Recommended Posts

It seems to me that some people are wrongly associating the abbreviation "UFO" with an alien spacecraft. If it's an object in the sky that's unidentified, then it's an unidentified flying object (UFO). It could be a military plane, a weather balloon, or an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV).

As for the picture and video, it's hard to tell if the object is outside of the plane (or merely a reflection of something inside the plane). I don't think it's an alien spacecraft. To me, it doesn't make sense for an advanced alien race to visit Earth. What would they be doing that they can't do from a distance (e.g. high Earth orbit)?

  • Like 1

According to most skeptics, if something is too clear, it's Photoshop. If it's too blurry, they want it more clear. No amount of evidence will ever convince someone that doesn't want to believe that aliens exist. My personal opinion, with the literally billions of galaxies with planets, it's impossible, mathematically for us to be alone. If we ARE an accident, with the age of the universe, another one happened before? us & since us. But if we aren't an accident, thus created, why not others?

Hey look a UFO!

3d4bf11554083a54.jpg

It's like when you are browsing for porn, anything with the words "Homemade sex tape" usually means it will have THE worst framerate and quality of any video you've seen on the internet. It looks like most homemade sex tapes are being recorded on a Intel PII 333 with a webcam from 1997.

According to most skeptics, if something is too clear, it's Photoshop. If it's too blurry, they want it more clear. No amount of evidence will ever convince someone that doesn't want to believe that aliens exist. My personal opinion, with the literally billions of galaxies with planets, it's impossible, mathematically for us to be alone. If we ARE an accident, with the age of the universe, another one happened before? us & since us. But if we aren't an accident, thus created, why not others?

This is overreaching until we have a theory for the origin of life its all just speculation, Sure id bet 5$ on there being other life in the galaxy but its worse than doing statistics on the probability of intelligent life on planets when you've got a sample size of 1.

Call me back when you have a corpse or part of one that we can do dna analysis on or part of the ship, That's not too much to ask for.

You know why people say "fake"? Because they usually fugging are! UFOlogists have an incredibly shabby record when it comes to honesty.

Doesn't it ever occur to people who believe in UFOs, alien spacecraft, that considering that there are people who dedicate a lot of their time watching the skies with quality equipment the best we ever get blurring photos and shakey video? Why haven't any of the dedicated UFOlogists produced anything better? Perhaps because there is nothing of note to film? Hmm?

That is the best quality UFO image I have every seen, and it is a fake. It was done by Michael Shermer to illustrate how easy it is to make UFO images. He threw a hub cap off a hill and photoed it.

First off, Michael Shermer is a complete, know-nothing idiot.

Hubcap photos have been done many decades ago -- at least since the 1950's.

Secondly, just because some people have faked so-called UFOs, proves nothing.

There have been many instances of quackery by doctors.

Does this mean no one should trust any doctor ?

Because sometimes cancer is misdiagnosed, does that mean we should just ignore it ?

Hubcaps do not glow brightly in the dark, hover, suddenly accelerate straight up, cause electrical failures when close by, nor do they leave detectable radiation burns on the ground and landing marks.

You also do not realize that our wonderful 'governments' have deliberately created UFO hoaxes precisely to cause UFO reports and witnesses to be discredited.

This is called Disinformation.

If you had done any research, you'd know that many UFO photos and videos have in fact be stolen, confiscated by the Air Force, or other unknown agents, from those who photographed the UFO. And the witnesses have been threatened. These photos may just be the 'clear', detailed images you expect to see.

They would not be doing this, if there was simply nothing significant behind UFOs.

Because something can be faked, is not proof that every event is fake.

  • Like 2

Because something can be faked, is not proof that every event is fake.

And a photo or video that could be faked is not sufficient evidence to prove that these objects exist never mind that they are alien in origin.

  • Like 1

According to most skeptics, if something is too clear, it's Photoshop. If it's too blurry, they want it more clear. No amount of evidence will ever convince someone that doesn't want to believe that aliens exist. My personal opinion, with the literally billions of galaxies with planets, it's impossible, mathematically for us to be alone. If we ARE an accident, with the age of the universe, another one happened before? us & since us. But if we aren't an accident, thus created, why not others?

