Windows 8 Falls Behind Even the Maligned Vista


Recommended Posts

So unusable that you had to install a 3rd party hack to get back to using the startmenu? So you really are not using Windows 8 so much as an Windows machine that has been hacked........logical

Wow, that makes no sense. A third party app (Im sure you have them on your xp/vista/7 machine) to bring back a start menu, is a hack and because of that I am not using windows 8? Wow, please, EDUCATE yourself before posting. There is more to windows 8 than the start menu friend. Look under the hood.

Messy-Desktop.jpg

Herp herp I can play this game too.

The desktop is so much less organized than the start screen, and needs far more babysitting. I keep mine completely empty, and it's nice.

A person has to manually create a messy desktop, and there's a cleanup tool. The Win 8 desktop is comparable to the Win 7 desktop, not the start page vs. Desktop.

The start page becomes convoluted from installs. Even if it's neat, it gets messy with lots of tiles. I have gotten used to it and don't mind the start page, but I remove or don't create start menu icons for most apps. Too messy. I pin to taskbar after starting the app.

What I wished is Windows 8 had offered dual modes for us desktop users, one for desktop mode with a start menu and one for those who wished to use the new start screen. It would have been perfect if one could switch back and forth between the two modes. A lot of us would have used desktop mode while slowly trying out and hopefully converting to the start screen mode. Both make sense in different circumstances.

A person has to manually create a messy desktop, and there's a cleanup tool. The Win 8 desktop is comparable to the Win 7 desktop, not the start page vs. Desktop.

bull****. Between applications that use the desktop as the default save and applications that clutter up your desktop with far too many icons (the program itself, the updater, the 3rd party crapware updater), most users desktops are a complete mess of crap.

How old is that screenshot? There's the previous IE, the older uTorrent, duplicate Safari icons, etc... Does that say 2009 on the taskbar?

I google'd "messy desktop" and posted that picture, which is about the equivalent of Warwagon finding a random picture of a messy start screen and posting it like he had in the post before the one I quoted.

If you let it get messy, that's your own damn fault. The same principle applies for the start screen. If it gets messy, it's because you let it happen. And the start screen offers far more organization options than the desktop. And it's far more readable.

So I've read through all 14 pages of this topic, and not much is actually being said about the topic at hand.... seems like a bunch of back and forth flaming on the merits of the start screen.

Here's my take on the actual topic at hand.

Vista out of the gate was not a disaster. In fact, it sold very well. Hear me out... in the initial months, Microsoft was selling Vista licenses at a rate of 20M per month. By 2.5 months, this rate dropped to 16M per month. By 6 months, this rate dropped again to 10M per month. From July 07 - July 08 Microsoft sold an average of 9.6M Vista licenses per month, while (according to Gartner) the PC industry shipped about 20M PCs per month (worldwide). Thus in the initial months, Vista was selling quite well... how it sold later on in its life is what we remember as a disaster.

This is corroborated by the Hitslink data. I don't have all of the data the original author does, as Hitlink only reports back to Nov 2007. But according to the three data points he provides, market share was growing at a rate of about 1.15 percentage points per month for the first three months, and at a rate of .602 percentage points per month from Nov 2007 until the release of Windows 7.

As for hitslink statistics in particular, I am generally wary of them. First, they count unique users instead of pageviews. There are several problems with doing so, as you get different results depending on how you define a "unique" user, and no matter how you do it there are problems involved. Go by IP.... what about dynamic IPs or multiple users from the same IP. Go by cookies... what about browsers without cookies or users that disable cookies? Further, they weight their data based on CIA internet user data that is 4 years old. This same data also lumps mobile and desktop users in together, so weighting solely desktop users based on this is problematic. Finally, their network is only 4,000 sites, and the data is derived from only 150 million samples. I just don't think this is a large enough sample.

