Recommended Posts

It seems to me that some people are wrongly associating the abbreviation "UFO" with an alien spacecraft. If it's an object in the sky that's unidentified, then it's an unidentified flying object (UFO). It could be a military plane, a weather balloon, or an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV).

As for the picture and video, it's hard to tell if the object is outside of the plane (or merely a reflection of something inside the plane). I don't think it's an alien spacecraft. To me, it doesn't make sense for an advanced alien race to visit Earth. What would they be doing that they can't do from a distance (e.g. high Earth orbit)?

  • Like 1

According to most skeptics, if something is too clear, it's Photoshop. If it's too blurry, they want it more clear. No amount of evidence will ever convince someone that doesn't want to believe that aliens exist. My personal opinion, with the literally billions of galaxies with planets, it's impossible, mathematically for us to be alone. If we ARE an accident, with the age of the universe, another one happened before? us & since us. But if we aren't an accident, thus created, why not others?

Hey look a UFO!

3d4bf11554083a54.jpg

It's like when you are browsing for porn, anything with the words "Homemade sex tape" usually means it will have THE worst framerate and quality of any video you've seen on the internet. It looks like most homemade sex tapes are being recorded on a Intel PII 333 with a webcam from 1997.

According to most skeptics, if something is too clear, it's Photoshop. If it's too blurry, they want it more clear. No amount of evidence will ever convince someone that doesn't want to believe that aliens exist. My personal opinion, with the literally billions of galaxies with planets, it's impossible, mathematically for us to be alone. If we ARE an accident, with the age of the universe, another one happened before? us & since us. But if we aren't an accident, thus created, why not others?

This is overreaching until we have a theory for the origin of life its all just speculation, Sure id bet 5$ on there being other life in the galaxy but its worse than doing statistics on the probability of intelligent life on planets when you've got a sample size of 1.

Call me back when you have a corpse or part of one that we can do dna analysis on or part of the ship, That's not too much to ask for.

You know why people say "fake"? Because they usually fugging are! UFOlogists have an incredibly shabby record when it comes to honesty.

Doesn't it ever occur to people who believe in UFOs, alien spacecraft, that considering that there are people who dedicate a lot of their time watching the skies with quality equipment the best we ever get blurring photos and shakey video? Why haven't any of the dedicated UFOlogists produced anything better? Perhaps because there is nothing of note to film? Hmm?

That is the best quality UFO image I have every seen, and it is a fake. It was done by Michael Shermer to illustrate how easy it is to make UFO images. He threw a hub cap off a hill and photoed it.

First off, Michael Shermer is a complete, know-nothing idiot.

Hubcap photos have been done many decades ago -- at least since the 1950's.

Secondly, just because some people have faked so-called UFOs, proves nothing.

There have been many instances of quackery by doctors.

Does this mean no one should trust any doctor ?

Because sometimes cancer is misdiagnosed, does that mean we should just ignore it ?

Hubcaps do not glow brightly in the dark, hover, suddenly accelerate straight up, cause electrical failures when close by, nor do they leave detectable radiation burns on the ground and landing marks.

You also do not realize that our wonderful 'governments' have deliberately created UFO hoaxes precisely to cause UFO reports and witnesses to be discredited.

This is called Disinformation.

If you had done any research, you'd know that many UFO photos and videos have in fact be stolen, confiscated by the Air Force, or other unknown agents, from those who photographed the UFO. And the witnesses have been threatened. These photos may just be the 'clear', detailed images you expect to see.

They would not be doing this, if there was simply nothing significant behind UFOs.

Because something can be faked, is not proof that every event is fake.

  • Like 2

Because something can be faked, is not proof that every event is fake.

And a photo or video that could be faked is not sufficient evidence to prove that these objects exist never mind that they are alien in origin.

  • Like 1

According to most skeptics, if something is too clear, it's Photoshop. If it's too blurry, they want it more clear. No amount of evidence will ever convince someone that doesn't want to believe that aliens exist. My personal opinion, with the literally billions of galaxies with planets, it's impossible, mathematically for us to be alone. If we ARE an accident, with the age of the universe, another one happened before? us & since us. But if we aren't an accident, thus created, why not others?