Of course we're not alone. but we're also not being visited by aliens

firstly we're not interesting enough to visit, secondly if aliens spent the enormous resources it would take to travel across the galaxy to get to us, it wouldn't be to passively watch us or to be friends with us, it would be tor ape our planet of resources. And if they where magically friendly aliens willing to spend a whole civilizations worth of resources epxloring space, they A: wouldn't stay hidden or B: would have advanced enough technology to not be detected and observe us from afar undetected.

Alien UFO's just isn't a likely scenario even if you stretch imagination to the limits. It's a fantasy and dream. but lets face it, even when we manage to make usable "hyperdrives", we're not leaving SOL to explorer and have fun, we're leaving to settle on new planets for resources and to make sure mankind will survive when the sun blows up or a gamma burst crispy fried our solar system or any other extinction level event that will hit us. We're not going out there to play friendly with the natives and hand out thanksgiving turkey.

First off, Michael Shermer is a complete, know-nothing idiot.

Really? Oh, because he is educated and destroys all this conspiracy garbage he's a "know-nothing idiot"? Typical. You know the truth and we're all just sheep right?

I doubt you've read any of his books, any of his articles, and spend exactly 0% of your time watching any of his lectures.

Im a skeptic for a reason, I need good credible proof or at least a clear logical explanation before Ill believe in such visitors are not from this planet.To say there are other planets with life on is credible but to say they have either the technology some people assume or the will to travel to such a backwards and war driven populace is not convincing in the least.

Even we send remote devices to other planets to learn about the biology and physics behind them but we clearly mark where the devices are from, neither do we hide their presence.Do you not think its a good assumption other similar civilizations would do the same?

First off, Michael Shermer is a complete, know-nothing idiot.

Hubcap photos have been done many decades ago -- at least since the 1950's.

Secondly, just because some people have faked so-called UFOs, proves nothing.

There have been many instances of quackery by doctors.

Does this mean no one should trust any doctor ?

Because sometimes cancer is misdiagnosed, does that mean we should just ignore it ?

Hubcaps do not glow brightly in the dark, hover, suddenly accelerate straight up, cause electrical failures when close by, nor do they leave detectable radiation burns on the ground and landing marks.

You also do not realize that our wonderful 'governments' have deliberately created UFO hoaxes precisely to cause UFO reports and witnesses to be discredited.

This is called Disinformation.

If you had done any research, you'd know that many UFO photos and videos have in fact be stolen, confiscated by the Air Force, or other unknown agents, from those who photographed the UFO. And the witnesses have been threatened. These photos may just be the 'clear', detailed images you expect to see.

They would not be doing this, if there was simply nothing significant behind UFOs.

Because something can be faked, is not proof that every event is fake.

So we should believe in the existence of extraterrestrial activity, on Earth, on the basis of disinformation? That's preposterous. I firmly believe that we are not alone in the universe and I'm a huge fan of science fiction but I don't let my interests cloud my judgment.

Why should I believe that a blurry object in a photo is an alien spacecraft? The blurry photo itself isn't verifiable evidence. I mean, you'd think people would get some nice high quality images considering the quality of cameras today but no... it's either really blurry or really small. And when someone questions you about it, an answer that basically says "Oh, the good pictures have been confiscated by the government to hide the truth." seems a little too convenient.

There's a reason why only a fraction of a tiny portion of the civilized world believes in the existence of extraterrestrial activity on Earth. It has no basis in reality because as far as we know, there's no evidence to support it. You don't need an alien spacecraft to explain power outages, bursts of electromagnetic radiation, or so-called "landing marks".

As for why a sufficiently advanced alien species would even need to visit Earth like this (and leave evidence of their activity) is beyond me.

We study cucumbers, mice and put make up on chimps. Are we really in a position to question why another species is doing what they do? We are an interesting bunch and we are almost at the point where we can totally destroy our planet. Why wouldn't intelligent life want to visit? And I'm sorry but those of you skeptics in this thread that say there has been no credible evidence, I don't think you want evidence and no matter what you get it will never be good enough.

There has been more than credible UFO and alien life evidence by ex Nasa workers, pilots, military personnel so on and so forth. But they are automatically dismissed as crazy. Remember the UFO Disclosure project? Some of the most credible people that worked for the US military and Nasa came forward asking for a congressional hearing, asking to be put under oath saying that the government and Nasa has been covering up alien life and contact for years. What liar asks to be put under oath? That isn't good enough? They said that as of 2010 we have catalogued 56 alien species and some even look like us. Then the Russian Prime minister says, off the record that the amount of aliens already living among us would panic the people. Still not good enough right?

