Windows 8 Falls Behind Even the Maligned Vista


Recommended Posts

Windows 8 is rubbish and so are the drivers for it. I don't need any flaming it just my opinion.

No flaming needed, more like educated.

Drivers are beyond fine, all my stuff works. Maybe you have old components that no longer have updated drivers for modern os's.

http://www.legitrevi...com/news/14779/

According to Net Applications, Windows 8's online presence has actually fallen to below that of Vista's at the same length of time after release, just two months on the market. On December 22, W8's usage share was sitting at 1.6% of all Windows PCs, up from 1.2% in November. However, in the same period, Vista was sitting at 2.2%, up from around 1% the month before. This is an abysmal result and compares very poorly with Windows 7's 6%+ share after the same two months on the market. It's possible that Christmas sales may redress this balance, but it seems unlikely.

Very deceptive numbers as it took a while before people realized how craptastic Vista was. I would be interested if the numbers for Win8 stay below that of Vista after 4-5-6 months.

Windows 8, IMO, is a failure on so many levels. It could have been a great experience but mixing the old with the new really places it at the bottom of the OS heap.

This video is still, again, IMO, is one of the best reasons of why Windows 8 is so horrible.

http://www.cultofmac...ems-ever-video/

This video makes me laugh so hard.

Windows 8 is UNUSABLE? Been using it fine since RTM, without a touchscreen.

Can't be productive? I installed Start 8, never use, go to, or load the Metro Start Screen, so I am left with a Windows, well, like WINDOWS 7.......how about that? Task bar is there, icons on desktop there, alt tab works, makes me productive day to day when I use my PC.

This video makes me laugh so hard.

Windows 8 is UNUSABLE? Been using it fine since RTM, without a touchscreen.

Can't be productive? I installed Start 8, never use, go to, or load the Metro Start Screen, so I am left with a Windows, well, like WINDOWS 7.......how about that? Task bar is there, icons on desktop there, alt tab works, makes me productive day to day when I use my PC.

Agreed, he does have SOME good points though. His presentation is also horrible, so hard to watch. But I do find it sad that we need to resort to third party apps to eliminate the frustrating things.

I said it before, I actually love Windows 8. But apparently nobody can even say one bad thing about the OS without being attacked.

  • Like 1

They also should have had the option to boot directly to the desktop. I never stick in the start screen or use the full screen apps, so it is irritating.

Easily remedied:

https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1099009-is-there-a-way-to-boot-windows-8-rtm-to-the-desktop/page__st__15

Comment #26

Completely agree. It would have been so easy.

And guess what? Everybody would win if they did that. Don't like the new Start Screen? Go to Control Panel.....

I just do not know why some people here are SO against choices. Choices are good. You get to use the OS how you want, and if I restart a lot (which I do flipping from OS X to Windows 8) I have an option to skip the Start Screen probably 6 times a day.

I really like Windows 8. I have the start screen set up in a way that I find it perfectly usable and unobtrusive, along with a couple of genuinely useful "Metro" apps. The other improvements under the hood has made it worth the money, too.

Regarding booting to the desktop, for me, my starting workflow hasn't changed between previous Windows and Windows 8,

Previously, i would turn on the computer, log in, click the application I need/want. The same thing happens in Windows 8.

Through the years, that application has either been in the Quick Launch, or the Taskbar (Starting with Windows 7) Now it's in the start screen. In Windows 8, no matter if the application is Metro, or works from the Desktop, it's still one click to start the application I need/want. If it's a desktop application, I still click its shortcut, and it opens on the desktop anyway, with zero added interaction on my part. I'm still forced to customize the Start screen just like I was forced to pin the applications I want in the Start Menu, same as I'm required to manually pin the applications I want on the Taskbar.

When looking at these initial steps of using a computer, I find it's actually one less key press to start the day with Windows 8. Specifically, I need only press Enter to start the first application on the Start screen. In Windows 7, I would need to press Win+Number.

