Recommended Posts

What is WinFX?

WinFX is a managed (CLR-based) API that extends the .NET Framework. However, it is accessible via MC++ to unmanaged applications. It encompasses all of the managed APIs that Microsoft will ship in Longhorn, including Avalon, Indigo, and WinFS, and .NET Frameworks.

It is broken down in to interface/data/communication layers which are Avalon/WinFS/Indigo respectively.

WinFX is the heart of Longhorn from which Avalon/WinFS/Indigo will all follow.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/111682-what-is-winfx/
Share on other sites

What is WinFX?

WinFX is a managed (CLR-based) API that extends the .NET Framework. However, it is accessible via MC++ to unmanaged applications. It encompasses all of the managed APIs that Microsoft will ship in Longhorn, including Avalon, Indigo, and WinFS, and .NET Frameworks.

It is broken down in to interface/data/communication layers which are Avalon/WinFS/Indigo respectively.

WinFX is the heart of Longhorn from which Avalon/WinFS/Indigo will all follow.

I think it should say C++ and not MC++ :devil:

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/111682-what-is-winfx/#findComment-1309651
Share on other sites

hey,

new here, but why not answer questions at first place? :)

CLR stands for Common Language Runtime, which is a needed environment for .NET enabled (managed) software. That means that softwares written in .NET are not in native win32 code, but rather in MSIL, which stands for MS Intermediate Language.. That code will be compiled during runtime by the CLR (or only at first run, but that's not important) with a tool called JITC, standing for Just-In-Time Compiler.. As these specifications are publicly available, everybody could write a JITC for the intermediate code, one project for that is Mono for Linux..

CLR (and the .NET framework) will be part of Windows codename: Longhorn in 2006, there's no other operating system that has it pre-installed, you can get it for Windows 2000/XP, but believe me, it's quite big, that means longer to download (and quite long to install) that means less people download it, that means less people have it, that means noone will really develop for the .NET platform on the client-side, only if it can be distributed with it (eg. software distributed on CD), but its still a hassle.. That's IMHO, as a developer, altough i would love to already work on current software meant for public with the .NET framework as it rocks :)

Hope that helps some better understanding, but ask more in detail, I might be here again someday :D

rev :D

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/111682-what-is-winfx/#findComment-1310351
Share on other sites

Hi,

Me too new here. And since I'm that kind of guy, I thought that I have to add my personal 50 cents. :happy:

rev, your opinion is exactly why there are not more .net applications. I stopped writing native apps some time ago, since IMHO it's not worth the effort to battle MFC bugs and glitches, when you can use the .net framework and WinForms instead. There even is a managed version of DirectX available. We wrote a 3D game engine using MDX, which really works well and is fast and good-looking. Thanks to the C# compiler being exposed to the framework, it's possible to have the game logic dynamically compiled and attached to objects at run-time. Our first game using that technology is currently in development (and we even found a publisher for it). You can have a look at some screenshots on our preliminary web site at http://www.saintbox.net.

The .net framework setup is only about 20MB. Okay, that's a lot for people with narrow-band internet connections, but for apps that are distributed on CD it's no problem at all. We have a setup app that takes care of installing all the neccessary components, so that the user isn't bothered with having to install lots of stuff manually. Think about it, almost every PC game requires DirectX to be installed, and installs a suitable version automatically as well. So why not install the .net framework and MDX, as well?

Apart from that, I absolutely agree with you - the .net framework rocks and puts the fun back into app development. And thanks to the marshalling mechanism, it's no big deal to use unmanaged code from your managed app (such as a third-party physics or sound engine). I'm looking forward to the future of Windows and .net! :D

PerpulaX

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/111682-what-is-winfx/#findComment-1310624
Share on other sites

hey,

new here, but why not answer questions at first place? :)

CLR stands for Common Language Runtime, which is a needed environment for .NET enabled (managed) software. That means that softwares written in .NET are not in native win32 code, but rather in MSIL, which stands for MS Intermediate Language.. That code will be compiled during runtime by the CLR (or only at first run, but that's not important) with a tool called JITC, standing for Just-In-Time Compiler.. As these specifications are publicly available, everybody could write a JITC for the intermediate code, one project for that is Mono for Linux..