Conversely, statcounter has 3 million sites and 17 billion page views per month. Much larger sample. They also do not weight their samples and count pageviews, not unique users. You can do your own weighting and manipulation of the raw data. But just the fact that the sample size is so much larger is a big bonus. Comparing the two sources, you can see that hitslink consistently under represents the marketshare of newer OSs compared to statcounter. This might suggest that hitslinks "network" or methodology is biased toward corporations, which tend not to jump on new operating systems. It was the same for Vista, Windows 7, and now Windows 8.

Anyway, I think it's extremely problematic to compare the growth rate of an OS from 2007 to the growth rate of an OS 5 years later. First, in 2007, Windows Vista had many sources to draw from. Back then, Windows 2000, ME, 98, NT, and even Windows 95 had an appreciable market share of about 5% collectively. These users were itching to ditch their old ancient systems, and that marketshare got folded into Vista's very quickly. This collective marketshare now stands at about .01% today. Today, Windows 8 does not face the same advantage. It's even more detrimental that users of Windows 7 and XP are more than happy to supplement their old systems with new tablets that don't run any Windows OS. For the foregoing reasons, it's specious to directly compare Windows 8 growth with the growth of Windows Vista, no matter how the percentages stack up.

So how is Windows 8 growing? At pretty much the same rate as Windows 7 was just before Windows 8 launched. Take a look at Statcounter's data for the 30 day period prior to Windows 8 launching. During this time Windows 7 was growing at a rate of .0272 percentage points per day. For the 30 day period following Oct 26, Windows 8 grew at an average of .0287 percentage points per day. Statcounter isn't breaking Win8 data on a daily basis, but from the Other category we can estimate that today it's peaking at about 2.5% on the weekends with a weekday baseline of about 2% (If you want to talk about as a percent of Windows Machine, it peaked at about 3.11% on Christmas Day). Even more telling is that Windows 7 has been on the decline since the very day Windows 8 was released.

Vista out of the gate was not a disaster. In fact, it sold very well.

I bought Vista two months after it's release, and never looked back to XP. I find it hard to believe people put up with XP for so long. Vista was like a breath of fresh air, after XP became stank with security and stability issues.

There's something people are missing and is: marketshare of 2007 != marketshare 2012. There are more computers, so the 1.6% is bigger than 2007's 2.2%.

This very much reminds me of the following attempt at statistical fraud:

Apple-OSX-Adoption-Rates.jpg

Another thing the author does not do is include Windows 8 Touch in with Windows 8 market share in his analysis. For some reason Hitslink breaks them out separately. Note Windows 8 Touch is different from Windows RT, which is also listed by Hitslink. This was a very very sloppy article, and a perfect example of how not to draw conclusions from statistics. Yet it feeds a belief people seem to hunger for (the demise of Microsoft) so it's getting much undue attention and people are treating it as if it's at all credible.

I bought Vista two months after it's release, and never looked back to XP. I find it hard to believe people put up with XP for so long. Vista was like a breath of fresh air, after XP became stank with security and stability issues.

I had a machine which ran Vista beautifully since day one, and a machine which was nothing but trouble. I belive Vista's troubles were part driver related, part resource consumption related, and part overzealous UAC. It took a while for developers to get in line with 1 and 3, and hardware to get in line with 2. Microsoft solved all of Vista's problems with UAC refinements and service tweaks. Windows 8 has no problems with the former... everything is related to the start screen. I believe with a couple tweaks with Windows Blue they'll be able to address 75% of these concerns as well. The other 25% will probably never be happy no matter what you do.

I've seen a lot of comments here that all Microsoft needed to do was add a checkbox for a choice of start screen or metro. I forget who said it, but the one post was lamenting on the fact that there's not enough choice. I find this sentiment very ironic, given that the reason there is a choice of over 30 start menu replacements today is because MS did not include this option. If MS had put in the option, there would be LESS choice.

  • Like 2

Vista was like a breath of fresh air, after XP became stank with security and stability issues.

XP had stability problems? since when... XP wasn't a hard drive grinder, or causing (Not responding...) explorer issues. As well as slow networking problems.

XP had stability problems? since when... XP wasn't a hard drive grinder, or causing (Not responding...) explorer issues. As well as slow networking problems.

