Microsoft Could Pull SkyDrive For iOS From App Store


Recommended Posts

Screen-Shot-2012-12-11-at-14.35.32.jpg

Source: http://www.cultofmac.com/205463/microsoft-could-pull-skydrive-app-for-ios-over-as-it-fights-with-apple-over-30-cut/

...And Apple continues to make enemies. Read on.

The future of Microsoft?s SkyDrive service on iOS looks bleak today as the company appears to have entered into a fight with Apple over its 30% cut of App Store revenues. Microsoft recently gave iOS users the ability to upgrade their SkyDrive subscriptions from their iPhones and iPads, but until the company agrees to give Apple a 30% cut of the in-app purchases, it won?t get any future updates approved.

A critical bug fix that prevents the app from crashing has now had to be placed on hold. Should Apple?s rules be a little more flexible in certain cases?

When you buy an app from the App Store, or you purchase an in-app upgrade on your iOS device, Apple takes 30% of that fee and then passes the rest of the money onto the developer. That?s been the case since the App Store opened its doors back in 2008, and it applies to every iOS developer ? whether they?re an independent game creator working alone, or a large corporation with a big catalog of apps.

So why should Microsoft be any different? Can?t it just pay the 30% cut like everyone else? Well, according to The Next Web, Microsoft has argued that when it comes to SkyDrive subscriptions, the 30% cut should not apply because the service isn?t exclusive to iOS.

In other words, you might upgrade your SkyDrive account on your iPhone to get a larger storage allowance, but you could upgrade to an Android or Windows Phone handset the following day ? or never use SkyDrive on an iOS device again ? and Apple still gets 30% of Microsoft?s revenue.

Microsoft doesn?t like that, and so it?s trying to work out a compromise with Apple. But as we know, Apple doesn?t like compromises; it?s usually Apple?s way or no way at all. Microsoft has even offered to remove the ability to upgrade subscriptions within the app, but Apple isn?t happy with that, either. And this is where the whole thing gets confusing.

You see, according to The Next Web, ?if a service has a subscription option, it seems, and it is not listed in the iOS store, the application cannot, and will not be allowed. That is, unless you are small enough that Apple doesn?t bothers to check. I assume that smaller companies could slip under the radar.?

But I know of a number of subscription services that do not allow customers to upgrade their subscription within the iOS app, and they?re not ?smaller companies.? There?s Spotify, for instance, and Netflix.

So it would seem Apple may have taken issue with Microsoft?s app for other reasons. But Microsoft?s not alone in this. Third-party developers who have built iOS apps that access SkyDrive are also feeling the Cupertino company?s wrath. One posted to Microsoft?s Live Connect forum:

Our iOS app ?Files Pro? [
] includes support for SkyDrive using the official Live SDK.

A few days ago our last update was rejected by the Apple review team because of the presence of the ?Sign Up? button in the Live login authorisation page. According to Apple the presence of this button violates their guideline that:

?Apps that link to external mechanisms for purchases or subscriptions to be used in the app, such as a ?buy? button that goes to a web site to purchase a digital book, will be rejected?

So even if Microsoft backs down here and just decides to remove its SkyDrive app from the App Store entirely, third-party developers will continue to face the same problem. It seems Apple won?t be happy until it gets its 30% cut.

That?s Apple?s call, of course, and it?s been the same way for over four years. No developer or company is exempt to this rule, and so you could argue that it shouldn?t change now for Microsoft.

However, I can?t help but think Apple needs to be a little more flexible with these rules in certain cases. Microsoft makes a good point: SkyDrive users can take their subscription anywhere, so why should Apple get 30% of their subscription fee.

Some companies may bite the bullet and accept it ? most have up until now. But at some point, a major developer?s going to have to pull a service from iOS because Apple won?t negotiate. It may be SkyDrive, it may not. But either way, it?ll be the user that suffers as a result. Again.

Read more at http://www.cultofmac.com/205463/microsoft-could-pull-skydrive-app-for-ios-over-as-it-fights-with-apple-over-30-cut/#YurGjp8PGrYbX7Gp.99

I said this in the article on the front page, why doesn't Microsoft just put the cost of the IAPs up by 30% for iOS users?