CLR (and the .NET framework) will be part of Windows codename: Longhorn in 2006, there's no other operating system that has it pre-installed, you can get it for Windows 2000/XP, but believe me, it's quite big, that means longer to download (and quite long to install) that means less people download it, that means less people have it, that means noone will really develop for the .NET platform on the client-side, only if it can be distributed with it (eg. software distributed on CD), but its still a hassle.. That's IMHO, as a developer, altough i would love to already work on current software meant for public with the .NET framework as it rocks :)

Hope that helps some better understanding, but ask more in detail, I might be here again someday :D

rev :D

Thnx for writing up a very nice explanation of the technology - I just want to refine some of the details you mentioned. First, managed software has two parts, the MSIL (as you mentioned) and Metadata which contains information about classes, function calls, variable types, etc... Also, MSIL is not compiled, it is more-or-less translated. The code is already compiled from a programming language into a psuedo machine language. What the CLR does is (and speedily) translate the abstract instructions into instructions that your CPU uses. This is in contrast to compiling the program from source code right before running it, which is a less elegant solution. Additionally, MSIL is for ANY cpu, not just x86 (Intel). So the same program can run on CISC, Itanium, ARM ... whatever.

I also believe that Windows XP SP1 includes the .Net framework during install - if not, SP2 surely will. And the download is not very large for broadband (about 15Mb I think?). A lot of this size is because of the Framework Classes (similar to MFC). What Longhorn does is not just include the framework during install - but the entire operating system is built around the managed code concept, to seemlisly integrate it all. Basically, the OS will be targeted for faster CPUs and promote strong security and unified development model (read more about MSBuild) - I think.

I agree with everyone else so far, it's awesome!

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/111682-what-is-winfx/#findComment-1311204
Share on other sites

Well the two new guys sure made this a great post :) Thanks and weclome

well, let me continue then ;) (thanks for all the kind posts about our posts btw :cool: )

I agree with all the stuff you posted here after my post.. Personally, I would LOVE to work on the .net platform as it is really cool. What holds me back, that the projects I work on are mostly based on web downloads.. They are not distributed on CDs, because you can never reach that many people as on the internet.. but here, unfortunately because broadband is still not enough widespread, size does count. There's a theory, a myth or whatever I should call, that every 100k that you add to the download size halves the number of downloads, and that means half of the people will evaluate your software and even less buy it.. This statement is based on experience, still might not be true, but it is the point.. and of course, if your business model relies on web-based downloads and purchase, it is something that you have to count on.

Okay, back to .NET framework.. What I like is that on the server-side, it's already there, may it be ASP.NET or else.. I already saw very very cool web services built on .NET technology and expect a lot more, even on my .NET enabled PDA, mobile phone, you name it.. or if you take a look at the Tablet PCs and Ink API that is part of the Tablet PC SDK.. It is so f*ckin' cool how you have a collection of strokes and you call .ToString() on it to convert it to normal string.. Recognition has never been so easy and if Microsoft cares enough about letting 3rd party developers expand functionality (as we are who have the coolest ideas :rolleyes: ) it will rock. The concept itself is so cool, and I don't care if Java worshippers complain about stealing (which I wouldn't call stealing but using) all the ideas into C# or anybody else complaining about this, then blame theirselves: if Microsoft was the one (because it had the resource, the knowledge, the skill, the better marketing team) to bring it to life as a successful platform, may it be. Right? :D

I'm seeing Billy Gates as 48, still as a child having as much as fun as he did back then and as much fun as we're going to have because all the good stuff is still in the future, waiting for us, anxious developers :)

