Microsoft begs Web devs not to make WebKit the new IE6


Recommended Posts

Given that Chrome is faster than any other browser on Windows their approach seems to be working, obviously lack of D3D support isn't holding them back.

Erm Chrome and Firefox does use DirectX/D3D via the ANGLE Project, which transforms WebGL into DirectX calls.

I guess you have to be special type of blind to miss the irony and hypocrisy in this..

And yet you're preaching on about how right it is for them to be doing the exact same thing? Open source or not, breaking standards is bad.

Only a problem if your browser isn't properly sandboxed. WebGL is no more dangerous than any of the other 2D or 3D acceleration APIs built into modern web browsers. And DirectX is a "standard" because Microsoft give incentives to game studios to leverage it. Google don't support it because Chrome is a cross platform browser, and it's easier to port code from one platform to another if you use the same API on each. Given that Chrome is faster than any other browser on Windows their approach seems to be working, obviously lack of D3D support isn't holding them back. Besides, the web relies on open source technologies, and Microsoft's 3D and 2D api's aren't open source, making them useless to web developers. I don't. I'm just tired of hearing Microsoft shills blathering on as if every company and person on the web has some obligation to design everything around their products.

Not as tired as I am of seeing you call everyone who disagrees with you a shill. If you haven't got an argument and need to rely on abuse it would probably be best if you just don't post.

HTML5 test is not a valid benchmark. It tests things which are out of spec.

AFAIK, it doesn't even test anything but just queries if the browser supports it.

Bingo. HTML5 test is only useful for marketing departments, you need test cases to measure conformance - you can't just test for existence and hope for the best.

It shows in the field too. Webkit's implementations are often buggy and incomplete, whereas while Trident might not have the broad array of implementations that Webkit does, the standards it does implement are far more refined.

I don't. I'm just tired of hearing Microsoft shills blathering on as if every company and person on the web has some obligation to design everything around their products.

Okay dude, you're just being pathetic now. And I say this as someone that often agrees with you on things such as Windows 8, I think that OS is an abomination.

But this isn't about Microsoft, this is about every other browser that isn't Chrome and making sure everyone (Including the Microsoft I currently dislike) has a fair chance at rendering a page correctly, and not being shut out by a bunch of vendor specific cruft.

IE needs to die completely.. end of..

and, no, IE8, IE9 and IE10 will be the new IE6. Apple and Google along with Mozilla are following W3C and WHATWG in implementing new features and support for CSS3 and HTML and thus when we build web stuff today it just works across all of these browsers with most of the fancy effects and we are still jumping hoops and having to put up with Microsoft's IE crap.

So ironic but expected that Microsoft can't understand why they are terrible in this regard as well. IE 10 is better than all other IEs but it's STILL IE and it's still Microsoft, so we will continue supporting webkit because it evolves and browsers update themselves to be always current on user's machines while Microsoft still peddles their old proprietary crap..

Hey Microsoft, here's an idea for you.. MAKE IE based on webkit and help build a better webkit base since it's open and help developers develop for one HTML/web engine? Oh you don't want to, or you have to deal with your users who you screwed with terrible IEs? Well the web and internet in general won't wait for you. Nobody cares what you think anymore. You have shown us what web looks like with you and it's not a pretty picture and it's so ironic that we are being warned by MS about competing rendering engine not being "good" for us.

Just die already and stop whining since you are a decade late to the next generation.

What are you smoking? Mind to share with us?

Nobody is breaking standards. If anything Webkit implements them first.

Are you just being thick on purpose? Or do you really not understand what this article is all about?

Your blind hate for MS just affects your reading comprehension it seems.

All MS is asking is, don't make the same mistake we did, the web is on the right track, lets all try to be standards compliant.

  • Like 2
Rich coming from someone who is defending a company who killed web progress for a decade with their crap browser and is now criticizing open source webkit that has even better standards support than IE10 as being "proprietary". I guess you have to be special type of blind to miss the irony and hypocrisy in this.. The whole world is laughing at Microsoft. Riiight.. the ONLY proper test is the one sponsored by Microsoft that shows IE10 doing well with HTML5.. GOT IT!