Just use the mobile Skydrive website. Boom. Done.

Can you upload as many file types from the iPhone to the browser?

I said this in the article on the front page, why doesn't Microsoft just put the cost of the IAPs up by 30% for iOS users?

In the Apple agreement, you have to offer the same price in the app.

Terrible move by Apple when they should be working closer with MS to stomp out Android. lul wut Dot? Either you haven't used Safari mobile lately or you've suddenly done a 180 in regards to 'app culture'. Unless you are on WP7, you do need an app for that.

Also the same reasons Steam and MS are at ends, so I hope MS remembers how it feels. Ah well, at least Europe is smart enough to drop some anti-competitive legislation on these stores eventually.

Terrible move by Apple when they should be working closer with MS to stomp out Android. lul wut Dot? Either you haven't used Safari mobile lately or you've suddenly done a 180 in regards to 'app culture'. Unless you are on WP7, you do need an app for that.

Also the same reasons Steam and MS are at ends, so I hope MS remembers how it feels.

Apple doesn't want to destroy Android now that Steve is dead. He was the one who took Android as a personal insult.

In the Apple agreement, you have to offer the same price in the app.

Well then Microsoft could charge Mac users who upgrade via the website 30% more to recover the money Apple are extorting from them through the app store.

Well then Microsoft could charge Mac users who upgrade via the website 30% more to recover the money Apple are extorting from them through the app store.

Actually this is a good idea.

Just use the mobile Skydrive website. Boom. Done.

Will not work - how do I upload pictures? I don't believe that you can browse to a file using the standard HTTP uploads since they have Safari so locked down. You can browse to pictures, and maybe some well known file types such as PDF, but it will not work in all cases.

But why should I have to settle? We hear people here on Neowin whine about web sites that have apps, but this is just another case where the app is much better than the web site, not perfect, but better because of the OS integration. But Apple doesn't even want that to happen, and instead, once again, turn their platforms into mediocrity in the name of control.

Will not work - how do I upload pictures? I don't believe that you can browse to a file using the standard HTTP uploads since they have Safari so locked down. You can browse to pictures, and maybe some well known file types such as PDF, but it will not work in all cases.

But why should I have to settle? We hear people here on Neowin whine about web sites that have apps, but this is just another case where the app is much better than the web site, not perfect, but better because of the OS integration. But Apple doesn't even want that to happen, and instead, once again, turn their platforms into mediocrity in the name of control.

In iOS 6 you can upload photos in Safari.

Apple doesn't want to destroy Android now that Steve is dead. He was the one who took Android as a personal insult.

Sure, Steve took it personally. This is just good business. Problem is, Apple, after all these years, still thinks it can exist without MS (and their cloud).

In iOS 6 you can upload photos in Safari.

After the Surface was released I have been using my iPad less and less, so I have not run into this lately just my experiences on iOS 5. But still, it is not good enough. For example, today I bought a couple of computer ebooks. On my Surface, I went to the Oreilly web site, bought 3 ebooks, downloaded the PDFs, opened the SkyDrive app, and uploaded the PDFs. If I were using my iPad, I could buy on the web site, but then I would need to go to another computer, download the PDFs, and then upload to SkyDrive. Of course, on an x86 computer I would not even need to upload because of the SkyDrive sync app, I could have just downloaded and it would have been automatically synced with SkyDrive, but at least I can still do it on Surface. But I cannot on my iPad.

After the Surface was released I have been using my iPad less and less, so I have not run into this lately just my experiences on iOS 5. But still, it is not good enough. For example, today I bought a couple of computer ebooks. On my Surface, I went to the Oreilly web site, bought 3 ebooks, downloaded the PDFs, opened the SkyDrive app, and uploaded the PDFs. If I were using my iPad, I could buy on the web site, but then I would need to go to another computer, download the PDFs, and then upload to SkyDrive. Of course, on an x86 computer I would not even need to upload because of the SkyDrive sync app, I could have just downloaded and it would have been automatically synced with SkyDrive, but at least I can still do it on Surface. But I cannot on my iPad.

