Sandy Hook may have been planned along with the Aurora Batman shooting


Recommended Posts

there are tons of incidents where 10+ people died at once in some tradgic incident like this? wow, would love to see this.... the problem is news is too fast now days and reporters take ANY piece of story to make something..... thats why the story kept changing so fast.. everyone had a story, even people that wern't involved directly had a story without knowing true information.... same thing happened on sept 11th..... people that wernt there strangely "Saw" something... and no you can't believe kids, a lot of them have great imaginations and like to tell stories... on the news that day there was a kid interviewed that said the shooter was shooting in his room, and turned out there was never anything happening in that room... another kid said the guy was throwing "bombs".. no bombs found... "things where blowing up" once again... no bombs... kids imagination and interpertation of what happened... kids will fill in the blanks it asked about something they didn't know everything about.. it happens all the time

YES. Chicago there are almost 500 murders this year and a few have had 6-10 in a day. As far as the kid, there is video of them chasing someone into the woods. Where is the video or report of the bombs? And I can understand both of those. If a kid is hiding and hears LOUD gun shots, how do they know f it's in their class or not? Or the difference between that and a bomb? Are they war vets?

That is different than seeing a man on the floor in handcuffs. The police saw two men running towards him and says so on the scanner. So he is lying too? We can't trust his judgement?

Edit: My damn wireless keyboard is acting up. SMH

That is pretty messed up! Is there an explanation for this? Maybe he is a sociopath?!

Or maybe his 6 year old daughter just got murdered and his head really isn't working properly at the moment... I dunno tho, maybe the batman conspiracy is real.

How idiotic can people be?

Yeah but he used the rifle to kill the kids right? But it was found in the car. People think this is a damn game.

so you are going by a video of a guy that is under a low of stress talking, wow no one ever messes up facts in those situations right?... never... heck he might not of even been there for a lot of stuff and just got information from different sources... that happens a LOT in criminology, the problem is people shouldn't talk or hold press conferences UNTIL everyone has the facts straight or people twist everything that is accidently said wrong...

I mean comon first it was two people went in and one was deatained... then it was one... then his mom worked there... then she didnt.... then his girlfriend died at the house... then it was his grandma... then it was his mom... then he had 3 guns... then 2... then all hand guns... then 2 hand guns and a rifel... then they where stolen... then registered to his mom... then turned out the person detained was his brother in another state and had no idea what happened at first..... then the names where wrong..... then the number killed was wrong multiple times all "confirmed" every time....

honestly no one should say a thing until an official report is done... until then its all what ever someone heard or said reported...

YES. Chicago there are almost 500 murders this year and a few have had 6-10 in a day. As far as the kid, there is video of them casing someone into the woods.Where is the vdeo or report of the bombs? And I can understand both of those. If a kid is hiding and hears LOUD gun shots, how do they know f it's in their class or not? Or the difference between that and a bomb? Are they war vets?

That is different than seeing a man on the floor in handcuffs. The police saw two men running towards him and says so on the scanner. So he is lying too? We can't trust his judgement?

6-10 a day by the same person at the same time by the same person? 500 murders in a city is nothing.... there was 12,664 murders alone last year in large cities.. look up the FBI crime index statistics...

and what you hear on a police scanner doesn't necesseraily mean what the public thinks it does... it could of been teachers running, or anyone else you have no idea what was going on when something was reported

YES. Chicago there are almost 500 murders this year and a few have had 6-10 in a day. As far as the kid, there is video of them casing someone into the woods.Where is the vdeo or report of the bombs? And I can understand both of those. If a kid is hiding and hears LOUD gun shots, how do they know f it's in their class or not? Or the difference between that and a bomb? Are they war vets?

That is different than seeing a man on the floor in handcuffs. The police saw two men running towards him and says so on the scanner. So he is lying too? We can't trust his judgement?

People might take you more seriously if you could string a complete, coherent thought together and communicate it effectively. Seriously, read what you wrote to yourself, out loud. You sound like a raving lunatic.

  • Like 3

How so? If people really care about these kids like they say they do, why not explore all angles? What happened to the other two people that were arrested? What abot "End the life of Adam"?

What other two people were arrested? If your source is a news report - well, there was a huge article out on how so much of this event was wrong on news. News stations openly admitted that with today's technology of instant, world-wide information, that they are in constant competition to get the latest angle out first...WITHOUT ANY VALIDATION. They hear a rumor and go with it without verifying the source.

