Recommended Posts

Anyone spotted Drift King in the trailer? LOL! Oh and.. I really hope Grant, Ellie, or even Malcolm makes a cameo in the movie. My guess it's probably in the beginning or at the end.. I really hope it's Malcolm though..

 

 

Also, I think I"ve said this before.. I really hope they talk about Dodgson's company a bit.. or at least they should. Or maybe Dodgson worked for the company who re-made Jurassic World? Hmm.. 

Is it me or this trailer hasn't wow me at all. CGI looks abit pants.

 

Honestly there are no good shots in the trailer to judge the CGI. The closeups in the original used practical effects which looked good but I feel like complaining about the CGI from what that trailer showed is just pointless.

First part of the trailer seemed promising, then pretty scientist says 'oh we've created a hybrid on the theme park island coz we could'...  My guess is a 6.5

Reminds me of this:

 

Only in this case, we could change it to say, "Your writers were so preoccupied with whether or not they could write crap, they didn't stop to think if they should."

Hollywood, it's a well known, scientifically proven fact, that  nipples, also get aroused by fear (primal reflex of some sort IIIRC) Please do not defy science and well, pure logic! :devil:

 

that lighting really enhances the mood of the scene. XD. 

  • Like 1

So... After all what happened in previous movies and.. .Seeing that carnivore dinosaurs ARE dangerous... They go ahead and modify one of them to make it even more dangerous and intelligent...

 

I loved Jurassic Park but... I am the only one who thinks the plot of this 4th movie is just stupid??? (I will watch it anyway yay :D )

  • Like 3

So... After all what happened in previous movies and.. .Seeing that carnivore dinosaurs ARE dangerous... They go ahead and modify one of them to make it even more dangerous and intelligent...

 

I loved Jurassic Park but... I am the only one who thinks the plot of this 4th movie is just stupid??? (I will watch it anyway yay :D )

While I do agree with you, you're basically contradicting human nature! We are idiots by nature... where's that famous quote, humans are the only animal that make the same mistake twice (though untrue) and then one simple word... MONEY! We are also very greedy!

I didn't even realize the stupidity of the premise until I saw the trailer. Let's give this failed concept of a dinosaur theme park ANOTHER try. Let's also add a genetically modified killer dino on top of all that. WHAT CAN GO WRONG?

 

After seeing Guardians of the Galaxy I just can't take Chris Pratt Seriously in this movie. He will always be Star Lord!

I don't think that the subject of this movie is stupid. Yeah, we all know what happened the first time, but it's in human's nature to be curious, and after so many years they feel confident that nothing can go wrong this time. It's like going from a prototype to a world wide release, it takes a lot of work, a lot of "alphas" and "betas" till you get it right. So they learned from past mistakes (at least they think they did).

 

"We're a curious race", to quote the immortal Jack O'Neill from SG-1. And ignorant too. :) To me, trying to do this again, after all that happened, is perfectly plausible. 

 

Also, there's a lot of money involved. They feel that the profits will go sky-high with that park, and they're right, because there's no person on this Earth that wouldn't want to see live dinosaurs, at least once in a lifetime. 

 

So yeah, it feels normal to me. I'm 100% convinced that the CGI will live up to the expectations, but I hope that the overall acting and characters will too.

Also what is with Chris Pratt's character riding on a bike with Raptors? Are we getting that story where they have controlled Raptors?

 

I read on Deadline I think (maybe Cinemablend) that those Raptors are either tamed or just being "aimed" at a target and Pratt's character has some sort of pheromone type thing on him or something.

Also what is with Chris Pratt's character riding on a bike with Raptors? Are we getting that story where they have controlled Raptors?

 

I'm thinking they may of been trained to cull numbers and let out to roam to feed. 

 

I'm not disappointed in the slightest, the genetic modifying is thought out a lot better then what I was imagining them doing. Can't wait to see this.

Also what is with Chris Pratt's character riding on a bike with Raptors? Are we getting that story where they have controlled Raptors?