Graphics drivers were a pain to keep stable. I got blue screens left and right because of it's stability issues.

bull****. Between applications that use the desktop as the default save and applications that clutter up your desktop with far too many icons (the program itself, the updater, the 3rd party crapware updater), most users desktops are a complete mess of crap.

100% fiction. 99.9% of all installs allow the option of creating a desktop icon and start menu entry. If users want the icon on the desktop, it's not convoluted. It's exactly what they want, and the desktop default is to align icons to grid.

The "Start" Page is populated by start menu items which 100% of users you're talking about (fictional users with a desktop full of folder shortcuts and whatnot in your mock up) create by default which makes a messy start page. Install any app and every little start menu shortcut from the main app to any shortcuts to help files, settings, uninstall shortcuts and the like overpopulate the Start Page.

I really don't care either way, but please stick to reality to make your points. Neither one of you know what most users desktops look like. But without a doubt, the Start Page is a mess if you install Win32 apps. You will be cleaning it up often and there is no way for it to elegantly handle lots of tiles. Perhaps in Windows 9.

I bought Vista two months after it's release, and never looked back to XP. I find it hard to believe people put up with XP for so long. Vista was like a breath of fresh air, after XP became stank with security and stability issues.

Vista was bogus, and hardware was crap.

Drivers malfunctioned and little support was given.

Very slow boot times, and hang ups.

And no, I'm not talking for someone else, but myself.

100% fiction. 99.9% of all installs allow the option of creating a desktop icon and start menu entry. If users want the icon on the desktop, it's not convoluted. It's exactly what they want, and the desktop default is to align icons.

The "Start" Page is populated by start menu items which 100% of users you're talking about (fictional users with a desktop full of folder shortcuts and whatnot in your mock up) create by default which makes a messy start page. Install any app and every little start menu shortcut from the main app to any shortcuts to help files, settings, uninstall shortcuts and the like overpopulate the Start Page.

I really don't care either way, but please stick to reality to make your points.

I haven't had any trouble with junk cluttering my screen. Office 2013 gave me only the main icons, and so did VS2013. Not sure what archaic programs you're running, but the fact that they barf icons onto the screen isn't Microsoft's issue. Microsoft doesn't control any one third party app. If it wants to throw icons all over the OS, there's nothing they can do. The issue is with developers not caring. Microsoft tried to get them to stop with their clutter in Vista, but they kept going at it regardless. Windows 8 might finally give them the push to straighten their acts out.

100% fiction. 99.9% of all installs allow the option of creating a desktop icon and start menu entry. If users want the icon on the desktop' date=' it's not convoluted. It's exactly what they want, and the desktop default is to align icons.

The "Start" Page is populated by start menu items which 100% of users you're talking about (fictional users with a desktop full of folder shortcuts and whatnot in your mock up) create by default which makes a messy start page. Install any app and every little start menu shortcut from the main app to any shortcuts to help files, settings, uninstall shortcuts and the like overpopulate the Start Page.

I really don't care either way, but please stick to reality to make your points.[/quote']

