• 0

Good uTorrent alternative?


Question

Recommended Posts

  • 0

It respects it as well as any other client.. you just need to remember that it only regulates the upload speed of the torrents themselves, it however does not count the normal peer traffic that isn't part of the actual upload..

I've found setting the speed to around 80% of what speed you actually want used works, but that will varry depending on how many active torrents/connections you have.

  • 0

It respects it as well as any other client.. you just need to remember that it only regulates the upload speed of the torrents themselves, it however does not count the normal peer traffic that isn't part of the actual upload..

I've found setting the speed to around 80% of what speed you actually want used works, but that will varry depending on how many active torrents/connections you have.

uTorrent is currently, as we speak, uploading at 980 KB/s - I've set a hard limit of 32 KB/s -_- And do not say I have a setting wrong, I've been working on fixing this for months. It's a bug. I know uTorrent's settings inside and out.

  • 0

Weird.. I'm running 2.2.1, ( just downgraded from the current 3.3 beta because of a trackers rules ) and neither of them have had issues.. respecting my limits..

  • 0

Weird.. I'm running 2.2.1, ( just downgraded from the current 3.3 beta because of a trackers rules ) and neither of them have had issues.. respecting my limits..

Good for you, mate :)

Now back to the topic...

I'll try those suggestions, guys. Thanks! :)

  • 0

qbitorrent is the best alternative I've found: http://qbittorrent.sourceforge.net/

opensource and crossplatform too. I switched from utorrent to this a while back.

qBitTorrent works really well. I also recommend Deluge, its a lil weird, but its got a unique setup where you can run its daemon on a separate system and your client connects to it, so it feels like its running natively. Its handy if you have a media server and want to leave that system on 24/7 doing things. QB for local system usage for sure, Deluge for the other situation.

  • 0

"uTorrent is currently, as we speak, uploading at 980 KB/s - I've set a hard limit of 32 KB/s"

And yet you have failed to to show the simple graph showing this to us.. Asked for multiple times, showed you mine where it clearly shows my limit, and then what I was uploading. So where is this graph showing your issue.

Have you set to limit overheard, have you set to limit local peer bandwidth? Lets see the graph where you say you have it set to 32k and its uploading at 980 - and then where is it sending that data too?? Simple enough to look on your connected peers to see where all the data is going.

Thought you were going to use 3rd party to limit your speed? Guess that didn't work either?? So if 3rd party didn't work either, what is wrong with your system? Highly doubt some other torrent client is going to work if 3rd party limiting doesn't work, nor does utorrent.

  • Like 1
  • 0

"uTorrent is currently, as we speak, uploading at 980 KB/s - I've set a hard limit of 32 KB/s"

And yet you have failed to to show the simple graph showing this to us.. Asked for multiple times, showed you mine where it clearly shows my limit, and then what I was uploading. So where is this graph showing your issue.

Have you set to limit overheard, have you set to limit local peer bandwidth? Lets see the graph where you say you have it set to 32k and its uploading at 980 - and then where is it sending that data too?? Simple enough to look on your connected peers to see where all the data is going.

Thought you were going to use 3rd party to limit your speed? Guess that didn't work either?? So if 3rd party didn't work either, what is wrong with your system? Highly doubt some other torrent client is going to work if 3rd party limiting doesn't work, nor does utorrent.

Why do you think I care if you think I'm lying?

Every time I post in this part of the forum, you always come with your wise-crack replies. It winds me up. Stop thinking you're better than everyone else!

  • 0

Just asking to see some info so I can help you dude.. I don't think your lying -- what I think is your not understanding what your seeing or don't have a setting right.

And yet again when asked for simple details of your issue so we can all be on the same page to help you - still no details of the actual issue... Just you saying stuff.

So for example when its uploading at 30x what you set the limit too -- where is all that bandwidth going? 1 client, 10 clients?? How many upload slots do you have per torrent? Does this happen when your doing just 1 torrent? Do you have multiple seeds going on in the background? Or does it happen only when your working like 10 active torrents?

Details Details Details -- can not help you with your limited statements of -- its not working. Gosh forbid you missed a setting, maybe you don't have local peer bandwidth limited, simple look on the connected peers would show us that maybe its sending to what it thinks is local peer?? Maybe from looking at the graph all your bandwidth is taken up in overhead, and your not limiting it?

