Recommended Posts

I have yet to see anyone in the modern era that even came close to the atrocities that Hitler did.

once again, Obama isn't done yet. And nobody is comparing what Hitler did to people and what Obama "did/is doing" to people. They are comparing how Hitler came to power to how Obama is possibly coming to power (like taking away guns, slogans, ect.)

But like I said earlier, if you dig enough you could probably come up with enough similarities to make Bush "come to power" like Hitler...... maybe not though.

  • Like 2

American Law allows for abortions.. Therefore America is Hitler.. /s

With over 1 Million Americans Killed each year without a chance to live, makes me sick..

I am not religious or some right wing nut.. I don't relate to any any religion, but abortion makes me sick.. I know its off topic but.. damn lol

And while I am at it, can we just move along.. Obama is our ****ing president.. get over it.. I don't really care much for the guy but damn.. Life goes on..

  • Like 1

Wow oh wow, this might be the worst one yet. I'm not an Obama supporter, and I even think comparing him to Hitler is incredibly laughable. This makes less sense than when people try to label him a Socialist. :no:

two things that always bugged me ....

1 ... if he was a socialist....why would you care, its not a bad thing

2 ... if he was a muslim ... why would you care, its not a bad thing

...

sad to see that this potential big discussion is reduced on the form of a logo/symbol. i absolutely cant stand the tea party and im still convinced that their acting cost mitt the election, but they are right with some things that there are parallels between what hitler did and what obama is doing. some could argue that there have been good aspects in dictatorships, health and education for example, also in eastern germany, but how could you say if it comes in a "nice" form. and if you oppose anything obama does you are a racist immediately.

to make it short: i always prefered individual choice and freedom over some - some dubious - organisations for the mass.

Exactly.

The "Hitlerian comparison" is resisted because of the BAD that happened under his rule. Never mind the good (including a well-designed national highway system - the Autobahnen - that was such a marvel that no less than Dwight David Eisenhower pilfered the idea and moved it lock, stock, and barrel to the United States); the BAD outweighed the good to such a degree that such comparisons are despised even by other dictatorships and autocracies. (Examples - Cuba, the PRC, Syria, etc.)

However, one modern dictator WELCOMED the comparisons to Hitler - fortunately, he is no longer among the living. That dictator is Saddam Hussein.

Would you rather that Barack Obama be compared to Neville Chamberlain or Albus Percival Wulfric Brian Dumbledore?

This is the type of thread that we say, "brings down the entire site to a joke." We shouldn't even entertain such stupid ideas. This thread should be closed. All it does is facilitate a place for closed minded stupidity to run rampant.

  • Like 2

American Law allows for abortions.. Therefore America is Hitler.. /s

With over 1 Million Americans Killed each year without a chance to live, makes me sick..

I am not religious or some right wing nut.. I don't relate to any any religion, but abortion makes me sick.. I know its off topic but.. damn lol

And while I am at it, can we just move along.. Obama is our ****ing president.. get over it.. I don't really care much for the guy but damn.. Life goes on..

######!?

3GnpVKI.jpg

once again, Obama isn't done yet.

You know how paranoid that sounds?

And nobody is comparing what Hitler did to people and what Obama "did/is doing" to people. They are comparing how Hitler came to power to how Obama is possibly coming to power (like taking away guns, slogans, ect.)

Coming to power a certain way is not illegal. I suspect if you comb the history books you will find many leaders that came to power that way. It's what they do with that power that's important.

Four years from now we'll be saying the same things about our next leader.

And for the record, I voted for Romney.

once again, Obama isn't done yet. And nobody is comparing what Hitler did to people and what Obama "did/is doing" to people. They are comparing how Hitler came to power to how Obama is possibly coming to power (like taking away guns, slogans, ect.)

But like I said earlier, if you dig enough you could probably come up with enough similarities to make Bush "come to power" like Hitler...... maybe not though.

First off Obama didn't "come to power" by taking away guns, he hasn't done that at all. Second slogans are a common practice among those striving for the top position. So to say because Hitler also had a slogan and therefore that's somehow a reason to equate similarities to Obama or anyone else for that matter is out right retarded. Another similarity is they both had moms and went to school and ate food.

1840 William Henry Harrison

Tippecanoe and Tyler Too

1844 James K. Polk

54-40 or fight

1844 James K. Polk

Reannexation of Texas and reoccupation of Oregon

1844 Henry Clay

Who is James K. Polk?

1848 Zachary Taylor

For President of the People

1856 John C. Fremont

Free Soil, Free Labor, Free Speech, Free Men, and Fremont

1860 Abraham Lincoln

Vote Yourself a Farm

1864 Abraham Lincoln

Don't swap horses in the middle of the stream

1884 Grover Cleveland

Blaine, Blaine, James G. Blaine, The Continental Liar from the State of Maine

1884 James Blaine

Ma, Ma, Where?s my Pa, Gone to the White House, Ha, Ha, Ha

1888 Benjamin Harrison

Rejuvenated Republicanism

1896 William McKinley

Patriotism, Protection, and Prosperity

1896 William McKinley

Good money never made times hard

1900 William McKinley

A Full Dinner Pail

1916 Woodrow Wilson

He kept us out of war

1920 Warren G. Harding

Return to normalcy

1920 Warren G. Harding

Cox and Cocktails

1924 Calvin Coolidge

Keep cool with Coolidge

1928 Herbert Hoover

A chicken in every pot and a car in every garage

1952 Dwight Eisenhower

I Like Ike

1956 Dwight Eisenhower

Peace and Prosperity

1960 Richard Nixon

For the future

1964 Lyndon B. Johnson

The stakes are too high for you to stay at home

1964 Barry Goldwater

In your heart you know he?s right

1968 Richard Nixon

Nixon's the One

1976 Gerald Ford

He?s making us proud again

1976 Jimmy Carter

Not Just Peanuts

1976 Jimmy Carter

A Leader, For a Change

1980 Ronald Reagan

Are you better off than you were four years ago?

