Recommended Posts

Hurr durr the bible doesn't mention extraterrestrial life. Why would there be such life, when earth is the center of the universe?

I don't like those bible thumping ignorant folks. If they believed God created this Earth, then why all the extra space? For nothing? I believe in God too but come on.

And there isn't evolution or id , in short don't overreach

Okay what? But you still haven't addressed any point besides that one. Are you just disagreeing to do it? Or are you interested in a real conversation?

I don't like those bible thumping ignorant folks. If they believed God created this Earth, then why all the extra space? For nothing?

Let me give you a hint: when the bible was written, men didn't know about stars, galaxies and universe; they saw light turn to dark and had to explain it somehow.

I believe in God too

le55h.jpg

Okay what? But you still haven't addressed any point besides that one. Are you just disagreeing to do it? Or are you interested in a real conversation?

If you wish I didn't want to beat a dead horse.

If one other planet has intelligent life then "look at the stars" isn't so useless
Assuming it wasn't killed off
Every other thing in nature that happens naturally or by accident happens more than once. Anything that happens only once was intentional.

Great so the origin of the universe was intentional, Craig would be impressed by these apologetics. Making sweeping statements about the entire universe based on what little we know is arrogant and bound to fail.

These are stone cold scientific facts. How is it over reaching?

No they are not.

Also, what should constitute a "proof"? In the infinite space, there are many clusters of galaxies. Let's assume in distant galaxies there are life forms, even advanced life forms. We will never contact them and they will never contact us due to the immense distances. Do we sink our head in the sand and say no extraterrestrial life exists because we haven't seen proof of it? Sounds as ignorant and retarded as "since we are on earth and we see everything change around us, we are in the center of the world". :rolleyes:

  • Like 1

Let me give you a hint: when the bible was written, men didn't know about stars, galaxies and universe; they saw light turn to dark and had to explain it somehow.

le55h.jpg

Not everyone that believes in God is a nutcase. I'm pro choice, support gay marriage and have a big ass gun. I believe from what I have experienced, not because my parents told me stories when I was young. In a nutshell, I went from a blood gang member, having my brother murdered on Christmas Eve to moving to Florida making well into the six figures at 27 years old. All after dropping out of high school. Is this common, yes it may be. But when I ran out of options and had nowhere to turn but crime, I asked God for answers and he literally showed me. I can't make it any clearer than that. But you are free to believe what you want. I can't hate you for that. It's just my choice.

If you wish I didn't want to beat a dead horse.

Assuming it wasn't killed off

Great so the origin of the universe was intentional, Craig would be impressed by these apologetics. Making sweeping statements about the entire universe based on what little we know is arrogant and bound to fail.

No they are not.

You haven't answered one single point but I bet you think you did. Take a step back, look at this for what it is and if you were someone else observing this conversation you would agree that what you just did is some ballroom dancing. You are right, we don't know much. But using that fact and saying we are alone is foolish. Just like if I were to say that people don't exist in Arkansas because I've never been there is ignorant and foolish.

Look, it's a game of numbers. With the vastness of the universe it's mathematically impossible for us to be alone. How is it possible to be so near sighted?

But nevermind, you are right. No need to beat a dead horse, we can agree to disagree or you can say you were right. It's fine with me.

Belief in a concept so pointless as life on other planets (which I would lay money does not exist) without a shred of any conclusive proof whatsoever is something we thinkers who think outside of the herd prefer to call by an accurate term. Namely: "faith". Be intellectually honest with yourselves. That's what it is.

I will leave it to psychologists to ponder why this concept has so much unwarranted support among ostensibly "scientific" thinkers as some here imagine themselves to be.

Do you think that if an advance planet would surely take our sytems down or whatever cause where too stupid, yes that's what it is.

Open your eyes and smell the coffe, lots of worlds out there more advance than us the stupid with just the a-bomb, think about it, what else do we have besides being slaves of gouverment ****.

Maybe that happened before..................never know.

Cheers.

Sorry but if they wanted to destroyed us, they would have, np.

