Recommended Posts

Hurr durr the bible doesn't mention extraterrestrial life. Why would there be such life, when earth is the center of the universe?

I don't like those bible thumping ignorant folks. If they believed God created this Earth, then why all the extra space? For nothing? I believe in God too but come on.

And there isn't evolution or id , in short don't overreach

Okay what? But you still haven't addressed any point besides that one. Are you just disagreeing to do it? Or are you interested in a real conversation?

I don't like those bible thumping ignorant folks. If they believed God created this Earth, then why all the extra space? For nothing?

Let me give you a hint: when the bible was written, men didn't know about stars, galaxies and universe; they saw light turn to dark and had to explain it somehow.

I believe in God too

le55h.jpg

Okay what? But you still haven't addressed any point besides that one. Are you just disagreeing to do it? Or are you interested in a real conversation?

If you wish I didn't want to beat a dead horse.

If one other planet has intelligent life then "look at the stars" isn't so useless
Assuming it wasn't killed off
Every other thing in nature that happens naturally or by accident happens more than once. Anything that happens only once was intentional.

Great so the origin of the universe was intentional, Craig would be impressed by these apologetics. Making sweeping statements about the entire universe based on what little we know is arrogant and bound to fail.

These are stone cold scientific facts. How is it over reaching?

No they are not.

Also, what should constitute a "proof"? In the infinite space, there are many clusters of galaxies. Let's assume in distant galaxies there are life forms, even advanced life forms. We will never contact them and they will never contact us due to the immense distances. Do we sink our head in the sand and say no extraterrestrial life exists because we haven't seen proof of it? Sounds as ignorant and retarded as "since we are on earth and we see everything change around us, we are in the center of the world". :rolleyes:

  • Like 1

Let me give you a hint: when the bible was written, men didn't know about stars, galaxies and universe; they saw light turn to dark and had to explain it somehow.

le55h.jpg

Not everyone that believes in God is a nutcase. I'm pro choice, support gay marriage and have a big ass gun. I believe from what I have experienced, not because my parents told me stories when I was young. In a nutshell, I went from a blood gang member, having my brother murdered on Christmas Eve to moving to Florida making well into the six figures at 27 years old. All after dropping out of high school. Is this common, yes it may be. But when I ran out of options and had nowhere to turn but crime, I asked God for answers and he literally showed me. I can't make it any clearer than that. But you are free to believe what you want. I can't hate you for that. It's just my choice.

If you wish I didn't want to beat a dead horse.

Assuming it wasn't killed off

Great so the origin of the universe was intentional, Craig would be impressed by these apologetics. Making sweeping statements about the entire universe based on what little we know is arrogant and bound to fail.

No they are not.

You haven't answered one single point but I bet you think you did. Take a step back, look at this for what it is and if you were someone else observing this conversation you would agree that what you just did is some ballroom dancing. You are right, we don't know much. But using that fact and saying we are alone is foolish. Just like if I were to say that people don't exist in Arkansas because I've never been there is ignorant and foolish.

Look, it's a game of numbers. With the vastness of the universe it's mathematically impossible for us to be alone. How is it possible to be so near sighted?

But nevermind, you are right. No need to beat a dead horse, we can agree to disagree or you can say you were right. It's fine with me.

Belief in a concept so pointless as life on other planets (which I would lay money does not exist) without a shred of any conclusive proof whatsoever is something we thinkers who think outside of the herd prefer to call by an accurate term. Namely: "faith". Be intellectually honest with yourselves. That's what it is.

I will leave it to psychologists to ponder why this concept has so much unwarranted support among ostensibly "scientific" thinkers as some here imagine themselves to be.

Do you think that if an advance planet would surely take our sytems down or whatever cause where too stupid, yes that's what it is.

Open your eyes and smell the coffe, lots of worlds out there more advance than us the stupid with just the a-bomb, think about it, what else do we have besides being slaves of gouverment ****.

Maybe that happened before..................never know.

