Recommended Posts

The only reason I got an optical drive (Blu-Ray) for my 2012 build was to put them on my media server for my PS3/WD TV Live. My wife and I love watching BD movies, none of the streaming services come to close to the fidelity. I see optical drives hanging around for awhile yet.

Apple has a major investment in iTunes so of course they will limit support for outside media.

Optical media is home to much higher quality media though. CDs have a higher bitrate than MP3s bought from any online storefront and definitely sound better....blu-rays (heck even some DVDs) look vastly superior to any highly compressed streaming or "digital copy" version.

You may want the optical to die but you're all willing to accept such terrible compromises with regards to quality it makes me cringe.

...

Most streaming video is terrible quality, but we passed transparency for audio a while back.

  • Like 1

Not for multi-channel audio. I can definitely hear the difference between a Netflix stream and my movies on Blu-Ray.

I was talking about audio settings (i.e. It'll be hard to find somebody who can actually tell the difference between 256Kbps AAC and FLAC, etc.). Audio for streaming media does often suffer though (I swear YouTube uses mono audio for some quality settings)

As when I build my PC around 2000ish, I didnt bother buying a floppy drive (which i still needed a few times tho, stupid winXP)

My current system does have a DVD drive, It hasnt been connected for at least a year or 2.

If i used a CD/DVD drive 20times the last decade, thats much.

And comming with the new Apple's having no CD drive... there have been Dells and HPs at least that had no DVD drive for years.

Since when was the iMac the flagship of the Apple desktop computer range. I didn't realise the MacPro was considered lower in the range.

I would love to give up my optical drives but it's still the highest quality music format widely available and whilst that is the case I will have one in my desktop.

a CD, really?

vinyl has higher quality mate. Unless you have 1 3min song being the whole CD instead of 20ish songs.

As when I build my PC around 2000ish, I didnt bother buying a floppy drive (which i still needed a few times tho, stupid winXP)

My current system does have a DVD drive, It hasnt been connected for at least a year or 2.

If i used a CD/DVD drive 20times the last decade, thats much.

And comming with the new Apple's having no CD drive... there have been Dells and HPs at least that had no DVD drive for years.

a CD, really?

vinyl has higher quality mate. Unless you have 1 3min song being the whole CD instead of 20ish songs.

CD does have the better quality. It's uncompressed audio. It always kind of made me sad that HD-Audio discs didn't become popular with 6-7 channels uncompressed.

I have a Blu-ray drive in my PC and I still use it. It will be a while before I retire the drive, although.... I do need the SATA Port it currently occupies :p

I was talking about audio settings (i.e. It'll be hard to find somebody who can actually tell the difference between 256Kbps AAC and FLAC, etc.). Audio for streaming media does often suffer though (I swear YouTube uses mono audio for some quality settings)

Dunno i'm watching Battlestar Galatica: Blood and Chrome from youtube and the quality is okay. It's not blu ray of course but it's good quality.

Flash sticks are getting to be throw aways like discs are. However, I think if the larger size blurays came down in price this would be different. 25GB are still .50-1.00 a piece, and 50gb are 3.50-5.00 a piece. Thats no way to push a format. Unfortunatly I think this has alot to do with piracy. I burn discs occassionally for client backups or install media when its just quicker than the throw away thumbs, especially boot diag media.

i still use my optical drives occasionally. my car (2005) doesnt have an aux port, so i cant play mp3s in my car. i'll burn CDs when i buy a new mp3 album. i'll also backup blu-rays as well. i'd like to buy a blu-ray burner eventually so i can create backups of important data. that way i can keep copies of stuff in my safe.

Optical media is home to much higher quality media though. CDs have a higher bitrate than MP3s bought from any online storefront and definitely sound better....blu-rays (heck even some DVDs) look vastly superior to any highly compressed streaming or "digital copy" version.

You may want the optical to die but you're all willing to accept such terrible compromises with regards to quality it makes me cringe.

No, they just flat out tell their customers what to think and the cultists believe everything blindly.

At least until we're all on gigabit connections and then can stream a bluray quality movie.

Millions of people are going to want to back-up their movies, documentaries, music, pictures, and other personal files, for years to come.

