Nurse Found dead after prank Call Hoax


Recommended Posts

Ok, it's terrible the nurse died, but I'm not sure why people are blaming the DJs, considering this wasn't even the nurse they spoke to (She simply transferred the call).

The DJ's should be charged with impersonation and should be fired.

They were very bad impersonations.

I'm not saying the DJs in this situations weren't douches, radio DJs here in Aus are all pretty much childish *******s, but to kill yourself is a complete over-reaction.

The media shouldn't get too self-righteous in all this, though. Since the pregnancy was announced, the media has been a complete circus over this issue. "OMG is it twins? What will the names be? 8-1 odds it will be a natural birth vs. C-section! Look at the royal baby-bump! (one of my most hated of words). Blah blah blah. Their fanatical reaction isn't that much better than what these DJs did.

I agree that the media don't really have a right to pick on the DJs, since the UK media is currently being forced to set up a regulatory body because it doesn't respect the law.

I doubt that this incident alone was the cause of the suicide. It certainly wouldn't have helped matters, but pair it with something like depression or another mental illness and it's certainly plausible that someone would take their own life over something like this. Not that I'd have any experience in such matters.

lets clear some stuff up, because there is a huge amount of BS in this thread.

First off, she wasn't facing any disciplinary action, at all. The Royal Family even told hospital managment they didn't want her to face any repercussions. Second off, she didn't disclose any information about anyone. all she did was transfer the call to the ward where Kate Middleton was staying. Thats it, nothing more, nothing less.

Doctors and Nurses have some of the highest suicide rates out of any profession.

Yeah, she wasn't facing disciplinary action at the time, but as a former NHS employee I guarantee you that there'd have been an investigation, and she could have taken a lot of the blame. They take DP breaches very seriously, even when the patient doesn't make a formal complaint. I worked in an administrative area, and whenever I received a phone call asking for patient information, the standard response was "I'm afraid I can't give out patient information over the telephone, but I can provide you with the email address for our Freedom of Information officer if it's a FOI request". I'd presume that there'd be a similar procedure for handling patient enquiries over the phone in the clinical areas too.

Do I think she's to blame? Probably not as much as the person that actually gave the information, but she certainly shouldn't have put the call through, and we don't know what was said between deceased and the nurse that actually gave out the information.

Either way, the DJs should be taking the bulk of the heat here. I hope they never get back on the air. Despicable people abusing people to get ratings. There's consolation in the fact that it's likely the station will have it's broadcast license revoked (again).

Yeah, she wasn't facing disciplinary action at the time, but as a former NHS employee I guarantee you that there'd have been an investigation, and she could have taken a lot of the blame. They take DP breaches very seriously, even when the patient doesn't make a formal complaint. I worked in an administrative area, and whenever I received a phone call asking for patient information, the standard response was "I'm afraid I can't give out patient information over the telephone, but I can provide you with the email address for our Freedom of Information officer if it's a FOI request". I'd presume that there'd be a similar procedure for handling patient enquiries over the phone in the clinical areas too.

Do I think she's to blame? Probably not as much as the person that actually gave the information, but she certainly shouldn't have put the call through, and we don't know what was said between deceased and the nurse that actually gave out the information.

Either way, the DJs should be taking the bulk of the heat here. I hope they never get back on the air. Despicable people abusing people to get ratings. There's consolation in the fact that it's likely the station will have it's broadcast license revoked (again).

I dont know much about british law to be honest, but I imagine having the Royal Family say they don't want any disciplinary actions brought against them is a bit different than the average patient.

But like you said, this most likely wasn't the main cause of the suicuide.

Real classy radio station they work for .....

Australia radio station which staged pregnant Kate phone prank forced girl to confess to her mother she was raped when she was 12

The broadcaster was handed the first reprimand three years ago after a young teenager was pushed into revealing live on air that she had been raped as he(sic) mother listened.

and also insulting a fellow journalist live on air for daring to criticise him,

The journalist for New Limited made the complaint to the ACMA after she was verbally assaulted by the Breakfast DJ after she dared to to criticise his work.

He was reported as saying: ?What a fat bitter thing you are, you deputy editor of an online thing. You've got a nothing job anyway. You're a piece of s**t," he said.

?You?re a bulls**t artist, girl. That's what you are. You should be fired from your job."

?Yeah, and your blouse. You haven't got that much t***y to be wearing that low-cut a blouse. Watch your mouth, girl, or I will hunt you down.'

Link

Talking from personal experience , Its hard to lose someone you love at Christmas ( The rest of the years not so easy as well), These lot seem like scum bags to me.I know the media can stoop to low depths at times but these seem to do it so well. Not sure about charges being made , but sack them for sure and punish the radio station for it (Something for the Australians to do obviously).