Cheers.

Sorry but if they wanted to destroyed us, they would have, np.

Not everyone that believes in God is a nutcase. I'm pro choice, support gay marriage and have a big ass gun. I believe from what I have experienced, not because my parents told me stories when I was young. In a nutshell, I went from a blood gang member, having my brother murdered on Christmas Eve to moving to Florida making well into the six figures at 27 years old. All after dropping out of high school. Is this common, yes it may be. But when I ran out of options and had nowhere to turn but crime, I asked God for answers and he literally showed me. I can't make it any clearer than that. But you are free to believe what you want. I can't hate you for that. It's just my choice.

le55h.jpg

People are so self centered, they actually can't take a coincidental sequence of events - they have convinced themselves that when they speak, someone listens. And since he has "showed" them but for example, won't "show" the millions of Africa starving, it probably makes them feel superior. :laugh:

Belief in a concept so pointless as life on other planets (which I would lay money does not exist) without a shred of any conclusive proof whatsoever is something we thinkers who think outside of the herd prefer to call by an accurate term. Namely: "faith". Be intellectually honest with yourselves. That's what it is.

I will leave it to psychologists to ponder why this concept has so much unwarranted support among ostensibly "scientific" thinkers as some here imagine themselves to be.

Conclusive proof is right here on this piece of rock we call Earth.

Belief in a concept so pointless as life on other planets (which I would lay money does not exist) without a shred of any conclusive proof whatsoever is something we thinkers who think outside of the herd prefer to call by an accurate term. Namely: "faith". Be intellectually honest with yourselves. That's what it is.

I will leave it to psychologists to ponder why this concept has so much unwarranted support among ostensibly "scientific" thinkers as some here imagine themselves to be.

And why is it pointless? What if I can offer proof? Do you realize that nothing I can say will ever change your mind? There is a TON of evidence out there from NASA scientists and astronauts, to government officials, to independent researchers. What more are you looking for?

le55h.jpg

People are so self centered, they actually can't take a coincidental sequence of events - they have convinced themselves that when they speak, someone listens. And since he has "showed" them but for example, won't "show" the millions of Africa starving, it probably makes them feel superior. :laugh:

How is that self-centered tho? We all have our sets of beliefs and they should be respected. Superiority is far from what's at play here and we both know that. Never once have I said I was better than anyone and I will never claim to have all the answers. All I know is what I believe and it works for me. So many people stuck in jobs and lives they hate and I was able to find something that works for me. We all need something to believe in. Why do you think "The Secret" sold so well? All it was is a rewording of the bible verse "Ask and ye shall receive."

You don't have to say it explicitly. By believing your prayer has been "answered", you inadvertently believe you are better than all those "many people stuck in jobs and lives they hate". :rolleyes:

You don't have to say it explicitly. By believing your prayer has been "answered", you inadvertently believe you are better than all those "many people stuck in jobs and lives they hate". :rolleyes:

Well technically I am aren't I? Let me ask you, if I had all the excuses to be dead or in jail and do the opposite then what does that make me? I'm no Mark Zuckerberg but doesn't that make him better than most? If someone went to college, graduated and now works at a job they hate and wish they could change what would you call them? I was moved to 13 different schools, chose to drop out of High School, got my GED 3 weeks later attended college and dropped out of that to build 2 businesses. Never had government assistance except for unemployment for 3 months, travel when and where I want and answer to no one. Most people wish they had that. If I were an atheist, does that make me a good businessman? Or is it my belief in God that makes you think I think I'm better than everyone?

What's the difference between my believing in God, and people that turn to self-affirmation to motivate themselves? I'm asking because I really want to understand your point of view. Have you been around that many religious people that look down on you? I'm not the average believer. I question everything about religion so believe me that my belief didn't come easily. I'm STILL in search. So please, help me out.

