Mum vs Windows 8 - attempting a shutdown


Recommended Posts

Like anything, our experiences is what determines the "norm".

I had a friend once ask the simple question, "Should I get a mac - all my friends said I should?", in-which I replied, "Not unless you want to re-learn everything." - to keep it simple.

She decided to ignore me, which is fine, and bought a Mac Book and I was curious - so I asked her, "How is the mac?", and the reply of, "This is the 3rd Mac I sent back, they keep giving me left handed macs", came back to me and had me curious.

The problem was the window minimize, full screen and close was on the left side of the window but because her experiences / expectations where different, she was lead to believe - this is wrong.

What's amazing is that she got 2 replacements just for the "wrong" placement of the buttons :/

I "spit vile on here daily"? perhaps you would be kind enough to post proof of this horrible accusation against me, show me one post per day I have made dating back for the last 7 days that I "spit vile" on here, I don't believe you at all.

Oh please.... you are one of the most vehement anti-Windows 8 trolls on here (along with a couple of others). Dot Matrix is entirely right in what he says.

Oh please.... you are one of the most vehement anti-Windows 8 trolls on here. Dot Matrix is entirely right in what he says.

Well in the other end of the scale, Dot Matrix is the worst Win 8 fannoy I have seen.

He simply can not get over the fact that a large portion of Windows users do not like 8, and he doesn't accept that any of their valid concerns are indeed valid.

I suggest he, and you, look up the saying horses for courses and have a read of what it means.

  • Like 2

I'll agree there, even some of Microsofts own Windows 8 apps aren't even preinstalled with Windows. You have to go find them in the "Store" (like Remote Desktop app etc) and the location for printing is terrible!

I disagree. The printing function for Metro apps is entirely logical when you think about it. You are interacting with a device. You therefore press the device charm. It's not rocket science.

Pushing the power button to shut down would be silly on most desktop setups. I could see it for laptops or AIO machines though I never did it.

Why would it be silly? It's call the power button, not the power ON button. It powers OFF too.

I grew up to NOT touch the button on the front. You always shut down from the OS, and once it told you it was safe, you could touch the button.

Now we're being told to do the opposite.

I wish MS had a refund policy for this useless OS.

The power button hasn't been a physical power button since the ACPI standard came out in 1996, and has triggered a "clean" shutdown (or sleep in Vista and 7) in Windows since not long after that (Windows 98 had it I think). If you want to live in the past where the power button physically cut the power to the machine nearly 20 years ago, then fair play to you. But if so, what are you doing with Windows 8?

Well in the other end of the scale, Dot Matrix is the worst Win 8 fannoy I have seen.

He simply can not get over the fact that a large portion of Windows users do not like 8, and he doesn't accept that any of their valid concerns are indeed valid.

I suggest he, and you, look up the saying horses for courses and have a read of what it means.

You are just as bad. Saying "large portion" without any corroborating facts whatsoever. If I said "an equally large portion of Windows users DO like 8" you'd be all over me like a rash.

Sure Windows 8 has a few issues here and there. But the shutdown options are where they are for a reason. When you're in Metro apps, you don't want to force people to go back to the start screen to shut down. That's just as stupid as making people click on Start to shutdown lol. To provide the shutdown options in a common place no matter where you are in the OS means it has to be on the charms bar somewhere. I for one don't think a 6th charm is needed just for power options. Especially as there are several alternative ways of shutting down your PC.

Perhaps they could rename the Settings charm to "System" ? That might make it more obvious that power controls are inside.

Surely, everything new needs a learning curve.But come on , this is windows.What sells here is that it is Familiar.

If I have to learn some OS tricks from scratch, why shouldn't I consider a new one?