People are not likely to throw out their DVD movies and are going to need to play them.

A DVD recording is much less likely to fail, compared to a hard drive, USB drive -- I'm not sure about SD flash cards.

Until they come up with something more reliable than the CD/DVD discs, these will be around for a long time to come.

personally, I'm of the opinion that the media industries (movie & music industry) are lobbying hard for this to happen to protect their extortion rackets.

Streaming services are poor at best, nothing beats physical media for quality. what happens when you can't gain access to the internet, or your internet provider throttles you because they haven't invested enough in providing acceptable bandwidths for everyone & you decide to stream 8 or 9 HD (debatable?) quality movies per day (fair use policies?). whilst you may have a high speed connection & the industry says you need a minimum 2mb broadband speed to stream movies (in reality streaming HD at 2mb is nye on impossible, even at 8mb & 16mb it's damn frustrating when you get freezing, buffering, jumping, audio sync problems etc).

& streamed audio is still crap compared to vinyl or CD/DVD even at 320k, even flac, even wave files. & yes you can tell the difference in sound quality, those that say you can't tell the difference have obviously never listened to a high end audio system with excellent quality speakers to match. getting rid of physical media (which is what the movie/music industries are wanting to happen) will seriously punish those who like to listen to quality music for the sake of ever increasing profiteers.

The last time I used the DVD on my laptop was.... never! Its been like 2~3 years since I last used a CD/DVD. I hate the fact that my laptop has a DVD player (so much space wasted!), the laptop could be slimmer, or had a bigger battery in it, if it wasnt for the DVD, I know I can get an ultrabook that's withour a DVD/CD player, but they don't have a numpad, and I am lost with out it. Looking forward to the time where laptops start coming without a DVD/CD drive.

Since when was the iMac the flagship of the Apple desktop computer range. I didn't realise the MacPro was considered lower in the range.

I would love to give up my optical drives but it's still the highest quality music format widely available and whilst that is the case I will have one in my desktop.

I've gotta say I'm in the same boat; my car plays only standard audio CDs, so I still like making mix CDs for it. Otherwise I probably wouldn't need it. It makes sense that Apple would kill them off. Heck, to purchase an additional 'Superdrive' (read: basic DVD/CD burner) for their Mac Pro costs an extra $100!! For a device that is going for like, $13 now.

I've gotta say I'm in the same boat; my car plays only standard audio CDs, so I still like making mix CDs for it. Otherwise I probably wouldn't need it. It makes sense that Apple would kill them off. Heck, to purchase an additional 'Superdrive' (read: basic DVD/CD burner) for their Mac Pro costs an extra $100!! For a device that is going for like, $13 now.

...and to think people think Microsoft vastly overcharge for the hard drives for the Xbox 360 eh? ;)

It's really stupid that Microsoft makes Win8 available for download for the consumer upgrade path but only distributes DVDs for the OEM version. I want an ISO damnit!

But you can get it on DVD if you pay for it. Also you can make an ISO from the downloaded install files. I have Win8 install on USB drive. Just google how to do it.

I don't see disks going away for a while yet. One of my laptops have no disc player while the other newer one does. I have a usb Multi player.

Might be that I'm in a third world country, but where I work, DVD drives is one of things that sells the most, for some weird reason. About a half of new PCs (the more advanced ones, mostly) indeed don't have them anymore, but I've also heard the "Yes, I wouldn't use it for anything, but how else I'm going to install Windows?" argument. Though the thing is - best part of them are being sold as they are, and so we stock several 10 unit boxes of them at a time.

We did consider offering premade bootable flash drives (and config boot order accordingly), but arguments against were - 1) can't make them read-only, 2) people would simply lose them, and 3) bulk orders bring crazy profit *cough*

But you can get it on DVD if you pay for it. Also you can make an ISO from the downloaded install files. I have Win8 install on USB drive. Just google how to do it.

I don't see disks going away for a while yet. One of my laptops have no disc player while the other newer one does. I have a usb Multi player.

I don't have an upgrade licence. I bought two System Builder licences and I can't get an official download.