Belief in a concept so pointless as life on other planets (which I would lay money does not exist) without a shred of any conclusive proof whatsoever is something we thinkers who think outside of the herd prefer to call by an accurate term. Namely: "faith". Be intellectually honest with yourselves. That's what it is.

I will leave it to psychologists to ponder why this concept has so much unwarranted support among ostensibly "scientific" thinkers as some here imagine themselves to be.

post-420821-0-56630900-1358570651.gif

Well technically I am aren't I? Let me ask you, if I had all the excuses to be dead or in jail and do the opposite then what does that make me? I'm no Mark Zuckerberg but doesn't that make him better than most? If someone went to college, graduated and now works at a job they hate and wish they could change what would you call them? I was moved to 13 different schools, chose to drop out of High School, got my GED 3 weeks later attended college and dropped out of that to build 2 businesses. Never had government assistance except for unemployment for 3 months, travel when and where I want and answer to no one. Most people wish they had that. If I were an atheist, does that make me a good businessman? Or is it my belief in God that makes you think I think I'm better than everyone?

What's the difference between my believing in God, and people that turn to self-affirmation to motivate themselves? I'm asking because I really want to understand your point of view. Have you been around that many religious people that look down on you? I'm not the average believer. I question everything about religion so believe me that my belief didn't come easily. I'm STILL in search. So please, help me out.

It means a plethora of things, included, yes, you being good business man, if you are indeed successful in what you do. Or do you attempt to claim that because you prayed, God succeeded for you? Are you for real? Do you claim that all successful businessmen are True? Believers?? :rolleyes: If so, why are not all those poor Africans or Americans or Europeans or people in general that all pray to your god not successful as well? Either you are "better" than them and your god has chosen you over them, or your imaginary friend does not exist and you made him to feel better/humble with yourself ("can't be I'm that good - I dropped out of school and college - so it must be god").

Regarding self-affirmation, there is absolutely nothing wrong with that. I do not see, however, how self-affirmation has anything to do with our discussion. Do you believe that if you had no god, you'd have nothing to motivate you? Why is that? Why is your success not reaffirming your qualities and thus motivating you to achieve more? I am not familiar with what you do, but you say you are good at it, and I "believe" you. If so, I find it puzzling why people do not see qualities in themselves, but instead attribute their success to this god or another. As a side-note, do you also attribute your "failings" to your god? Do you attribute your school moving and dropping out to him? Or do you take the "blame"? If this is the case, I "believe" you have been indoctrinated like most religious folk - bad things are one's fault but good things are god's doing; "god works in mysterious ways" and so on.

I live in Israel, so as you can imagine I meet many religious people. Let's just say that the "looking down on" has been mutual. They have their beliefs and look down upon me, and they have their beliefs so I look down upon them. :laugh:

Sure there's a strong possibility of life on other planets other than our own. More likely well beyond our capabilities to travel. Like many of our Sci-Fi movies portray this life may be predatory in nature. Do we really need to find such? Then again, who's to say that asteroid didn't come from a different dimension? In this dimension we are the only life in the universe, but in other dimensions there are multiple life forms across universes.

From a poster on Reddit

I was excited, but from reading the paper, and doing a little research, I'm flagging.

Reasons to be skeptical:

1) [N.C. Wickramasinghe](http://en.wikipedia...._Wickramasinghe), one of the authors of the paper, has been "finding" fossilised life in meteorites for years. He's regarded as a fringe scientist, and allies himself with many rather bullish personalities. He claims that the universe was intelligently designed, and has argued on the side of a type of creationism. He claims that fossil finds of the near-bird dinosaur Archeopterix are frauds.

2) The paper is full of references to other scientific papers, as it should be. But Wickramasinghe was personally involved in almost every one.

3) This paper was published in a [journal with a checkered history](http://en.wikipedia....al_of_Cosmology), run by another bullish man known to run his mouth off when questioned. He's also a long-time fan of Wickramasinghe.