Don't know until can see this info that asking for! You say you have been troubleshooting it for MONTHS!! Well clearly your overlooking something.

Was the 3rd party able to limit?? If not then why do you think some other torrent client is going to be able too.. Maybe there some other issue with your machine?? For all we know your infected with something and that is what is uploading, and your seeing the upload somewhere else and not in the utorrent client?? Details!!

  • 0

And if its a bug - have you reported the details to them so they can work on it? Again these details come into play when you report it.

If it was a "bug" you would think there would be some info about it? I find nothing recent when searching for this topic, other then your threads here on neowin about it.

And older threads -- where guess what, same thing they ask for DETAILS on the problem so that they can help work it out for the poster.

  • 0

uTorrent is currently, as we speak, uploading at 980 KB/s - I've set a hard limit of 32 KB/s -_- And do not say I have a setting wrong, I've been working on fixing this for months. It's a bug. I know uTorrent's settings inside and out.

Have you tried setting it from the bottom right by right clicking etc. does it show the limit? theres around 4 settings for upload, although if you're uploading at 1mbs you must have a lot of leechers?

  • 0

Big list of ?Torrent alternatives.

I use transmission myself and I like it, there is a Windows port apparently too, so that might be worth a shot. I've used Deluge on Windows in the past and that's pretty good too. Vuze is too bloated for my liking (although I haven't used it for a few years so it might have improved).

  • 0

If it's a bug it should be gone if you cleaned every trace of uTorrent and reinstalled.

personally I only run utorrent for quick downloads on my laptop, and I'm looking for an alternative not because of issues but because of the horrible new ad interface. for my actual downloads I run Azureus/Vuze since it offers more control and extension I use for sorting and managing.

  • 0

'but because of the horrible new ad interface."

You can disable all the ad stuff, pretty easy...

Turn all these settings to false:

offers.left_rail_offer_enabled/left_rail_offer

gui.show_plus_upsell

offers.sponsored_torrent_offer_enabled/sponsored_torrent_offer_enabled

bt.enable_pulse

gui.show_notorrents_node

offers.content_offer_autoexec

  • 0

Deluge is best alternative.

Never heard of this bug and not getting into the argument.

that's the one that insists on using your computers locale setting for the language instead of the language setting or a language setting of it's own, and changing it's is a total PITA, isn't it... no thanks.

  • 0

that's the one that insists on using your computers locale setting for the language instead of the language setting or a language setting of it's own, and changing it's is a total PITA, isn't it... no thanks.

Out of curiousity, why would you want to run it in a different language than the one used by your OS?

  • 0

Out of curiousity, why would you want to run it in a different language than the one used by your OS?

My OS is English, my locale settings are Nrowegian, cause you know, I'm in Norway, and American and British, measure thing in weird ways and have crazy punctuation on numbers and stuff.