http://winaero.com/c...omment.news.168

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • On the topic of being locked out of a service. Recently two different friends of mine got locked out of their Google accounts. Both were hack attempts and one of them is waiting 30 days before he can get back in. He had backup codes and MFA but not a passkey. It was a browser token hack. Anyhow he has to wait 30 days for the dispute or whatever to end. The other person only had a password and is screwed losing all of the email, docs and years of photos. Google won’t help her at all. Her fault because she had no backup/recovery setup. Enable passkeys if possible. Also do NOT use browser based password managers. If using a cloud service make sure it is one you can fully sync to one of your devices so you can back it up. Like a PC or Mac with some backup drive plugged into it. Google is the worst to use IMHO. You can’t sync your photos at all. You have to use the “Take Out” service which is manual and takes days. That service strips the meta data from your photos. Also Google Docs synced to a device are useless without a Google accounts. MS Office/Libre Office is not going to open a link to a Google doc to a dead account.
    • Why you need to take back control of your synced passwords and how to go about doing that by Paul Hill Credit: Pixabay Last month, when Google decided to introduce daily and weekly caps for Gemini, it reignited an anxiety of mine, that you can’t really depend on service providers to maintain features forever, and it got me looking into free software (as in freedom) in other areas too. One app I quickly came across was KeePassXC on desktop and KeePassDX on Android as an alternative to password manager lock-in within the Chrome or Firefox ecosystems. I personally like to switch around with browsers, and using either password manager is inconvenient, so something like KeePassXC was interesting to me. The main issue with it now is syncing; I was not sure how to do that. After a bit of research, I came across Syncthing, a tool I was vaguely familiar with but had never used because it seemed complicated. However, I was completely wrong, and honestly, I think everyone should use it if they use multiple devices. It essentially lets you share folders peer to peer across all of your devices, no cloud services that you don’t control necessary! And it was fairly simple to set up, if not a bit clunky. Since setting it up, I’ve also started using Syncthing to back up other apps too, so don’t think it’s limited to just saving password databases. You can use it for pretty much anything you use Dropbox or Google Drive for. Before continuing to talk about those apps a bit more, let’s walk back a bit and talk about browser sync. Ever since the late 2000s and early 2010s, really, since we have been using smartphones, browser sync has been a necessity of life. I don’t know about you, but I have hundreds of passwords saved. For the most part, they’re all unique, so I don’t remember them and rely on software to manage them for me. Until recently, I’ve relied on password managers in Chrome and Firefox, but what I always found annoying was that it can be hard to transfer them between browsers. Sure, on Windows it is simple enough, but on Linux, exporting bookmarks has been temperamental. It works OK nowadays, but not too long ago, Chrome required you to enable exporting passwords in chrome://flags. The situation is even worse on mobile; there is no exporting or importing of passwords of any kind. You literally have to do it on a desktop, which is incredibly annoying in our mobile-first world. Sync also lets us take out bookmarks, history, tabs, and autofill data easily. To enable sync, it’s just a matter of signing into the browser once, and it handles the rest. It’s nice and easy. Obviously, all this has some issues, including those I’ve outlined above about it being hard to transfer data between browsers, but also things such as account suspension, lost account passwords, and other lock-in mechanisms, such as passkeys, being tied to a specific browser. On a sidenote, I have just removed all of my passkeys because they can make it harder to move browsers. I think the biggest threat to your synced passwords, especially if doing this with Google, is having your account suspended. I don’t ever expect mine to be suspended, but you do hear horror stories on Reddit where people lose access to their Google accounts. Imagine if you have hundreds of passwords, then suddenly lose access to them because Google froze your account, what would you do? So yes, it can be nice to use these syncing services for their convenience, but they also have risks. You may have seen me going on about free software quite a bit in my editorials. It’s essentially a concept championed by the Free Software Foundation. It’s software under particular licenses that grant you four freedoms: run the program for any purpose (0), study and change the source code (1), redistribute copies to others (2), and the freedom to distribute modified copies to others (3). For example, if there is an app I use and one day it gets abandoned by the developer, I can keep running it or even clone the software and continue developing it. Look at the myriad of cool services Google has run over the years before killing them. You can’t take the source code for those because they are proprietary, for the most part. Both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so I get the freedoms listed above. In my use case where I’m syncing a database full of my passwords, I also get proper ownership over my data, there is no losing access to the database due to a frozen account, I