RDP client for Android 2.3.5


Recommended Posts

I tried the following:

PocketCloud free (bad res scaling and touch controls suck)

Jump Free (res scaling issues and doesn't auto orient)

2X (can't connect)

and 2X looks like it's the best but it's telling me to disable NLA on the server 2012 remove VM and It doesn't support windows 8/server 2012 very well :(

any others that are good....??

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1124626-rdp-client-for-android-235/
Share on other sites

I use Xtralogic Remote Desktop Client extensively. I used to use it with Gingerbread, but that was a long time ago. It may no longer be compatible with older Android versions, but I can highly recommend it. I use it with everything from Windows Server 2003 to 2012. It's a native RDP client, supports RDP gateways, NLA, local device native resolution, trackpad and pointer modes, storage and audio redirection, Windows 8 and server 2012 touch screen support.

http://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.xtralogic.android.rdpclient

thanks... but it looks like I need to install an app on the server.... i just want a straight up RDP with no software to install on the server

Ah, not sure then unless you go around it the long way, install Splashtop on PC and Droid > Remote into PC > Remote from PC to Server using normal Remote Desktop lol

I use Xtralogic Remote Desktop Client extensively. I used to use it with Gingerbread, but that was a long time ago. It may no longer be compatible with older Android versions, but I can highly recommend it. I use it with everything from Windows Server 2003 to 2012.

http://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.xtralogic.android.rdpclient

ouch! 15 bucks! :( I'm broke as a joke after x-mas shopping :(

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The problem of course is simply that government does not always know best. My point is that agency is taken away from the EU consumer in these cases. I'm sorry, but I do not believe that governments (politicians) are inherently good, and "looking out for me." Primarily they look to themselves and their own personal desires first, foremost, and always. When the EU or the DOJ fines these companies, claiming to "represent the welfare of the consumer," how much of these billion-dollar judgments are handed to the consumers they claim to represent? Not even a dollar, as I've seen. Yet the EUC lawyers who are paid to sit around and dream up these suits make huge commissions on the fines the EUC adjudicates, which is an ironclad fact I hope everyone is aware of. It's also rank corruption, of course, but that's another topic. Last, when the EU inflicts these judgments, or the DOJ, take your pick, the costs are bundled right along in the cost of the goods and services these companies provide the consumers they are "looking out for." If you are someone who believes his government is his savior then you have my condolences. I think Apple is right here, because the whole scheme of consumer choice is that consumers pick and choose among the products companies offer. Microsoft Windows is more compatible with third party software and hardware than any desktop OS on Earth, which is my sole reason for choosing it. Just because the EUC forces companies do certain things it knows the companies do not want to do, "or else", has no bearing on consumer benefit. This Siri thing is almost idiotic it's so infantile. But this is what the EUC does when the EU in Brussels becomes cash-strapped and needs a big infusion of cash. Some people get upset by "big companies" but it's the opposite when governments dwarf the size and scope of these companies, which is so obvious it hurts.... I mean you can't honestly believe that forcing Apple to do things with Siri it has its own reasons to decline is something that "opens up" Apple, do you? Say it aint' so...
    • Looks like many years since the request was made, a directory tree view finally may be added. https://github.com/files-community/Files/pull/18537
    • There's this from last year https://gist.github.com/threat...364659a8887841aa43deca4efd9 but nothing about a buffer overflow that MS somehow can't code against. No matter what, it makes sense to take a "protected by default" approach.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      sjbousquet earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      DragonOfMercy earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      bella52 earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      Techinmay earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      501
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      213
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      84
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!