After reading most of this thread, I have come to the conclusion that this should be dot matrix's new sig

You guys can hurl all the **** you want at me. Still doesn't make it any less of a fact. Change is part of the game -

Did we HAVE to move away from the abacus? No, but we did anyway. Did we HAVE to move away from the large ENIAC systems? No, but we did anyway. Did we HAVE to move away from the CLI? No, but we did anyway. Did we HAVE to move away from Program Manager? No, but we did anyway. Did we HAVE to move away from Windows 95? No, but we did anyway. Same principal applies here. Do we HAVE to move away from the desktop? No, but we're never going to get anywhere by clinging to it.

The GUI will evolve to incorporate new technologies like touch and Kinect/motion sense. Things the old 80's/90's desktop can't and never will handle. Again, all you have to do is look at science fiction film/TV to see what's can be and almost will be possible in the future. All you need is some vision.

You guys can hurl all the **** you want at me. Still doesn't make it any less of a fact.

It's true, Dot is from the future, so he knows what he's talking about. Anything some people like me might perceive as "speculation" or "talking out of one's ass" has actually happened. Even though I don't like W8 now, I will in the future. It is gospel.

After reading most of this thread, I have come to the conclusion that this should be dot matrix's new sig

obama_change-WE-NEED.jpg

That's a fine signature. Perfect for the last 30 years or so of the PC industry.

Your argument is therefore invalid.

It's true, Dot is from the future, so he knows what he's talking about. Anything some people like me might perceive as "speculation" or "talking out of one's ass" has actually happened. Even though I don't like W8 now, I will in the future. It is gospel.

You will like Metro in Windows 9. It will change a bit, but will be basically the same mechanism. However, the fact that it isn't new, not being a major change, and that you won't have any frustration since you learned how to use it in Windows 8 will make you like it.

So, I'm from the future also.

I find it absolutely hilarious that some people here think change is not necessary, when for the past 30 years the PC industry growth and development has been all about change.

I wonder if liberals like Windows 8 more than conservatives. Would make sense for some opinions here.

Well obviously 9+ people agree with me. Stop trying to start stuff up. I mean really? C'mon.

Wow 9 people compared to the millions of people who simply press the power button to switch off in the simplest way possible. If you want to do things the hard way and complain when it's even harder in the new OS, then good for you. Just don't complain about it so much. Everyone else will simply just use the easiest and most consistent way that hasn't changed in nearly 20 years.

Many people are following the assumption that it's okay to be an ignorant consumer and that Microsoft should cater to you. No, that's not how it works. When you buy a product, ANY product, you take the time to learn about what it is you're buying. I mean, unless of course you're just wasteful, in which case, good on you for buying something you have no clue about only to bitch about it on the internet. /golfclap

As for the video, I find it completely off base. You don't sit someone in front of a computer and expect them to know how everything works without telling them. If she went out to buy a computer herself, I'm sure she would have at least asked questions regarding what she's looking at, or maybe how to use it. At least, that's in giving her credit on the notion that she's a smart consumer. She was able to open the web just fine, so I'm not sure if she was limited to having to do it herself, as she otherwise could have Google'd it and have been done.

As far as teaching people goes, I thought the 60+ age group of people would be the most difficult ones to teach. Instead, I'm noticing it's the 30-40 age group that seems quite stubborn, having this horrid attitude like it's my fault Microsoft made Windows 8. They act like they know it all, their excuses are flimsy, and it really comes down to them being impatient as if someone crapped in their cheerios that morning. I say this because the excuses I hear usually fall like a house of cards once I demonstrate the tasks for them.

Now personally, I'm not a big fan of Windows 8. However, I'll take legitimate concerns over these half-baked lazy/ignorant claims. There's no excuse for not educating yourself as a consumer, especially today when Google (or Bing if that's what you fancy) is literally in your pocket.

Why can't Microsoft simply put a "Shut Down PC" tile on the new Start screen? The new shut down process is ridiculous. My PC is on the floor - I don't want to have to reach all the way under my desk just to shut it down.

Can't they have expected this change to cause major confusion? "Shut Down" belongs in the Start menu. That's what "everyone" remembers. End of story.

