Windows 8 Falls Behind Even the Maligned Vista


Recommended Posts

Please be aware that my post was aimed at you as well.

Never doubted it for a second... and I agree. I shouldn't have to get drawn into a debate over metro, just for having made a post about win8 sales figures.

Pin Powershell ISE or create a shortcut for it anywhere. the difference is that win7 actually had a shortcut for it nested somewhere. The search engine won't show all the random commands/arguments that can be sent to a program.

I would like to see Microsoft just acknowledge its failure. It's painfully obvious to everyone how horrible it is.

I thought nothing could be worse then Vista and ME, but 8 proves us all wrong.

If you truly want to make an impact, you have to think with your wallet - and support your family/friends doing the same. If you buy it and then hate it, they've already won.

you never heard of fujitsu or fujitsu-siemens?

Nope. They're not a popular brand where I live. Hell, it's the first I'm hearing of their AMD tablet too.

In the States where I live, the popular brands are HP, Dell, Lenovo, and Acer.

Pin Powershell ISE or create a shortcut for it anywhere. the difference is that win7 actually had a shortcut for it nested somewhere. The search engine won't show all the random commands/arguments that can be sent to a program.

%windir%\system32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\PowerShell_ISE.exe , so not a shortcut.

%windir%\system32\WindowsPowerShell\v1.0\PowerShell_ISE.exe , so not a shortcut.

The ISE is an administrative tool so it doesn't show up in search if you have that option turned off.

1. Either turn on "Show Administrative Tools" in the Start Page settings then unpin what you don't want or

2. copy/move the shortcuts for the ISE from "\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\Start Menu\Programs\Administrative Tools" to "\ProgramData\Microsoft\Windows\Start Menu\Programs\System Tools" and you're all set.

  • Like 1

Nope. They're not a popular brand where I live. Hell, it's the first I'm hearing of their AMD tablet too.

In the States where I live, the popular brands are HP, Dell, Lenovo, and Acer.

There is more to the world than the US, Fujitsu-Siemens is very popular in Europe, especially for businesses.

If you truly want to make an impact, you have to think with your wallet - and support your family/friends doing the same. If you buy it and then hate it, they've already won.

That's the problem for Windows 8. No one is buying it. And most of those who have are cursing themselves over it. When your at a computer shop and customers are demanding that the employees wipe Windows 8 and put Windows 7 on computers and brand new laptops, that speaks volumes.

Family and friends have already made the wise decision to not buy it, and I for one can't blame them.

Personally, I hit WinKey, type what I want and get what I want.

E.g.

WinKey, type DNS, hit enter, I get a DNS console.

WinKey, type powershell ise, hit enter, I get a Powershell ISE.

WinKey, type steam, hit enter and I get my games.

It's fantastic.

Never before has Windows listened to me.

How people cannot want this? I don't know.

I know what you mean, I wish you could do that with Windows 7.

Despite all the drama over how true this article was, noone can deny Win 8 is not doing that good. Solid proof is a thread like this one, split kinda like 50/50, unlike the general positive word on Windows 7.

I tried Win 8, it wasn't faster or that much slower, it worked like Win 7 after getting rid of the new Start and replacing it with the old. There is no reason to upgrade yet, it's just a pain in the rear to set it up for getting what? The same stuff from Win 7? Aside from a true faster boot time it only wastes time. Perhaps with updates and when it has a solid line-up of must have apps stuff will change. But as many believed (I was against the thought at first), it pretty much feels like what Vista was for 7... a growing slow pain. Windows 7 is so much usable at the moment.

Despite all the drama over how true this article was, noone can deny Win 8 is not doing that good. Solid proof is a thread like this one, split kinda like 50/50, unlike the general positive word on Windows 7.

I tried Win 8, it wasn't faster or that much slower, it worked like Win 7 after getting rid of the new Start and replacing it with the old. There is no reason to upgrade yet, it's just a pain in the rear to set it up for getting what? The same stuff from Win 7? Aside from a true faster boot time it only wastes time. Perhaps with updates and when it has a solid line-up of must have apps stuff will change. But as many believed (I was against the thought at first), it pretty much feels like what Vista was for 7... a growing slow pain. Windows 7 is so much usable at the moment.

I had pretty much the same experience. I'll admit the new hybrid boot mode is pretty impressive but once I got it set up the way I liked it, by replacing the horrible RTM theme with the one from the RP, and by installing StartIsBack it was basically Windows 7 with a slight facelift. And then I got bad_pool_header bluescreens whilst trying to use vlite to slipstream some updates into a Vista deployment source for the charity I do volunteer work at. In the end I just decided it wasn't worth the hassle and went back to 7. I will probably buy a licence before the end of January and use 8 in the future but right now apart from the horrible choices made by the GUI team it just hasn't felt as stable for me for general usage.