Of course we're not alone. but we're also not being visited by aliens

firstly we're not interesting enough to visit, secondly if aliens spent the enormous resources it would take to travel across the galaxy to get to us, it wouldn't be to passively watch us or to be friends with us, it would be tor ape our planet of resources. And if they where magically friendly aliens willing to spend a whole civilizations worth of resources epxloring space, they A: wouldn't stay hidden or B: would have advanced enough technology to not be detected and observe us from afar undetected.

Alien UFO's just isn't a likely scenario even if you stretch imagination to the limits. It's a fantasy and dream. but lets face it, even when we manage to make usable "hyperdrives", we're not leaving SOL to explorer and have fun, we're leaving to settle on new planets for resources and to make sure mankind will survive when the sun blows up or a gamma burst crispy fried our solar system or any other extinction level event that will hit us. We're not going out there to play friendly with the natives and hand out thanksgiving turkey.

First off, Michael Shermer is a complete, know-nothing idiot.

Really? Oh, because he is educated and destroys all this conspiracy garbage he's a "know-nothing idiot"? Typical. You know the truth and we're all just sheep right?

I doubt you've read any of his books, any of his articles, and spend exactly 0% of your time watching any of his lectures.

Im a skeptic for a reason, I need good credible proof or at least a clear logical explanation before Ill believe in such visitors are not from this planet.To say there are other planets with life on is credible but to say they have either the technology some people assume or the will to travel to such a backwards and war driven populace is not convincing in the least.

Even we send remote devices to other planets to learn about the biology and physics behind them but we clearly mark where the devices are from, neither do we hide their presence.Do you not think its a good assumption other similar civilizations would do the same?

First off, Michael Shermer is a complete, know-nothing idiot.

Hubcap photos have been done many decades ago -- at least since the 1950's.

Secondly, just because some people have faked so-called UFOs, proves nothing.

There have been many instances of quackery by doctors.

Does this mean no one should trust any doctor ?

Because sometimes cancer is misdiagnosed, does that mean we should just ignore it ?

Hubcaps do not glow brightly in the dark, hover, suddenly accelerate straight up, cause electrical failures when close by, nor do they leave detectable radiation burns on the ground and landing marks.

You also do not realize that our wonderful 'governments' have deliberately created UFO hoaxes precisely to cause UFO reports and witnesses to be discredited.

This is called Disinformation.

If you had done any research, you'd know that many UFO photos and videos have in fact be stolen, confiscated by the Air Force, or other unknown agents, from those who photographed the UFO. And the witnesses have been threatened. These photos may just be the 'clear', detailed images you expect to see.

They would not be doing this, if there was simply nothing significant behind UFOs.

Because something can be faked, is not proof that every event is fake.

So we should believe in the existence of extraterrestrial activity, on Earth, on the basis of disinformation? That's preposterous. I firmly believe that we are not alone in the universe and I'm a huge fan of science fiction but I don't let my interests cloud my judgment.

Why should I believe that a blurry object in a photo is an alien spacecraft? The blurry photo itself isn't verifiable evidence. I mean, you'd think people would get some nice high quality images considering the quality of cameras today but no... it's either really blurry or really small. And when someone questions you about it, an answer that basically says "Oh, the good pictures have been confiscated by the government to hide the truth." seems a little too convenient.

There's a reason why only a fraction of a tiny portion of the civilized world believes in the existence of extraterrestrial activity on Earth. It has no basis in reality because as far as we know, there's no evidence to support it. You don't need an alien spacecraft to explain power outages, bursts of electromagnetic radiation, or so-called "landing marks".

As for why a sufficiently advanced alien species would even need to visit Earth like this (and leave evidence of their activity) is beyond me.

We study cucumbers, mice and put make up on chimps. Are we really in a position to question why another species is doing what they do? We are an interesting bunch and we are almost at the point where we can totally destroy our planet. Why wouldn't intelligent life want to visit? And I'm sorry but those of you skeptics in this thread that say there has been no credible evidence, I don't think you want evidence and no matter what you get it will never be good enough.

