Microsoft blasts PC makers: It's YOUR fault Windows 8 crash landed


Recommended Posts

I just don't get it! It seems as though 99.9%+ of the animosity leveled towards Windows 8 revolves around Metro and the lack of the Start menu. You are NOT REQUIRED to use anything Metro...with the exception of the Start menu, which can easily be gotten around by pinning applications to the desktop or the taskbar. With one of those two options in use the time you need to spend anywhere other than the desktop shrinks to an infinitesimal fraction of 1% of your total computer usage time. That change aside you just use all of your programs the same way you've always been doing! Where is the problem? Someone please explain it to me. I'm not trying to be an jerk here I honestly just don't understand what the major issue is. When you consider the benefits of Windows 8 - faster startup, better security, the *option* for touch computing, and many more it seems as though the tiny bit you arguably may have to give up is insignificant to the benefits.

i must admit, i also one of those consumers.

I usualy buy one with FreeDos preinstalled (not any version of windows),

so i can install whatever OS on it & customized according to my liking and crapware free too.

As W8 provides no benefit based on how I use my computer, I opt for non W8 OS.

I went the other way - I replaced 7 with 8, but left the hardware unchanged.

However, in our own ways, both of us are outliers; while you buy prebuilt, you buy specifically with a no-cost OS so you can install your own, while I build/upgrade my own PCs - therefore, I'm impacted far less by *crapware* than the average consumer.

I was referring to the same folks that normally WOULD go into a Carphone Warehouse or Tesco or hhgregg or Best Buy and buy a portable or desktop PC. If they have a solidly working PC at home, they can either keep it exactly as it is, OS and all, or upgrade just the OS - neither choice counts as an OEM sale, while the latter WOULD count as a sale of Windows.

Since the beginning, sales of Windows have been primarily OEM-driven - in fact, Windows 3.x was the first version to be sold retail in ANY quantity, while it took Windows XP to become the first NT-based OS to be sold in volume in retail.

Windows 8 seems to be very much bucking that trend - it is apparently very much upgrade-driven in terms of uptake. And because it's bucking the trend, there's a lot of finger-pointing going on.

I also brought my copy as an upgrade, I simply don't buy OEM machines because I overclock and because I like more control over my hardware.

I wouldn't believe an accusation by The Register when no proof is provided.

'Rumour' tag added to thread, to remove possible misguidance and the possibility of false accusations being made

  • Like 2

This needs to be made clear: neither Microsoft or any of their employees have actually said anything openly and officially on the matter.

Our well-placed source said that bad sales combined with PC makers ?ignoring? Microsoft's advice has left Redmond executives fuming.

?Microsoft is very frustrated with major OEMs who didn't build nearly enough touch systems and are now struggling to find parts and ramp up. Microsoft says they provided very specific guidance on what to build,? our insider said.

The Register :x

  • Like 2

A questionable statement to make to say the least. I do use Windows 8 (with a start replacement and the theme from the RP) but if Windows 8 was an improvement on the desktop front as they claim the lack of tablets would not have mattered. The public are sending a message with the weak sales Windows 8 machines are getting and I hope they're heeded because Windows 8 is a solid OS once you get past the start screen and the butt ugly theme.

Windows 8 is a solid OS period - the problem (for OEMs) is that the hardware requirements (when it gets down to cases) are not merely similar to Windows 7, but identical to Windows 7.

Windows 8 replaced Windows 7 because I can run more applications.games/etc. - at the same time, and on the same hardware - compared to Windows 7.

However, how old IS Windows 7?

How long had Windows 7 been available when Windows 8 launched?

Basically, how old is the Windows 7 hardware base?

Also - and the question has to be asked - what percentage of the entire Windows 7 hardware base is unsuitable for Windows 8 (broken, too little hard drive, too weak GPU, etc.)?

What a lot of us are forgetting is that it isn't JUST Windows 8 vs. Windows 7, it's the Windows 8 OEM hardware vs. the existing hardware base, of which Windows 7 comprises a large number, but likely not the largest number.

There are doubtless some that are standing pat with Windows 7 (or Vista, or Linux, or even XP) - however, others may have simply grabbed a Windows 8 upgrade. Those aren't OEM sales - if anything, they are LOST OEM sales - however, they ARE sales of Windows 8.

We're getting hard data from the OEMs now - and the usual trend (big OEM sales numbers) is NOT there this time. However, 70 million Windows 8 licenses sold to date (and in less than six months) is an all-time record for ANY version of Windows. Given the lack of OEM sales, there's head-scratching and finger-pointing going on.

Increased price never stopped Windows 7.

Different situation, Windows 7 was the much needed/wanted upgrade from the Vista fiasco.