That's the problem for Windows 8. No one is buying it. And most of those who have are cursing themselves over it. When your at a computer shop and customers are demanding that the employees wipe Windows 8 and put Windows 7 on computers and brand new laptops, that speaks volumes.

Family and friends have already made the wise decision to not buy it, and I for one can't blame them.

You keep saying no one is buying it and those that do hate it.

you're still wrong and you're still not providing any proof.

Despite all the drama over how true this article was, noone can deny Win 8 is not doing that good. Solid proof is a thread like this one, split kinda like 50/50, unlike the general positive word on Windows 7.

I tried Win 8, it wasn't faster or that much slower, it worked like Win 7 after getting rid of the new Start and replacing it with the old. There is no reason to upgrade yet, it's just a pain in the rear to set it up for getting what? The same stuff from Win 7? Aside from a true faster boot time it only wastes time. Perhaps with updates and when it has a solid line-up of must have apps stuff will change. But as many believed (I was against the thought at first), it pretty much feels like what Vista was for 7... a growing slow pain. Windows 7 is so much usable at the moment.

Well it actually is faster, but besides that, maybe if you had actually tried the new start screen and bothered to learn it (takes a whole of 5 minutes if you're a slow learner, the regular dumb users get it right away when I demonstrate it) you would have seen the advantage in a faster and more effective and better organize launcher.

Subjective opinion not objective fact. In my case it's nothing to do with being a slow learner I simply dislike it, and the same goes for a lot of people that don't like the way the start screen works. It's getting old now, there's nothing about liking the start screen that makes you smarter or superior ;)

I bought it because it was cheap 15? but i didnt install. Didnt like using it when i tested in other computers, many stupid changes that will be corrected in the next version. MS always skips 1 version like a test version. Windows 9 will be adopted just like Win7 was with Vista before.

Rightly so, it's a horrible frankenstein mish-mash of a load of ideas, a fair few ripped right from a tablet experience. Upper management must of been pushing everything through to Windows 8, I simply cannot believe the design teams (or anyone related to usability experience) were happy with it.

Removing the start button in such a hacky way was simply not the way forward and such a terrible idea for a desktop experience. You use a program (I use Startisback) and suddenly the OS becomes usable, but the unpolished tearing out of Aero, slapping in a bulky ribbon based system (yes I know it can be hidden) and then throwing in a Start Screen which feels like an app, not part of the system, says of the rest.

  • Like 2

Subjective opinion not objective fact. In my case it's nothing to do with being a slow learner I simply dislike it, and the same goes for a lot of people that don't like the way the start screen works. It's getting old now, there's nothing about liking the start screen that makes you smarter or superior ;)

one is a fact, the other... not so much. anecdotal evidence at best, to support why you think it sucks/win8 is failure.

I never said Windows 8 was a failure so quit putting words in my mouth, I was simply correcting a misconception about the views of some of the resident Microsoft shills of those of us that don't like it.

Windows 8, IMO, is a failure on so many levels. It could have been a great experience but mixing the old with the new really places it at the bottom of the OS heap.

This video is still, again, IMO, is one of the best reasons of why Windows 8 is so horrible.

http://www.cultofmac.com/207632/why-windows-8-is-one-of-the-worst-operating-systems-ever-video/

  • Like 2

Windows 8, IMO, is a failure on so many levels. It could have been a great experience but mixing the old with the new really places it at the bottom of the OS heap.

This video is still, again, IMO, is one of the best reasons of why Windows 8 is so horrible.

http://www.cultofmac...ems-ever-video/

While his presentation is horrible, he does have good points.

Honestly, everybody in the real world that I know wants the Start Menu back. Why couldn't Microsoft keep it? It was removed for a reason you say? Then how come there are so many third party start menus out there? Why couldn't Microsoft build their own INTO the OS?

Personally, I do not care about the start menu, but geez it is so irritating getting questions about it to where MS should have included it.

They also should have had the option to boot directly to the desktop. I never stick in the start screen or use the full screen apps, so it is irritating.

Yes, there are actually people that do shut their computers down, and I am constantly reminding people that their shut down button is not in the start menu / start screen anymore. They should have kept it in the Start Screen. And no you cannot just make a statement like "just press the power button or close the lid" because it is not a 100% guarantee that it will shut down. For example, my power button is still on Sleep instead of Shut Down.

MS NEEDS to have an option to disable these hot corners while in the desktop environment. I constantly hear people complain about accidentally activating them, and I did the same thing until I got Start8.

My ONLY complaint with Windows 8 is the hot corners on the desktop and not being able to boot directly to it. Why couldn't MS made a couple of check boxes in the Control Panel for us?

Look I love Windows 8. I had to reinstall my Windows partition on my Mac, and I decided to go back to Windows 7. I actually missed Windows 8 so I upgraded to it again.

