This Is What Happens When You Deep Fry a Frozen Turkey


Recommended Posts

This is what happens when you embed a youtube video that can't be embedded.

Also you're supposed to cook the turkey in the oven at low heat over time. not deep fry it.

You can deep fry anything ;)

Question is, can it be eaten after the fireworks?

If you can get it out without catching yourself on fire :o It might also be a little overdone.

Just cook it in the oven at low temperature over long time. Then you keep the natural meaty juices in, don't fillet with fat and crap, and it's extra juice and has all the flavours it's supposed to. And it's actually healthy unlike deep fried one.

Also you're supposed to cook the turkey in the oven at low heat over time. not deep fry it.

Many people do turkey that way. Is supposed to be quite awesome. If done right, it's supposed to be nice and juicy and very tasty.

But like any way you do a turkey, it is supposed to be thawed completely before cooking.

Sorry HawkMan, but deep fried turkey > any other kind of cooked turkey. Describing how awesome it is would take too long lol.

  • Like 1

It might be delicious, but to me as an Europeon it sounds absolutely disgusting. Way too fatty

The oil doesn't penetrate very deep into the meat. The reason for deep frying anything is to preserve natural juices (and nutrients) that are removed with traditional cooking methods. Remove the skin after cooking and it's no more fatty than any other turkey, but it's much more moist and flavorful.

of course it's juicy, you're bathing in in oil. and most of the tastyness, comes from all the oil and salt and crap.

No, the skin absorbs the oil, and forms a barrier to keep natural moisture from the meat IN and most of the oil OUT. the only way to infuse flavor from spices, extra juices, etc, is to stuff the turkey with it. Have you tasted one? You'll swear by it if you do.

Just cook it in the oven at low temperature over long time. Then you keep the natural meaty juices in, don't fillet with fat and crap, and it's extra juice and has all the flavours it's supposed to. And it's actually healthy unlike deep fried one.

Actually that method reduces moisture and flavor. The only way to maintain moisture and flavor in meat is to provide adequate derict heat to the surface to create a barrier that prevents the escape of liquids. Pan searing, frying, etc are all ways. You don't even know what turkey really tastes like until you've had it this way.

It might be delicious, but to me as an Europeon it sounds absolutely disgusting. Way too fatty

The same people that create some of the most unhealthy menu options in any Restaurant in America. Bangers and Mash? Fish & Chips? Pudding? The organic and health foods markets were popularized in America, not Europe.

  • Like 2

uh, no, low temperature cooking over long time will keep all the natural juices in the meat, be it turkey, chicken, beef, anything.

It keeps it in better than high temp baking, but not like searing, be it a grill, a pan, 400 degree oil, what have you.

Actually that method reduces moisture and flavor. The only way to maintain moisture and flavor in meat is to provide adequate derict heat to the surface to create a barrier that prevents the escape of liquids. Pan searing, frying, etc are all ways. You don't even know what turkey really tastes like until you've had it this way.

Actually it has been proven many times that searing doesn't keep the liquids in. (search on google for proof) It does however provide a very tasty maillard reaction.

Deep frying anything without thermostat (as I see being done in all those turkey videos) is one of the most unhealthy things you can do. The oil gets way too hot and cancerous products get formed.

The same people that create some of the most unhealthy menu options in any Restaurant in America. Bangers and Mash? Fish & Chips? Pudding? The organic and health foods markets were popularized in America, not Europe.

Erm, I said European, not British ;). The British kitchen isn't known for it's delicatesse :p I like to count myself as a fan of the Italian kitchen and it's simplicity. And I don't mean fat, drippy pizzas by that.

With all that said, you might be right and it might be delicious to eat turkey this way. But putting an entire turkey in a big frying pan is just not something that would ever get in my head. ;)

It keeps it in better than high temp baking, but not like searing, be it a grill, a pan, 400 degree oil, what have you.

You need to listen to some actual cooks and not TV cooks, searing does NOT keep in any juices.

the usual argument is that searing closes the pores, but of course, meat doesn't have pores, and if searing closes the so called pores, then why is juices bubbling out the top the sign that you're done... because it's not doing it. searing only has the purpose of making the meat look more appetizing. searing however dries out the meat.

With all that said, you might be right and it might be delicious to eat turkey this way. But putting an entire turkey in a big frying pan is just not something that would ever get in my head. ;)

I have deep fried Chicken, mostly due to ease and speed, an while it's tasty, long low temp cooking is better.

Deep frying is a simple way to cook something incredibly delicious, but there are a lot of misconceptions about it. As mentioned, deep frying doesn't just mean fat. If done right, the oil shouldn't soak and seep into what you are frying. If it does, you probably fried it for too long. The reason people think deep frying is bad for you is because we hear about it a lot used with some kind of thick batter or breading that does soak up the oil more, or we hear about it from the state fair where they are frying something that's already terrible for you. The number one thing about a fryer is that water is DANGEROUS in a fryer. A fryer will cause water to almost instantly boil, which is what causes it to foam up or splash and what can cause fires. You have to completely thaw and dry anything before frying it, and you'll never have any trouble. I picked up a fryer a few months ago for pretty cheap and it's a great way to quickly cook something and keep great flavor too. It's a great thing to have, but I find it a little bit of a pain in the ass to use, especially if you don't use it much, because you have to let it cool, then filter and collect the oil after you're done for next time.