I didn't see a single person in handcuffs during all of this except his brother, who was only brought in for questioning.

How so? If people really care about these kids like they say they do, why not explore all angles? What happened to the other two people that were arrested? What abot "End the life of Adam"?

that's not even the same voice someone did a voice over on that thing to put that in, and all police are trained to talk clearly and not quietly into their radios... that one part compared to the rest is an obvious fake

People might take you more seriously if you could string a complete, coherent thought together and communicate it effectively. Seriously, read what you wrote to yourself, out loud. You sound like a raving lunatic.

I'm not worried if you take me seriously or not. I'm not here to please you. If you can't contribute, don't talk to me. Seriously.

that's not even the same voice someone did a voice over on that thing to put that in, and all police are trained to talk clearly and not quietly into their radios... that one part compared to the rest is an obvious fake

Fake? How so? And have you ever heard a police radio? So if that one part is a fake, what about the part where the cop says he see's two people running towads him and "This is it!".Then whe he goes on to say he has one "proned out". Is that fake too?

Fake? How so? And have you ever heard a police radio? So if that one part is a fake, what about the part where the cop says he see's two people running towads him and "This is it!".Then whe he goes on to say he has one "proned out". Is that fake too?

Hi, I have a criminology degree and have worked with police and other law encforcement officers in the past. nice to meet you.....

Like I said you have NO idea what they where talking about, you don't have video, saying two people running is nothing, it could of been anyone trying to get away, teachers, staff, other people you have no idea... and this is it also means well nothing, he could of saw someone that was dead and said that when they found the crime scene... you don't know, you wernt there to see it... and proned out? ok so someone is face down, so what? you still did not see what was going on!

police aren't just reporting on the radio what suspects are doing, but anything they think someone should be aware of

so you are going by a video of a guy that is under a low of stress talking, wow no one ever messes up facts in those situations right?... never... heck he might not of even been there for a lot of stuff and just got information from different sources... that happens a LOT in criminology, the problem is people shouldn't talk or hold press conferences UNTIL everyone has the facts straight or people twist everything that is accidently said wrong...

I mean comon first it was two people went in and one was deatained... then it was one... then his mom worked there... then she didnt.... then his girlfriend died at the house... then it was his grandma... then it was his mom... then he had 3 guns... then 2... then all hand guns... then 2 hand guns and a rifel... then they where stolen... then registered to his mom... then turned out the person detained was his brother in another state and had no idea what happened at first..... then the names where wrong..... then the number killed was wrong multiple times all "confirmed" every time....

honestly no one should say a thing until an official report is done... until then its all what ever someone heard or said reported...

6-10 a day by the same person at the same time by the same person? 500 murders in a city is nothing.... there was 12,664 murders alone last year in large cities.. look up the FBI crime index statistics...

and what you hear on a police scanner doesn't necesseraily mean what the public thinks it does... it could of been teachers running, or anyone else you have no idea what was going on when something was reported

As far as the misinformation from multiple sources, yes that happens quite a bit. Difference is, if we are talking about fixing these issues, we need to actually talk about it. I don't see a single report of what you are talking about as far as the mixups go. I see a report about them detaining one person in the woods, and a report about another near the school. The kid said he saw someone in handcuffs on the floor, the officer said he had someone proned out. A teacher said she saw two shadows running away from the school the cop on the radio says he see's two people running toward him.

I'm not going off hunches, these are things that are being reported by more than one person at more than one time. I'm not here to play conspiracy games. It is what it is and unfortunately most of Neowin is more concerned with personal attacks rather than actually having a discussion. So what more can I say or do? It's pretty pointless, but entertaining none the less.

Hi, I have a criminology degree and have worked with police and other law encforcement officers in the past. nice to meet you.....

Like I said you have NO idea what they where talking about, you don't have video, saying two people running is nothing, it could of been anyone trying to get away, teachers, staff, other people you have no idea... and this is it also means well nothing, he could of saw someone that was dead and said that when they found the crime scene... you don't know, you wernt there to see it... and proned out? ok so someone is face down, so what? you still did not see what was going on!

police aren't just reporting on the radio what suspects are doing, but anything they think someone should be aware of

So having a criminology degree makes you a top expert in the field? You are right about one thing tho, I was not there, but neither were you. So I will take the work of a student who was there saying that they had someone else in handcuffs. Obviously the person should not have been there. They would have credentials if they worked for the school right?