Had Windows 8 not launched at such a cheap rate I doubt you'd be seeing the marketshare you see today, and its only going to nosedive in units sold a month once the price goes back up.

No doubt they will try and spin it by forcing Windows 8 on OEMs as units sold.

They should just release a full Desktop version without the crap fullscreen Metro frankenstein garbage instead of forcing it on everyone, that would make things better for customers.

They should just release a full Desktop version without the crap fullscreen Metro frankenstein garbage instead of forcing it on everyone, that would make things better for customers.

Agreed. Or at least provide some options in the control panel to do what Start8 and the others do:

  1. Boot directly to the desktop environment
  2. Disable the hot corners.

I do not care about the start screen vs the start menu. But geez, as often as I restart, it is so annoying to boot into the Start Screen and having ti go to the Desktop right away. The hot corners are also very very very very irritating when you are doing something productive.

Here is the thing, despite those two AND ONLY TWO complaints I have about the OS, I still get slammed by Windows 8 fanatics. Having people say "Oh you just do not know how to use computers then", or "learn how to move your mouse". I mean really, there is NO POSSIBLE way anybody can EVER activate those hot corners by accident? I have said many many times that I actually prefer Windows 8 to Windows 7. So we are not allowed to complain about any product anymore? Let's just get rid of Amazon reviews, rotten tomatoes, and any other review/rating system. A company makes a video game that crashes every 30 minutes? Oh well, it is their product and they can do whatever they want right?

For me personally this article is on the spot.

I've upgraded my laptop to Windows 8 but didn't buy any new hardware.

At the moment there is nothing out there that I really like.

It seems that MS and the hardware manufacturers are always out of sync.

Wouldn't the start of Windows 8 been much better if they could have released new ultrabooks and laptops with those new Ive Bridge low power iCore processors from the start?

Lets not forget, The Register did publish the false study that people who use Internet Explorer have lower IQ's compared to those who use alternative web browsers. http://www.ibtimes.com/aptiquant-confirms-internet-explorer-study-was-hoax-823089 The Register's fanbase ate it up like popcorn, but when it was revealed that the study was a hoax, The Register surprisingly did post an article saying it was fraudulent, but basically also said IE users are dumb anyway, we didn't really need a study to prove that. http://www.theregister.co.uk/2011/08/03/internet_explorer_iq_study_hoax/

How can anyone take this so called tech site seriously?

So it's the PC manufacturer's fault that Microsoft changed an already fine, beautiful, familiar and working UI for a P.O.S UI with squared blocks that nobody yet understands?

Windows 8 is an epic fail because of YOU Microsoft, not because of PC manufacturers.

Agreed. Or at least provide some options in the control panel to do what Start8 and the others do:

  1. Boot directly to the desktop environment
  2. Disable the hot corners.

I do not care about the start screen vs the start menu. But geez, as often as I restart, it is so annoying to boot into the Start Screen and having ti go to the Desktop right away.

Easily solved without paying for a 3rd party fix:

http://www.neowin.ne...op/page__st__15

Post #26. I simply have all the programs I use, about 15, on the desktop. No need for a Start Screen or Start Menu. But to each their own.

Anyway, count me in the group that wishes Microsoft had released 2 separate versions of Windows 8. One for non-touch devices, and one for touch devices. Alas, this will be my last non-touch computer anyway. Life goes on.

They should just release a full Desktop version without the crap fullscreen Metro frankenstein garbage instead of forcing it on everyone, that would make things better for customers.

That totally eliminates the whole entire purpose of Microsoft's company, and services wide reorganization.

Easily solved without paying for a 3rd party fix:

http://www.neowin.ne...op/page__st__15

Post #26. I simply have all the programs I use, about 15, on the desktop. No need for a Start Screen or Start Menu. But to each their own.

Anyway, count me in the group that wishes Microsoft had released 2 separate versions of Windows 8. One for non-touch devices, and one for touch devices. Alas, this will be my last non-touch computer anyway. Life goes on.

But that does not fix #2. I would rather have one application control both, so I can uninstall just one thing if I wanted/needed to. And there are free ones out there that do the same thing. I just prefer Start8 because I have used some of Stardock's software back in the XP days and I think their version is the best is just my personal opinion.

Alas, this will be my last non-touch computer anyway.

Not for me, I will not fill my monitor with fingerprints. Doing graphics, programming, podcasts, and everything like that. I could never use a touch screen.

And nowhere have you said that Windows 8 didn't work for non-touch hardware (specifically keyboards and mice). You basically assumed that because it supported touch that it either supported keyboards and mice poorly or not at all.