I recently went over to Android after years and years of iPhones. I love the freedom its offering compared to iPhone.

Just use the mobile Skydrive website. Boom. Done.

You are very limited in terms of upload file size when using the browser. The Skydrive app lets you upload files of larger size.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • If someone chooses to continue using SB and therefore goes through the manual intervention in the thread, afterwards the BSOD problem is gone. Whether they then re-enable the task doesn't matter, they're done, though on such machines it might pay to keep it disabled in case the next update (if there is a next) causes the same problem. OTOH, if someone disables SB in the BIOS, the problem is also gone. Incidentally, I noticed that this task exists even on machines that don't support SB. It's just installed across the board...and runs. Doing what on such machines is a little hazy.
    • qBittorrent 5.2.2 by Razvan Serea The qBittorrent project aims to provide a Free Software alternative to µtorrent. qBittorrent is an advanced and multi-platform BitTorrent client with a nice user interface as well as a Web UI for remote control and an integrated search engine. qBittorrent aims to meet the needs of most users while using as little CPU and memory as possible. qBittorrent is a truly Open Source project, and as such, anyone can and should contribute to it. qBittorrent features: Polished µTorrent-like User Interface Well-integrated and extensible Search Engine Simultaneous search in most famous BitTorrent search sites Per-category-specific search requests (e.g. Books, Music, Movies) All Bittorrent extensions DHT, Peer Exchange, Full encryption, Magnet/BitComet URIs, ... Remote control through a Web user interface Nearly identical to the regular UI, all in Ajax Advanced control over trackers, peers and torrents Torrents queueing and prioritizing Torrent content selection and prioritizing UPnP / NAT-PMP port forwarding support Available in ~25 languages (Unicode support) Torrent creation tool Advanced RSS support with download filters (inc. regex) Bandwidth scheduler IP Filtering (eMule and PeerGuardian compatible) IPv6 compliant Available on most platforms: Linux, Mac OS X, Windows, OS/2, FreeBSD qBittorrent 5.2.2 changelog: FEATURE: Use D-Bus to show file in file managers (Chocobo1) #24340 BUGFIX: Fix friendlyUnitCompact precision calculation (vafada) #24323 BUGFIX: Remove all top-level folders (glassez) #24333 BUGFIX: Use proper API for checking exit status (Chocobo1) #24349 BUGFIX: Delete stale lockfile when hostname mismatch (TurboTheTurtle, glassez) #24363 BUGFIX: Fix wrong removal procedure of watched folder paths (Chocobo1) #24413 BUGFIX: Don't reannounce before interface changes are applied (glassez) #24447 BUGFIX: Use Latin script for Bosnian locale name (Andy Ye) #24342 WEBUI: Fix performance of global checkbox toggling (tehcneko) #24316 WEBUI: Fix Safari transfer list header misalignment (Piccirello) #24377 WEBUI: Fix error when submitting magnet before metadata loads (Piccirello) #24378 WEBUI: Use correct row id when updating Rss Downloader feed selection (Chocobo1) #24402 WEBUI: Use SameSite=Lax for session cookie to fix cross-site login (Piccirello) #24422 WEBUI: Bring back properties panel expand/collapse button (vafada) #24430 WEBAPI: Only use X-Forwarded-Host header when reverse proxy support is enabled (Chocobo1) #24457 RSSS: Fix "RSS Smart Episode Filter" RegEx (nathanon-akk, glassez) #24398 RSS: Fix previously matched episode format (glassez) #24452 WINDOWS: Fix Python fallback search path (TurboTheTurtle) #24325 WINDOWS: NSIS: Allow to install x64 binary on ARM64 (Chocobo1) #24358 Download: qBittorrent 5.2.2 | 41.1 MB (Open Source) Download: qBittorrent 64-bit installer (qt6) | 43.6 MB Links: qBittorrent Home page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Weechat. https://weechat.org/
    • they should stop making bad games that no one asked for
  • Recent Achievements

    • Veteran
      branfont went up a rank
      Veteran
    • Reacting Well
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      Cosminus earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Year In
      ThatGuyOnline earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Jeroen Wilms earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      485
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      184
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      126
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      87
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!