Let me take a wild guess C-Squarez, Your a Pope Ron Paul supporter and oppose gun control. That a coincidence ?

No not really. Pro Ron Paul I'm guessing is what you meant. And yes, I agree with Ron on a few things but I have never voted for him. If he were an actual contender I would tho. Legalize marijuana since it has no damaging effects on anyone ever in the history of ever. That solves a few problems. End the FED, that doesn't need to be explained. And as far as gun control, I really don't care. I have had the same gun for 10 years, since I was 17 and I never had a permit so how would it affect me? Gun control laws hurt those that follow them.

And understand something, we may not agree on a few things but I'm far from crazy. If I am, you must be too because not even a month and a half ago you were agreeing with everything I was saying in another topic because you hit the like button more than a few times. So if I'm irrational and crazy, you must be too.

I just find it funny. Nothing is ever fishy to some people. They lack reason which is essential to self-preservation. Whatever they are told is just that and there is nothing else to it. That's not the reality of this world and it will never be. I remember when we went into Iraq and you had people, like me, who felt it was unjustified and Saddam had no WMD's. But you had a group of people that swore he was a threat and danger and would use those WMD's on us all if we didn't take him out. They wouldn't even entertain the idea that maybe the intelligence was wrong. Here we are in 2012 and still no WMD's.

You have people that couldn't fathom that the government would kill its own people or conduct biological tests on the populace but thanks to the Freedom of Information Act we know that is NOT the case. But what do I know. I just stay away from personal attacks (most times) and deal in what I know and feel. If a few people don't like it, oh well.

  • Like 1

Legalize marijuana since it has no damaging effects on anyone ever in the history of ever.

Well that's demonstrably false by a simple search on pubmed but whatever.

I just find it funny. Nothing is ever fishy to some people. They lack reason which is essential to self-preservation. Whatever they are told is just that and there is nothing else to it. That's not the reality of this world and it will never be. I remember when we went into Iraq and you had people, like me, who felt it was unjustified and Saddam had no WMD's. But you had a group of people that swore he was a threat and danger and would use those WMD's on us all if we didn't take him out. They wouldn't even entertain the idea that maybe the intelligence was wrong. Here we are in 2012 and still no WMD's.

You have people that couldn't fathom that the government would kill its own people or conduct biological tests on the populace but thanks to the Freedom of Information Act we know that is NOT the case. But what do I know. I just stay away from personal attacks (most times) and deal in what I know and feel. If a few people don't like it, oh well.

But to make that conclusion you need evidence, Finding some inaccurate messages being sent out in a warzone isn't that.

It just all to convenient that the blame for these attacks is again put on in government people who support gun control. It is classic psychological projection and it happens every single time another shootout happens in suburban America.

So having a criminology degree makes you a top expert in the field? You are right about one thing tho, I was not there, but neither were you. So I will take the work of a student who was there saying that they had someone else in handcuffs. Obviously the person should not have been there. They would have credentials if they worked for the school right?

I'm not saying I am an expert, I am just saying that we can't know what happened, and to listen to audio and determin from that what happened won't work... and people are twisting stuff they don't know any background about.. heck they could of had someone in handcuffs THINKING someone was the one who was responsible... they could of handcuffed a teacher if they where freaking out about what happened to control them, thing is you don't know what happened... handcuffed != necessarily mean responsible... means they need to control someone for any variety of reasons...

and there could of easily been other people in the school without school credentials, almost all elmentary schools have volunteers that have background checks, but not badges or other things employees have... parents could of been there, student teachers, pre student teachers observing teachers (all uncredentialed)... it's not hard to get into a school if you have a reason to be there...

Well that's demonstrably false by a simple search on pubmed but whatever.

Not true. And I swear I'm not a weed smoker, I have before tho and there is no way to prove that to anyone but I know what i know. And more people die of peanut allergies per year than of marijuana. As a matter of fact, new studies say that weed doesn't damage brain tissue.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/21/teens-marijuana-brain-tissue-alcohol_n_2331779.html?utm_hp_ref=mostpopular

But I understand that the weak need someone to tell them what to believe. They have no power to decide or think for themselves. All I can do is provide something to think about. And it raises the question, who is crazier, me for raising the question, or those who completely ignore it and cast it to the side as the ravings of a lunatic? I mean, the world IS flat after all.