However, the attitude here and in other places is very annoying. Even though I love the OS, as soon as I make my complaint about the hot corners people immediately jump down my throat saying "Oh looks like another person who never used Windows 8" or "Learn how to use your mouse" or "you suck at computers".

So we are in a age now where, even if we like a product, we cannot even say ONE BAD THING about it? Why not just get rid of movie, games, and every other review possible then?

Hey lets let NVIDIA release 100% faulty graphics cards. It is their product right, and they can do what they want. We have no right to complain about it now right?

We are consumers, yes MS can do whatever they want to an OS, but as consumers, we have the power. If nobody buys Windows 8 and the number one reason why is the start menu, I bet you MS would add it back. I do not know how else to word it but when you create a product, yes you can do whatever you want. But if people do not buy it because of things you changed, you better change back if you want to keep the business.

Subjective opinion not objective fact. In my case it's nothing to do with being a slow learner I simply dislike it, and the same goes for a lot of people that don't like the way the start screen works. It's getting old now, there's nothing about liking the start screen that makes you smarter or superior ;)

Well I wasn't replying to you, disliking it is one thing. however, the start screen is not slower or less effective than the start menu, it is in fact faster, and more efficient and far more organized.

They also should have had the option to boot directly to the desktop.

Why should they boot directly to the desktop ? when you start your computer, you're not going to have it sit on the desktop, you're going to use it for something.

for the regular and power user the start screen is the launcher, and it's far better launcher, so you click whatever app you want to start using and voila you're back on the desktop.

For some desktop users the start screen is also used as an information panel in addition to the launcher, in which case you have all the information right there on boot, and can then start into whatever app you're going to use, desktop or not.

starting to an empty passive desktop makes no sense. you'll have to open the start screen to launch most of your applications anyway. whining because it takes you a fraction of a second to click the desktop tile to get to the desktop on startup is such a ridiculous notion to start with.

  • Like 3

Why should they boot directly to the desktop ? when you start your computer, you're not going to have it sit on the desktop, you're going to use it for something.

for the regular and power user the start screen is the launcher, and it's far better launcher, so you click whatever app you want to start using and voila you're back on the desktop.

For some desktop users the start screen is also used as an information panel in addition to the launcher, in which case you have all the information right there on boot, and can then start into whatever app you're going to use, desktop or not.

starting to an empty passive desktop makes no sense. you'll have to open the start screen to launch most of your applications anyway. whining because it takes you a fraction of a second to click the desktop tile to get to the desktop on startup is such a ridiculous notion to start with.

What? When windows 7 boots, what happens then? Even the Start Menu is not activated by default.

starting to an empty passive desktop makes no sense

So Windows 7 makes NO SENSE at all?

whining because it takes you a fraction of a second to click the desktop tile to get to the desktop on startup is such a ridiculous notion to start with.

Right so ANYTHING we say about the OS is now whining? I am not stomping my feet crying that I have to click the desktop tile. If I NEVER do ANYTHING on the start screen (once I create my desktop shortcuts), why can't I simply check a box in the Control Panel to take me to the desktop mode by default? I have NO NEED of the start screen. ME....so why not make an option? If you do, then do not check that option.

starting to an empty passive desktop makes no sense. you'll have to open the start screen to launch most of your applications anyway. whining because it takes you a fraction of a second to click the desktop tile to get to the desktop on startup is such a ridiculous notion to start with.

It need not be empty. I have shortcuts to all of my "programs" on the desktop. I have no need for little kiddie "apps". Oh boy, you can display 2 at a time! Big deal. I often display several windows on the desktop at once. I guess it depends on what you use you system for, but after a few weeks, I am going to revert to Windows 7 for the new year. It's like Microsoft built an OS for 2 types of users, the desktop/laptop folks and the tablet folks. I am simply tired of switching between the 2 environments.

I love Microsoft as a company, but for me, Windows 8 is a dud. If you are happy with it, more power to ya. To all the overly-defensive Windows 8 fans, we are all entitled to our own opinion. Try not to get your undies in a bunch. :)

  • Like 2
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • On the topic of being locked out of a service. Recently two different friends of mine got locked out of their Google accounts. Both were hack attempts and one of them is waiting 30 days before he can get back in. He had backup codes and MFA but not a passkey. It was a browser token hack. Anyhow he has to wait 30 days for the dispute or whatever to end. The other person only had a password and is screwed losing all of the email, docs and years of photos. Google won’t help her at all. Her fault because she had no backup/recovery setup. Enable passkeys if possible. Also do NOT use browser based password managers. If using a cloud service make sure it is one you can fully sync to one of your devices so you can back it up. Like a PC or Mac with some backup drive plugged into it. Google is the worst to use IMHO. You can’t sync your photos at all. You have to use the “Take Out” service which is manual and takes days. That service strips the meta data from your photos. Also Google Docs synced to a device are useless without a Google accounts. MS Office/Libre Office is not going to open a link to a Google doc to a dead account.
    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!