Deluge sets the language based on the type of number setting you use, NOT the language setting, hence why I complained it used the locale setting and NOT the language setting.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The machines are starting to fight back any way they can.
    • No news articles about the Arch Linux repo being majorly infected with malware?!?
    • Waymo recalls self-driving software after cars enter closed freeway work zones by Paul Hill Waymo, the self-driving car maker owned by Alphabet – the parent company of Google –, has recalled some of its fifth-generation Automated Driving Systems (ADS). It did so after some of its cars drove through closed construction zones. According to the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration (NHTSA), the affected vehicles were capable of driving through a closed freeway construction zone and continuing to drive at speed. The listing on the NHTSA website says that Waymo is currently developing a solution to fix this issue, but in the meantime, freeway driving is being restricted. Waymo will update its ADS software so that vehicles can detect when they can avoid entering construction zones. According to the Safety Recall Report, on April 20, 2026, Waymo’s Field Safety Committee began meetings reviewing an event from April 11, 2026, and five events from April 19, 2026, where Waymo’s autonomous vehicles didn’t recognize and drove past ramp closure signs into the pre-planned freeway construction zones. This took place in Phoenix, Arizona. Separately, on May 18, 2026, seven Waymo vehicles entered freeway lanes with active construction in the San Francisco Bay Area by driving between cones that were placed to show the lane was closed. On the back of both of these events, Waymo restricted freeway driving until it could address the issue. In June, Waymo’s Safety Board reviewed the issue and additional information related to ADS performances around construction zones; then, as a result, it decided to conduct a recall. This development is not good for Waymo as it adds to a growing list of technical hiccups its cars have experienced. Ultimately, it will lead to more scrutiny from lawmakers around the world who will be more cautious about letting autonomous vehicles on their roads without tighter regulation. For readers in areas where Waymo operates, does this news make you more wary about stepping into one of these vehicles?
    • I'm still on Windows 10 22H2 because I didn't want to deal with all the issues in Windows 11, so I waited almost a week before installing the latest Patch Tuesday update (KB5094127), I went ahead and did it, and it was a huge mistake—ever since then, my File Explorer has seen a performance drop of about 30% when transferring large files... Once again, Microsoft has outdone itself! This update cannot be uninstalled, either through the Control Panel (via Settings) or by accessing Advanced Startup Options. The only possible alternative would be to use system restore points, but I’d have to reinstall all app and driver updates (and there’s no guarantee it would work). Or there’s the “nuclear option” of a in-place repair without losing files or apps, but even then, all my customizations would be lost! Microsoft just can’t help but mess everything up! Way to go, Microsoft! But I still don’t want your c****y Windows 11!
    • Microsoft: Windows 11 could finally solve a major issue across AMD, Nvidia, and Intel GPUs by Sayan Sen While Microsoft has been trying to improve it, Windows 11 is definitely not flawless, as even today some issues are taking a year to publicly acknowledge. However, one area of trouble that may finally see much better results soon is graphics driver crashes. Work on graphics driver timeouts, also called Timeout and Detection Recovery (TDR), is not new as the latest WDDM 3.2 also has specific improvements regarding it. Windows Display Driver Model (WDDM) version 3.2 is supported on Windows 11 24H2 and 25H2. However, with the upcoming version 26H2, TDR crash diagnosis could go to the next level as Microsoft is introducing a new DirectX 12 API feature called "DirectX Dump Files". Similar to how system memory dump files work when a system crashes or freezes or encounters any such major issue, DirectX Dump Files (DDF) will essentially record a snapshot of the GPU execution right at the moment a graphics-related crash or hang or freeze occurs, so that developers can better understand and diagnoze these TDR and timeout detection errors. The dump will be available as a .dxdmp file for analysis and it will be a comprehensive dump file generated with detailed insights about the hardware, drivers, Windows, as well as the affected application. This should be another welcome change in this department. Earlier at GDC 2026, when the technology was first debuted, Microsoft had shared more details regarding it. The company had explained how DDF is designed to gather data from every layer of the graphics stack into a single file, eliminating the need for developers to manually correlate logs from multiple tools. As mentioned above, the dump can contain a lot of useful details like GPU hardware state information such as register values, shader program counters, page fault virtual addresses, shader memory data, and command buffers. Alongside that, it also captures DirectX runtime and kernel information, including D3D objects, pipeline state objects, device error data, adapter details, and CPU call stacks. Microsoft says the feature has been built around two primary use cases: retail device removals and local device removals. The former allows developers to collect crash information from end users' systems in the field, while the latter helps QA teams and developers investigate issues on test machines. Developers will also be able to include up to 2 MB of custom application data through new D3D12 APIs, providing additional context for troubleshooting. In addition, Microsoft is introducing three dump collection modes ranging from zero-overhead capture, which has no runtime performance impact on supported hardware, to higher-detail modes that collect more vendor-specific debugging data. On compatible Tier 2 hardware, zero-overhead dumps will be enabled by default, meaning developers may begin receiving useful crash diagnostics without making any code changes. The table below explains the three tiers: Tier Description NO_OVERHEAD Enables crash capture with no runtime cost and is suitable for broad deployment MEDIUM_OVERHEAD Provides a balance, capturing additional diagnostic data with moderate impact HIGH_OVERHEAD Collects the most detailed GPU and driver state available, enabling deeper investigation at the cost of higher runtime overhead In terms of availability, the company expects broader release to be around the fall of 2026, which should be right around the time when Windows 11 version 26H2 lands. Right now, DirectX Dump Files are available as a preview and currently, only AMD has the compatible AgilitySDK Developer Preview driver version 26.10.07.02. You can find the official announcement post here on Microsoft's website.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • First Post
      BizSAR earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      599
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      190
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      79
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      77
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      70
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!