Regarding the Charms, it's a very deliberate motion to activate them. The mouse has to be all the way in the corner, then moved along the edge for at least a 1/5th of the way down/up. This is just to make them appear. Then the mouse has to be moved even further to reach the Charms themselves, then clicked to be used. Stories that it's easy to activate them accidentally are very difficult to believe.

That said, the HINTS for the Charms are another matter entirely. Those are easily activated, and once the user learns how to use the Charms, the hints for them quickly become an unnecessary nuisance. I would have liked an option to disable them.

Well it actually is faster, but besides that, maybe if you had actually tried the new start screen and bothered to learn it (takes a whole of 5 minutes if you're a slow learner, the regular dumb users get it right away when I demonstrate it) you would have seen the advantage in a faster and more effective and better organize launcher.

You are terribly rude reminding me of the old days of console wars. :D

Seeing the no. of posts you have in this thread, there is no point in having a discussion on the matter unless one pretends to like what you like. It's like me getting used to a car and then assume everyone is too dumb to understand that's the best car ever made.

It need not be empty. I have shortcuts to all of my "programs" on the desktop. I have no need for little kiddie "apps". Oh boy, you can display 2 at a time! Big deal. I often display several windows on the desktop at once. I guess it depends on what you use you system for, but after a few weeks, I am going to revert to Windows 7 for the new year. It's like Microsoft built an OS for 2 types of users, the desktop/laptop folks and the tablet folks. I am simply tired of switching between the 2 environments.

I love Microsoft as a company, but for me, Windows 8 is a dud. If you are happy with it, more power to ya. To all the overly-defensive Windows 8 fans, we are all entitled to our own opinion. Try not to get your undies in a bunch. :)

So you have all your shortcuts in a mess on the desktop.

so instead of hitting the winkey to get an organize efficient layout of all your shortcuts, every time you want to start a new app, you have to use the show desktop shortcut, start your app, and then undo the show desktop. yeah that makes a LOT more sense....

I just do not know why some people here are SO against choices. Choices are good. You get to use the OS how you want, and if I restart a lot (which I do flipping from OS X to Windows 8) I have an option to skip the Start Screen probably 6 times a day.

I don't get it either. To me PCs have always been about customization, but now the mantra is if you don't like it you better GTFO. There are even Windows 8 zealots on this site that have said they hope Microsoft releases an update for Windows 8 that prevents programs like Start8 from working at all.

You are terribly rude reminding me of the old days of console wars. :D

Seeing the no. of posts you have in this thread, there is no point in having a discussion on the matter unless one pretends to like what you like. It's like me getting used to a car and then assume everyone is too dumb to understand that's the best car ever made.

i.e.

I have no argument, so I'll just ignore you.

As a Windows 8 user, I must say that the additions to the OS are confusing and without structure. The push toward metro apps for everything just seems crazy. I spent a while searching the Windows Store today (not easy) and feel like I am using something designed for a phone.

As a quick example, I have a stopwatch application that i have used since XP. The app has a start and stop and sits quietly on the taskbar showing me how long something has been running, I use it when I put dinner in the oven or am timing a new piece of hardware.

The Windows store gave me lots of stop watches but most were Metro apps and wanted to take over my whole screen - Why???

I just want an app that i can click and put on my taskbar - why does everything have to take over my 23 inch screen and give me the most basic of options. Why cant I click on an item in the store, and then click back to search again, why do I have to re-open the search charm and select the windows store as my search item???

OK Im calm again now.

This video makes me laugh so hard.

Windows 8 is UNUSABLE? Been using it fine since RTM, without a touchscreen.

Can't be productive? I installed Start 8, never use, go to, or load the Metro Start Screen, so I am left with a Windows, well, like WINDOWS 7.......how about that? Task bar is there, icons on desktop there, alt tab works, makes me productive day to day when I use my PC.