There has been more than credible UFO and alien life evidence by ex Nasa workers, pilots, military personnel so on and so forth. But they are automatically dismissed as crazy. Remember the UFO Disclosure project? Some of the most credible people that worked for the US military and Nasa came forward asking for a congressional hearing, asking to be put under oath saying that the government and Nasa has been covering up alien life and contact for years. What liar asks to be put under oath? That isn't good enough? They said that as of 2010 we have catalogued 56 alien species and some even look like us. Then the Russian Prime minister says, off the record that the amount of aliens already living among us would panic the people. Still not good enough right?

So please forgive me if I don't believe that those asking for evidence really want it. The reality speaks to the contrary. Added to that, if you don't believe in aliens, you must believe in creation. If you do believe in aliens, you must believe in creation. Why? Because as I've stated, if this all was an accident what rational person would believe, given the size and age of the universe that we were the only accident? And if we are the only ones, it was created because accidents happen more than once. A deliberate act, doesn't.

And I'm sorry but those of you skeptics in this thread that say there has been no credible evidence, I don't think you want evidence and no matter what you get it will never be good enough.

Call me back when you have a corpse or part of one that we can do dna analysis on or part of the ship, That's not too much to ask for.
So please forgive me if I don't believe that those asking for evidence really want it. The reality speaks to the contrary. Added to that, if you don't believe in aliens, you must believe in creation. If you do believe in aliens, you must believe in creation. Why? Because as I've stated, if this all was an accident what rational person would believe, given the size and age of the universe that we were the only accident? And if we are the only ones, it was created because accidents happen more than once. A deliberate act, doesn't.

We have zero evidence of alien life, A sample size of one (ourselves) and no theory of the origin of life.

Again overreaching.

Call me back when you have a corpse or part of one that we can do dna analysis on or part of the ship, That's not too much to ask for.

We have zero evidence of alien life, A sample size of one (ourselves) and no theory of the origin of life.

Again overreaching.

How do you know we don't have all that already? You are a smart person, at least a reasonable from what I've seen. Yet you haven't addressed any of the important points I brought up. Do you not believe the people that worked for the military and Nasa? I don't know what they have but they do and they say we have had alien contact for years. You can't ask me because I don't know. I'm just smart enough to listen to the people that do know or have had first hand experience.

What about Lockheed Martins Skunk Works Project? What about Ben Rich? He is the head of the program and have you seen or heard what he says about extra terrestrial life?

?Jim, we have things out in the desert that are fifty (50) years beyond what you could possibly comprehend. If you have seen it on Star Wars or Star Trek, we?ve been there done that, or decided it was not worth the effort?

(Source: direct comments by Ben Rich to Jim Goodall via telephone call at the USC medical center approximately one week before Ben passed away on January 5th 1995)

Read up on the history if you have the time. It isn't nut cases that believe in alien life. It's the most rational intelligent people in the world. Unfortunately, we are on a forum of skeptics that won't believe an alien existed even if they met one. They would doubt their own eyes. Doesn't mean it isn't real tho.

http://en.wikipedia....iki/Skunk_Works

Another great quote

?We already have the means to travel among the stars, but these technologies are locked up in black projects and it would take an act of GOD to ever get them out to benefit humanity?

(source: statement made after UCLA presentation to three Disclosure Project witnesses)

How do you know we don't have all that already?

I dont and i wont belive until its presented that or equally compelling evidance

u are a smart person, at least a reasonable from what I've seen. Yet you haven't addressed any of the important points I brought up. Do you not believe the people that worked for the military and Nasa?

No because thats an appeal to authority llogical fallicy, Just because you can find one person or ten out of all those that claim to have ever worked there does not mean you can dismiss the findings of the enitre orginisation.
What about Lockheed Martins Skunk Works Project? What about Ben Rich? He is the head of the program and have you seen or heard what he says about extra terrestrial life?

Its the same thing again people can be mistaken.

Read up on the history if you have the time. It isn't nut cases that believe in alien life. It's the most rational intelligent people in the world.