Im in two minds about this, i mean yes its terrible news someone committed suicide and sympathy goes out to her family, but then again it aimed to be harmless joke that sadly unfortunately back fired, how were they supposed to know that she was close to the edge?

This wasnt the first prank call or will it be the last and it certainly wont be the last joke done. If you think the DJs should be taken to court etc, then maybe you should think about blanket ban on every joke out there, just in case someone takes it badly. Also maybe you should be having a go at the media for blowing the whole situation up when all the nurse did was forward the call, also maybe you should complain about the hospital not making protocols more clear before having a go at the DJs

Im in two minds about this, i mean yes its terrible news someone committed suicide and sympathy goes out to her family, but then again it aimed to be harmless joke that sadly unfortunately back fired, how were they supposed to know that she was close to the edge?

This wasnt the first prank call or will it be the last and it certainly wont be the last joke done. If you think the DJs should be taken to court etc, then maybe you should think about blanket ban on every joke out there, just in case someone takes it badly. Also maybe you should be having a go at the media for blowing the whole situation up when all the nurse did was forward the call, also maybe you should complain about the hospital not making protocols more clear before having a go at the DJs

It wasn't a joke, it was abusing staff at a very busy hospital in an attempt to grab ratings. I've got no problem with crude radio shows or anything like that. Free speech is free speech, but when you're prank calling busy hospitals trying to obtain confidential patient information, that's crossing a line. Perhaps not legally (although probably), but certainly ethically.

I agree though that the DJ's aren't the only ones to blame here. The hospital certainly has some explaining to do.

I think that what people don't seem to understand is the lady that killed herself was not white. She looked to be Indian and probably wasn't accustomed to some aspects of western culture. Many Indians take their work very seriously and even a simple mistake like this can cause complete humiliation for them based on the pressure put on them by the culture they were raised in.

You can't just assume when you make a hoax call to a random person that they will take it as an innocent prank and laugh it off.

its tragic.

like most people, there are two ways to see it.

it was NOT intended to cause the consequences it did. Yes it was a stupid joke, and they shouldnt have done it, but they did...

my heart goes out to the family.

the DJ's should be fired along with management for aproving the call to go on air. most likely the radio will close like the news of the world. this is not something that will be forgotten with time.

I cant imagine what the DJ's themselves are going through....

its a tragic story all round

Another perspective:

Comedian Wil Anderson, a former presenter on Austereo's Triple M network, said he felt sorry for Christian and Greig.

"Firstly, I have sympathy for the nurse and her family because this is a terrible tragedy," he said. "But I also have a fair degree of sympathy for these kids.

"At an Austereo meeting, the number one thing is often, 'Which prank or 'gotcha' calls are we going to do today?'

"Personally, I hate prank calls and I didn't do them because I feel uncomfortable when everyone is laughing at one person ? and that person doesn't know why.

"In this case, the first alarm bell should have been calling a pregnant woman who was sick in hospital, with a chance she could have lost her baby. That's when the grown-ups in the room should have said, 'Do we want to go ahead with this?'."

Anderson said the presenters would never have expected their silly accents and claim to be royals would be believed by the hospital.

"I assume this didn't go live to air, so at some point, an adult should have said, 'We're not going to play this'," he said.

"These are kids who are trying to make a name in an industry where Kyle Sandilands [another Australian radio DJ, for our overseas readers] gets all the attention. It's a culture where you're told, 'Make some noise, be talked about, get in the papers'. You're not instructed to be talked about in a positive way; they just want you to be talked about.

"Is the culture of radio to blame? Possibly. But people make thousands of these prank calls each year and they usually result in good material. These kids have done something that I find distasteful but it's something that many other presenters have done without any negative consequences.

"It all comes back to, 'Who's the adult in the room?' After the surprise of actually getting through to the hospital, it's the job of the adults to decide whether it goes to air."

This is a tough one. On the one hand this prank was ill conceived and idiotic, but on the other committing suicide over a prank isn't an outcome anyone could really have predicted. Just another case of misconceived stupidity going wrong. The station that aired the prank should be taken off the air, but realistically all they're looking at is involuntary manslaughter.

I think that what people don't seem to understand is the lady that killed herself was not white. She looked to be Indian and probably wasn't accustomed to some aspects of western culture. Many Indians take their work very seriously and even a simple mistake like this can cause complete humiliation for them based on the pressure put on them by the culture they were raised in.

You can't just assume when you make a hoax call to a random person that they will take it as an innocent prank and laugh it off.

All she did was forward a call, the other nurse made the mistake of giving out information (And even then it was just "She's fine")

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      569
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!