We'll that's all for now, any technical questions are welcome by me and my fellow newbie friends :)

rev :D

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/111682-what-is-winfx/#findComment-1313945
Share on other sites

reactions:

i'm happy to hear that managed DirectX with C# can be a good platform to build DirectX enabled applications, but still think that lower-level (and that means unmanaged c++ with inline assembly stuff ;) languages, environments do a better job at optimizing.. When performance is less important than let's say rapid development, i agree with you and I would choose C# too. Again, games are mostly distributed through CDs and if they are downloads they size 20MB+, where that +20MB doesn't really count. Anyway, gamers have time and the knowledge to download and install stuff (newest Catalyst / Detonator drivers, DirectX9.01b, etc).. It's the everyday users that really spend money and there, it's totally the other side of the coin.. whatever, only important thing is, develop a good business model for it :)

Thanks to the C# compiler being exposed to the framework, it's possible to have the game logic dynamically compiled and attached to objects at run-time.

This thing amazes me and makes me smile even more :)

Keep up the good posts, guys! :)

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/111682-what-is-winfx/#findComment-1313968
Share on other sites

I also believe that Windows XP SP1 includes the .Net framework during install - if not, SP2 surely will. And the download is not very large for broadband (about 15Mb I think?).

SP1 does include .NET. I think it runs about 15 MBs for a download and takes up ~100 megs of space, which was sadly an issue on my old laptop with only a 4 gig harddrive.

I can definately see how using it would be a total market killer for a web app though, there was a 2000/XP transparency program written in .NET (can't remember which one it was off hand) and it was about 100k in size, but required the .NET framework, which I didn't have at the time. Needless to say I passed on that program.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/111682-what-is-winfx/#findComment-1314009
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...
  • 3 weeks later...
  • 5 months later...
  • 1 year later...
  • 5 months later...

Basically, yeah, it "wants to" but so far the .NET Framework can't do everything so people resort to calling unmanaged Win32 APIs.

Well, thats one of the benefits of WinFX - the whole benefit of it is the fact that it isn't an all or nothing API; its about using managed and unmanaged code where it makes sense - there are times where using one or the other makes sense, but unfortunately in the Java world its so difficult to make native calls, and the fact that its an all Java or nothing, aka, you can't run managed C++ and calling Java classes, what you end up having is very few companies willing to port as they can't make a gradual switch in the areas where managed code would make sense.

Its also about kicking parts of the win32 off the wagon - there is alot of crap there, replacing them with newer ways of approaching problems, using managed extensions where it makes sense, and basically in a nutshell, improving the over all programming experience.

Its like the migration from Classic to Carbon to Cocoa programming, once people made that final move to Cocoa, I know many programmers who look back and ask how they heck they put up with the antiquated crap that is Carbon/Classic.

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/111682-what-is-winfx/#findComment-587240170
Share on other sites