Even Linux is easier to shut down.

Okay, you won't "shut down" a tablet, but you do shut down a desktop/laptop.

Why can't Microsoft simply put a "Shut Down PC" tile on the new Start screen? The new shut down process is ridiculous. My PC is on the floor - I don't want to have to reach all the way under my desk just to shut it down.

Can't they have expected this change to cause major confusion? "Shut Down" belongs in the Start menu. That's what "everyone" remembers. End of story.

Even Linux is easier to shut down.

Okay, you won't "shut down" a tablet, but you do shut down a desktop/laptop.

You can do that yourself, someone posted instructions on how to do it earlier in this very thread.

Can't understand why these so called "power users" who are so against the power options been where they are can't just do that - isn't that solving the issue?

Oh I forgot, they expect MS to do it for them!

Only time I ever shutdown is to change hardware or in the case of a storm. That said, the only logical place, besides where it's currently at, to put a Shut down button would be in the user menu on the Start screen.

I don't even know anyone that shuts their pc down. They either close the lid on their laptop or simply walk away from their computer which either leaves it running or puts it to sleep depending on the power options.

I guarantee you that if you ask what your typical user does with their PC shutting down will not be part of their tasks. Most people just want to shop online, search, user Facebook, play the odd game or two, use Microsoft office, and watch youtube videos. All of which are more than possible.

Bottom line is this argument has been beaten to death and does nothing but show that people are grasping at the straws to find faults with Windows 8. It's FUD and nothing more.

Why can't Microsoft simply put a "Shut Down PC" tile on the new Start screen? The new shut down process is ridiculous. My PC is on the floor - I don't want to have to reach all the way under my desk just to shut it down.

Can't they have expected this change to cause major confusion? "Shut Down" belongs in the Start menu. That's what "everyone" remembers. End of story.

Even Linux is easier to shut down.

Okay, you won't "shut down" a tablet, but you do shut down a desktop/laptop.

Out of the box Microsoft expects you to not shutdown the machine. By default windows 8 goes into sleep mode in 15 minutes.

Many people are following the assumption that it's okay to be an ignorant consumer and that Microsoft should cater to you. No, that's not how it works. When you buy a product, ANY product, you take the time to learn about what it is you're buying. I mean, unless of course you're just wasteful, in which case, good on you for buying something you have no clue about only to bitch about it on the internet. /golfclap

As for the video, I find it completely off base. You don't sit someone in front of a computer and expect them to know how everything works without telling them. If she went out to buy a computer herself, I'm sure she would have at least asked questions regarding what she's looking at, or maybe how to use it. At least, that's in giving her credit on the notion that she's a smart consumer. She was able to open the web just fine, so I'm not sure if she was limited to having to do it herself, as she otherwise could have Google'd it and have been done.

As far as teaching people goes, I thought the 60+ age group of people would be the most difficult ones to teach. Instead, I'm noticing it's the 30-40 age group that seems quite stubborn, having this horrid attitude like it's my fault Microsoft made Windows 8. They act like they know it all, their excuses are flimsy, and it really comes down to them being impatient as if someone crapped in their cheerios that morning. I say this because the excuses I hear usually fall like a house of cards once I demonstrate the tasks for them.

Now personally, I'm not a big fan of Windows 8. However, I'll take legitimate concerns over these half-baked lazy/ignorant claims. There's no excuse for not educating yourself as a consumer, especially today when Google (or Bing if that's what you fancy) is literally in your pocket.

No....that is not how products work. VERY VERY UNLIKELY: If Photoshop released CS7 for the same price, and ALL it did was crop images, would that be okay? No. You said it...we BUY the software. If it does not do what we want, we will not buy it. Just because you make an operating system/video game/any program does not give you immunity to do whatever you want.

If this change made Windows 8 a MASSIVE.....MASSIVE failure, as a business they WOULD have reverted back to the old ways.