can access the code of the tools I’m using, and I can get support from real people online if I run into issues, rather than having to consult a vague help page from an opaque company. With the KeePassXC password manager, you create a .kdbx file, which is what will be synced between devices. KeePassXC has cross-platform apps and also has browser extensions so that the browser can fetch passwords from the database once it is unlocked. Meanwhile, Syncthing is a peer-to-peer file sync tool where you can select folders to sync between your devices. Just pop files in the folders you choose, and then they will be available across your other devices whenever they come online. Syncthing is resilient as it works over both LAN and the internet and only ever sends content between your devices, never to a third-party server somewhere else. By combining these two pieces of software, you can essentially replicate the browser sync functionality. I have had a weird, conflicting issue where a new file is appearing, but it doesn’t seem to be impacting my main password database, which is updating between devices just fine. If you want to get a setup similar to what I have, you will need to go here to download KeePassXC for your computer. Once you have that, you will need to download your passwords from your web browser to a CSV file. In Chrome, you can type chrome://password-manager/settings into the URL bar, and you should see an option to download your passwords under Export Passwords. This will give you the CSV file you need for importing into KeePassXC. If you use a different browser, just use a search engine and type “browser-name export passwords” and muddle along. In KeePassXC, you’ll want to press Import File from the home screen, select the CSV file, and create a new database from it. On one of the screens of the wizard, there will be a Title field with a drop-down selected to none. Change this to Title and continue. You’ll select a name for the database, the encryption level (the defaults are fine), and then you will pick a password. I would choose four unrelated words that are easy for you to remember, as you’ll be typing them fairly often to access your passwords. When you have all your passwords in your new database, you will want to set up the browser extension so that your browser can fetch passwords from KeePassXC. Rather than explain how to do that here, refer to KeePassXC’s guide on how to set it up properly. Once you’ve got that set up, you want to install KeePassDX on Android. You can grab it on the F-Droid store and the Google Play Store. For iPhone users, there are other .kdbx-supporting apps, but I haven’t tried any of them, so have a look around and use what suits you. Once you have that done, you will want to install Syncthing on your computer and find a third-party app for your mobile device. On Android, I use an app called BasicSync; there are also options for iOS, but again, I’ve not tried these. Once you’ve got SyncThing, you’ll want to set it up and connect all of your devices together and share a folder between your gadgets. PCWorld has a good tutorial on setting up a synchronized file between your devices using SyncThing. Once you’ve set it up, congrats, you’ll never have to touch that stuff again except for adding or removing devices. I’ll be honest, I didn’t particularly like setting up Syncthing. It didn’t take me a massive amount of time, but I think I had to check online because I found it a bit confusing. That said, I’ve had it running for several weeks now and never need to touch the Syncthing settings, so that’s very nice. I also mentioned a conflicting file. I’m not sure why this is appearing, but the main .kdbx file seems to be updating and syncing just fine. What’s nice is that both KeePassXC and Syncthing are free software, so they won’t just vanish one day; you can take the code and fork the project or use a range of alternative implementations that others have made. It’s also nice that it works over LAN, so even if your ISP is having problems, your passwords will still sync. One area where you will want to be a bit more careful with this setup is if you only have one device. I am OK because I have a computer and two phones, all synced up. If you just have one device, you will probably want to store a backup of your .kdbx file somewhere else. Obviously, you’ll also want to remember your password really well, too. If you get locked out, it's game over. Overall, if you want to take back control of your computing from big tech, taking control of your passwords is an important part of this. You don’t need to immediately clear out your browser’s password manager; try running KeePassXC and the password manager concurrently for a while to see if you run into any problems. If you do try this out, let us know some other creative ways to use Syncthing. I haven’t really come up with a solution about what to do with my bookmarks, for example.
    • If the price was a dollar, someone would complain "Why isn't it free?" If it was free, someone would complain they weren't being paid to play it.
    • That lens of history will burn if you hold it at the right angle... Warn users too late: Shame, Microsoft! That extremely minor update to an obscure Control Panel widget required 2 years of warning. Warn users too early: Shame, Microsoft! We've got better things to do. Pipeline and process be damned, we'll just always be disappointed, eh?