  • 3 months later...
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Google Pixel 11 series: Here's what to expect by Hamid Ganji Google Pixel 10 series In recent years, Google has successfully turned its Pixel devices into worthy contenders in the smartphone market. The search giant is now preparing to launch the Pixel 11 series in just a few months, and many Pixel fans are likely wondering what Google has in store for them this year. The next lineup of Google smartphones includes four devices: the Pixel 11, Pixel 11 Pro, Pixel 11 Pro XL, and Pixel 11 Pro Fold. This year, we don’t expect Google to bring revolutionary upgrades to its handsets, and the Pixel 11 series is likely to receive modest hardware improvements alongside a slew of AI-powered features. Here are the rumored specifications of the Google Pixel 11 series ahead of its official debut: When will the new Pixel phones be unveiled? The last two generations of Google Pixel phones (Pixel 9 series and Pixel 10 series) were launched in August, unlike the previous three generations that debuted in October. With that in mind, we expect Google to unveil the Pixel 11 series sometime in August 2026. The exact launch date has yet to be confirmed. Google Pixel 11 CAD renders - Image via AndroidHeadlines How much will the Pixel 11 series cost? Predicting the final price of upcoming smartphones has become increasingly difficult. As you may know, RAM and memory prices are rising sharply, leading to significant increases in the cost of consumer electronics. Recently, Apple CEO Tim Cook said that price increases for some future Apple products are unavoidable, suggesting that the iPhone 18 series could become more expensive. Google has remained tight-lipped about any potential price increases for the Pixel 11 series. If the company manages to maintain last year’s pricing structure, here’s what the lineup could cost: Pixel 11: $799 Pixel 11 Pro: $999 Pixel 11 Pro XL: $1,199 Pixel 11 Pro Fold: $1,799 Given current market conditions, it may be difficult for Google to avoid raising prices unless it adopts cost-saving measures, such as equipping the base model with 8GB of RAM. Google Pixel 11 series anticipated specs: We expect the Google Pixel 11 series to debut with a new Tensor G6 processor as well as an upgraded camera system. The overall design, however, is expected to remain largely unchanged across the lineup. Specifications Pixel 11 Pixel 11 Pro Pixel 11 Pro XL Pixel 11 Pro Fold Display 6.3-inch LTPO AMOLED / 120Hz refresh rate / up to 3100 nits of brightness 6.3-inch Super Actua LTPO OLED, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness 6.8-inch Super Actua LTPO OLED, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness 8-inch inner screen and 6.4-inch outer display, 120Hz refresh rate, up to 3600 nits of brightness RAM & Processor Tensor G6 / 8-12GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 12-16GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 12-16GB of RAM Tensor G6 / 16GB of RAM Storage options 128GB or 256GB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB 256GB, 512GB, 1TB Camera 50MP main sensor, 13MP ultra-wide, 10.8MP 5x telephoto, 10.5MP front camera 50MP main camera, 48MP ultra-wide, 48MP telephoto with 5x optical zoom, 42MP selfie camera 50MP main camera, 48MP ultra-wide, 48MP telephoto with 5x optical zoom, 42MP selfie camera 50MP main camera, 10.5MP ultra-wide camera, 10.8MP telephoto camera, 10MP front camera, 10MP inner camera Battery 4,840 mAh 4,707 mAh 5,000 mAh 4,658 mAh Software Android 17 Android 17 Android 17 Android 17 The Pixel 11 series won’t be a major departure from its predecessor, with Google instead focusing on subtle improvements and AI additions such as Gemini Intelligence. However, a patent filed by Google suggests the company is working on a removable battery for its smartphones, and we could see this feature make its way to the Pixel 11 Pro Fold. Given that nearly all smartphones today lack removable batteries, such a feature would be a welcome addition to future Pixel devices. That said, it may not arrive with this year’s lineup after all, and the final decision is yet to be made by Google. The Pixel 11 series could also face an uphill battle in the market. In the Android segment, Samsung is performing well with the Galaxy S26 series, while the Galaxy Z Fold 8 lineup is also expected to launch next month. On the other hand, Apple is preparing to unveil the iPhone 18 Pro and iPhone 18 Pro Max in September alongside its first foldable iPhone.
    • At least AMD is still taking Windows 10 seriously (after the oops) before it consumer extended support ends. @WaltC - Memories, 2x Voodoo in SLI with a Riva TNT with an Aureal A3D soundcard.
    • So size is the ONLY selling point????? People have been plugging in PC's to TV's in living rooms for 20+ years. I would take a bigger box for more peformance. Also lot and lots of SFF/Mini ITX build guides out there.
    • My point is, if you buying this instead of a console for TV purposes, that you need to understand that you will not be able to play the most popular MP games with Steam OS. Now if you are not into those games, and into some of the perputual alpha/beta games on Steam then this is an option. I would argue a gaming PC would be the better route, more expensive but take the 1k -1.4k you are about to spend on this thing and build a better one. Because it is running Linux you can overide its 1080p settings. However The Verge complained about its 1080p cap and how you would have to get around it at the CLI, so someone buying this instead of a PS5 or Xbox might have a challege on their hands.