You can do that yourself, someone posted instructions on how to do it earlier in this very thread.

Can't understand why these so called "power users" who are so against the power options been where they are can't just do that - isn't that solving the issue?

Oh I forgot, they expect MS to do it for them!

You expect my parents or grandparents to do this? THEY are the users that shut down their computers more often than us.

Stupid post is stupid, for the love of god use the corners - that is all (and shut up about 2 extra clicks you whining *******s, how many times do you shutdown? its 2 clicks for the love of god, 2 presses of a finger you little hissy fit teeny boppers.......said in mock hissy fit manner)

No....that is not how products work. VERY VERY UNLIKELY: If Photoshop released CS7 for the same price, and ALL it did was crop images, would that be okay? No. You said it...we BUY the software. If it does not do what we want, we will not buy it. Just because you make an operating system/video game/any program does not give you immunity to do whatever you want.

If this change made Windows 8 a MASSIVE.....MASSIVE failure, as a business they WOULD have reverted back to the old ways.

You expect my parents or grandparents to do this? THEY are the users that shut down their computers more often than us.

You saying that in a way that implies all parents / grandparents can't speak or don't know how to do a google search etc. Do you not have 2-5 mins to do it for them?

My father is 67, he's not a power user whatsoever, I've just upgraded his PC to Windows 8, shown him once how to shut it down etc and he's fine .... not asked me since on how to shut down or get to the start screen etc.

People really do need to give the older generation the benefit of doubt instead of using them to further their dislike of Windows 8

No....that is not how products work. VERY VERY UNLIKELY: If Photoshop released CS7 for the same price, and ALL it did was crop images, would that be okay? No. You said it...we BUY the software. If it does not do what we want, we will not buy it. Just because you make an operating system/video game/any program does not give you immunity to do whatever you want.

If this change made Windows 8 a MASSIVE.....MASSIVE failure, as a business they WOULD have reverted back to the old ways.

You expect my parents or grandparents to do this? THEY are the users that shut down their computers more often than us.

I don't think anyone is expecting your parents or grandparents to do anything, well anything other than use the charm bar/settings/power/shutdown. It isn't obvious no, but its also not obvious when it was in the start menu - you just knew it was there. This charm bar method takes no time to get used to, but if your not even going to show them how to use the modern interface or even say 'use the corners' then your kind of building your own obstacles.

Wow 9 people compared to the millions of people who simply press the power button to switch off in the simplest way possible. If you want to do things the hard way and complain when it's even harder in the new OS, then good for you. Just don't complain about it so much. Everyone else will simply just use the easiest and most consistent way that hasn't changed in nearly 20 years.

Millions of people press the power button? Since when? I have never seen anyone do that, and I do IT help desk. Pushing a physiscal power button is the hard way. I want to shutdown the computer via software...you know...like we are soposed to?

Stupid post is stupid, for the love of god use the corners - that is all (and shut up about 2 extra clicks you whining *******s, how many times do you shutdown? its 2 clicks for the love of god, 2 presses of a finger you little hissy fit teeny boppers.......said in mock hissy fit manner)