You need to listen to some actual cooks and not TV cooks, searing does NOT keep in any juices.

the usual argument is that searing closes the pores, but of course, meat doesn't have pores, and if searing closes the so called pores, then why is juices bubbling out the top the sign that you're done... because it's not doing it. searing only has the purpose of making the meat look more appetizing. searing however dries out the meat.

Correct. I'm glad some people don't believe the searing myth. Alton Brown (on the Food Network) did a moisture study and searing the meat definitely took away more moisture. Searing simply adds flavor in the form of char. Nothing more, nothing less. :)

Correct. I'm glad some people don't believe the searing myth. Alton Brown (on the Food Network) did a moisture study and searing the meat definitely took away more moisture. Searing simply adds flavor in the form of char. Nothing more, nothing less. :)

Very true, and this is another misconception. Frying or searing don't seal in juices, but they help with browning and getting a great texture. That's why I like to flash fry to add the final touch when cooking some meats. Frying is definitely one of the most misunderstood methods of cooking.

Then again, most people massively overcook their food regardless of the method resulting in dry meat. I almost can't stand eating a steak I didn't cook these days.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • My experience in the past with older Windows 11 builds was not great on unsupported machines but I recently used Rufus to put the latest build on a older 5th Gen Core Thinkpad T that we upgraded with a SATA SSD and 8GB of RAM four years ago when hardware was reasonable and it seemed pretty fast and solid. Customer is very happy with the performance and will probably get four more years out of that venerable laptop that he loves so much. Another customer just retired his Dell Studio laptop from 2009 running Windows 10. It got an SSD over 10 years ago and did everything he needed it to for 17 years but he also retired last year and is happy doing everything on his iPad now.
    • Apple's newest AirTag 2 gets first big discount by Taras Buria In late January 2026, Apple introduced its second-generation AirTag trackers, bringing a refresh to the old model that has been on the market for half a decade. Now, you can get these new trackers at an all-time low price, thanks to the first big discount that brought the price down by 17% on Amazon. While the second-generation AirTag looks identical to its predecessor, it packs meaningful upgrades inside. The second-gen ultrawideband chip works 50% farther than the original AirTag, allowing you to detect lost items in a wider range. In addition, the second-generation AirTag features an upgraded Bluetooth chip for extended range and a significantly louder speaker (up to 50%) so that you can hear it better when locating a lost item. Note that the second-gen AirTag only works with iPhones and iPads that run iOS/iPadOS 26 and newer, so you need a compatible device to use the tracker. Like the original AirTag, the AirTag 2 is available in two packs: one and four pieces. Both are now available at a notable discount on Amazon, and you can purchase them using the links below. Apple AirTag 2 tracker - $24 | 17% off on Amazon Apple AirTag 2 tracker (four-pack) - $89 | 10% off on Amazon Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S.- specific and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • I've been on Deezer for over a decade, but glad that Tidal joined them in fighting AI slop. Can't stand such takes as Spotify's: "Spotify's CEO recently pushed back against listeners who call AI music "slop," urging people to stop using the term and instead embrace the creative potential of AI music."
    • “Could” … in the IS the healthcare is run by insurance companies that make indecent profits denying basic treatments to people that are paying money for nothing. Besides, where are all the Trump epigones who were stating that the tariffs were going to paid by foreign companies and not the US citizens? …
    • Microsoft Teams gets smarter at spotting sneaky meeting bots by Usama Jawad Microsoft Teams is set to receive a couple of new features soon, including a dedicated Recap app and a rather controversial location tracking functionality. The Redmond tech giant has also explained how it has made online communication and collaboration a lot more performant this year. Now, the company has detailed more secure bot admission mechanisms, as first reported by us in March 2026, and now available in Teams. As the use of AI has expanded across enterprise environments, Microsoft has begun allowing users to integrate bots into their meetings for various tasks, such as note-taking. While this has a tangible productivity benefit for users, Microsoft has highlighted how misconfiguration has allowed bots to join meetings that they shouldn't. This has created security and privacy risks, which Microsoft is now combating using a new Teams admin policy that allows organizers to control how external bots access meetings. Admins can leverage a policy called Manage external bots and their access to meetings. The default configuration is "When detected, require approval before joining", which places detected bots in a lobby before they are explicitly admitted into the meeting. The other option disables the experience. Microsoft has also requested admins to only allow organizers and co-organizers to manage access to a meeting, so that other people don't randomly allow bots into meetings. Teams will now be able to leverage infrastructure signals to intelligently detect and distinguish between bots and humans. Microsoft will soon also trial a registration experience for independent software vendors (ISVs) to build a system that registers a bot with Microsoft, so it is marked as a "known" bot. Teams will also categorize bots as trusted and suspected threats so that organizers can quickly identify which bots they want to allow into a meeting. Additional safeguards to block accidental admission of a bot into a meeting include: No one-click Admit option for identified bots Confirmation prompts when admitting participants that include bots Warnings when organizers choose Admit all, and bots are included Microsoft has begun rolling out this experience, and it will be retiring the current CAPTCHA verification implementation. In the future, the company plans to roll out new capabilities like allow-lists, organization-wide policies, admin reports, audit logs, and more granular controls.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      538
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!