Remember prohibition? Alcohol was the worst thing to ever happen to mankind and it was outlawed. Why is it okay now? Because the government says so? The government dabbles in illegal drugs too, look up project bluebird and no, it's not a conspiracy.

Or maybe his 6 year old daughter just got murdered and his head really isn't working properly at the moment... I dunno tho, maybe the batman conspiracy is real.

How idiotic can people be?

Have you not encountered loss before?

I'm not saying I am an expert, I am just saying that we can't know what happened, and to listen to audio and determin from that what happened won't work... and people are twisting stuff they don't know any background about.. heck they could of had someone in handcuffs THINKING someone was the one who was responsible... they could of handcuffed a teacher if they where freaking out about what happened to control them, thing is you don't know what happened... handcuffed != necessarily mean responsible... means they need to control someone for any variety of reasons...

and there could of easily been other people in the school without school credentials, almost all elmentary schools have volunteers that have background checks, but not badges or other things employees have... parents could of been there, student teachers, pre student teachers observing teachers (all uncredentialed)... it's not hard to get into a school if you have a reason to be there...

Completely agree. Problem is, most people in here act as if it just never could happen. I never said they were the ones responsible (that I can recall). I said that two more people were said to be seen and then detained. I was met with wild out bursts that I'm a fool, don't know what I'm talking about and that it's all crazy talk. They could have been detained for any number of reasons. My question is WHY were they detained and why haven't we heard anything about it?

As far as the police scanner being fake, if someone were to come in and say that the first responders at the Batman shooting faked the scanner chatter how viciously would you attack them? If there was audio saying that the perp had orange hair and was shooting innocent people, and they said "Fake! The government faked that just so they could frame him!!" How far would you go with your attacks? But it's okay to claim that the part where they say "End the life of Adam." was faked, right?

And as far as getting into schools without any hassle, I experience it every day. My girlfriend has kids and we go to their elementary school to drop things off and it's like we can walk in and out with the kids with no issue. I guess it helps tho that I live in an upper class neighborhood I guess they don't care.

Not true. And I swear I'm not a weed smoker, I have before tho and there is no way to prove that to anyone but I know what i know. And more people die of peanut allergies per year than of marijuana. As a matter of fact, new studies say that weed doesn't damage brain tissue.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/12/21/teens-marijuana-brain-tissue-alcohol_n_2331779.html?utm_hp_ref=mostpopular

http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2516340/

Their are mountains of peer reviewed articles on its negative effects

How the hell does this go off topic?? Neowin home of the expert fools.. Degrees doesnt prove anything. I know plenty of people who have them... They are usually the ones who I find completely dumb!

  • Like 1

http://www.ncbi.nlm....les/PMC2516340/

Their are mountains of peer reviewed articles on its negative effects

Ever hear of Dr. Max Gerson? He cured cancer. And he has a bunch of clinics that have helped people, at a cost, cure their cancer. Dr. Gerson was exposed tho. It was said that the people who went there and were cured would have been cured anyway because their cancer was just not that bad. There is a movie on Netflix about it.

I say that to say this, who says those people wouldn't have gotten cancer anyway? Even tho the study uses logistic regression and is banking on what ifs. From what I did grasp of that, they were saying that marijuana is more dangerous than cigarettes but also said that non carcinogenics were found in the properties of marijuana which is confusing. Now I'm not the smartest guy so forgive me but what I do know is this. According to the CDC worldwide, tobacco use causes more than 5 million deaths per year.

http://www.cdc.gov/tobacco/data_statistics/fact_sheets/fast_facts/

And as of 2009 marijuana has killed 0.

http://www.drugwarfacts.org/cms/Causes_of_Death

So going by those numbers, I would say that a 8% increase in a chance for lung cancer by using a substance that is linked to 0 deaths per year is a better deal than smoking a cigarette which is linked to 5 million.

How the hell does this go off topic?? Neowin home of the expert fools.. Degrees doesnt prove anything. I know plenty of people who have them... They are usually the ones who I find completely dumb!

Hey, people with degrees work for me! I don't have one but that's besides the point. I know a lot of people with degrees that work their asses off and make a third of what I make.