    • A review of Synology's BeeCamera software for the BeeStation Plus by Christopher White Synology is leaning into the BeeStation and the BeeStation Plus, and it's easy to understand why. While power users will want something more customizable, the BeeStation and its more powerful sibling, the BeeStation Plus, are great for those who want a device they can simply plug in, click a few buttons, and have it work as their own personal cloud. Until recently, the device was mostly used for the storage of files, photos, and videos, and with the Plus model, you could install and stream media through Plex. Synology recently released a new free application for the BeeStation Plus called BeeCamera, which is basically a stripped-down version of Surveillance Station. First, let's get the confusing naming out of the way. While you might initially think that BeeCamera is a physical device, perhaps a camera that Synology created specifically for the BeeStation Plus, that would be incorrect. BeeCamera is simply the name for the application that runs on the NAS and on your mobile device. I think the marketing team missed the mark here, but it does fit the other naming on the device, like BeePhotos and BeeFiles, I guess. Camera Support As of right now, only Synology-branded cameras are supported, which many will see as a callback to the drive locking the company implemented and then backtracked on. That said, while I 100% disagree on drive locking, I agree that camera locking for a device made to simply plug and play is the right decision. The whole point of the BeeStation line is simplicity. There are currently three camera model lines available, a wireless device for indoor use, and two PoE models for external use. CC400W (Wi-Fi): Plug it into power using the included power adapter, and connect it to your wireless network. This camera is rated only for indoor use and is the one I was provided to review the BeeCamera. $198.36, in line with the Unifi G6 Compact. BC510 (PoE): A bullet-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. TC510 (PoE): A dome-style camera. Connect it to an Ethernet cable that is providing Power over Ethernet (PoE). This camera is rated for both indoor and outdoor use. $240. Although this isn't a review of the actual Synology camera, I did want to note that a positive for the Synology CC400W is that it uses a magnetic base. This means you can mount it on any magnetic surface, which is pretty handy. However, a downside to the camera is that it's powered by a built-in USB cable that's about six and a half feet (two meters) long. This means that the cable will probably be either too long or too short, but more importantly, if the cable is damaged at all, you'll likely need to buy an entirely new camera because there doesn't appear to be a way to replace it, unlike many competitors, like the Unifi G6 Instant. Hopefully, this is something Synology addresses in a future revision of the hardware. The BeeStation Plus supports up to four cameras. Setup The setup of BeeCamera is, like everything in the BeeStation family, very straightforward. Simply make sure you're on at least version 1.5 of the BeeStation OS, and BeeCamera is automatically installed on the device. BeeCamera Setup Screenshots Setting up the CC400W was just as easy. Plug it in, open up the BeeCamera app, and follow the on-screen steps to add the camera. During this process, you'll configure the camera name and how many days of retention you want to keep. The system will also automatically update the firmware for you. The whole thing took only a couple of minutes, excluding the time it took for the camera to update the firmware. Once the camera is connected to the BeeStation Plus, you can manage the various camera settings within the app, although there aren't many to choose from. You're able to configure whether the microphone will record audio (some privacy laws may preclude you from recording it), select what codec to use (H.264 or H.265), configure the color and exposure of the camera, and determine what data you want to overlay onto the video. Finally, you can set up AI detections so that BeeCamera will alert you if it sees certain things. These are all of the common detections you would expect in a camera system, such as people, pets, and vehicles. Under people and vehicles, you can also add extra monitoring for lingering and congestion detection, although pets are currently in "Lab" and therefore have no extra features yet. Recording in 4K using H.265 for 30 days will take roughly 300 GB of storage, which is very reasonable for most regular households, as the BeeStation Plus has 8TB of native storage. If you want to set up detection zones, you can. These are areas that BeeCamera will look at for the various detections, and are helpful if, for example, there's a tree in your frame and you don't want to be notified each time the wind makes the branches move around in the frame. Finally, you can also schedule when the camera should and should not be recording, which is a very useful feature. For example, you may want to record only at night when you're sleeping, but not during the day when you're up and about the house, so you can easily shut the camera off between 8 am and 