4) The paper refers to an incident of "[Red Rain](http://en.wikipedia...._rain_in_Kerala)", a weather phenomenon that has occurred infrequently over the last decade in that area of the world. It is caused by algae spores suspended in water vapor. Initially, the Indian Centre For Earth Science Studies posited an extra-terrestrial origin (a cometary burst) for the spores, but when ground-investigations were carried out, it was found to be a common species of Algae the grew extensively in the area. Wickramsighe et al appear to have ignored this result.

5) The type of Algae found in Red Rain is **[photosynthetic](http://en.wikipedia....cal_composition)**, and so, deprived of light, would have died in the heart of the meteorite/comet.

6) The paper quite confidently states:

> "At the time of entry into the Earth?s atmosphere on 29 December 2012, the parent body of the Polonnaruwa meteorite would have had most of its interior porous volume filled with water, volatile organics and possibly viable living cells."

Without any explanation of how that could have been inferred, or how it would even be possible in the frigid depths of space.

7) The overall tone of the paper is less investigative than it is persuasive and dismissive. The final sentence neatly sums up the unscientific attitude of the authors:

> The universe, not humans, must have the final say to declare what the world is really like.

This whole thing is turning into an embarrassing disappointment. But with peer-review, and other institutions' investigations, perhaps it's true.

Who is more likely to find life in a meteorite than someone who has been searching for it for his entire life?

...A double-edged sword if ever I saw one.

The Journal of Cosmology doesn't have the best reputation.

I don't like those bible thumping ignorant folks. If they believed God created this Earth, then why all the extra space? For nothing? I believe in God too but come on.

