David Cameron 'orders new curbs on internet porn'


Recommended Posts

Cameron to ensure parents are led through a filter process on all new computers

David Cameron is to toughen up controls on internet pornography to protect children.

In future, anyone buying a new computer or signing up with a new internet service provider will be asked whether they have children when they log on for the first time.

Those answering ?yes? will automatically be taken through the process of installing anti-pornography filters and a series of questions about how stringent they want restrictions to be.

That will allow parents to impose timed access limits on lewd material, or prevent children viewing social networking sites such as Facebook during certain hours of the day.

Ministers will also demand that internet service providers impose ?appropriate measures? to ensure that those setting the parental controls are over 18.

And they will be told to prompt existing customers to install porn blocking technology.

The proposals, due to be announced by the Government later this month, go much further than a blueprint drawn up by Reg Bailey, the head of the Mothers? Union, who was commissioned by the Government to suggest new curbs.

His plan would simply have seen parents given an ?active choice? to opt in or out of porn controls. But under the Prime Minister?s plans, those with children will be automatically guided through the process of installing the filters.

article-2234264-161223CA000005DC-563_634x520.jpg

The move marks a significant step forward for the Daily Mail?s Block Online Porn campaign, which has called for the introduction of content filtering systems for internet accounts.

Mr Cameron has rejected calls for an automatic block on porn, which adults would have to actively opt out of, after experts advised that parents needed to play an ?active role? in installing filters so they are fully informed about the technology.

The Government plans to tell service providers that they must impose the new controls or face legislation.

His aides believe they will fall into line because they have already introduced Mr Bailey?s ?active choice? proposals.

Children now start to use the web at the age of eight. As many as one in three under-tens have seen pornography on the web, while four out of five children aged 14 to 16 admit regularly accessing explicit images on their home computers.

Half of children say they use the internet alone in their bedroom, making it difficult for parents to effectively monitor their activity.

A senior No10 source said: ?We know lots of parents are concerned about the material their children are accessing on the internet and we want to do more to help. We?ve consulted on a variety of options on how we can make it safer for children online.

?Internet service providers have made great progress to date in implementing ?active choice? controls, as recommended by Reg Bailey, where all users are asked if they want to switch on parental controls.

?After intervention from the Prime Minister, the Government is urging providers to go one step further and make sure their systems actively encourage parents, whether they are new or existing customers, to switch on parental controls.?

TalkTalk, which provides a HomeSafe porn blocker to its customers, welcomed the plans.

Chief executive Dido Harding said: ?We have been asking all our new customers if they want to turn on HomeSafe, the only parental control service that protects every device using the home internet connection, since the beginning of the year and our experience shows it really works.

?One in three new customers ? roughly the proportion of households in the UK with dependent children in them ? are choosing to turn parental controls on and 80 per cent think being asked is a good thing.?

http://www.dailymail...-computers.html

Oh good Lord...

Invest that time into some real troubleshooting.

The UK needs quite a fair share of that.

Hint: teens getting off on internet porn is none of that. (Y)

Glassed Silver:mac

Great, another reason to put up internet prices (I bet the service will actually cost the ISPs a fair bit to setup and run)

**** you cameron, **** you. Who voted this idiot into power?

Noone, he lost, as did all the rest, but as he had the most votes he a$$licked the lib-dems and managed to create a coalition just to beat labour, but you would never know it was a coalition

Great, another reason to put up internet prices (I bet the service will actually cost the ISPs a fair bit to setup and run)

**** you cameron, **** you. Who voted this idiot into power?

Quite a few people, unfortunately. :p

I must say that it's a bit absurd that this will be enforced onus and the ISPs. They could just send out a leaflet to teach parents to mind their kids, or pray that some parents have common sense, or simply let the kids watch porn. I've heard of more harmful things to do.

Great, another reason to put up internet prices (I bet the service will actually cost the ISPs a fair bit to setup and run)

**** you cameron, **** you. Who voted this idiot into power?

sheltering oblivious soccer moms.

  • Like 1
Those answering ?yes? will automatically be taken through the process of installing anti-pornography filters and a series of questions about how stringent they want restrictions to be.

On the plus side, it will give the child something to do for the first ten minutes of owning their shiny new computer; disabling the porn filtering that mummy and daddy thought would be so brilliant.

  • Like 1

I wonder if these same anti-porn filters will also block the Daily Mail online? the same Daily Mail which was drooling over a 13yr old saying she "looks all grown up" if the Daily Mail was a family member it'd be a creepy uncle complaining about paedos while asking the kids to sit on his lap. :|

Forcing ISPs to do it is though.