So unusable that you had to install a 3rd party hack to get back to using the startmenu? So you really are not using Windows 8 so much as an Windows machine that has been hacked........logical

Microsoft is practically giving Win8 away for nothing and still, it's not a huge seller. You can blame Tablet (Android, iOS), or the poor distribution of MS Surface.

The fact remains that Win8 is not selling as fast as Win7 was, even at a low price. And I've yet to see MANY Touch enabled laptop, monitors, ... It seems like the hardware is not there to support Win8 fully.

To each their own. Some people in this forum are just incredible at forcing things down someone else throats.

So unusable that you had to install a 3rd party hack to get back to using the startmenu? So you really are not using Windows 8 so much as an Windows machine that has been hacked........logical

windows has ALWAYS been about customization, how is installing Start8 in Windows 8 to installing say RocketDock or ObjectDock in 7 and below and hiding the taskbar any different

your complaint has no merit

As a Windows 8 user, I must say that the additions to the OS are confusing and without structure. The push toward metro apps for everything just seems crazy. I spent a while searching the Windows Store today (not easy) and feel like I am using something designed for a phone.

As a quick example, I have a stopwatch application that i have used since XP. The app has a start and stop and sits quietly on the taskbar showing me how long something has been running, I use it when I put dinner in the oven or am timing a new piece of hardware.

The Windows store gave me lots of stop watches but most were Metro apps and wanted to take over my whole screen - Why???

I just want an app that i can click and put on my taskbar - why does everything have to take over my 23 inch screen and give me the most basic of options. Why cant I click on an item in the store, and then click back to search again, why do I have to re-open the search charm and select the windows store as my search item???

OK Im calm again now.

The apps should be able to run in the background. I don't know if the ones that you tried do, but they should. If they do need to run at full screen, then yes, for something like a stopwatch, that is pretty silly.

Also, for the store, doesn't clicking "Back" take you back to the search results? It should, and does so for me. I do not have to start another search.

The apps should be able to run in the background. I don't know if the ones that you tried do, but they should. If they do need to run at full screen, then yes, for something like a stopwatch, that is pretty silly.

Also, for the store, doesn't clicking "Back" take you back to the search results? It should, and does so for me. I do not have to start another search.

It does take me back but the search pane is gone so I have to go bring it all up again and let it know I want to search the store and not the default files. Ideally there should just be a search box at the top of the store.

I can totally see the point of apps, on a phone or tablet they are great, but on a big monitor, with lots of space to multitask, its just limiting me.

windows has ALWAYS been about customization, how is installing Start8 in Windows 8 to installing say RocketDock or ObjectDock in 7 and below and hiding the taskbar any different

your complaint has no merit

on the contrary. Customizing Windows is one thing.. to enhance or whatever you want to do. What YOU did is hack Windows 8 to be more like Windows 7. How many people that you know hack their Windows 7 to look more like Windows XP? If you have to add something to make it look like last years version..then why not just stick with last years version? The whole point of Windows 8 is lost on you because you want it to function more like Windows 7. You are NOT customizing..you're reverting. Big difference.

I'm all for Windows 8 on touch screens. It makes sense. (except for the abomination when it dumps you onto the desktop) but for non touch devices? Bleh.

I spent a while searching the Windows Store today (not easy) and feel like I am using something designed for a phone.