It's not just the shut down procedure that makes Windows 8 a fail to me. There are no drivers for my motherboard or drawing tablet, I hate the chicklet style UI, the desktop app is ugly and bland, the damn list goes on. Do you really think I'm going to rush out and buy a product I don't like?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Transmission 4.1.2 by Razvan Serea Transmission is a fast, easy-to-use bittorrent client with support for encryption, a web interface, peer exchange, magnet links, DHT, µTP, UPnP and NAT-PMP port forwarding, webseed support, watch directories, tracker editing, global and per-torrent speed limits, and more. Transmission has one of the lowest memory & resource footprints of any major BitTorrent client. Transmission's light overhead is one reason why it is so well suited for home NAS and media servers. Having been used by Western Digital, Zyxel and Belkin, Transmission gives truly impressive performance on almost any compatible hardware. Transmission is an open source, volunteer-based project. Unlike some BitTorrent clients, Transmission doesn't play games with its users to make money. Transmission doesn't bundle toolbars, pop-up ads, flash ads, twitter tools, or anything else. It doesn't hold some features back for a payware version. Its source code is available for anyone to review. Transmission doesn't track users, the website and forums have no third-party ads or analytics. Transmission 4.1.2 changelog: This is Transmission 4.1.2, a bugfix release. It fixes 20+ bugs and has a few performance improvements too. All users are encouraged to upgrade to this version. Highlights Fixed 4.1.0 bug that could cause duplicate HTTP announces to be sent to trackers. (#8639) All Platforms Reject benc data that has invalid characters. (#8577) Fixed a bug during the startup sequence where if one torrent failed to parse, subsequent torrents would also fail. (#8605) Fixed a bug that stalled some downloads at 99%. (#8654) Fixed a 4.1.0 upgrade bug that could overwrite utp_enabled and tcp_enabled settings. (#8658) Fixed a 4.1.0 crash that could happen when a peer supplied reqq value smaller than 32 in LTEP handshake. (#8713) Fixed a 4.1.0 regression that periodically wrote upload & download stats to disk even when Transmission had been idle since the last write, preventing the stats file's disk from hibernating while idle. (#8722) Fixed a 4.1.0 bug that prevented TCP peer connections on some systems. (#8748) Added safeguards to HTTP responses to prevent clickjacking. (#8749) Fixed edge case that didn't preserve the order of a batch of torrents when moving their queue position up or down. (#8782) Added sanitization for UTF-8 client names provided by peers during handshake. (#8809) Stopped appending redundant zeros to blocklist files when downloaded from a remote URL. (#8819) Fixed a build failure that occurred when building with link-time optimization. (#8540) macOS Client Fixed a 4.1.0 memory leak. (#8613) Fixed navigation focus issues in the Inspector. (#8792, #8810) Improved UI code to use less CPU. (#8832, #8833, #8835, #8836, #8842, #8846, #8851) Qt Client Fixed a 4.1.0 crash when parsing some RPC responses from older Transmission servers. (#8618) Fixed a 4.1.0 bug that saved both deprecated and current settings names to settings.json. (#8623) GTK Client Fixed a 4.1.0 bug that did not show translated logging level strings. (#8611) Fixed a 4.1.0 crash when toggling alternative speed limits. (#8709) Web Client Fixed a 4.1.0 bug that displayed timestamps in some dropdowns as 6.75:45 instead of 6:45. (#8624) Fixed a bug that could show incorrect torrent status when reconnecting to the server after a lost connection. (#8780, #8783) transmission-remote Improved transmission-remote console output for JSON-RPC 2. (#8799, #8805) Download: Transmission 64-bit | Qt 5 Setup ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Download: Transmission 32-bit | Qt 5 Setup Links: Transmission Homepage | Other OSes | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • The sweet release of death has never looked more appealing.
    • Meh, just another dongle-haven downgrade compared to my Surface Pro 7+. Whenever I decide to upgrade in the next decade or so, it certainly won't be another microslop Surface with this enshitification trend they've been having after the Surface Pro 7+. Hopefully a future generation of the Framework 12 will be a real upgrade...