Completely agree. Problem is, most people in here act as if it just never could happen. I never said they were the ones responsible (that I can recall). I said that two more people were said to be seen and then detained. I was met with wild out bursts that I'm a fool, don't know what I'm talking about and that it's all crazy talk. They could have been detained for any number of reasons. My question is WHY were they detained and why haven't we heard anything about it?

As far as the police scanner being fake, if someone were to come in and say that the first responders at the Batman shooting faked the scanner chatter how viciously would you attack them? If there was audio saying that the perp had orange hair and was shooting innocent people, and they said "Fake! The government faked that just so they could frame him!!" How far would you go with your attacks? But it's okay to claim that the part where they say "End the life of Adam." was faked, right?

And as far as getting into schools without any hassle, I experience it every day. My girlfriend has kids and we go to their elementary school to drop things off and it's like we can walk in and out with the kids with no issue. I guess it helps tho that I live in an upper class neighborhood I guess they don't care.

how do you know for 100% sure it said "end the life of adam"? just because someone said thats what they heard, you can now hear it yourself, the mind can trick you into thinking what you heard... you could of heard a part of a word or words that went into a larger sentence... police don't generally talk that quiet on a radio, the radio came on for who knows what reason, but it was obviously mid sentance when it did and went off wen the guy was still talking..

schools around me you can't get into the building without being buzzed in, they put those on after columbine, and we live in a relatively rich area too. we use to be able to just walk into a school before that, after that parents freaked out and where sure if we didn't do that it would happen here too... so they put the systems in...

and why was someone detained? we may never know, if someone was detained just for safety reasons, it probably wont even make it into a police report... sometimes in protests where police feel threatened they zip tie cuff anyone that is around until they find out what is going on, but they don't make a report on who was cuffed... only the main people make it in and why... it's just too much work sometimes to report on everything.

I find it pretty sad and pathetic that someone would take such a horrific tragedy, and try to turn into one of their completely moronic conspiracy theories.