That's your mistake. I'm not defending Microsoft per se, I'm just defending their request which is perfectly sensible. If they were saying that they want developers to use their own proprietary extensions I'd happily argue that that was a ridiculous position. However, all they're doing here is asking developers to use standards.

I'm well aware of Microsoft's history (and the irony of the situation) but you're the one who wants to see a repeat of that situation.

Nobody is breaking standards. If anything Webkit implements them first.

ok, lets break this down to you

Step 1. W3C creates a new spec for touch controls which all browsers can implement as a standardized platform

Step 2. All browsers start implementing it.

Step 3. EXCEPT, Chrome/Webkit since google instead decides to make their own incompatible version who is also inferior in many ways.

Step 4. All browser use the standard version except chrome, and some like Opera try to implement Googles version on top of the actual standard to support both versions despite obvious functionality differences and certain things who can't be supported and translated

You're saying this is good, that this is how it should be, instead of Google just using the actual accepted Standard which is also better ?

Seriously.

FYI this is actually worse than what MS did, as back then there was a serious lack of standards, and most of the new proprietary stuff MS implemented didn't have a standard and didn't exist before. Google on the other hand is purposely breaking a standard.

based on what? From what I see, and numbers say it all, they are following the standards the closest (btw Maxthon is webkit as well). IE10 is dead last.

And stop with this Google is doing this sh**.. Webkit is NOT Google.. Webkit is everyone. IE is Microsoft only.. this alone should make it obvious to you that MS is full of crap.

GG9

Please go away. If I ask you, "can you cook Bibimbap?" and you answer yes, it doesn't mean you can cook it let alone properly. That's what your quoted "test" does. So please, learn about things before talking or you will only embarrass yourself like you are doing now.

...while 99% [marketshare] on mobile makes it a standard...

ok. I should have read this quote before. Then I wouldn't bother replying to a silly kid like you.

-webkit-weed

Figures. I was hoping it'd be weed instead of -webkit-weed.

99% market share means -webkit-weed is the standard, I guess.

Why the **** support any company which wants to make a web developer's life hard?

You mean like Microsoft did for nearly a decade? pot, kettle, black

Peacekeeper is not a valid benchmark. It tests things which are out of spec.

It doesn't account for them in the final score either. Peacekeeper is mainly a performance benchmark and Chrome blows IE apart on that front.

Not as tired as I am of seeing you call everyone who disagrees with you a shill. If you haven't got an argument and need to rely on abuse it would probably be best if you just don't post.

Pretty rich coming from a guy claiming that I "knew nothing" and then when proven to be wrong went off at an alternate tangent rather than admitting so.

It doesn't account for them in the final score either. Peacekeeper is mainly a performance benchmark and Chrome blows IE apart on that front.

Of course it does peacekeeper doesn't test real world situations performance and Chrome is coded specifically to score high on the test,

You mean like Microsoft coded IE9 to cheat Sunspider? I've been using Peacekeeper since it was made available and I have always found it's findings in line with what I actually get out of real world usage.

It's irrelevant? Having everyone access to the engine's base and being able to build upon it, improve it, independent from any one company is irrelevant to you?

Yeah, please. You clearly don't know what you are talking about nor you have an idea of how open source works.

It matters because Microsoft can follow W3C standards now and when it gets 80% of marketshare again they can do the same thing they did with IE6 and nobody can do anything about it. You don't see how that's a possibility?

With webkit that can't happen because it is now owned, nor developed exclusively by a single company. How can you people not get that.

The reason IE is a slower lifecycle is MS supports its corporate apps with such longevity so they can regain their investments. When you spend 10 million dollars to implement a new ERP system, you can give a rats ass about the latest and greatest CSS gimmick, what you want is a browser that works and the best thing to make sure that it works and is supported perpetually is that it adheres to the standards approved by the standardization body. Being able to modify the engine/change things and hack for the sake of hacking does NOTHING to improve the industry, in fact it greatly detracts from the ability to build manageable apps.

also, you seem to like the sound of your own voice. Maybe if you scream it enough people will believe it? lol

You mean like Microsoft did for nearly a decade? pot, kettle, black

If Microsoft were trying to act like they're the saviours of web standards you'd maybe have a point. But since all they're doing is trying to influence developers to write standards-compliant code that benefits everyone, rather than proprietary Webkit-specific code that only benefits Apple and Google, you have no point.