Not everyone that believes in God is a nutcase. I'm pro choice, support gay marriage and have a big ass gun. I believe from what I have experienced, not because my parents told me stories when I was young. In a nutshell, I went from a blood gang member, having my brother murdered on Christmas Eve to moving to Florida making well into the six figures at 27 years old. All after dropping out of high school. Is this common, yes it may be. But when I ran out of options and had nowhere to turn but crime, I asked God for answers and he literally showed me. I can't make it any clearer than that. But you are free to believe what you want. I can't hate you for that. It's just my choice.

le55h.jpg

People are so self centered, they actually can't take a coincidental sequence of events - they have convinced themselves that when they speak, someone listens. And since he has "showed" them but for example, won't "show" the millions of Africa starving, it probably makes them feel superior. :laugh:

Belief in a concept so pointless as life on other planets (which I would lay money does not exist) without a shred of any conclusive proof whatsoever is something we thinkers who think outside of the herd prefer to call by an accurate term. Namely: "faith". Be intellectually honest with yourselves. That's what it is.

I will leave it to psychologists to ponder why this concept has so much unwarranted support among ostensibly "scientific" thinkers as some here imagine themselves to be.

Conclusive proof is right here on this piece of rock we call Earth.

Belief in a concept so pointless as life on other planets (which I would lay money does not exist) without a shred of any conclusive proof whatsoever is something we thinkers who think outside of the herd prefer to call by an accurate term. Namely: "faith". Be intellectually honest with yourselves. That's what it is.

I will leave it to psychologists to ponder why this concept has so much unwarranted support among ostensibly "scientific" thinkers as some here imagine themselves to be.

And why is it pointless? What if I can offer proof? Do you realize that nothing I can say will ever change your mind? There is a TON of evidence out there from NASA scientists and astronauts, to government officials, to independent researchers. What more are you looking for?

le55h.jpg

People are so self centered, they actually can't take a coincidental sequence of events - they have convinced themselves that when they speak, someone listens. And since he has "showed" them but for example, won't "show" the millions of Africa starving, it probably makes them feel superior. :laugh:

How is that self-centered tho? We all have our sets of beliefs and they should be respected. Superiority is far from what's at play here and we both know that. Never once have I said I was better than anyone and I will never claim to have all the answers. All I know is what I believe and it works for me. So many people stuck in jobs and lives they hate and I was able to find something that works for me. We all need something to believe in. Why do you think "The Secret" sold so well? All it was is a rewording of the bible verse "Ask and ye shall receive."

You don't have to say it explicitly. By believing your prayer has been "answered", you inadvertently believe you are better than all those "many people stuck in jobs and lives they hate". :rolleyes:

You don't have to say it explicitly. By believing your prayer has been "answered", you inadvertently believe you are better than all those "many people stuck in jobs and lives they hate". :rolleyes:

Well technically I am aren't I? Let me ask you, if I had all the excuses to be dead or in jail and do the opposite then what does that make me? I'm no Mark Zuckerberg but doesn't that make him better than most? If someone went to college, graduated and now works at a job they hate and wish they could change what would you call them? I was moved to 13 different schools, chose to drop out of High School, got my GED 3 weeks later attended college and dropped out of that to build 2 businesses. Never had government assistance except for unemployment for 3 months, travel when and where I want and answer to no one. Most people wish they had that. If I were an atheist, does that make me a good businessman? Or is it my belief in God that makes you think I think I'm better than everyone?

What's the difference between my believing in God, and people that turn to self-affirmation to motivate themselves? I'm asking because I really want to understand your point of view. Have you been around that many religious people that look down on you? I'm not the average believer. I question everything about religion so believe me that my belief didn't come easily. I'm STILL in search. So please, help me out.

Belief in a concept so pointless as life on other planets (which I would lay money does not exist) without a shred of any conclusive proof whatsoever is something we thinkers who think outside of the herd prefer to call by an accurate term. Namely: "faith". Be intellectually honest with yourselves. That's what it is.

I will leave it to psychologists to ponder why this concept has so much unwarranted support among ostensibly "scientific" thinkers as some here imagine themselves to be.

post-420821-0-56630900-1358570651.gif

Well technically I am aren't I? Let me ask you, if I had all the excuses to be dead or in jail and do the opposite then what does that make me? I'm no Mark Zuckerberg but doesn't that make him better than most? If someone went to college, graduated and now works at a job they hate and wish they could change what would you call them? I was moved to 13 different schools, chose to drop out of High School, got my GED 3 weeks later attended college and dropped out of that to build 2 businesses. Never had government assistance except for unemployment for 3 months, travel when and where I want and answer to no one. Most people wish they had that. If I were an atheist, does that make me a good businessman? Or is it my belief in God that makes you think I think I'm better than everyone?

What's the difference between my believing in God, and people that turn to self-affirmation to motivate themselves? I'm asking because I really want to understand your point of view. Have you been around that many religious people that look down on you? I'm not the average believer. I question everything about religion so believe me that my belief didn't come easily. I'm STILL in search. So please, help me out.