They should be ashamed of themselves. :(

  • Like 3
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Go for a Echo Dot or Pop instead. These Echo shows just advertise to you.
    • NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 by Razvan Serea NetSpeedTray is a lightweight, open-source Windows network monitor that shows live upload and download speeds directly on the Taskbar. Designed for efficiency, it quietly sits in the system tray, conserving CPU and battery with dynamic updates. It blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11, adapts to light/dark themes, and auto-positions to avoid overlaps. Features include accurate interface detection, customizable display, optional mini-graph, color coding, granular font and unit control, detailed per-interface history graphs, safe data management, and easy CSV export—bringing the network monitoring Windows forgot. NetSpeedTray key features: Lightweight & Efficient Runs quietly in your system tray without consuming resources. Features a "Dynamic Update Rate" that lowers refresh frequency when the network is idle to save CPU and battery life. Native Look & Feel Blends seamlessly with Windows 10/11 UI. Smart detection for light and dark taskbar themes ensures text is always visible. Intelligent & Adaptive Positioning Automatically finds empty space next to your system tray and shifts to make room for new icons, preventing overlaps. Seamless OS Integration Behaves like a native Windows component. Hides instantly with auto-hiding taskbar Hides when a fullscreen app is active Smart Network Monitoring Accurate by Default: Auto mode identifies your main internet connection and ignores noise from VPNs or virtual adapters. Easy Interface Selection: Switch effortlessly between Auto, All, or Selected network interfaces via intuitive radio buttons. Total Visual Customization Free Move Mode: Unlock and place the widget anywhere on your screen. Optional Mini-Graph: Real-time graph of recent network activity with adjustable opacity. Color Coding: Customize colors and speed thresholds to quickly see network status. Granular Display Control Text & Font: Adjust font family, size, weight, and alignment. Units: Automatic (B/s, KB/s, MB/s) or fixed Mbps display. Precision: Set decimal places and always show them for uniform appearance. Detailed & Intelligent History Graph Smart Scale: Logarithmic scale shows low-level traffic and large spikes clearly. Per-Interface Filtering: View speed history for specific adapters (Wi-Fi, Ethernet, VPN). Safe & Efficient Data Management: Adjustable retention, automatic cleanup, optimized database. Easy Data Export: Export raw data to .csv or save high-quality graphs for reports. NetSpeedTray v1.3.3: The Updater Fix A stabilization release that repairs a critical regression in v1.3.2: the app shipped without OpenSSL, which silently broke every HTTPS request — including the built-in update checker (the "Could not check for updates" error many of you hit). This release restores it, hardens the build so it can't happen again, and fixes a startup crash plus four other reported bugs. Changes: Fixed update checking — Resolved a critical issue that prevented the app from checking for updates ("Could not check for updates"). Fixed startup crash with Auto-Cycling — The app no longer crashes on launch after enabling Cycle display mode. Fixed incorrect network speeds on 10GbE adapters — Multi-gigabit network cards now display speeds correctly instead of being stuck at 0. Improved color coding — Default color is shown when idle, and color/threshold changes now apply immediately without restarting. Fullscreen visibility fix — The widget now correctly stays visible over fullscreen apps when Keep Visible is enabled. Improved AMD Ryzen temperature detection — More reliable CPU temperature monitoring for Ryzen processors. Cleaner upgrades — Installer now removes outdated application files during upgrades, preventing DLL/version conflicts while preserving user settings. Improved stability — Fixed potential DLL loading issues by excluding critical OpenSSL and NumPy components from UPX compression. Better settings window — Scrollbars removed and layout improved for a cleaner experience. Localization improvements — Updated translations and completed missing UI text across all supported languages. More reliable releases — Added regression tests covering recent critical fixes, bringing the test suite to 196 passing tests. [full release notes] Download: NetSpeedTray 1.3.3 | 87.9 MB (Open Source) Download: NetSpeedTray Portable | 101.0 MB View: NetSpeedTray Home Page | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • Why Delta Chat is the best decentralized messenger you have probably never tried by Paul Hill There is no shortage of messaging apps out there; we have WhatsApp, Messenger, and Telegram, just to name a few. While Meta has taken steps to incorporate encryption into Messenger and WhatsApp, they still leave a lot to be desired. If you are in the market for a messaging app that promotes security, privacy, and optional anonymity, you'll want to read what I have to say about Delta Chat. For those not familiar with Delta Chat, rather than relying on centralized servers as you do with Facebook Messenger, it relies on email. Essentially, it is a chat interface that feels like a messaging app, but secretly in the background, it is firing off emails. In the past, you used to have to sign in with your email account. When you sent messages to people, it would just be sending encrypted messages to their inbox, which their Delta Chat client would decrypt. When I first learned about Delta Chat, it required users to sign in with an email account, but I was pleasantly surprised upon trying it in 2026 that this is no longer a requirement, or the preferred method was to use the app. Recently, I’ve tried UAD-ng on my old Nokia 3.4 to disable most of the Google apps because the bootloader is locked, and this is the next best option. While finding replacement apps in F-Droid, I came across Delta Chat again, and it has undergone quite a big change since I last used it, with its new chatmail relays, which no longer require you to sign in to your own email account, providing anonymity, and they offer greater security. Android and Desktop Delta Chat apps. Not only does it run on my de-googled phone, but it also works on desktop computers and iOS, making it truly ubiquitous. For me, Delta Chat is a wonderful alternative messenger because it gives you more control. It supports switching between different profiles, which you can set up super quickly; you don’t register a username, you don’t register a password. The only thing you do have is a random string email address on a chatmail relay (which you don’t have to memorize). To maintain access to your profile, you just need to add a second device to your account via QR code or make a backup of your account, which you can restore later. Fail to do these, your account is gone - as it should be if you don’t want to leave accounts that could get hacked later