Recommended Posts

(Reuters) - AT&T Inc added fewer customers than expected in the third quarter due to a shortage of the latest Apple Inc iPhone, highlighting its outsize dependence on the device.

The company's slowing customer growth shows that it is rapidly losing ground to bigger rival Verizon Wireless. Since most people already have cellphones, operators like AT&T and Verizon have to battle each other to add new customers.

AT&T, the No. 2 U.S. mobile service provider, added 151,000 net new subscribers in the quarter, compared with the average expectation for 358,000, according to five analysts contacted by Reuters. Verizon Wireless added 1.5 million net new subscribers in the same period.

"They're clearly losing significant market share to Verizon Wireless," Stifel Nicolaus analyst Christopher King said. "It appears, based on these numbers, that Verizon Wireless is really pulling away from the rest of the industry."

King said the trend could be a bad omen for smaller rival Sprint Nextel, which is due to report results on Thursday.

more

They forget to blame the real reasons. They have very high prices, caps on data which are ridiculously expensive to start with and they signal sucks big time.

  • Like 2

Maybe AT&T should blame it on the fact that Verizon is faster at building out its network. I'm with AT&T, and we got 3G in my area about a year before Verizon rolled out 4G LTE here. I don't live in the boonies or anything.

They forget to blame the real reasons. They have very high prices, caps on data which are ridiculously expensive to start with and they signal sucks big time.

Sigh. I know. I have to use AT&T for work reasons but I really hate them.I would love to tell them goodbye forever.

They forget to blame the real reasons. They have very high prices, caps on data which are ridiculously expensive to start with and they signal sucks big time.

just about the same price and verizon verizon has CAPS again just about the same cost and signal is fine here

Maybe AT&T should blame it on the fact that Verizon is faster at building out its network. I'm with AT&T, and we got 3G in my area about a year before Verizon rolled out 4G LTE here. I don't live in the boonies or anything.

this i will fully agree with lol we just got full 4g here no lte but Verizon have both 4g and lte

no, the real reason they are losing customers to Verizon is the network. They both cost about the same with very similar plans, which are both expensive. The difference is that Verizon puts that money right back into their network to expand their 4g coverage, and it really shows, they blow away the competition. Im not the biggest fan of Verizon, but I do respect that they invest the money they make to improve their product, not just line their pockets.

  • Like 2

Agreed. Verizon's 4G coverage is superb.

I can go from Chicago to Iowa City almost entirely on 4G LTE.

When I had AT&T before, there were times it would drop down to 2G....

On the other hand, AT&T's HSDPA+ is much faster than VZW's 3G spectrum

AT&T and Verizon prices are way too high for what you're getting. It's one of the reason why I'm not on those networks. Going to spend $100 a month a phone plan. It's just not worth it. T-Mobile is not the greatest but $180 a month for 5 phones with unlimited texting and 5GB 4G a month is much better for me.

Verizon had more time to invest in their 4G LTE because their CDMA-based 3G network was an absolute dinosaur and horrendous XD hahah

Both companies are just as bad :x

whatever the past may be, their 4Glte network now is far and away superior to every carrier, its not even a competion right now and consumers are speaking with their dollars.

Verizon. simple as that. better coverage, and better customer relations.

Microsoft and Nokia are making a mistake and selecting them for the most of windows phone stuff.

ATT spends more money sponsoring sports then building thier network prolly. I see ATT on so many sporting events but I see not much ATT on coverage maps for my area LOL...

I see more people cussing out thier ATT phones and the Verizon and Sprint users are happily playing on thier phones while the ATT users are crying or cussing... LOL.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Looks like the 7.1 is fake effects, can it at least do real 5.1? It says 'virtual 7.1' in all descriptions.
    • You can't, if you didn't notice, it doesn't support surround at all, it's right in the spec list.
    • Hi — I’m always interested in soundcards. Like displays, I just want to know I’m getting as much clean “sonic juice” into my brain as possible as the years take their toll. I’m not entirely sure what to take away from this review, though. It doesn’t really tell me whether the AE‑X is a good product or who it’s actually for. Most of what I’m getting is: there’s a driver to install, here’s what it looks like, and here’s what’s in the box. There’s a lot of emphasis on the SPDIF input. When you mention not needing to switch headphones between console and PC — does that mean the PC has to be powered on just to pass audio through? That seems like a fairly big waste of energy. Is this more something a streamer would use alongside a capture card? How are you testing the sound? (Also, you might want to clarify that you’re using the headphones in wired mode when you mention they’re wireless.) You mention the lack of EMI shielding — how much real‑world difference does that make compared with typical motherboard audio? On multi‑channel: what exactly isn’t supported? Does this mean Windows spatial audio (Dolby Atmos for Headphones, DTS Headphone:X, etc.) won’t work, or just that the card itself doesn’t decode surround formats? And are there any true multi‑driver “surround” headphones left that would even use that? You also highlight support for high‑impedance headphones — but what does that translate to in practice? How does it compare to driving the same headphones from a normal device, and does it make any difference for everyday, lower‑impedance models? In short, who is this card actually targeted at?
    • Yes, THIS is wordart, not the styling that can now be done. Wordart was all about those curvy words, that you could change the path of, like making words go around a circle. I don't think it can be done now, right?
    • Just saw a news report of a Waymo driving into a flooded road.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      76
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      74
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!