It could be that they're all running from the same thing.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Calling GTA 6 overhyped crap doesn’t make you edgy, it just makes you sound like someone who hasn’t enjoyed anything since the PS2 era.
    • I’m not arguing whether Rockstar likes money. Obviously, they do, they’re a business. I’m saying this isn’t new. They’ve always launched console first. This is just how Rockstar operates.
    • I'm not sure how old the school is, but they've been doing this since GTA 3. Back in those days we'd be lucky for game companies to release on the PC at all. And with the current state of Sony (or Microsoft) their gaming wing won't be getting a penny from me.
    • We now know when and how the Universe may truly end by Sayan Sen Image by Marek Pavlík via Pexels| Not representative A study by physicist Henry Tye of Cornell University suggests that the universe may not expand forever. Instead, it could eventually stop expanding, begin contracting and end in a "Big Crunch" roughly 20 billion years from now. The research, published in the Journal of Cosmology and Astroparticle Physics, was conducted by Tye, Horace White Professor of Physics Emeritus at Cornell University. Using recent observations from major dark-energy surveys, Tye and his collaborators developed a cosmological model that predicts the universe could have a total lifespan of about 33 billion years. Since the universe is currently estimated to be 13.8 billion years old, the model places it near the midpoint of its existence. According to Cornell University's summary of the research, the study centers on the cosmological constant, a term introduced by Albert Einstein in his theory of general relativity. In modern cosmology, the cosmological constant is commonly used to describe the simplest form of dark energy, the unknown phenomenon believed to be driving the accelerating expansion of the universe. "For the last 20 years, people believed that the cosmological constant is positive, and the universe will expand forever," Tye said in a Cornell University news release. "The new data seem to indicate that the cosmological constant is negative, and that the universe will end in a big crunch." The study draws on data from the Dark Energy Survey (DES) and the Dark Energy Spectroscopic Instrument (DESI), two major projects designed to investigate the nature of dark energy. According to Tye, recent observations suggest that dark energy may not behave exactly like a simple cosmological constant. To account for those observations, Tye and his collaborators proposed a model involving an extremely light hypothetical particle that evolves over time. In their calculations, this produces a negative cosmological constant and leads to a future collapse of the universe. The model predicts that cosmic expansion would continue for approximately another 11 billion years before reaching a maximum size, after which the universe would begin contracting and eventually collapse. Scientists have long debated how the universe might end. As explained in an article published in The Conversation by Stephen DiKerby of Michigan State University, several possibilities have been proposed. If dark energy remains constant and positive, the universe could continue expanding indefinitely, gradually becoming colder, darker and more diffuse in a scenario often called the "heat death" of the universe. Other theoretical possibilities include a Big Rip, in which cosmic expansion accelerates so dramatically that galaxies, stars and even atoms are torn apart, or a Big Crunch, in which expansion reverses and the universe collapses back into an extremely dense state. DiKerby notes that the Big Crunch idea itself is not new. What distinguishes Tye's work is that it attempts to use current observational data to estimate when such a collapse might occur and how it could unfold. Much of the universe's long-term evolution remains uncertain. According to current astrophysical understanding, stars will continue to form and die for billions of years. The Sun, for example, is about halfway through its expected lifespan. Galaxies are also expected to continue merging; the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies are projected to collide several billion years from now. At the same time, the nature of dark energy remains one of the biggest unanswered questions in cosmology. While observations indicate that the universe's expansion is accelerating, scientists still do not know what is causing that acceleration. Future observations may therefore alter current predictions about the cosmos's ultimate fate. Tye emphasized that additional evidence will be needed before firm conclusions can be drawn. DESI continues to collect data, while upcoming observations from missions and observatories including Euclid, SPHEREx and the Vera C. Rubin Observatory are expected to provide more precise measurements of dark energy. "People have said before that if the cosmological constant is negative, then the universe will collapse eventually. That's not new," Tye said. "However, here the model tells you when the universe collapses and how it collapses." For now, the study presents one possible future for the cosmos rather than a settled prediction. Whether the universe ultimately ends in a Big Crunch, expands forever, or follows another path entirely remains an open question that future observations will help answer. Source: Cornell University, The Conversation This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • If you look around on Amazon, some of these are available for $9
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      AndreaB earned a badge
      First Post
    • Week One Done
      Huge Trailer earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Classifyskilleducation earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      eurospharma62 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      With What earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      570
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      175
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      73
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      68
    5. 5
      neufuse
      64
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!