And on top of that, you're really starting to look petty. Microsoft may be retarded, but they're not always wrong.

Pretty rich coming from a guy claiming that I "knew nothing" and then when proven to be wrong went off at an alternate tangent rather than admitting so.

You don't know what you're talking about which is why you have to rely on insults. You constantly undermine your own arguments with your nonsensical personal attacks and it's not worth discussing anything with you if you can't post sensible comments.

  • Like 2

Ignorant IE Hating. Internet Explorer is in the right here and is following the spec. You harp on and on about spec compliance, yet when it comes to this it doesn't matter? This is not a deficiency in IE that Microsoft is asking people to fix. This is IE following the spec to the letter and people not using proper code. Since people are never going to get their heads out of there asses, IE should just start parsing -webkit prefixed CSS like opera. Then we can all pretend we're webkit just like we all pretend we're netscape.

http://webaim.org/bl...string-history/

Market share means nothing (or should anyways).

Vendor specific prefixes are a bad a idea and were a bad idea and now we're seeing the result of it. Vendor specific prefixes should have never been implemented in any version of the browser designed for the average user. It causes this horrible mess of a situation.

  • Like 2

based on what? From what I see, and numbers say it all, they are following the standards the closest (btw Maxthon is webkit as well). IE10 is dead last.

GG9

Sorry to quote this again but I had to point out this example of 448 score chrome fail: http://newilk.com/te...eholder_styling

If this is not enough to shut you up, you either have logic issues or are one of the best example of fanboi.

PS: Assuming I'm not wrong, this is the specific relevant test in html5test.com : http://html5test.com/compare/feature/form-other-placeholder.html

As you can see, most browsers get full points in this test while only IE10 and Firefox support it (almost) properly.

Out of your 448 point chrome (or webkit), there is huge percentage of points awarded for saying "yes, I can cook 5-star Bibimbap" while what it cooks may be worse than eating trash from garbage dump.

So for the last time, do not quote html5test again. It is a great site for a quick overview. But it is not solid, often misleading and tests **** loads of things that are not part of HTML5 or not even standards.

By the way, Chrome is a great browser. So is IE10 and Firefox. I personally do not like firefox except firebug (<3).

I find this entire thread hilarious.

I don't think anyone on this site will agree that IE6 was the most awesome browser of all time. Hell I was using FireFox to escape it back when I was on XP. Microsoft even want it to die for Christ's sake, and that's saying something.

So long story short, IE6 shall be regarded as the dark ages of the internet from which FF and Opera inspired a renaissance.

Then we got IE7. At first I ignored it and carried on using FF in Vista, until I had to do a reinstall and didn't bother using it and carried on used IE7 as it had tabbed browsing and well, worked. Still wasn't perfect but was a step in the right direction at least for Microsoft standards wise can we not all agree?

Next up IE8. Does anyone remember using the IE8 beta's and watching all the sites fall over unless it was in compatibility mode? Again was Microsoft not trying to make a better standards compatible browser? Still wasn't quite there though was it, and performance needed a swift kick in the arse, again I think we can all agree on that?

Close, but no cigar.

Then we had IE9 that showed the world that Microsoft was serious about the web again. Supporting part of HTML5 and CSS3 with a great performance boost as well. And now, a year and half later we now have IE10. If anything I think everyone should be supporting Microsoft's catch up over the past few years.

But the best thing I find hilarious is the bashing that IE isn't HTML5 standard compatible? Hate to point this out, bit of a small detail but HTML5 ISN'T A FREAKING RATIFIED STANDARD YET! Once W3C has ratified it and said "Hey everyone, this is what you should be doing" and IE(insert version number at the time) isn't standards compatible, then yes go ahead, bash away.

No really I won't stop you, hell I'll join in with you. Microsoft have time to do it, they have till 2014 till the recommendation is out so they don't have an excuse. I don't think you'll find many people defending them for being late.

Hell I think we should start making bets when the IE11 preview will come out. I give it 1 month after IE10 for Win7 comes out.