They're legally not forcing them to do it as they'd never actually be able to legislate it, it's just a bluff he's hoping the ISPs just do as he says and they might do a small part but some of the ISPs have actually been fairly decent about protecting their users.

They're not forcing them to do it right now, they've got to do it by themselves or he will legislate it. It was legislated on mobile phone internet too, never used to be limited but now with all providers in the UK you have to phone them up to get the internet restrictions off.

So David Cameron takes advice from the Daily Mail now?

Problem with democracy is, I can't even stop this lousy ****...

Oh I can go on the governments petition website and set one up, that's going to make all the difference. /s

  • Like 1
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • AnyDesk 9.7.7 by Razvan Serea AnyDesk is a fast remote desktop system and enables users to access their data, images, videos and applications from anywhere and at any time, and also to share it with others. AnyDesk is the first remote desktop software that doesn't require you to think about what you can do. CAD, video editing or simply working comfortably with an office suite for hours are just a few examples. AnyDesk is designed for modern multi-core CPUs. Most of AnyDesk's image processing is done con­currently. This way, AnyDesk can utilize up to 90% of modern CPUs. AnyDesk works across multiple platforms and operating systems: Windows, Linux, Free BSD, Mac OS, iOS and Android. Just 7 megabytes - downloaded in a glimpse, sent via email, or fired up from your USB drive, AnyDesk will turn any desktop into your desktop in se­conds. No administrative privileges or installation needed. AnyDesk 9.7.7 fixes: Fixed an issue that prevented users from creating meetings without an active license Download: AnyDesk 9.7.7 | 8.0 MB (Free for private use, paid upgrade available) Links: AnyDesk Home Page | Other platforms | Release History | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • I used a Pixel 10 Pro XL when it first came out for about 8 months. When I first got it, it was using Google assistant and that was fast, when asking it to call somone etc. Then it automatically switched with some update to Gemini. Doing even the simplist of things like asking it to call someone in my contacts was soooooo slow compared to Google assistant. I guess it had to go out to the cloud to do that? Back on iPhone and while Siri is dumb right now, it does do those simple things, like call someone, set a timer, star the stop watch etc, really fast. That an while I like Google Material Design 3 over iOS 26, they Pixel 10 Pro XL was so slow in comparison to the iPhone 17 Pro I am using.
    • I use Gemini in my rotation of AI clients...that work pays for. It is good at most things, better than copilot for imgage searching and making images, worse at writing vs Claude and way worse at hadling technical issues when it comes to Azure stuff. I also use YT premium and maps. Anything else Google is a pass for me. I have now seen multiple people locked out of their Google accounts for reasons that are just very vauge.
    • Microsoft is building an AI datacenter that "uses less water than a fast food restaurant" by Ivan Jenic Image: Microsoft Microsoft has announced plans to build a new datacenter campus in Pecos, Texas, as the company continues to invest billions in AI infrastructure. The new facility, called project Kilby, will reportedly have a capacity of 2 gigawatts and will be one of the largest single capacity additions in the company’s history. To power the campus, Microsoft signed a 20-year deal with Chevron to supply natural gas from the Permian Basin, America's largest oil field. This deal is set to become the largest collaboration to date between a U.S. oil and gas giant and Big Tech. It’s no secret that Big Tech has often been criticized for exploiting natural resources for its AI developments. Microsoft is trying to mitigate some of that negative consensus by promising to build its own power supply for the new datacenter, independent of the public grid. The Pecos datacenter will be powered by a power plant hub, built by Chevron, with up to 2.5 gigawatts of gas-fired capacity, with potential to scale to up to 5 gigawatts. The facility will include at least seven GE Vernova turbines, with first power potentially coming online as early as late 2027 or early 2028. The power plant hub is part of an approximately $7 billion investment by Chevron, making it one of the largest dedicated energy projects tied to a single datacenter campus in the U.S. Microsoft hasn’t publicly disclosed the amount it’s investing in the new datacenter. Microsoft has also committed to implementing a closed-loop cooling system that will only require an initial water charge to operate. The company said that “the total lifecycle water use of this datacenter is only a fraction of that consumed annually by a typical fast-food restaurant.” What the press release doesn’t mention, however, is how much water the natural gas plant itself will consume, or how a 20-year fossil fuel commitment squares with the company's pledge to be carbon negative by 2030. The construction of the new datacenter should provide over 6,000 construction jobs at peak build-out, and create hundreds of operational job roles once the facility is built. Via: Reuters
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      tuben earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      mnsgroup earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      524
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      199
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      94
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      82
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!