How is it not easy? Just start typing, and Search automatically opens.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Maradona if hydration breaks had existed in Mexico 86.
    • The quantum search for Time's origin had an equally mind-boggling conclusion by Sayan Sen Image by Steve Johnson via Pexels A theoretical study from researchers at the University of Surrey suggested that the direction of time may not be fundamentally fixed in certain quantum systems. The work, published in Scientific Reports, examined how the “arrow of time” could emerge from microscopic physics and found that time-reversal symmetry can remain intact even in models used to describe processes such as energy loss and thermalisation. The arrow of time refers to the observed one-way direction from past to future in everyday life. In macroscopic processes, this is easy to see. Spilled milk spreads across a table and does not gather back into a glass, and heat flows from hotter objects to colder ones. These processes shape the common sense idea that time moves in a single direction. However, at the level of fundamental physics, many equations do not prefer a direction of time. Time-reversal symmetry means that the same physical laws can describe a system whether time moves forward or backward. This has made it difficult to explain why irreversible behaviour appears in the large-scale world even when the underlying rules do not require it. Dr Andrea Rocco, Associate Professor in Physics and Mathematical Biology at the University of Surrey, described this contrast: "One way to explain this is when you look at a process like spilt milk spreading across a table, it's clear that time is moving forward. But if you were to play that in reverse, like a movie, you'd immediately know something was wrong – it would be hard to believe milk could just gather back into a glass. However, there are processes, such as the motion of a pendulum, that look just as believable in reverse. The puzzle is that, at the most fundamental level, the laws of physics resemble the pendulum; they do not account for irreversible processes. Our findings suggest that while our common experience tells us that time only moves one way, we are just unaware that the opposite direction would have been equally possible." The study focused on open quantum systems, which are quantum systems that interact with a surrounding environment. This environment, often described as a heat bath, can exchange energy and information with the system. The researchers used this framework to study how a direction of time might appear even when the underlying physics does not enforce one. A key part of the analysis involved the Markov approximation. This is a simplification used in many models where the system is assumed not to retain memory of its past states. The idea is that changes depend only on the current state, not on earlier history. This is commonly used when studying thermalisation, which is the process where a system settles into equilibrium with its environment. The study also used concepts such as master equations, including the Lindblad and Pauli equations, which describe how probabilities of different quantum states change over time. Another related model discussed was quantum Brownian motion, which describes the random-like movement of a quantum particle interacting continuously with its environment. In these descriptions, a “memory kernel” can appear, which is a mathematical term that accounts for how past states influence current behaviour. The researchers found that applying the Markov approximation did not break time-reversal symmetry. Even when the system interacted with an effectively infinite heat bath, the resulting equations of motion remained symmetric in time. This meant that the same mathematical description could, in principle, run forward or backward in time without contradiction. The study further showed that standard frameworks used in open quantum systems, including quantum Brownian motion and master equations like the Lindblad and Pauli forms, could be written in a time-symmetric way. These equations are typically used to describe processes that look irreversible, such as dissipation and thermalisation, but the results suggested they can also be interpreted as allowing evolution in both time directions. Thomas Guff, Research Fellow in Quantum Thermodynamics, said: "The surprising part of this project was that even after making the standard simplifying assumption to our equations describing open quantum systems, the equations still behaved the same way whether the system was moving forwards or backwards in time. When we carefully worked through the maths, we found that this behaviour had to be the case because a key part of the equation, the "memory kernel," is symmetrical in time. We also found a small but important detail which is usually overlooked – a time discontinuous factor emerged that kept the time-symmetry property intact. It’s unusual to see such a mathematical mechanism in a physics equation because it's not continuous, and it was very surprising to see it appear so naturally." The researchers also noted that deriving a one-way arrow of time from time-reversal symmetric microscopic dynamics remains an open problem across fields such as thermodynamics, statistical mechanics, particle physics, and cosmology. Their results suggested that some standard descriptions of irreversible behaviour in open quantum systems may be better understood using a time-symmetric formulation of Markovianity. According to the study, processes such as thermalisation, which are usually treated as irreversible, could in theory be described in a way that allows evolution in either time direction under the same rules. This does not imply that time reversal occurs in everyday life, but rather that the underlying equations do not strictly enforce a single direction. Overall, the findings suggested that the perceived direction of time may emerge from how physical systems are modelled and approximated, rather than from a fundamental asymmetry in the laws themselves. The researchers noted that this perspective could have implications for ongoing work in quantum mechanics, thermodynamics, and cosmology on the origin of time’s arrow. Source: University of Surrey, Nature This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing
    • A bit premature... 100% Marketing. Bizarre.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      BizSAR earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      581
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      182
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      75
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      73
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!