It means a plethora of things, included, yes, you being good business man, if you are indeed successful in what you do. Or do you attempt to claim that because you prayed, God succeeded for you? Are you for real? Do you claim that all successful businessmen are True? Believers?? :rolleyes: If so, why are not all those poor Africans or Americans or Europeans or people in general that all pray to your god not successful as well? Either you are "better" than them and your god has chosen you over them, or your imaginary friend does not exist and you made him to feel better/humble with yourself ("can't be I'm that good - I dropped out of school and college - so it must be god").

Regarding self-affirmation, there is absolutely nothing wrong with that. I do not see, however, how self-affirmation has anything to do with our discussion. Do you believe that if you had no god, you'd have nothing to motivate you? Why is that? Why is your success not reaffirming your qualities and thus motivating you to achieve more? I am not familiar with what you do, but you say you are good at it, and I "believe" you. If so, I find it puzzling why people do not see qualities in themselves, but instead attribute their success to this god or another. As a side-note, do you also attribute your "failings" to your god? Do you attribute your school moving and dropping out to him? Or do you take the "blame"? If this is the case, I "believe" you have been indoctrinated like most religious folk - bad things are one's fault but good things are god's doing; "god works in mysterious ways" and so on.

I live in Israel, so as you can imagine I meet many religious people. Let's just say that the "looking down on" has been mutual. They have their beliefs and look down upon me, and they have their beliefs so I look down upon them. :laugh:

Sure there's a strong possibility of life on other planets other than our own. More likely well beyond our capabilities to travel. Like many of our Sci-Fi movies portray this life may be predatory in nature. Do we really need to find such? Then again, who's to say that asteroid didn't come from a different dimension? In this dimension we are the only life in the universe, but in other dimensions there are multiple life forms across universes.

From a poster on Reddit

I was excited, but from reading the paper, and doing a little research, I'm flagging.

Reasons to be skeptical:

1) [N.C. Wickramasinghe](http://en.wikipedia...._Wickramasinghe), one of the authors of the paper, has been "finding" fossilised life in meteorites for years. He's regarded as a fringe scientist, and allies himself with many rather bullish personalities. He claims that the universe was intelligently designed, and has argued on the side of a type of creationism. He claims that fossil finds of the near-bird dinosaur Archeopterix are frauds.

2) The paper is full of references to other scientific papers, as it should be. But Wickramasinghe was personally involved in almost every one.

3) This paper was published in a [journal with a checkered history](http://en.wikipedia....al_of_Cosmology), run by another bullish man known to run his mouth off when questioned. He's also a long-time fan of Wickramasinghe.

4) The paper refers to an incident of "[Red Rain](http://en.wikipedia...._rain_in_Kerala)", a weather phenomenon that has occurred infrequently over the last decade in that area of the world. It is caused by algae spores suspended in water vapor. Initially, the Indian Centre For Earth Science Studies posited an extra-terrestrial origin (a cometary burst) for the spores, but when ground-investigations were carried out, it was found to be a common species of Algae the grew extensively in the area. Wickramsighe et al appear to have ignored this result.

5) The type of Algae found in Red Rain is **[photosynthetic](http://en.wikipedia....cal_composition)**, and so, deprived of light, would have died in the heart of the meteorite/comet.

6) The paper quite confidently states:

> "At the time of entry into the Earth?s atmosphere on 29 December 2012, the parent body of the Polonnaruwa meteorite would have had most of its interior porous volume filled with water, volatile organics and possibly viable living cells."

Without any explanation of how that could have been inferred, or how it would even be possible in the frigid depths of space.

7) The overall tone of the paper is less investigative than it is persuasive and dismissive. The final sentence neatly sums up the unscientific attitude of the authors:

> The universe, not humans, must have the final say to declare what the world is really like.

This whole thing is turning into an embarrassing disappointment. But with peer-review, and other institutions' investigations, perhaps it's true.

Who is more likely to find life in a meteorite than someone who has been searching for it for his entire life?

...A double-edged sword if ever I saw one.

The Journal of Cosmology doesn't have the best reputation.

I don't like those bible thumping ignorant folks. If they believed God created this Earth, then why all the extra space? For nothing? I believe in God too but come on.

I think Leo meant that as a little sarcastic/humorous. ;)

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Again, this is an irrelevant attempt to attack the messenger. The truth does not require any justification.
    • Removed the blue and underline as you did not post a link. This would also  be considered spamming.
    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      jessse3334 earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      506
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      196
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      153
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      65
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!