10 pm. Each hour of each day can be configured to record continuously, only upon a detection event, or disabled completely. You can't fine-tune to record at a specific time, though, only hourly blocks on the hour. Daily Use The best part of BeeCamera is that it's easy and just works. If you only care about being notified when things happen, the mobile app sends those notifications and lets you click the button to bring up the video and see what's going on. For example, when I went out of town and had the camera pointed at the cat tower in our hallway, it was nice to be able to drop in and check that my furry friends were doing okay without me. Initiating the remote connection to the BeeStation Plus through the app is very responsive, but this will heavily depend on your ISP. In my case, using Xfinity, I'm able to go from starting the app to seeing live video in roughly three seconds, which is about the same amount of time it takes to connect to my Unifi UNVR system that costs much more. If you want to see footage from a specific day and time, you can do so using the calendar icon. You can also scroll through the timeline, looking for detections that are labeled in blue (vs. the normal gray when there's nothing of interest). There are buttons that let you go to the last/next detection on the timeline, which is helpful if you missed the notification on your mobile device. That's where the ease of use stops, though. While you can download clips that are flagged by detection, there's apparently no way to select generic time frames you're interested in, and the only place to download is to your phone. In addition, sharing a video shares the actual video, not just a link back to your BeeStation Plus. While that's good from a security and privacy perspective, it's a little awkward for sharing large videos. Limitations While the ease of implementation is great, there are some things that are lacking from BeeCamera. The most obvious is that there is no way to view the footage on the desktop. You can log in to the BeeStation Plus to see how much storage BeeCamera is using, but unlike BeePhotos and BeeFiles, there is no BeeCamera on the web console to manage or view footage. This means you'll be viewing all of your security footage on your mobile device, which is pretty limiting. In addition, there's no way to download the video to your PC without first using your phone as the intermediary. The one exception to this is that you can use BeeFiles to see the raw MP4 files. They're saved in 5-minute increments, and it's just raw data with no detection information or any other way to identify what any of them are. The lack of a way to interact with BeeCamera on the desktop also makes configuration of the cameras more difficult. For example, trying to set up detection zones using a tiny screen and your finger to draw boxes is more cumbersome than it needs to be. This reinforces the idea that BeeCamera is not made for power users. It's also missing some of the more advanced functionality of Surveillance Station. For example, I couldn't find a way to say, "Alert me if the thing in this zone is no longer there." Another major deficiency with BeeCamera, and a feature I suspect may come out in the future, is that while it can detect generic people, there is no specific facial recognition yet. This is an interesting omission, given the fact that other Synology tools can detect specific individuals, and competitors such as Unifi Protect also do it. This is probably a software limitation, so we will have to wait and see if this feature is added in the future. Conclusion If you need a security guard to monitor surveillance cameras to make sure your property is secure, then BeeCamera is not the solution for you. That said, you probably wouldn't be using a BeeStation Plus as the brains behind the system either. BeeCamera (and BeeStation in general) is clearly aimed at households that want to avoid sending personal data to Google and Amazon, and now want to add some cameras to keep an eye on their home and their pets while they're away. BeeCamera excels at doing this. The target market isn't interested in creating cases, tying multiple views together in a single pane of glass, or the like, and for the intended use case, the system works great. Where it starts to fall apart a bit is with more advanced features. Not being able to use a desktop app is a major compromise in my opinion, and having to do all of the configuration on a mobile device is annoying, but not impossible. If you don't want to have a full-fledged NAS device in your home, but still want control over your data (or maybe want an easy way to backup your data for World Backup Day), and want to add a couple of cameras to keep an eye on your house and your pets, this is a great, cheap, and easy way to go, and I suspect more functionality will come over time. If Synology releases a desktop app or at least a way to configure cameras and view footage on a desktop browser, this would be a near-perfect solution for a general home user. As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
    • First Post
      mike_rumble earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      476
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      172
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      104
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      88
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!