I think Leo meant that as a little sarcastic/humorous. ;)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I notice how you dodged the questions I had about the racism shown by ignorant, gullible, cowardly people when the Poles, like your partner, were the immigrants. Ahem. I wonder how you'd feel if native born Brits suddenly treated you as "dirty crooked immigrant" for being half Trump-American? If they ordered you to leave and "go back to your corrupt country" (on the other side of the Atlantic), would you go? The truth is based on facts as supported by evidence. As requested in your previous posts, I have used the facts in your own post to show everyone the truth.
    • US citizens are paying to their government, who could use that to fund healthcare and tuition and relieve the costs of these for citizens instead of making tax breaks that overwhelmingly favor the rich. I'm not saying that tariffs are the correct solution, but what else would they be used for? What else could Trump have in mind for wanting them, if he hasn't figured out that labor costs are higher in the US?
    • I’m in need of a new chair and it sounds like the backrest cannot be locked? I also sat on a Herman miller and was devastated that it couldn’t be locked also, what is going on with chairs. I want to be able to lock the backrest into any position but not even the Herman’s do that
    • Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 Ergonomic Office Chair review: The Ikea of chairs by Steven Parker I've reviewed a few gaming chairs over the past three years or so and generally found them to score well in our reviews. SIHOO reached out asking if I was interested in taking a look at their flagship chair, the Doro C300 Pro V2. I never got the chance to check out its predecessor, but the V2 is described as an "Adaptive Ergonomic Chair." It became available to buy in April of this year. Let's get things rolling with a closer look at the specifications and features. Specifications Doro C300 Pro V2 Model Ergonomic Materials Mesh Back and Seat; Soft PU Coated Armrests Height adjustability 45.5 - 53 cm / 17.5" - 20.9" Seat (w+d) 52 x 43 - 47 cm / 20.5" x 16.9" - 18.5" (adjustable) Backrest 52 – 60 cm / 20.5" - 23.6" (adjustable) Lumbar support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Armrest adjustability 8D Bionic Armrests Rocking angle 105°, 120°, 135° (fixed) Neck support Mesh built-in (adjustable) Net weight 27.3 kg / 59.64 lbs Weight support 150 kg / 330 lbs Colors Black, White Warranty 5 years (upon registering) Price $499.99, $539.99 Introduction At first glance, it looks like a chair that in another life wants to be a Herman Miller; It certainly looks like my Aeron Remastered, but the Doro C300 Pro V2 has quite a few more features and costs quite a bit less. SIHOO says that it is made up of a "DynaCore" system that tracks your movement and synchronizes the headrest, backrest, lumbar support, and armrests as you shift, twist, or recline. They also say that the "SyncroFlex Backrest" molds to your spine, which kind of describes how the mesh fabric works in most ergonomic chairs, but anyway. Below are the meat and potatoes measurements for the chair. Here is the same tech sheet, but in inches. Durability I would be remiss to not talk about the various durability testing this chair underwent before coming to market, as this is claimed on the product page. First of all, the chair is BIFMA-, SGS-, and TÜV-certified. As for durability, the tests undergone were: 100,000 Castor cycles tested 120,000 Armrest cycles tested 120,000 Recline cycles tested 120,000 Gas lift cycles tested 60,000 Armrest durability cycles tested 120,000 Rotation cycles tested Nothing about weights testing, though. Now that's all disclosed, now onto my own personal findings. Assembly The Doro C300 Pro V2 came in two large boxes (1) (2), and everything was packed very well, protecting the different parts of the chair. In the box, there is a folded sheet that explains the 12 steps to assemble it; they are: Remove the bottom cover on the aluminum base; Insert the five legs into the aluminum base and use ten screws to fasten them; Insert the castors into the legs; Replace the bottom cover on the bottom of the aluminum base; Place the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder into the aluminum base; Screw the bottom part of the arm rests, taking care of the orientation using two screws on each side; Use three torx screws to fasten the footrest to the bottom of the seat; Fasten the backrest to the seat using four torx bolts; Fasten the armrests to the backrest using four Torx bolts (two on each side), taking care to note the orientation; Place the chair onto the Class 4 Hydraulics gas cylinder; Insert the headrest into the top of the backrest; Use two torx screws to fasten the headrest to the backrest. There's also an online guide you can refer to. Carefully unpacking the two boxes took around 15 minutes because almost everything is wrapped in plastic and protective foam; the chair assembly itself took around an hour. I say in the above assembly steps to take note of the orientation, because it's not obvious which way around the bottom portion of the armrests go, and although there is an L and R on the bottom of the armrests, it also wasn't clear from the instructions which was actually left or right, facing the chair, or in the seated down orientation? Anyway, I ended up putting the bottom portions on the wrong sides, and after securing one of the armrests, I discovered that although it was on the correct side, the armrest base could rotate a full 360°, but not when bolted to the chair, so I had to remove it, rotate it, and then bolt it back on. Truly an Ikea experience! Also, to complicate things further, although all the parts are labeled from A to X (yes, that's 24 parts) unhelpfully, these letters do not appear on the parts themselves or the package with the bolts, screws, and washers. There's also a pair of protective gloves in the box, but I think they were made for much smaller hands than I have. Even my friend, who is 5.1, had difficulty putting them on. Once assembled, I needed to sit down. Anyway, as I said, it looks quite