So please forgive me if I don't believe that those asking for evidence really want it. The reality speaks to the contrary. Added to that, if you don't believe in aliens, you must believe in creation. If you do believe in aliens, you must believe in creation. Why? Because as I've stated, if this all was an accident what rational person would believe, given the size and age of the universe that we were the only accident? And if we are the only ones, it was created because accidents happen more than once. A deliberate act, doesn't.

And I'm sorry but those of you skeptics in this thread that say there has been no credible evidence, I don't think you want evidence and no matter what you get it will never be good enough.

Call me back when you have a corpse or part of one that we can do dna analysis on or part of the ship, That's not too much to ask for.
So please forgive me if I don't believe that those asking for evidence really want it. The reality speaks to the contrary. Added to that, if you don't believe in aliens, you must believe in creation. If you do believe in aliens, you must believe in creation. Why? Because as I've stated, if this all was an accident what rational person would believe, given the size and age of the universe that we were the only accident? And if we are the only ones, it was created because accidents happen more than once. A deliberate act, doesn't.

We have zero evidence of alien life, A sample size of one (ourselves) and no theory of the origin of life.

Again overreaching.

Call me back when you have a corpse or part of one that we can do dna analysis on or part of the ship, That's not too much to ask for.

We have zero evidence of alien life, A sample size of one (ourselves) and no theory of the origin of life.

Again overreaching.

How do you know we don't have all that already? You are a smart person, at least a reasonable from what I've seen. Yet you haven't addressed any of the important points I brought up. Do you not believe the people that worked for the military and Nasa? I don't know what they have but they do and they say we have had alien contact for years. You can't ask me because I don't know. I'm just smart enough to listen to the people that do know or have had first hand experience.

What about Lockheed Martins Skunk Works Project? What about Ben Rich? He is the head of the program and have you seen or heard what he says about extra terrestrial life?

?Jim, we have things out in the desert that are fifty (50) years beyond what you could possibly comprehend. If you have seen it on Star Wars or Star Trek, we?ve been there done that, or decided it was not worth the effort?

(Source: direct comments by Ben Rich to Jim Goodall via telephone call at the USC medical center approximately one week before Ben passed away on January 5th 1995)

Read up on the history if you have the time. It isn't nut cases that believe in alien life. It's the most rational intelligent people in the world. Unfortunately, we are on a forum of skeptics that won't believe an alien existed even if they met one. They would doubt their own eyes. Doesn't mean it isn't real tho.

http://en.wikipedia....iki/Skunk_Works

Another great quote

?We already have the means to travel among the stars, but these technologies are locked up in black projects and it would take an act of GOD to ever get them out to benefit humanity?

(source: statement made after UCLA presentation to three Disclosure Project witnesses)

How do you know we don't have all that already?

I dont and i wont belive until its presented that or equally compelling evidance

u are a smart person, at least a reasonable from what I've seen. Yet you haven't addressed any of the important points I brought up. Do you not believe the people that worked for the military and Nasa?

No because thats an appeal to authority llogical fallicy, Just because you can find one person or ten out of all those that claim to have ever worked there does not mean you can dismiss the findings of the enitre orginisation.
What about Lockheed Martins Skunk Works Project? What about Ben Rich? He is the head of the program and have you seen or heard what he says about extra terrestrial life?

Its the same thing again people can be mistaken.

Read up on the history if you have the time. It isn't nut cases that believe in alien life. It's the most rational intelligent people in the world.

Just like the people who belive in christianity
Unfortunately, we are on a forum of skeptics that won't believe an alien existed even if they met one. They would doubt their own eyes. Doesn't mean it isn't real tho.

I told you what evidance you need, Its certnly not mkuch to ask if theyre as common as being claimed.

I dont and i wont belive until its presented that or equally compelling evidance

No because thats an appeal to authority llogical fallicy, Just because you can find one person or ten out of all those that claim to have ever worked there does not mean you can dismiss the findings of the enitre orginisation.

Its the same thing again people can be mistaken.

Just like the people who belive in christianity

I told you what evidance you need, Its certnly not mkuch to ask if theyre as common as being claimed.

Well first I'd like to say I'm glad you aren't being as snarky as you and the rest of this place has been. For some reason it seems that people can't disagree civilly.

