to keep playing it. Plus this game kills the crap out of vibration on your controller. It just doesnt stop at times. I'll just pass on this game, I don't normally play need for speed anyways, but I thought about trying this one since it was Criterion. As usual though, this series is stale and poor on quality.

I didn't like this game at all. I thought it would be fun from watching videos on the internet, but this game controls horribly. The controls are sluggish so when I hit left or right it takes a while before the car will turn. The lack of storyline didn't really give me any motivation to keep playing it. Plus this game kills the crap out of vibration on your controller. It just doesnt stop at times. I'll just pass on this game, I don't normally play need for speed anyways, but I thought about trying this one since it was Criterion. As usual though, this series is stale and poor on quality.

I really want to make a 286 joke but I have more class than that.

I think.

Anyway, I got the DLC, maxed out the Pagani Zonda R and took down the Hennessey =) Was it worth $10? I dunno. But it was worth getting.

I really want to make a 286 joke but I have more class than that.

I think.

Anyway, I got the DLC, maxed out the Pagani Zonda R and took down the Hennessey =) Was it worth $10? I dunno. But it was worth getting.

So it is all new events right? And is it 25 new events? Or 5 new events, repeated over and over for each car?

Didn't bother to max out Zonda R, just finished its races and beat Hennesey Venom like standing. No wonder, too, because it's a crap car to drive - rubberbanding AI struggled like mad to keep it with me. Also, best part of Lotus cars are ugly in general.

For short-living awesomeness of Zonda R and Aventador J it wasn't worth the price, but indeed worth getting still. At least PC users weren't shafted this time.

I only did one cars so far, but it only had one race I'd already been through. EA claims 25 new events (races and speed runs.)

Really been pretty occupied with Far Cry 3 lately, although obviously I do play other stuff.

