Recommended Posts

Today has debuted two videos straight from the set of Universal Pictures' upcoming Jurassic World that take you behind-the-scenes of the upcoming film. Featuring director Colin Trevorrow and stars Chris Pratt, Bryce Dallas Howard, Ty Simpkins and Nick Robinson?, you can check out the two videos at http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=119868

Today has debuted two videos straight from the set of Universal Pictures' upcoming Jurassic World that take you behind-the-scenes of the upcoming film. Featuring director Colin Trevorrow and stars Chris Pratt, Bryce Dallas Howard, Ty Simpkins and Nick Robinson?, you can check out the two videos at http://www.comingsoon.net/news/movienews.php?id=119868

All I got out of those 2 videos is that W's daughter is an NBC correspondent...not a very good one though.

  • 2 weeks later...

That "brochure" says that it was printed at FedEx Office (Kinkos). Would a real life Jurassic Park actually be so cheap as to allow that to be printed on their brochures. It really makes me wonder if that is legit or fan-made?

 

If that is legit, talk about sponsored product placing that is completely out of place. Absolutely terrible and cheap looking.

  • Like 1

That "brochure" says that it was printed at FedEx Office (Kinkos). Would a real life Jurassic Park actually be so cheap as to allow that to be printed on their brochures. It really makes me wonder if that is legit or fan-made?

 

If that is legit, talk about sponsored product placing that is completely out of place. Absolutely terrible and cheap looking.

 

Do you honestly believe that if Jurassic World was real, they wouldn't have paid sponsors? It's way more realistic to have paid sponsors than to not have any. A real Jurassic World would have Coca Cola banners around every bend.

  • Like 2

Do you honestly believe that if Jurassic World was real, they wouldn't have paid sponsors? It's way more realistic to have paid sponsors than to not have any. A real Jurassic World would have Coca Cola banners around every bend.

Coca-Cola would be a completely different story. That's something they probably sell there. That brochure just looks cheap.

 

I seem to recall a character from JP saying, "Spared no expense." Guess that won't be true for the printed materials.

 

Seriously, you spend billions on buying islands, researching cloning dinosaurs, actually cloning them, building a park, etc., but can't spend a few extra dollars not having another company's logo on your brochure?

Coca-Cola would be a completely different story. That's something they probably sell there. That brochure just looks cheap.

 

I seem to recall a character from JP saying, "Spared no expense." Guess that won't be true for the printed materials.

 

Seriously, you spend billions on buying islands, researching cloning dinosaurs, actually cloning them, building a park, etc., but can't spend a few extra dollars not having another company's logo on your brochure?

 

Every theme park in the world gets paid by sponsors of all kinds even not featured in the parks just to advertise. 

 

This is a pamphlet. This isn't something that will be on the big screen. This is something thousands of will be produced to go along with thousands of other background props in the park. I'm starting to think but they might have these outside the cinemas etc as a freebie. That would be pretty cool.

Coca-Cola would be a completely different story. That's something they probably sell there. That brochure just looks cheap.

 

I seem to recall a character from JP saying, "Spared no expense." Guess that won't be true for the printed materials.

 

Seriously, you spend billions on buying islands, researching cloning dinosaurs, actually cloning them, building a park, etc., but can't spend a few extra dollars not having another company's logo on your brochure?

 

:huh: Actually cloning them? :huh:

You do realize this is a fiction Hollywood movie. 

 

Edit:  SORRY, I misunderstood. :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:   Silly me... I feel like such an idiot now.  Please forgive me ;)

Am I the only person who thinks Alien Resurrection is good?

 

it was good.

 

but we all have our own opinions about movies.

 

The 4th movie is never good.

Alien 4

Terminator 4

The 4th Star Wars

The 4th Bourne

etc

 

Star wars a new hope is technically the fourth movie of the franchise..

 

 

Oh, I don't know...the fourth Star Trek was pretty good. (Now, the fifth, that's another story entirely.) :)

 

All star trek movies are great.

:huh: Actually cloning them? :huh:

You do realize this is a fiction Hollywood movie. 

 

Edit:  SORRY, I misunderstood. :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl: :rofl:   Silly me... I feel like such an idiot now.  Please forgive me ;)

:p  It happens! I know I've made some posts that made me feel like an idiot over my tenure here, so no hard feelings  :)

  • Like 1

@ Dermot: I don't think Alien 4 was good. I've read the original Alien books, 1 to 3, the 4th one was written by a different author and pointless, why would they mess up the story like that?? Obviously, I've also seen the movies and my opinion is the same. Even if Ripley (read Sigourney Weaver) was on the 4th Alien, I really think it was a mistake. The original trilogy was a real masterpiece, any continuation (or deviation, like those awful Alien vs Predator things) was crap.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • >defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool It is not. It is the inhuman artist replacement. The human writing the prompt is the employer/manager requesting the work product of the artist -- a supervisory/descriptive job that doesn't carry with it any rights to the copyright of that work product at all. And since AI is not human itself, it can't gain copyright for anything it is asked to regurgitate or hallucinate, so it can't transfer that copyright to the employer/manager/human who asked for the output. This was all legally reaffirmed last year. So, no, while there are AI tools, AI slopware generation is NOT a "tool" in the legal definition of that word.
    • As long as i get to play GTA 6 before it ends 😂😂
    • Google is opening the world's first AI museum in Los Angeles by Ivan Jenic Image via: Google Ever since AI image generators went mainstream, the debate over whether AI-generated art is real art hasn't let up. Those who don’t consider AI to be art say that if a machine does the creating and anyone can prompt it, there’s no skill involved, and therefore no art is produced. The counter-argument is equally persistent, as defenders of AI-generated artworks often claim that AI is just a tool, and that every major technological breakthrough, like the camera or the computer, was met with the same skepticism before eventually being accepted as a legitimate creative medium. Google’s position in this debate is clear. Which is no surprise, as the company is investing billions in AI infrastructure. And now, in efforts to encourage people to use its AI even more, Google is opening Dataland on June 20, which it's calling the world's first AI arts museum. Located inside The Grand LA, a Frank Gehry-designed building in Los Angeles, the museum spans 25,000 square feet. The museum is built around a collaboration with media artist Refik Anadol, who has worked with Google since 2016. The inaugural exhibition is called Machine Dreams: Rainforest, and is powered by an AI model trained on “an extensive dataset of the natural world.” It generates 1.2 billion pixels of visuals in real time and reacts to visitors dynamically. The space also generates soundscapes, real-time emotion sensing, and algorithmically produced scents. Image via: Refik Anadol Studio / Google Google says that the museum is powered by its Gemini models, which run on Google Cloud. So, everything is generated inside one of Google’s AI data centers and is streamed to the museum. Alongside the museum opening, Google Arts & Culture is funding an AI Artist Residency, giving four artists $25,000 grants each, along with mentorship from Refik Anadol Studio and access to Google's machine learning tools. Their work will be shown at Dataland and on the Google Arts & Culture website later this year. Google’s AI museum will undoubtedly initiate a fired-up debate on social media, and we can’t wait to see the first reactions. Via: Smithsonian Magazine
    • Calling GTA 6 overhyped crap doesn’t make you edgy, it just makes you sound like someone who hasn’t enjoyed anything since the PS2 era.
    • I’m not arguing whether Rockstar likes money. Obviously, they do, they’re a business. I’m saying this isn’t new. They’ve always launched console first. This is just how Rockstar operates.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      570
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      178
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      74
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!