What I will say tho is that you are free to believe what you want, that's what's great about life. You are, unfortunately taking this conversation all over the place and speaking in a roundabout way that proves nothing. The people that worked for the military and Nasa weren't janitors, they were high ranking officials and they had the clearance to know what they are talking about.

Second, Ben Rich and Skunk Works were given government grants to work on the things he talks about, again, not a janitor. He and his crew were tasked to head up special projects by the CIA, the Air Force and other government and military branches. But I understand that you would have more evidence and more authority than the people that are paid and given an unlimited budget to research and oversee these things.

But again, you are free to believe what you want. If I bring up the Russian Prime minister, your response* will be "So?? If I bring up the high ranking officials in God knows how many government and military agencies your response will be "So?" No matter what I say, the response will be "So?? So, I don't know what else to say besides the evidence is overwhelming. Well, to me at least.

Also, look up Colonel Phillip J Corso and tell me he's crazy. He said that most of the technology we use today came from the Rosewell crash. He actually oversaw the project. Why hasn't he been accused of being a liar? He's a high ranking military official and he confirms that aliens exist. Please tell me he is crazy. Even had a Dateline special about him.

C-Squarez, there is not overwhelming evidence for any of this. You still have to make a leap of faith to buy into believing any of it.

You're choosing to believe it as I have not see any evidence through which one can reason out the same conclusion you seem to have come to.

Of course that doesn't necessarily mean you are wrong.

i swear you people would ruin a kids birthday party because you would argue the air in the ballons could not really be a true form of oxygen or it's compounds needed to inflate the wall thickness of the red ones. or something f_cked up. now i remember why i come to this site, it's a train wreck. i have to look at the comments, no normal human being would ever think these up. you people are the main attraction at freak-o-rama-fest. keep it up, i'm sure there's someone out there studying this type of abnormal human behavior.

Also, look up Colonel Phillip J Corso and tell me he's crazy. He said that most of the technology we use today came from the Rosewell crash. He actually oversaw the project. Why hasn't he been accused of being a liar? He's a high ranking military official and he confirms that aliens exist. Please tell me he is crazy. Even had a Dateline special about him.

And this is different form the neurosurgeon who claims he saw the afterlife how ? He can say whatever he wants until he proves these claims his opinion is worthless.

And by prove I mean provide an alien corpse or part of a corpse or some technology/material of alien origin.

Id also like to know how this alien civilization was able to travel here from another star system literally trillions of miles yet couldn't even land on this rock without crashing.

Also, look up Colonel Phillip J Corso and tell me he's crazy. He said that most of the technology we use today came from the Rosewell crash. He actually oversaw the project. Why hasn't he been accused of being a liar? He's a high ranking military official and he confirms that aliens exist. Please tell me he is crazy. Even had a Dateline special about him.

because his claims are so ridiculous people are just ignoring him.

if you know anything about technology and development you'd see that.

Also, wouldn't the TCAS on the plane detect if an object was close to it?

I would imagine the TCAS would be enabled on an airliner flying over populated areas at night, and surely they wouldn't just ignore an object flying next to it.

On all American and Eurpoean flights TCAS is enabled all the time, it's a legal requirement for flying there. Not sure about other territories though.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • All these CEOs got the biggest boners thinking about firing employees for AI. Turned out it was just a wet dream.
    • And the fact that the majority of people from Poland are white European Christians while the people you are complaining about in post after post are not is just a coincidence... Every sentence in your post I am replying to is racist nonsense. None of it is actually based on any facts whatsoever. All immigrants are seeking a better life too. It's literally the only reason they would risk everything and leave their homes, families, and homeland. They are working and contributing to the economy too, as you even admit. They get the same benefits your partner did AND that YOU are eligible for as well. That is one of the key things of the EU and a mark of a civilization. That is the definition of a society where everyone is given a chance, treated equally and fairly, and is judged by the content of their character, not their different skin color or which version of ignorant superstitious nonsense their parents lied about as children. Racists around the world said the same things about the Irish and Jews and Poles (like your partner) and...every other immigrant movement over the centuries. What's your family's heritage, by the way? Were your ancestors lied about with racist fearmongering crapola by self-entitled locals the same way as you are now? If someone like that said the same things about all people from Poland, like your partner, would they be right? Or would you want them to judge your partner based on who they actually were, not where they just happened to come from?
    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!