IE across the board sucks and from IE6 to IE9 has broken the web over and over again.. and then Microsoft starts coming out and complaining how everyone is using webkit (an open source browser engine that is absolutely KICK ASS) and because they are adding new features (who btw, will most likely be adopted by WHATWG and W3C eventually).

Wtf are we talking about.. and yes.. IE 10 sucks compared to every other browser. Just because it's a bit more compliant with HTML5 as a standard still doesn't make it great.. it makes it suck less.

IE across the board sucks and from IE6 to IE9 has broken the web over and over again.. and then Microsoft starts coming out and complaining how everyone is using webkit (an open source browser engine that is absolutely KICK ASS) and because they are adding new features (who btw, will most likely be adopted by WHATWG and W3C eventually).

Wtf are we talking about.. and yes.. IE 10 sucks compared to every other browser. Just because it's a bit more compliant with HTML5 as a standard still doesn't make it great.. it makes it suck less.

I see you're ignoring all the posts you can't refute and argue with again, and just sprouting bull crap about how awesome Google and Webkit is again.

*yawn*

  • Like 2

I see you're ignoring all the posts you can't refute and argue with again, and just sprouting bull crap about how awesome Google and Webkit is again.

*yawn*

You and others didn't refute anything but just whine and defend garbage that Microsoft is and was in regards to IE browsers. The reason web is still having trouble moving forward is Microsoft and IE and nobody else. But that goes over your head.

The point of Microsoft whining is not about HTML5 and standards.. it's about them losing dominance and being completely irrelevant on mobile. And that's completely their fault and is completely disingenuous (but what else do you expect form that company who gave us IE6) to come out and whine how open source engines are introducing new features that IE can't support. Hey, guess what, the world doesn't care about Microsoft anymore. The world has moved on. We build stuff for webkit, gecko because stuff just works and for the past years we got stuck with IE garbage and having to write hacks and tons of other crap because of Microsoft (and not just IE6.. IE7, IE8, IE9.. they ALL suck). The web would be a better place without them. And nobody cares about IE10. Because Microsoft is unreliable Today it might be somewhat following HTML5 standard, but tomorrow Microsoft will bring more of the proprietary extensions (that are already happening btw with WinRT) and they will break everything again so they can try to hijack the web again towards their own interests.

So they are a joke of the developer world. Every serious web developer LOATHES Microsoft and IE.. and laughs their ass off at Microsoft telling anyone anything about compatibility and standards, especially comparing open source engines and others to their proprietary IE6. The biggest irony of all.

Again, the standards organizations MADE a standard for touch controls that all browsers decided to follow. Google decided to make their own incompatible and non compliant and in fact a worse implementation. of touch controls and not implement the standard one.

you keep ignoring this little fact, the standard already existed, Google's method isn't going to be a standard, they already had a standard, a better standard.

And we're not defending MS, we're arguing to Google shouldn't make their own standards when there are already standards for it.

  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
    • 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD drops to its lowest price in over three months by Fiza Ali Amazon is currently offering the 2TB WD_Black SN7100 internal solid-state drive at its lowest price in over three months, so you may want to check it out, if you have been considering a storage upgrade, before the deal dries up (purchase link is toward the end of the article). Featuring a PCIe Gen 4.0 interface and M.2 2280 form factor, the SN7100 promises to deliver sequential read speeds of up to 7,250MB/s and sequential write speeds reaching 6,900MB/s, offering as much as a 35% improvement in performance compared with the previous generation. It also achieves random read speeds of 1,000,000 IOPS and random write speeds of 1,400,000 IOPS. The drive uses Western Digital’s TLC 3D NAND technology for reliable performance and is further supported by a five-year limited warranty. It also offers strong endurance, rated at up to 1,200TBW, making it suitable for demanding workloads such as gaming, content creation, and high-speed recording. Moreover, its DRAM-less architecture claims to improve power efficiency (the SSD relies on system memory for caching via HMB), while the WD_Black Dashboard software enables users to monitor drive health, install firmware updates, and activate Game Mode for potentially better performance. Finally, it operates within an operating temperature range of 0°C to 85°C, and can withstand storage temperatures from -40°C to 85°C. 2TB WD_Black SN7100 PCIe Gen4 NVMe SSD: $242.96 (Amazon US) Check this deal out if you want a 4TB option. Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      514
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!