Pentagon to Move From BlackBerry to Android, iPhones


Recommended Posts

RIM experiencing several large firms moving thousands of employees from BlackBerry to iPhones and Android-powered smartphones.

RIM has been dealt a further blow with the news of the Pentagon due to move up of to 8 million employees from its BlackBerry devices to Android-powered smartphones and Apple's iPhone.

The Defense Department is planning to hire a contractor to build a system that will both manage and secure at least 162,500 Android devices, in addition to Apple products including the iPhone and iPad. It's possible that the system may be expanded to handle 8 million devices, the department confirmed.

The project is ?a significant step towards delivering a secure mobile communications capability?? to the agency, it said. The Pentagon wishes to gives employees the opportunity to access its network through a broader range of mobile devices so it can ?take advantage of the increasing wireless capabilities that exist and that are developing in the marketplace."

The Pentagon?s Defense Information Systems Agency will grant the contract to a single company by April, with bids due by November 27.

Although the Defense Department is not instructing contractors to propose systems that can manage RIM devices, it ?desires? a system that can also handle BlackBerry smartphones, in addition to Android and iOS devices.

Last week, the U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency said it will end the contract it holds with RIM, subsequently leading to 17,600 employees moving away from BlackBerry devices to the iPhone. Preceding that was consulting firm Booz Allen Hamilton dropping BlackBerry in favor of the iPhone and Android smartphones for about 25,000 employees.

http://www.tomshardw...roid,18822.html

Poor RIM can't win anything these days. Just a question.....is it possible to secure iPhones and Android phones?

Contractor can use a Nexus brand hardware, and customize the code from AOSP.

On top of that, Android 4.2 suppose to have a lot of internal changes making it more secure which should be out soon.

I do think Microsoft missing an opportunity but not having RIM level enterprise management in place from the start. But to be fair, Android and iOS are not there yet either.

is it possible to secure iPhones and Android phones?

Well I'd say you'd have an easier job of a Windows Phone 8 or RIM device over an iPhone, which are probably all easier than securing an Android device to the level they need.

As a taxpayer i'm against them paying a premium for an iphone, when they can get the same equivalence if not better from an android device for much less.

I really don't care what they buy as long as it's secure. I'm not sure anything can be as secure as a Blackberry.

Well I'd say you'd have an easier job of a Windows Phone 8 or RIM device over an iPhone, which are probably all easier than securing an Android device to the level they need.

How so? If they needed to, they could literally change the Android source to suit their needs. Not so much for the others, although the government could probably come to an agreement with the respective companies to get access to the source.

How so? If they needed to, they could literally change the Android source to suit their needs. Not so much for the others, although the government could probably come to an agreement with the respective companies to get access to the source.

Then you're basically hiring contract developers which is going to cost a fortune to even get familiar and up to speed before you can start making changes.

You can through the Apple Configurator, OS X Server profiles, or ActiveSync.

The biggest reason they are moving is the cost of the handsets.

Right now, the cost of an iPhone that would be compliant (iPhone 4S or newer) is less than any Blackberry that is DMS (Defense Message System) compliant; basically, price is the entire reason for the move.

Not to the extent the Blackberry can. I can't think of any way to disable cameras on the iphone, for example.

You can through the Apple Configurator, OS X Server profiles, or ActiveSync.

Also MDM's like Afaria, IBM Bigfix that can do this.

The devices can be even configured such a way that say you enter into a secure zone where there are no cameras allowed, as per your geo location as soon as you step into this facility your camera will automatically be turned off.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • While I miss Outlook for a couple of small things, I use Thunderbird now because I don't like how MS wants to force you to change things.
    • Chrome has history of being the browser everyone uses because Internet Explorer sucks, not realizing that Edge changed that, but people got into the habit of using Chrome. I use Brave and I've never been happier with a browser. It does what it is meant to do and gets out of the way.
    • Wino Mail -> Microsoft Outlook (the new one). Link: https://github.com/bkaankose/Wino-Mail Just sayin.
    • Microsoft launches Godot Sample to streamline Xbox PC game development on the engine by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe Microsoft today announced a new endeavor that aims to make it simpler for Godot developers to get their products into the Xbox PC ecosystem. Dubbed the "XBOX Godot Sample," this is a new public reference for developers using the open-source engine. This is set to serve as an example of how Microsoft GDK, Xbox Services, and PlayFab can be integrated into their projects. The sample is available now on GitHub as a working example. This covers key features in gaming projects that developers may need to release their projects on Xbox PC, with everything from matchmaking and game sign-in to gamepad compatibility with Godot being covered. This release is being called the first step in giving Godot developers the tools to bring their games over to Xbox PC, with more changes to come based on feedback and issue reports. However, the company was clear that this is not related to bringing Godot projects to Xbox consoles. The engine's open development model stops it from accessing console SDKs due to the requirement of NDAs and legal contracts. Here's how it explained this Godot sample project's focus: This is a source-only sample, not a product. It's MIT-licensed at the wrapper layer; the GDK and PlayFab dependencies still require their own installs and license acceptance, consistent with our other XBOX samples. There is no set update cadence for support or maintenance. We’ll watch the repo, monitor issues, and iterate where it makes sense, but this isn't a commercial release. That said, we’re excited to hear your feedback and see any community PRs, as we evolve this together. This is the first step in bringing Godot for XBOX on PC. We plan to evolve it over time based on what the community tells us is most valuable. This sample is built specifically for XBOX on PC. It doesn’t include support for XBOX Series X|S or XBOX One. If you’re already building for XBOX Series X|S or XBOX One, please talk with your XBOX representative. If not, you can get started by signing up here. Game developers can find the XBOX Godot Sample by heading to GitHub over here. Documentation on how to get started with Godot for building an Xbox PC project can be seen here.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      Asgardi earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Conversation Starter
      mobandz earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Apprentice
      fernan99 went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • One Month Later
      nothanks earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      468
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      243
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      79
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      73
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      60
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!