similar to my Herman Miller. And here is the back of it. If you look at the product page and on Amazon, it seems like a lot of thought has gone into the chair itself and what it's capable of, but there is no mention at all about the castors, and this is an area where I think the chair trips up quite quickly. I found it difficult to move the chair in any direction. I asked a friend who came to visit me earlier this week to test my findings, and she said that the wheels were "no good," so it definitely isn't just me. I am 6'2 myself and a big guy, I work from home and gained a few pounds from mostly staying in and the hell away from other people. However, the Doro C300 Pro V2 is rated for up to 150kg (330lbs), which in my case is used well within its max rating. Ergonomics The number of adjustments you can make, right up to setting it in nap mode — which I haven't fully tested yet — is what you'd expect from a premium chair. Yes, you can go up and down (max 7.5 cm adjustment), rock back and forth (with tilt adjustment), and lock the chair between three stages of 105°, 120°, 135°, which is not quite as flat as the AndaSeat I tested at 160°. Some thought has also gone into the "8D" armrests, too, which are cushioned but quite firm; you'll only know it if you press hard into the PU-covered tops, which give about half a centimeter, but it's enough to ensure your skin won't get awkwardly stuck to it in warmer (or sweatier) conditions. It almost feels like plastic and is very easy to keep clean. However, the armrest positions move far too easily, and I am not sure what that "elbow" function is. Maybe it is good for a short person with short arms, anyway, I never used it and kept it flat at all times. There are eight levels of adjustment for the armrests, they are: backwards, forwards, swing left/right, height up and down, tilt, and 360° rotation, which can be handy for desk clearance. As I said, the armrest pads shift far too easily, which could give off an ergonomic vibe, but who wants the armrest sliding when you are shifting weight? The height adjustability does lock into place when lifting and adjusting. Comfort This is ultimately what it boils down to at the end of the day, right? Quite a lot of reviews praise the comfort of this chair, and I don't disagree that the mesh seating is quite comfortable. I am used to the material from my daily Herman Miller. However, the backrest cannot be locked into place, and this is actually a feature; as you shift or recline yourself on the chair, the backrest moves with your body. It took some getting used to. The lumbar gives ample support, but I would have preferred an adjustable one built into the seat base, as this causes the backrest to move up and down at will. Again, as with my previous chair review, this chair is also rated for tall people, but nowhere in the product documentation does it say how tall. Being 6'2 myself, I'm happy to say that the backrest is tall and wide enough, and thought has been given to being able to adjust the neck rest, but as others have mentioned in their reviews, people as tall as 6.2ft is about the limit for the neckrest. Conclusion What I didn't like The footrest is rated for 15kg (33 lbs), which to me seems a bit light, and after looking online, it seems like a chair footrest for adults must be at least twice that rating. In all honesty, they are just hollow metal tubes, so it is not recommended to let a kid sit on them. I also feel like it doesn't really go out far enough for my height, so that kind of puts the dampener on me being able to use it regularly. I'll just have to continue to use my subwoofer as a footrest! I do not like the armrests being able to shift around as easily as they can, and they are a little too forward-positioned in the chair to comfortably sit close to my desk, because even in the lowest height position, they don't allow me to go under the desk like is possible with my Herman Miller. I also feel like this chair could have been delivered partially constructed, especially the armrests on the seat, and why the aluminum base wasn't already pre-constructed (without the castors) is baffling, considering it would have fit in one of the two boxes that way. The instructions also need to be clearer. On the pamphlet, there's an A to X listing (which is also used in the steps), but none of the physical parts use this lettering system! What I did like I'll be honest, I haven't used it for very long, just one week, and seating comfort is subjective after all! Any spills wiped straight off it, the stitching, and the lines look great, not a fray to be seen or stitch out of place. It looks kind of cool, too. My favorite feature of these seats is the nap mode. While you're not lying completely flat, it leans far back enough to make you easily doze off after a heavy gaming or working session. Overall, this chair offers plenty of comfort features. The MSRP does vary quite a bit depending on the region, at £549.99 in the UK, and €580 in Europe, and $599 before tax in the U.S. However, shipping is free, which is a bonus for such a heavy item. Is it worth it, though? At three years' warranty, I think it's a decent deal. Another firm out of Germany sent me a free replacement hydraulic gas spring for a chair that failed after almost four years, so it was well outside its two-year warranty. My advice is to always try, as you might have the same luck I did. If I could fault it at all, it would be the constant shifting of the armrests and backrest. Where to buy Although the footrest variant normally costs $539.99, it has been discounted to $469.99 on the official website in Black or White. In fact, the non-footrest variant is only $40 cheaper. On Amazon, it currently costs more at $499.99 links below. Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $469.99 (official website) Sihoo Doro C300 Pro V2 for $499.99 at Amazon US SIHOO provided a free sample without any review or pre-approval. Good to know This Amazon link is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      207
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      73
    5. 5
      macoman
      62
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!