I don't have an upgrade licence. I bought two System Builder licences and I can't get an official download.

i believe you still can by making an image of your disc from an image program and using the usb creation tool offered free from microsoft to make a usb installer

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Which finger's fingernail are we talking about? I can see how not having this info can lead to massive differences in interpretation.
    • This Chinese company is reportedly developing a feature Apple and Samsung can only dream of by Hamid Ganji While companies like Apple and Samsung have been relatively conservative with their devices’ battery capacities in recent years, Chinese manufacturers have taken the competition to the next level by introducing significantly larger batteries. However, the latest report from China suggests that a local company may already be developing a smartphone with a whopping 14,000mAh battery. Chinese leaker Digital Chat Station claimed on Weibo that a smartphone maker is developing a device with a 14,000mAh battery. If true, it would be the largest battery ever used in a smartphone and could, in theory, provide up to a week of battery life on a single charge. The leaker did not reveal the name of the company behind the device, but there are some clues. This week, HONOR unveiled the X80 Pro Max in China with an 11,000mAh battery and 90W wired charging support. The company also launched the Honor Win in January, which packs a 10,000mAh battery. HONOR, a former subsidiary of Huawei, has a proven track record of developing smartphones with unusually large batteries. However, other Chinese brands, including Xiaomi, have also launched devices such as the Xiaomi 17 Pro Max with 7,500mAh batteries. Though Chinese users on Weibo also believe the company behind the new battery is HONOR. Interestingly, Digital Chat Station said the device with the 14,000mAh battery weighs around 220 grams, making it lighter than the Apple iPhone 17 Pro Max (233 grams) and slightly heavier than the Samsung Galaxy S26 Ultra (214 grams). The iPhone 17 Pro Max currently packs a 5,088mAh battery in eSIM-only versions, while the Galaxy S26 Ultra features a 5,000mAh battery. Neither device is expected to see a dramatic increase in battery capacity in its next-generation successor. So when it comes to battery comparison, Chinese brands are unbeaten. HONOR smartphones are currently available in the EU, but the Chinese brand has no official presence in the United States due to restrictions imposed by the U.S. government.
    • Qualcomm takes on NVIDIA with new Dragonfly CPU and AI chips by Pradeep Viswanathan Microsoft, Google, Amazon, AMD, Meta, Apple, OpenAI, and several others have been developing their own chips for AI infrastructure. However, NVIDIA still remains the dominant player in the market. Today, Qualcomm announced a major expansion of its data center infrastructure portfolio to better compete with NVIDIA. The new lineup includes the Qualcomm Dragonfly C1000 CPU, Qualcomm High Bandwidth Compute technology, the Dragonfly AI300 inference accelerator, new connectivity products, and custom silicon solutions. Qualcomm claims that this new lineup improves performance per watt, token throughput, and total cost of ownership for AI data centers. The Dragonfly C1000 is a new data center CPU built with Qualcomm’s custom Oryon cores. This chip will feature more than 250 cores, frequencies above 5GHz, and a chiplet-based design. Qualcomm claims that this new C1000 can deliver more than 2x better performance per watt compared to existing server CPU offerings based on specifications. The Dragonfly C1000 will support PCIe Gen 7 with more than 2TB/s of connectivity, along with CXL, advanced RAS features, and both air and liquid cooling. Qualcomm expects the Dragonfly C1000 to be commercially available in 2028. Additionally, Qualcomm and Meta announced a multi-year, multi-generation agreement under which Qualcomm will supply Dragonfly C1000 data center CPUs for Meta’s next-generation server fleet. Qualcomm also announced High Bandwidth Compute, a new near-memory computing architecture designed to address AI’s memory bandwidth bottleneck. HBC Gen 1 will debut with the Dragonfly AI250, which is expected to sample in mid-2027. The AI250 will deliver 133TB/s per card, an 18x increase in effective memory bandwidth compared to the AI200 with LPDDR5X. The new Dragonfly AI300 with HBC Gen 2 is a rack-level AI inference platform from Qualcomm. Qualcomm claims that the AI300 can deliver 4x to 8x better performance per watt compared to existing GPU-based architectures based on memory bandwidth per watt per card. The Dragonfly AI300 is expected to be available in 2028.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Meta Plast earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      461
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      136
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      78
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!