on. My decision to block Google stuff on my Nokia was done for practical reasons; the device sucked when it launched, and it sucks even more now. The nice thing about F-Droid and the apps within is that they’re usually lightweight, free of bloat, and work well on that device. What was inconvenient for me was that it was hard to send messages from that device, say if I wanted to copy a code over to my main phone or send family members a link from that device. That’s when I decided to look at the available chat apps and saw Delta Chat. Another nice thing about Delta Chat is its notifications. Some messaging apps rely on Google’s ecosystem for notification transport on Android; however, with Delta Chat, it can use Google’s solutions if you have Play Services or MicroG installed. Otherwise, it is able to keep a background connection to the chatmail relay server so that you can get notified when you receive a message. As free software, the code of Delta Chat is open for all who want to take it and build upon it. In the future, if the developers of Delta Chat make a catastrophically bad decision and take the app in an undesirable direction, users can take the code and fork the project. This contrasts with closed-source apps from corporations that can take their products in any direction they like. By relying on free software instead of closed-source programs, you actually control your computing. I’ve spoken at length about how running this type of software is like owning your own home rather than renting it. The same applies here; if you use Delta Chat, you don’t need to worry about it going away in the future. Whether it is Telegram, WhatsApp, or Messenger, you are required to register a username and password to use these services. A major flaw in this design is that anyone can try various passwords and potentially break into your account with your complete chat history intact. Sure, there is encryption in Messenger, where you need a second PIN and two-factor authentication in Telegram, but breaches happen all the time. Unlike before, when you used to sign in to your email account to send and receive messages, the primary way to do it now is to create an account on a chatmail relay. The resulting email address is a random string followed by the name of the relay you pick. This means you can start and begin adding contacts Without a username and password, you either need to ensure you have a backup or at least one device running your Delta Chat profile. The primary way to log in on another device is to go to the settings and add a second device. Then, you’ll just scan a QR code with your new device, and it’ll log in to your account and sync all your chat history and contacts. To end users, Delta Chat just looks like any instant messenger; however, it is really sending your messages as encrypted emails to your contact. This is pretty cool from a censorship perspective, as it makes the service more difficult to block. Previously, the main way to use the app was by logging in with email, but nowadays, it’s recommended that you use chatmail relays. Chatmail relays temporarily hold messages in case your device is offline. They are cheap, simple servers that don’t store data as group states. Other information, like your name and avatar, only exists on your device and the devices of those you share your contact information with. The relays are also decentralized and operated by various groups and individuals. It is even possible to set up your own chatmail relay, but most people will want to use one hosted elsewhere. To keep your messages secure, Delta Chat uses a secure subset of the OpenPGP standard that gives you automatic end-to-end encryption. It also uses Secure-Join to exchange encryption setup information through QR-code scanning or invite links. Autocrypt is also used to automatically establish end-to-end encryption between contacts and all members of group chat, but sometime this year Autocrypt v2 will be rolled out, bringing post-quantum resistant encryption and forward secrecy. The Delta Chat FAQ is an interesting read that explains many more details about the app. Credit: Pexels Delta Chat is unique among messaging apps because it is built on email, a technology that’s decades old and isn’t going anywhere soon. What’s more is that email is not centralized either, so it’s far more difficult for any authoritarian regime to disrupt the Delta Chat app. I haven’t spoken too much about features yet, so I will do that now. Delta Chat allows you to do one-on-one chats, group chats, and create channels. It also supports file sharing and making audio and video calls when chatting one-to-one, but it’s not available for group chats right now. At the time of writing, the calling functionality is disabled and can be enabled in Settings > Advanced > Debug Calls. I have used the video calling feature, and the quality is excellent. It works over WebRTC, another open standard. The app also lets you send voice notes, enables disappearing messages, and has its own app ecosystem. I did try playing chess one time there, but it was a bit spotty; though, we did manage to complete the game with a victory for me. To add people to Delta Chat, you can either give them your Delta Chat link or your QR code to scan. These are the only ways to add users, so you won't have any spam bots bothering you. If the people you want to chat with don't have the app yet, just send them your link, and it will take them to a webpage where they can install the app and then add you. It's really quick for them to install it and get started, which is nice. Credit: Microsoft. The Majorana 2 quantum chip unveiled in 2026. I do not think quantum computers are too far out now, and I do hope that Delta Chat is able to push out Autocrypt v2 sooner, rather than later, so bad actors do not attempt to collect encrypted communications and then decrypt them in the future using quantum computers. By getting people’s messages post-quantum-safe now, users won’t have to worry when quantum computers start cracking legacy encryption. Overall, I would recommend this app to people who are already past WhatsApp and Messenger and have perhaps begun using apps like Telegram or Session. It shares a lot of characteristics with these apps and goes a lot further than Telegram in terms of security. By being based on email, it is also resistant to censorship, and the lack of a username and password makes you anonymous (if you want to be) and safe from brute force password cracking attempts. Let me know in the comments if you’ve tried Delta Chat recently. Do you think it's a good bulwark against governments that are tightening their grip on the internet?
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • First Post
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      OffsetAbs earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      474
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      220
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      156
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!