Cool, thanks for the fast reply. I did see EA's claim of 25 new events, but was wondering if it was just that, a claim. I think I will pick it up soon. Thanks again.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Is the article messed up? I understand 26H2 is in Beta, now Build 28020.2308. I'm not even sure what this is supposed to mean: "..... Microsoft is officially moving the Experimental Channel to version 26H2." And...would you please fix your graphics. They are outdated and don't fit the article.
    • The Light of Life? We actually do glow till our Death, study finds by Sayan Sen Image by Rafael Rendon via Pexels A study by researchers at the University of Calgary has found that living organisms produce an extremely faint light known as ultraweak photon emission, and that this glow appears to drop significantly after death. The research was published in the Journal of Physical Chemistry in April 2025 and quickly drew widespread attention, leading to more than 200 news stories about the findings. Ultraweak photon emission (or UPE), sometimes called biophoton emission, refers to tiny amounts of light released by living cells as a result of normal biological activity. A photon is the basic particle of light, and researchers say every living system examined so far, including plants and animals, has been found to emit these photons. The glow is far too faint to be seen by the human eye. “I suppose it has a little to do with people being reminded of auras,” says Dr. Christoph Simon, PhD, one of the authors of the study and a professor in the Department of Physics and Astronomy in the Faculty of Science. “It is a fact that living beings glow. It’s a very weak glow, but it’s there and visible with very sensitive cameras.” According to the study, the light involved is extremely weak, ranging from 10 to 1,000 photons per square centimetre per second across a spectral range of 200 to 1,000 nanometres. For comparison, a nanometre is one-billionth of a metre and is commonly used to measure wavelengths of light. Detecting emissions at such low levels requires highly specialized equipment. To study the phenomenon, researchers used electron-multiplying charge-coupled device (EMCCD) and charge-coupled device (CCD) cameras. These imaging systems are designed to detect extremely small amounts of light, including individual photons, while minimizing background noise. The technology allowed researchers to capture signals that would otherwise be impossible to observe. The team worked with the Human Health Therapeutics Research Centre at the National Research Council of Canada (NRC) in Ottawa to examine photon emissions in mice. Researchers took two-hour exposure images of the animals before and after death and compared the results. “We saw that the level of light that they emit – this biophoton glow – is distinctly different between living and dead animals,” says Dr. Daniel Oblak, PhD, an associate professor in Physics and Astronomy and the corresponding author of the study. The images showed a clear decrease in photon emissions after death across the entire body of each mouse. According to the researchers, this provided direct evidence that living and dead tissue produce different levels of ultraweak photon emission. “It’s a very small amount and it’s, of course, very tricky to detect,” Oblak says. The study grew out of discussions between Simon, whose research interests include quantum biology, and Oblak, whose work focuses on detecting light for quantum communication experiments. Quantum biology is a field that explores whether processes described by quantum physics, which studies matter and energy at very small scales, may also play a role in living systems. “Since I work as a quantum physicist on light detection for quantum communication, I thought that experimentally we have a lot of the tools to be able to detect the light,” Oblak explains. The researchers also investigated UPE in plants and found that the light changed in response to stress. When plants were exposed to higher temperatures or physically injured, their photon emissions increased. Chemical treatments also affected the glow. Among the substances tested, the local anesthetic benzocaine produced the strongest emission response when applied to injured plant tissue. These findings suggest that ultraweak photon emission is closely linked to biochemical and metabolic activity inside living organisms. Metabolism refers to the chemical reactions that allow cells and organisms to stay alive and function. Because these reactions change when an organism experiences stress, injury or disease, researchers believe UPE may provide a way to monitor those changes. The researchers stress that the glow is a physical and biological phenomenon, not a metaphysical one. Oblak says more research is needed to understand exactly how the light is produced and what information it may reveal about the condition of living tissue. “We must understand what that is to figure out what’s happening,” he says. “If we can understand how that relates to certain influences on the body – stress, diseases – then that could be used as a diagnostic tool.” The researchers believe the technique could eventually help scientists study health and disease without invasive procedures. Because UPE can be measured without adding dyes, markers or labels, it may offer a way to monitor whether tissue is healthy, damaged or alive. In plants, it could help researchers better understand how organisms respond to injury, heat and other forms of stress. While the work is still in its early stages, the study demonstrates that ultraweak photon emission imaging can provide a non-invasive and label-free way to observe biological activity. Researchers say the approach could become a useful tool for studying vitality, stress responses and other important processes in both animals and plants. Source: University of Calgary, ACS publication This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • Damn, I loved this show back in the day.  
    • Rufus 4.15.2393 Beta 2 by Razvan Serea Rufus is a small utility that helps format and create bootable USB flash drives, such as USB keys/pendrives, memory sticks, etc. Despite its small size, Rufus provides everything you need! Oh, and Rufus is fast. For instance it's about twice as fast as UNetbootin, Universal USB Installer or Windows 7 USB download tool, on the creation of a Windows 7 USB installation drive from an ISO (with honorable mention to WiNToBootic for managing to keep up). It is also marginally faster on the creation of Linux bootable USBs from ISOs. A non-exhaustive list of Rufus supported ISOs is available here. It can be especially useful for cases where: you need to create USB installation media from bootable ISOs (Windows, Linux, UEFI, etc.) you need to work on a system that doesn't have an OS installed you need to flash a BIOS or other firmware from DOS you want to run a low-level utility Rufus 4.15.2393 Beta 2 changelog: Add RISC-V 64 support to UEFI:NTFS Improve the guards for using the "silent" option Improve the ability to cancel during write retries Improve progress reporting for compressed image extraction Fix unrestricted XML entity expansion and integer overflow in ezxml parser (courtesy of @esadowski4) [GHSA-55r2-34wg-8mv9] Fix "silent" Windows installation failing at 75% in most cases [#2960] Fix a crash during boot when using UEFI:NTFS on Snapdragon X based ARM64 platforms [#2934] Fix the first WUE option always being checked by default [#2965] Fix an infinite loop when using Windows ISOs that contain multiple WIMs Fix "Enable runtime UEFI media validation" checkbox not always being properly enabled Other WUE improvements/fixes for OneDrive removal and username validation (with thanks to @christian8641) [#2984, #2991] Download: Rufus 4.15 Beta 2 | 1.9 MB (Open Source) Links: Rufus Home Page | Project Page @GitHub | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      AMV earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      83
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!