Just like the people who belive in christianity
Unfortunately, we are on a forum of skeptics that won't believe an alien existed even if they met one. They would doubt their own eyes. Doesn't mean it isn't real tho.

I told you what evidance you need, Its certnly not mkuch to ask if theyre as common as being claimed.

I dont and i wont belive until its presented that or equally compelling evidance

No because thats an appeal to authority llogical fallicy, Just because you can find one person or ten out of all those that claim to have ever worked there does not mean you can dismiss the findings of the enitre orginisation.

Its the same thing again people can be mistaken.

Just like the people who belive in christianity

I told you what evidance you need, Its certnly not mkuch to ask if theyre as common as being claimed.

Well first I'd like to say I'm glad you aren't being as snarky as you and the rest of this place has been. For some reason it seems that people can't disagree civilly.

What I will say tho is that you are free to believe what you want, that's what's great about life. You are, unfortunately taking this conversation all over the place and speaking in a roundabout way that proves nothing. The people that worked for the military and Nasa weren't janitors, they were high ranking officials and they had the clearance to know what they are talking about.

Second, Ben Rich and Skunk Works were given government grants to work on the things he talks about, again, not a janitor. He and his crew were tasked to head up special projects by the CIA, the Air Force and other government and military branches. But I understand that you would have more evidence and more authority than the people that are paid and given an unlimited budget to research and oversee these things.

But again, you are free to believe what you want. If I bring up the Russian Prime minister, your response* will be "So?? If I bring up the high ranking officials in God knows how many government and military agencies your response will be "So?" No matter what I say, the response will be "So?? So, I don't know what else to say besides the evidence is overwhelming. Well, to me at least.

Also, look up Colonel Phillip J Corso and tell me he's crazy. He said that most of the technology we use today came from the Rosewell crash. He actually oversaw the project. Why hasn't he been accused of being a liar? He's a high ranking military official and he confirms that aliens exist. Please tell me he is crazy. Even had a Dateline special about him.

C-Squarez, there is not overwhelming evidence for any of this. You still have to make a leap of faith to buy into believing any of it.

You're choosing to believe it as I have not see any evidence through which one can reason out the same conclusion you seem to have come to.

Of course that doesn't necessarily mean you are wrong.

i swear you people would ruin a kids birthday party because you would argue the air in the ballons could not really be a true form of oxygen or it's compounds needed to inflate the wall thickness of the red ones. or something f_cked up. now i remember why i come to this site, it's a train wreck. i have to look at the comments, no normal human being would ever think these up. you people are the main attraction at freak-o-rama-fest. keep it up, i'm sure there's someone out there studying this type of abnormal human behavior.

Also, look up Colonel Phillip J Corso and tell me he's crazy. He said that most of the technology we use today came from the Rosewell crash. He actually oversaw the project. Why hasn't he been accused of being a liar? He's a high ranking military official and he confirms that aliens exist. Please tell me he is crazy. Even had a Dateline special about him.

And this is different form the neurosurgeon who claims he saw the afterlife how ? He can say whatever he wants until he proves these claims his opinion is worthless.

And by prove I mean provide an alien corpse or part of a corpse or some technology/material of alien origin.

Id also like to know how this alien civilization was able to travel here from another star system literally trillions of miles yet couldn't even land on this rock without crashing.

Also, look up Colonel Phillip J Corso and tell me he's crazy. He said that most of the technology we use today came from the Rosewell crash. He actually oversaw the project. Why hasn't he been accused of being a liar? He's a high ranking military official and he confirms that aliens exist. Please tell me he is crazy. Even had a Dateline special about him.

because his claims are so ridiculous people are just ignoring him.

if you know anything about technology and development you'd see that.

Also, wouldn't the TCAS on the plane detect if an object was close to it?

I would imagine the TCAS would be enabled on an airliner flying over populated areas at night, and surely they wouldn't just ignore an object flying next to it.