    • This could exactly be how our Sun ends but it's not as simple by Sayan Sen Image by Drew Rae via Pexels An international team led by Université de Montréal (University of Montreal) PhD student Érika Le Bourdais has found that the ancient white dwarf star LSPM J0207+3331 is still pulling in planetary debris, even though it has been cooling for about three billion years. White dwarfs are dense, Earth-sized stellar remnants left behind when Sun-like stars exhaust their nuclear fuel and shed their outer layers. The star, located 145 light-years away in the constellation Triangulum, is the oldest and coldest white dwarf known to have a surrounding disk of dust. The star was first spotted in 2019 by a citizen scientist through the Backyard Worlds: Planet 9 project. Its cool temperature immediately suggested that it was very old, since white dwarfs gradually lose heat over time. Using the W. M. Keck telescopes in Hawaii, astronomers later confirmed that the star shows infrared signals consistent with dust rings formed by asteroids breaking apart under its strong gravity. Such infrared excesses occur when a star emits more infrared light than expected, often because warm dust surrounding it absorbs and re-radiates energy. “This discovery challenges our understanding of planetary system evolution,” said Le Bourdais. “The fact that we still see planetary debris being accreted three billion years after the star became a white dwarf suggests that asteroids, comets, and even planets can remain in orbit around these stars for a very long time.” Spectroscopic analysis—a technique that studies light to identify the chemical elements present in an object—revealed thirteen heavy elements in the star’s atmosphere: sodium, magnesium, aluminium, silicon, calcium, titanium, chromium, manganese, iron, cobalt, nickel, copper, and strontium. Normally, heavy elements sink quickly in hydrogen-rich white dwarfs, making them hard to detect. “We expected to see only a few elements, but we found dozens!” explained Le Bourdais. The research paper adds more detail. The absence of carbon features suggests the debris came from a carbon-volatile-depleted source. The abundance pattern shows slight deficits of magnesium and silicon compared to iron but otherwise resembles Earth-like material. This points to a differentiated rocky body—one whose materials have separated into distinct layers such as a metallic core and rocky mantle—with a metallic core fraction higher than Earth’s. In other words, the star is accreting the remains of a large rocky object, similar in structure to Earth or the asteroid Vesta. “White dwarfs offer one of the only ways we can directly measure the composition of exoplanets,” said Patrick Dufour, co-author and professor at Université de Montréal. “When planetary debris come too close, they are torn apart by the star’s gravity and end up polluting its atmosphere, leaving a detailed chemical fingerprint of its composition.” The team also detected weak Ca II H & K line core emission, making this only the second known isolated polluted white dwarf to show this feature. These are specific spectral signatures produced by ionised calcium and can indicate unusual physical activity in a star’s upper atmosphere. The finding suggests that extra physical processes may be happening in or above the star’s upper atmosphere. The study stresses the importance of including heavy elements in model atmosphere calculations, since leaving them out can distort the inferred structure and lead to inaccurate stellar parameters. Earlier work suggested the star’s infrared excess came from two dust rings. The new analysis shows that a single silicate dust disk—a ring composed largely of rock-forming minerals rich in silicon and oxygen—can explain the observed signal at 11.6 μm, simplifying the picture of the system’s structure. The question of how debris ended up falling into the star so late remains open. One idea is that giant planets in the system slowly destabilised smaller bodies over billions of years. Another possibility is that a passing star disturbed the orbits of debris. “Future observations with the James Webb Space Telescope or archival data found in the European Space Agency’s Gaia mission could help distinguish between a planetary rearrangement and the gravitational effect of a close stellar encounter,” said John Debes, co-author and researcher at the Space Telescope Science Institute. Dufour noted that hydrogen-rich white dwarfs are the most common type, and the coolest among them are the oldest stars in the galaxy. “We didn't have the habit of looking for signs of accretion in them. This unique case motivates us to expand our search to more of these stars.” The findings show that even after billions of years, planetary systems can remain active and complex. Substantial accretion events—the gradual accumulation of surrounding material onto a celestial object—can still occur long after a star’s death, offering a rare window into the composition and fate of distant worlds. Source: University of Montreal, IOPScience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      B2Proxy earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      MadMung0 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      jefred earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Apprentice
      JoeyNeo went up a rank
      Apprentice
    • Week One Done
      oliviaexpo earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      485
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      228
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      70
    4. 4
      FloatingFatMan
      58
    5. 5
      neufuse
      56
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!