This Is What Happens When You Deep Fry a Frozen Turkey


Recommended Posts

This is what happens when you embed a youtube video that can't be embedded.

Also you're supposed to cook the turkey in the oven at low heat over time. not deep fry it.

You can deep fry anything ;)

Question is, can it be eaten after the fireworks?

If you can get it out without catching yourself on fire :o It might also be a little overdone.

Just cook it in the oven at low temperature over long time. Then you keep the natural meaty juices in, don't fillet with fat and crap, and it's extra juice and has all the flavours it's supposed to. And it's actually healthy unlike deep fried one.

Also you're supposed to cook the turkey in the oven at low heat over time. not deep fry it.

Many people do turkey that way. Is supposed to be quite awesome. If done right, it's supposed to be nice and juicy and very tasty.

But like any way you do a turkey, it is supposed to be thawed completely before cooking.

Sorry HawkMan, but deep fried turkey > any other kind of cooked turkey. Describing how awesome it is would take too long lol.

  • Like 1

It might be delicious, but to me as an Europeon it sounds absolutely disgusting. Way too fatty

The oil doesn't penetrate very deep into the meat. The reason for deep frying anything is to preserve natural juices (and nutrients) that are removed with traditional cooking methods. Remove the skin after cooking and it's no more fatty than any other turkey, but it's much more moist and flavorful.

of course it's juicy, you're bathing in in oil. and most of the tastyness, comes from all the oil and salt and crap.

No, the skin absorbs the oil, and forms a barrier to keep natural moisture from the meat IN and most of the oil OUT. the only way to infuse flavor from spices, extra juices, etc, is to stuff the turkey with it. Have you tasted one? You'll swear by it if you do.

Just cook it in the oven at low temperature over long time. Then you keep the natural meaty juices in, don't fillet with fat and crap, and it's extra juice and has all the flavours it's supposed to. And it's actually healthy unlike deep fried one.

Actually that method reduces moisture and flavor. The only way to maintain moisture and flavor in meat is to provide adequate derict heat to the surface to create a barrier that prevents the escape of liquids. Pan searing, frying, etc are all ways. You don't even know what turkey really tastes like until you've had it this way.

It might be delicious, but to me as an Europeon it sounds absolutely disgusting. Way too fatty

The same people that create some of the most unhealthy menu options in any Restaurant in America. Bangers and Mash? Fish & Chips? Pudding? The organic and health foods markets were popularized in America, not Europe.

  • Like 2

uh, no, low temperature cooking over long time will keep all the natural juices in the meat, be it turkey, chicken, beef, anything.

It keeps it in better than high temp baking, but not like searing, be it a grill, a pan, 400 degree oil, what have you.

Actually that method reduces moisture and flavor. The only way to maintain moisture and flavor in meat is to provide adequate derict heat to the surface to create a barrier that prevents the escape of liquids. Pan searing, frying, etc are all ways. You don't even know what turkey really tastes like until you've had it this way.

Actually it has been proven many times that searing doesn't keep the liquids in. (search on google for proof) It does however provide a very tasty maillard reaction.

Deep frying anything without thermostat (as I see being done in all those turkey videos) is one of the most unhealthy things you can do. The oil gets way too hot and cancerous products get formed.

The same people that create some of the most unhealthy menu options in any Restaurant in America. Bangers and Mash? Fish & Chips? Pudding? The organic and health foods markets were popularized in America, not Europe.

Erm, I said European, not British ;). The British kitchen isn't known for it's delicatesse :p I like to count myself as a fan of the Italian kitchen and it's simplicity. And I don't mean fat, drippy pizzas by that.

With all that said, you might be right and it might be delicious to eat turkey this way. But putting an entire turkey in a big frying pan is just not something that would ever get in my head. ;)

It keeps it in better than high temp baking, but not like searing, be it a grill, a pan, 400 degree oil, what have you.

You need to listen to some actual cooks and not TV cooks, searing does NOT keep in any juices.

the usual argument is that searing closes the pores, but of course, meat doesn't have pores, and if searing closes the so called pores, then why is juices bubbling out the top the sign that you're done... because it's not doing it. searing only has the purpose of making the meat look more appetizing. searing however dries out the meat.

With all that said, you might be right and it might be delicious to eat turkey this way. But putting an entire turkey in a big frying pan is just not something that would ever get in my head. ;)

I have deep fried Chicken, mostly due to ease and speed, an while it's tasty, long low temp cooking is better.

Deep frying is a simple way to cook something incredibly delicious, but there are a lot of misconceptions about it. As mentioned, deep frying doesn't just mean fat. If done right, the oil shouldn't soak and seep into what you are frying. If it does, you probably fried it for too long. The reason people think deep frying is bad for you is because we hear about it a lot used with some kind of thick batter or breading that does soak up the oil more, or we hear about it from the state fair where they are frying something that's already terrible for you. The number one thing about a fryer is that water is DANGEROUS in a fryer. A fryer will cause water to almost instantly boil, which is what causes it to foam up or splash and what can cause fires. You have to completely thaw and dry anything before frying it, and you'll never have any trouble. I picked up a fryer a few months ago for pretty cheap and it's a great way to quickly cook something and keep great flavor too. It's a great thing to have, but I find it a little bit of a pain in the ass to use, especially if you don't use it much, because you have to let it cool, then filter and collect the oil after you're done for next time.