On all American and Eurpoean flights TCAS is enabled all the time, it's a legal requirement for flying there. Not sure about other territories though.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 Ergonomic Office Chair review: The Ikea of chairs by Steven Parker I've reviewed a few gaming chairs over the past three years or so and generally found them to score well in our reviews. SIHOO reached out asking if I was interested in taking a look at their flagship chair, the Doro C300 Pro V2. I never got the chance to check out its predecessor, but the V2 is described as an "Adaptive Ergonomic Chair." It became available to buy in April of this year. Let's get things rolling with a closer look at the specifications and features. Specifications Doro C300 Pro V2 Model Ergonomic Materials Mesh Back and Seat; Soft PU Coated Armrests Height adjustability 45.5 - 53 cm / 17.5" - 20.9" Seat (w+d) 52 x 43 - 47 cm / 20.5" x 16.9" - 18.5" (adjustable) Backrest 52 – 60 cm / 20.5" - 23.6" (adjustable) Lumbar support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Armrest adjustability 8D Bionic Armrests Rocking angle 105°, 120°, 135° (fixed) Neck support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Net weight 27.3 kg / 59.64 lbs Weight support 150 kg / 330 lbs Colors Black, White Warranty 5 years (upon registering) Price $499.99, $539.99 Introduction At first glance, it looks like a chair that in another life wants to be a Herman Miller; It certainly looks like my Aeron Remastered, but the Doro C300 Pro V2 has quite a few more features and costs quite a bit less. SIHOO says that it is made up of a "DynaCore" system that tracks your movement and synchronizes the headrest, backrest, lumbar support, and armrests as you shift, twist, or recline. They also say that the "SyncroFlex Backrest" molds to your spine, which kind of describes how the mesh fabric works in most ergonomic chairs, but anyway. Below are the meat and potatoes measurements for the chair. Here is the same tech sheet, but in inches. Durability I would be remiss to not talk about the various durability testing this chair underwent before coming to market, as this is claimed on the product page. First of all, the chair is BIFMA-, SGS-, and TÜV-certified. As for durability, the tests undergone were: 100,000 Castor cycles tested 120,000 Armrest cycles tested 120,000 Recline cycles tested 120,000 Gas lift cycles tested 60,000 Armrest durability cycles tested 120,000 Rotation cycles tested Nothing about weights testing, though. Now that's all disclosed, now onto my own personal findings. Assembly The Doro C300 Pro V2 came in two large boxes (1) (2), and everything was packed very well, protecting the different parts of the chair. In the box, there is a folded sheet that explains the 12 steps to assemble it; they are: Remove the bottom cover on the aluminum base; Insert the five legs into the aluminum base and use ten screws to fasten them; Insert the castors into the legs; Replace the bottom cover on the bottom of the aluminum base; Place the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder into the aluminum base; Screw the bottom part of the arm rests, taking care of the orientation using two screws on each side; Use three torx screws to fasten the footrest to the bottom of the seat; Fasten the backrest to the seat using four torx bolts; Fasten the armrests to the backrest using four Torx bolts (two on each side), taking care to note the orientation; Place the chair onto the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder; Insert the headrest into the top of the backrest; Use two torx screws to fasten the headrest to the backrest. There's also an online guide you can refer to. Carefully unpacking the two boxes took around 15 minutes because almost everything is wrapped in plastic and protective foam; the chair assembly itself took around an hour. I say in the above assembly steps to take note of the orientation, because it's not obvious which way around the bottom portion of the armrests go, and although there is an L and R on the bottom of the armrests, it also wasn't clear from the instructions which was actually left or right, facing the chair, or in the seated down orientation? Anyway, I ended up putting the bottom portions on the wrong sides, and after securing one of the armrests, I discovered that although it was on the correct side, the armrest base could rotate a full 360°, but not when bolted to the chair, so I had to remove it, rotate it, and then bolt it back on. Truly an Ikea experience! Also, to complicate things further, although all the parts are labeled from A to X (yes, that's 24 parts) unhelpfully, these letters do not appear on the parts themselves or the package with the bolts, screws, and washers. There's also a pair of protective gloves in the box, but I think they were made for much smaller hands than I have. Even my friend, who is 5.1, had difficulty putting them on. Once assembled, I needed to sit down. Anyway, as I said, it looks quite similar to my Herman Miller. And here is the back of it. If you look at the product page and on Amazon, it