Android's on-device malware checker has poor detection rate of 15.32%


Recommended Posts

To quantify the effectiveness of this service, we leverage our prior Android Malware Genome Project and check whether the collected Android malware samples can be detected. We conducted our experiments on November 30, 2012, by using the same dataset of 1260 samples (belonging to 49 different families) that has been widely shared within the research community, including Google. Our study involves semi-automated installation of them on a few of latest Nexus 10 tablets (16GB) running Android 4.2 (build number:JOP40C). The detailed detection results are shown in Table 1. Overall, among these 1260 samples, 193 of them can be detected, indicating a low detection rate of 15.32%.

Link: http://www.cs.ncsu.edu/faculty/jiang/appverify/

I have found that most people that get infected with malware on Android devices are people who download every stupid little unknown app there is and put it on their phone without first checking the validity of its source.

  • Like 2

I`ll install just about any .apk I find floating around and have never ended up with any problems, all my accounts still belong to me and no-one has reported spam coming from my email addresses and I wouldn't be naive enough to do anything like banking on Android anyway (Tablet so no issues with premium rate numbers, I might be more careful if it was a phone)

Just make sure you read the permissions the app asks for before you install it, a prime example was a member posted his news feed app here the other day and when I read it wanted to send emails without the owner knowing, read personal data and basically have access to your entire personal life, I cancelled the install

I'm not much of an app downloader but many of my friends are and they've never reported any trouble. They are just lucky, I guess. I do have a cousin that seemingly got something but no one was ever sure.

I've downloaded tonnes of apps, for years and never came across anything slightly malicious. The most worst thing I've came across is an ad popup on the notification bar.

Imagine third party antivirus on your android? That's a bit embarrassing... I honestly wouldn't be surprised if one already exists. The operating system is bloated already as it is.

There exists three that I know of. Actually security experts say we should install antivirus on every platform.

Imagine third party antivirus on your android? That's a bit embarrassing... I honestly wouldn't be surprised if one already exists. The operating system is bloated already as it is.

How is that embarrising? apple's app store has had malware passed as official apps before too...

Imagine third party antivirus on your android?

There are five antivirus for Android as we speak. I have one of them installed. ESET Mobile Security.

Imagine third party antivirus on your android? That's a bit embarrassing... I honestly wouldn't be surprised if one already exists. The operating system is bloated already as it is.

there's been antivirus apps for android for over a year now, here's a list of them http://www.techsupportalert.com/content/best-free-antivirus-app-android.htm

There are lots of antivirus solutions for Android. Some common names include ESET, Kaspersky, Avast, Norton, McAfee, AVG, Comodo, and Avira, and there are plenty of others. As for the practicality, I honestly have no idea. But I run Avast on my phone without any problems, and it has some nice anti-theft features as well.

The main problem is that one can get malware even while installing from Google Play. Malware in an .apk is understandable in such open platform.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • finally [Taskbar] Taskbar customization just got easier. As we continue to make improvements to the Taskbar experience mentioned last month, we've introduced a dedicated Taskbar Size setting, making it simpler to find, understand, and personalize your ideal taskbar experience.
    • Let me get this straight... It was a web interface for Gmail, so if privacy at Google wasn't concerning enough you'd be going through two companies. And their big feature was the very thing that would make people consider dumping Gmail.
    • Microsoft's fast coding model MAI-Code-1-Flash comes to Copilot Business and Enterprise by Karthik Mudaliar Microsoft’s recently announced MAI-Code-1-Flash model is now generally available to GitHub Copilot Business and Copilot Enterprise customers. With this support, organizations can have more centralized policy controls and billing while finally being able to use Microsoft’s lightweight, first-party coding model. According to GitHub’s announcement, Business and Enterprise plan administrators must enable the MAI-Code-1-Flash policy in Copilot settings before developers can access the model. Microsoft says that MAI-Code-1-Flash is for fast, iterative coding work rather than the most demanding architectural or debugging tasks. GitHub’s official model comparison page says that the model is great for "general-purpose coding and writing," while it excels at fast, accurate code completions and explanations Microsoft introduced MAI-Code-1-Flash on June 2 as part of a broader collection of internally developed MAI models. GitHub subsequently expanded support to Copilot CLI, the Copilot cloud agent, GitHub.com chat, GitHub Mobile, Visual Studio, JetBrains IDEs, Eclipse, and Xcode, but said support for managed Business and Enterprise customers was still on the way. In Microsoft’s own benchmark testing, MAI-Code-1-Flash scored 51.2% on SWE-Bench Pro, compared with 35.2% for Anthropic’s Claude Haiku 4.5. Microsoft also claimed that the model used up to 60% fewer tokens on SWE-Bench Verified. Do note that these are vendor-run results rather than independent measurements. The model is billed at provider list pricing under GitHub’s usage-based system. GitHub currently lists MAI-Code-1-Flash at $0.75 per million input tokens, $0.075 per million cached input tokens, and $4.50 per million output tokens. For organizations, the main incentive to use MAI-Code-1-Flash is likely to be efficiency rather than maximum capability. A smaller model that responds quickly and limits unnecessary output is quite useful for repetitive agent tasks at scale, especially after GitHub Copilot’s move toward usage-based billing. The "Flash" model is recommended for fast work and not necessarily for huge repositories with loads of context. It's better if teams compare their output with other larger models, especially if they're working on security-sensitive changes and complex, multi-file work.
    • yes AND no the "original" or plain/normal Optiplex 7010 won't be getting any more new firmware updates BUT the Optiplex SFF/SFF Plus {small form factor}, Micro/Micro Plus & Tower/Tower Plus 7010 editions DO get new updates such as this new one   and here are similar guides from the Dell web site for Dell systems: https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000390990/secure-boot-transition-faq https://www.dell.com/support/kbdoc/en-us/000347876/microsoft-2011-secure-boot-certificate-expiration
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      462
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      213
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      157
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!