1984 Ronald Reagan

It?s morning again in America

1984 Walter Mondale

America Needs a Change

1988 George Bush

Kinder, Gentler Nation

1992 Bill Clinton

Don?t stop thinking about tomorrow

1992 Bill Clinton

Putting People First

1992 Ross Perot

Ross for Boss

1996 Bill Clinton

Building a bridge to the 21st century

1996 Bob Dole

The Better Man for a Better America

2000 Al Gore

Prosperity and progress

2000 Al Gore

Prosperity for America's families

2000 George W. Bush

Compassionate conservatism

2000 George W. Bush

Leave no child behind

2000 George W. Bush

Real plans for real people

2000 George W. Bush

Reformer with results

2000 Ralph Nader

Government of, by, and for the people...not the monied interests

2004 John Kerry

Let America be America Again

2004 George W. Bush

Yes, America Can!

2008 John McCain

Country First

2008 Barack Obama

Change We Can Believe In

2008 Barack Obama

Change We Need

2008 Barack Obama

Hope

2008 Barack Obama

Yes We Can!

2012 Barack Obama

Forward

2012 Mitt Romney Believe in America

This is the type of thread that we say, "brings down the entire site to a joke." We shouldn't even entertain such stupid ideas. This thread should be closed. All it does is facilitate a place for closed minded stupidity to run rampant.

What is the name of that rule? I am invoking it.

I tried pages ago...

Neowin should use Godwin's law to moderate. That way threads like this would never make it past post 1... :rolleyes:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Godwin's_law

"As an online discussion grows longer, the probability of a comparison involving Nazis or Hitler approaches 1."

"Once such a comparison is made, the thread is finished and whoever mentioned the Nazis has automatically lost whatever debate was in progress."

Reason being such comparisons are pure hyperbole, and obviously the discussion isn't between reasonable people if such comparisons are being made. This discussion started out at 1 so never should have made it past the first page.

too true but we're a 5000 year old civilization, bound to make a few mistakes over the millennia .... how old is your country again?

To me someone should not throw stones if they can't take it. The thread is not about America it is about a comparison of Obama to Hitler. If you read my original post on this the matter is rubbish and this thread should be closed Shakey suggested.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • >defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool It is not. It is the inhuman artist replacement. The human writing the prompt is the employer/manager requesting the work product of the artist -- a supervisory/descriptive job that doesn't carry with it any rights to the copyright of that work product at all. And since AI is not human itself, it can't gain copyright for anything it is asked to regurgitate or hallucinate, so it can't transfer that copyright to the employer/manager/human who asked for the output. This was all legally reaffirmed last year. So, no, while there are AI tools, AI slopware generation is NOT a "tool" in the legal definition of that word.
    • As long as i get to play GTA 6 before it ends 😂😂
    • Google is opening the world's first AI museum in Los Angeles by Ivan Jenic Image via: Google Ever since AI image generators went mainstream, the debate over whether AI-generated art is real art hasn't let up. Those who don’t consider AI to be art say that if a machine does the creating and anyone can prompt it, there’s no skill involved, and therefore no art is produced. The counter-argument is equally persistent, as defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool, and that every major technological breakthrough, like the camera or the computer, was met with the same skepticism before eventually being accepted as a legitimate creative medium. Google’s position in this debate is clear. Which is no surprise, as the company is investing billions in AI infrastructure. And now, in efforts to encourage people to use its AI even more, Google is opening Dataland on June 20, which it's calling the world's first AI arts museum. Located inside The Grand LA, a Frank Gehry-designed building in Los Angeles, the museum spans 25,000 square feet. The museum is built around a collaboration with media artist Refik Anadol, who has worked with Google since 2016. The inaugural exhibition is called Machine Dreams: Rainforest, and is powered by an AI model trained on “an extensive dataset of the natural world.” It generates 1.2 billion pixels of visuals in real time and reacts to visitors dynamically. The space also generates soundscapes, real-time emotion sensing, and algorithmically produced scents. Image via: Refik Anadol Studio / Google Google says that the museum is powered by its Gemini models, which run on Google Cloud. So, everything is generated inside one of Google’s AI data centers and is streamed to the museum. Alongside the museum opening, Google Arts & Culture is funding an AI Artist Residency, giving four artists $25,000 grants each, along with mentorship from Refik Anadol Studio and access to Google's machine learning tools. Their work will be shown at Dataland and on the Google Arts & Culture website later this year. Google’s AI museum will undoubtedly initiate a fired-up debate on social media, and we can’t wait to see the first reactions. Via: Smithsonian Magazine
    • Calling GTA 6 overhyped crap doesn’t make you edgy, it just makes you sound like someone who hasn’t enjoyed anything since the PS2 era.
    • I’m not arguing whether Rockstar likes money. Obviously, they do, they’re a business. I’m saying this isn’t new. They’ve always launched console first. This is just how Rockstar operates.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      571
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      178
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!