seems like a lot of thought has gone into the chair itself and what it's capable of, but there is no mention at all about the castors, and this is an area where I think the chair trips up quite quickly. I found it difficult to move the chair in any direction. I asked a friend who came to visit me earlier this week to test my findings, and she said that the wheels were "no good," so it definitely isn't just me. I am 6'2 myself and a big guy, I work from home and gained a few pounds from mostly staying in and the hell away from other people. However, the Doro C300 Pro V2 is rated for up to 150kg (330lbs), which in my case is used well within its max rating. Ergonomics The number of adjustments you can make, right up to setting it in nap mode — which I haven't fully tested yet — is what you'd expect from a premium chair. Yes, you can go up and down (max 7.5 cm adjustment), rock back and forth (with tilt adjustment), and lock the chair between three stages of 105°, 120°, 135°, which is not quite as flat as the AndaSeat I tested at 160°. Some thought has also gone into the "8D" armrests, too, which are cushioned but quite firm; you'll only know it if you press hard into the PU-covered tops, which give about half a centimeter, but it's enough to ensure your skin won't get awkwardly stuck to it in warmer (or sweatier) conditions. It almost feels like plastic and is very easy to keep clean. However, the armrest positions move far too easily, and I am not sure what that "elbow" function is. Maybe it is good for a short person with short arms, anyway, I never used it and kept it flat at all times. There are eight levels of adjustment for the armrests, they are: backwards, forwards, swing left/right, height up and down, tilt, and 360° rotation, which can be handy for desk clearance. As I said, the armrest pads shift far too easily, which could give off an ergonomic vibe, but who wants the armrest sliding when you are shifting weight? The height adjustability does lock into place when lifting and adjusting. Comfort This is ultimately what it boils down to at the end of the day, right? Quite a lot of reviews praise the comfort of this chair, and I don't disagree that the mesh seating is quite comfortable. I am used to the material from my daily Herman Miller. However, the backrest cannot be locked into place, and this is actually a feature; as you shift or recline yourself on the chair, the backrest moves with your body. It took some getting used to. The lumbar gives ample support, but I would have preferred an adjustable one built into the seat base, as this causes the backrest to move up and down at will. Again, as with my previous chair review, this chair is also rated for tall people, but nowhere in the product documentation does it say how tall. Being 6'2 myself, I'm happy to say that the backrest is tall and wide enough, and thought has been given to being able to adjust the neck rest, but as others have mentioned in their reviews, people as tall as 6.2ft is about the limit for the neckrest. Conclusion What I didn't like The footrest is rated for 15kg (33 lbs), which to me seems a bit light, and after looking online, it seems like a chair footrest for adults must be at least twice that rating. In all honesty, they are just hollow metal tubes, so it is not recommended to let a kid sit on them. I also feel like it doesn't really go out far enough for my height, so that kind of puts the dampener on me being able to use it regularly. I'll just have to continue to use my subwoofer as a footrest! I do not like the armrests being able to shift around as easily as they can, and they are a little too forward-positioned in the chair to comfortably sit close to my desk, because even in the lowest height position, they don't allow me to go under the desk like is possible with my Herman Miller. I also feel like this chair could have been delivered partially constructed, especially the armrests on the seat, and why the aluminum base wasn't already pre-constructed (without the castors) is baffling, considering it would have fit in one of the two boxes that way. The instructions also need to be clearer. On the pamphlet, there's an A to X listing (which is also used in the steps), but none of the physical parts use this lettering system! What I did like I'll be honest, I haven't used it for very long, just one week, and seating comfort is subjective after all! Any spills wiped straight off it, the stitching, and the lines look great, not a fray to be seen or stitch out of place. It looks kind of cool, too. My favorite feature of these seats is the nap mode. While you're not lying completely flat, it leans far back enough to make you easily doze off after a heavy gaming or working session. Overall, this chair offers plenty of comfort features. The MSRP does vary quite a bit depending on the region, at £549.99 in the UK, and €580 in Europe, and $599 before tax in the U.S. However, shipping is free, which is a bonus for such a heavy item. Is it worth it, though? At three years' warranty, I think it's a decent deal. Another firm out of Germany sent me a free replacement hydraulic gas spring for a chair that failed after almost four years, so it was well outside its two-year warranty. My advice is to always try, as you might have the same luck I did. If I could fault it at all, it would be the constant shifting of the armrests and backrest. Where to buy Although the footrest variant normally costs $539.99, it has been discounted to $469.99 on the official website in Black or White. In fact, the non-footrest variant is only $40 cheaper. On Amazon, it currently costs more at $499.99 links below. Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $469.99 (official website) Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $499.99 at Amazon US SIHOO provided a free sample without any review or pre-approval. Good to know This Amazon link is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Making US citizens pay is a prominent tool? Joke of the week…
    • Price Drop: Save 86% on Microsoft Office 2021 Professional Plus lifetime digital license by Steven Parker Today's highlighted deal comes via our Apps + Software section of the Neowin Deals store, where you can save 86% on a lifetime license to Microsoft Office 2021 for Windows. This bundle is for families and small businesses who want classic Office apps and email. It includes Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, Teams, and OneNote. A one-time purchase installed on 1 Windows PC for use at home or work. Lifetime license for MS Word, Excel, PowerPoint, Outlook, Teams, & OneNote One-time purchase installed on 1 Windows PC for use at home or work Instant Delivery & Download – access your software license keys and download links instantly Free customer service – only the best support! Microsoft Office Professional 2021 (for Windows) includes: Microsoft Office Word Microsoft Office Excel Microsoft Office PowerPoint Microsoft Office Outlook Microsoft Office Teams Microsoft Office OneNote Microsoft Office Publisher Microsoft Office Access No faffing about with subscriptions, just classic apps that don't expire. Good to Know ONE-TIME PURCHASE INSTALLED ON 1 DEVICE Redemption deadline: redeem your code within 30 days of purchase Access options: desktop Full versions No subscriptions – no monthly/annual fees Version: 2021 Updates included* *Support for this version of Office ends on Oct 13, 2026 A lifetime subscription to Microsoft Office 2021 Professional normally costs $219.99, but this deal can be yours for just $29.97, that's a saving of $190. For full terms, specifications, and license info, click the link below. Get Microsoft Office Professional 2021 for just $29.97, or learn more Although priced in U.S. dollars, this deal is available for digital purchase worldwide. Support queries If you have queries or need support for any of the Neowin Deals, please use the contact form here. Neowin Deals are managed and sold by StackCommerce who represent Neowin on an affiliate basis. Why we post these deals We post these because we earn commission on each sale so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. So for those that keep moaning and complaining, be thankful we're still online for you to even do that. Other ways to support Neowin Whitelist Neowin by not blocking our ads Create a free member account to see fewer ads Make a donation to support our day to day running costs Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: Neowin benefits from revenue of each sale made through our branded deals site powered by StackCommerce.
    • The only reason I want to know where you from is because if you are not from the U.K, then why should you care what we in the U.K do or don't do? Racist I am not, I am fed up with the amount coming over here and feel they can come over here and think we need to support them. Do you know how much it costs this country to support these people coming over here? Even when we give them a place to live it is not good enough. We had a barge that was being used to house immigrants, oh but that was not good enough. A mate said to me at the time, when he was homeless, he would have been happy to live on the barge, instead of ending up sleeping on a bench on the beach. I am not scared to say what my family heritage is, unlike you who is scared to say where they are from or where they live. Father side U.S, mother side Wales, still have family living in the U.S. A mate who sadly died a few years ago, had a load of people from different races recording in his studio, I got on with all of them. Skin colour don't bother me, where they are from don't bother me. Religion don't bother me as long as they don't push it onto me and it is not crazy stuff. I am not religious. But if you are not living in the U.K, then why should you care if we are in the E.U or not? This the problem, too many people poking their noses into where it don't belong. But you believe what you believe, if you think I am racist, then be it, I really do not care. Just grow a pair
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      206
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      macoman
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!