You need to listen to some actual cooks and not TV cooks, searing does NOT keep in any juices.

the usual argument is that searing closes the pores, but of course, meat doesn't have pores, and if searing closes the so called pores, then why is juices bubbling out the top the sign that you're done... because it's not doing it. searing only has the purpose of making the meat look more appetizing. searing however dries out the meat.

Correct. I'm glad some people don't believe the searing myth. Alton Brown (on the Food Network) did a moisture study and searing the meat definitely took away more moisture. Searing simply adds flavor in the form of char. Nothing more, nothing less. :)

Correct. I'm glad some people don't believe the searing myth. Alton Brown (on the Food Network) did a moisture study and searing the meat definitely took away more moisture. Searing simply adds flavor in the form of char. Nothing more, nothing less. :)

Very true, and this is another misconception. Frying or searing don't seal in juices, but they help with browning and getting a great texture. That's why I like to flash fry to add the final touch when cooking some meats. Frying is definitely one of the most misunderstood methods of cooking.

Then again, most people massively overcook their food regardless of the method resulting in dry meat. I almost can't stand eating a steak I didn't cook these days.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • With the current hardware prices Microsoft should lift the restriction. Then if you have the correct TPM then allow you to use X feature, if you don't have the correct TPM then don't but still actually let you run windows. 11. With a disclaimer during install that X features would be unavailable.
    • It's good for recycling of course. But commence inflation of a second hand RAM bubble and price gouging on DDR 4 inventory in 3... 2... 1...
    • Bypassed Windows 11 shows surprising stability on ancient, completely unsupported hardware by Sayan Sen When Windows 11 was first released, one of the most complained-about issues with the new desktop Microsoft OS was its higher system requirements, which pushed many relatively modern and powerful processors and devices onto the officially unsupported list. Thankfully, they have not been updated again for the base OS, though systems require four times the memory and storage if they want to run AI-powered apps and features. As such, Windows 11 technically runs on 4GB of memory, and there is no imposed restriction on the generation of memory it supports. Speaking of memory, prices are extremely high nowadays for hardware, especially DDR5 and DDR4 kits due to the current silicon shortage, and there are also reports of it affecting DDR2 as well, and it might only be a matter of time before even DDR1 gets affected. Before that could happen, an enthusiast took an ancient DDR1-based system and decided to try out Windows 11 on it to see how well the modern OS would fare on such hardware. The system runs an outdated graphics card interface standard based on AGP, or Advanced Graphics Port, called AGP 3.0 or AGP8x. AGP was essentially succeeded by the modern PCI Express (PCIe) bus standard. The user behind the experiment is retro hardware enthusiast Omores, who built the system around an ASRock ConRoe865PE motherboard based on Intel's i865PE chipset from way back in 2003, around the time when AGP was still in fashion. What made this board special back in the day was its unusual support for newer Core 2 Duo and even Core 2 Quad processors while still retaining older DDR1 memory support and an AGP8X graphics slot, making it an ideal bridge or link between two vastly different generations. Powering the machine was Intel's Core 2 Quad Q6600 alongside 3GB of DDR1 RAM and an ATI Radeon HD 4650 AGP graphics card, one of the final and most capable GPUs released for the aging AGP interface. While installing Windows 11 itself was relatively easy by bypassing Microsoft's hardware checks, getting the graphics card fully functional proved to be some challenge. Microsoft had quietly dropped native AGP support after the earliest releases of Windows 10, meaning newer versions of Windows no longer include the necessary Graphics Address Remapping Table (GART) drivers required for proper AGP acceleration. Without them, AGP graphics cards typically boot up, though with limited functionality, and can often throw a Code 43 error in Device Manager. To work around the limitation, Omores extracted Intel's legacy AGP440 SYS driver from an early Windows 10 release and paired it with a modified INF file so Windows 11 would correctly recognize the chipset. Following this and combined with AMD's final 64-bit Catalyst AGP drivers from 2012, the Radeon HD 4650 was able to operate with full AGP 8X acceleration intact. The result was said to be surprisingly usable for hardware that is over two decades old. Hardware-accelerated H.264 video playback worked correctly and benefited apps like Firefox, while legacy applications and games ran without major graphical issues. The system also successfully completed the 3DMark 2001 benchmark, although performance naturally lagged behind what the same hardware achieves under Windows 7, which is significantly lighter than Windows 11. There was, however, one unavoidable limitation as Microsoft's Windows 11 version 24H2 introduces a mandatory SSE4.2 CPU instruction requirement that cannot be bypassed through installer modifications or registry tweaks. Since no AGP-era processor supports SSE4.2, Windows 11 version 23H2 effectively becomes the final release capable of running on such systems. Regardless, it is still a very cool feat and quite fascinating to see just how stable Windows 11 turned out to be on such unfamiliar hardware. Source: Omores (Patreon) via O_MORES (Reddit)
    • That will only really help other players that are also responsible for creating the problem.
    • Well, it's good to know that they have found a workaround to a problem that they helped create, I guess...
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      NovaEdgeX earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      539
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      266
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      98
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!