    • Microsoft Paint used to be my favorite Windows app as a kid, and it's still pretty good by Usama Jawad I have been using Windows since the early 2000s, when I was around 10 years old or so. I vaguely remember playing around with Windows 98 and Windows 2000, but that may have been on school PCs which had old operating systems installed. My main OS on the home PC, and the one I recall spending most time with, was Windows XP. At that time, I used the home PC to create Word and PowerPoint documents for school, but a lot of the time, I simply used it to play games. My dad would bring game discs which we would try and install on the PC, sometimes unsuccessfully, and sometimes, we would rely on flash games in the browser, like Bubble Trouble on Miniclip. However, the problem with the latter approach was the internet speed. On a good day, our dial-up internet would offer us speeds of 56 kbps, but on most days, it was closer to 33 kbps. This did not facilitate online gaming as I would often have to wait minutes for a game to load or "draw" on the screen, and trying to download pirated games wasn't simple either. I remember getting tired of waiting for online games to load and just downloading simulator games from the Big Fish Games website instead, only to be disappointed after finding out that I was just being given access to trial versions of the title, and I needed to fork out money to pay for the full version. All of this is to say that it wasn't very easy to find entertainment options on the home PC when I was a kid, due to a number of reasons, mostly outside of my control. This situation pushed me towards a rather unconventional ally: Microsoft Paint. Whenever the internet wasn't working as good as I expected, I would simply spin up Paint and draw complete rubbish on the canvas. Of course, that wasn't always the intention, but it usually happened when I messed up drawing a straight line or something, and then I would give up on that particular piece and simply draw a random collection of objects. Microsoft Paint was extremely accessible and easy to use. Even if you weren't an artist, you could quickly understand the tools at your disposal and how to leverage them on a canvas. The absolute breadth on offer ensured that each painting was truly unique, as you could utilize various combinations of tools like the pencil, paint, spray paint, and more to truly personalize your creation. Since I wasn't particularly good at drawing both on digital screen or a physical screen, I remember that my main style of art would be to insert a bunch of randomly intersecting lines and then fill them with random colors through the paint can. I have trying to replicate that art style in the latest version of Paint below, and as you can see, it's truly Pablo Picasso-esque. The human imagination truly knows no bounds Microsoft Paint kept me occupied for hours and was my best friend when video games on the home PC were inaccessible for one reason or the other. There was no academic or professional reason for which I would need to use Paint, but I still loved using it in my personal time, even if what I created wasn't worth being shown to anyone. It was simply fun. Fast-forward to today, and the situation is mostly the same. Now that I am almost 29 years old, and I still have no reason to use Microsoft Paint in a professional capacity. In fact, I don't even use it in a personal capacity, except to dabble with it from time to time, just to see if core functionalities are still intact. And I'm happy to say that I think Microsoft Paint still offers the same accessibility and inviting experience that it did to me a couple of decades ago, even though its UX has been refreshed and it's been integrated with Copilot features. Interestingly, things could have been a lot different, had Microsoft had its way. Microsoft Paint was marked for deprecation with the Windows 10 Fall Creators Update in 2017, and even began displaying a product retirement alert, urging customers to shift to Paint 3D instead. Fortunately, after consumer backlash, Microsoft reversed course on this decision, and Paint continues to be a native app inside Windows installations that can also be updated quite frequently through the Microsoft Store. Instead, Paint 3D ended up on the chopping block, which is for the better, I think. I have intermittently played around with Microsoft's refreshed Paint experience in the past few years, and I do think it has received worthwhile upgrades. the UI and the UX has been modernized while retaining core functionality, and the app is still fairly easy to use. It doesn't meet any of my use-cases, but I've never really had any use-cases ever, as described previously. Of course, the elephant in the room is the Copilot integration. Personally, I believe that this is one place where Copilot does make sense, environmental concerns aside. I know that a lot of creatives use AI to generate images, and while some may be using professional alternatives, Paint still offers a decent casual experience, with the power of Copilot. Of course, you do need to have a valid Microsoft 365 Copilot license and available credits to use it, but even if you don't, you still get the big Copilot button in the toolbar, unfortunately. All in all, I am glad that Microsoft Paint continues to be a native feature in Windows 11, and a piece of software that has evolved to meet modern needs without cutting off its own roots. It's just an iconic piece of Windows history that was an essential part of my childhood, and while I don't use it anymore, I'm just glad it is still there.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      hhgygy earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      AMV earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      513
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      88
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      73
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!