I bought Windows 8 and use it as my primary operating system, therefore I didn't "assume" anything. I formed an opinion based on my experiences. I never suggested that Windows 8 doesn't work for non-touch hardware, just that it wasn't optimised for mouse and keyboard as much as it was for touch. The Charm Bar is horrible, especially as you have to use it to shut down your computer by mouse (there are alternative keyboard shortcuts). The hot-corners are irritating, especially when they don't work properly with Aero Snap. And Metro apps use completely different mouse gestures to Aero. As a mouse and keyboard user I find those changes annoying. Is it the end of the world? No. Does it make Windows 8 a bad operating system? No. But I don't like some of the changes.

I just don't get it! It seems as though 99.9%+ of the animosity leveled towards Windows 8 revolves around Metro and the lack of the Start menu. You are NOT REQUIRED to use anything Metro...with the exception of the Start menu, which can easily be gotten around by pinning applications to the desktop or the taskbar.

Nonsense. To add users, change your Start Screen background, change your lock screen or manage your user account you have to use the new Metro 'PC Settings' (the alternative to the Control Panel), and clicking on the network icon brings up a Metro interface element. Shutting down the computer by mouse requires you to use the Charm Bar, which is fiddly and obviously optimised for touch, and many Windows features have been moved to Metro (Solitaire) or default to Metro (Mail, Photos, Videos, Reader, etc). Sure you can avoid most Metro elements but Microsoft tries very hard to force it upon users and you cannot escape entirely.

Personally I think it's great that Microsoft took touch really seriously with Windows 8 but the way the Metro elements were bolted onto the desktop was?quite simply?terrible. And let me repeat, I prefer Windows 8 to Windows 7 and I love some of the new desktop improvements - Storage Spaces, Task Manager, the Explorer Ribbon, file transfer dialogue, cloud accounts, etc. But I can certainly appreciate the frustration many people have using it and some of the changes are completely unnecessary.

  • Like 2

I'm gonna have to agree with Microsoft on this one. Just look at Windows Phone 8. It would not have been successful if Nokia hadn't produced the quality Lumia 920.

If any OEM had produced hardware comparable to an iPad, it would have been successful as well.

Microsoft clearly had a plan for Windows 8 and the OEMs did not stick to it. Microsoft had the same plan for Windows Phone 8 (hero devices, featured devices, marketing, etc etc), Nokia and HTC stuck with it, and they have been succesful.

So it's the PC manufacturer's fault that Microsoft changed an already fine, beautiful, familiar and working UI for a P.O.S UI with squared blocks that nobody yet understands?

Windows 8 is an epic fail because of YOU Microsoft, not because of PC manufacturers.

PC sales were already falling even with Windows 7, because of crap hardware. That is the point.

I'm gonna have to agree with Microsoft on this one. Just look at Windows Phone 8. It would not have been successful if Nokia hadn't produced the quality Lumia 920.

If any OEM had produced hardware comparable to an iPad, it would have been successful as well.

Microsoft clearly had a plan for Windows 8 and the OEMs did not stick to it. Microsoft had the same plan for Windows Phone 8 (hero devices, featured devices, marketing, etc etc), Nokia and HTC stuck with it, and they have been succesful.

PC sales were already falling even with Windows 7, because of crap hardware. That is the point.

Most of the peeps I know are looking for a new PC when the time is nigh and they don't pick "hero PCs", but PCs that will do what's required.

PCs aren't looked at in the same way smartphones are looked at.

Smartphone = features, has got the apps I need

PC = has OS, is newer than current machine, doesn't cost a fortune = will do the trick; also: Windows anyways= runs my software

Glassed Silver:mac

  • Like 1
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • You've tried DuckDuckGo and Brave Search, now get serious with SearXNG by Paul Hill Over the last decade, it has become quite trendy to dump Google Search in favor of privacy-preserving alternatives such as DuckDuckGo, Startpage, and Brave Search. These search engines have done a very good job at highlighting dodgy practices by Google, such as adjusting search results based on what it thinks you’ll like (filter bubble) and stalking you around the web to advertise to you. While these search engines are good starting points when compared to non-private services like Google, there are still quite a few issues with them. For example, both DuckDuckGo and Brave Search require running non-free JavaScript in your web browser, which is comparable to running proprietary software on your computer, meaning you can be sure about what it’s actually doing in the background. Another issue is that these search engines are hosted on the respective companies’ servers, and you are using a service that you don’t control. Finally, DuckDuckGo, while offering privacy features, relies heavily on Microsoft’s infrastructure for its results and, in the past, has permitted Microsoft tracking scripts. If you are looking for a more private search solution than DuckDuckGo, Brave Search, and Startpage, then I recommend taking a look at SearXNG. It is a privacy-respecting metasearch engine that can be used via different public instances, which is useful for mobile users, or you can install it on your computer or server and run it locally with maximum control. Unlike Google, Bing, or Brave Search, which crawl the web and have their own search indexes, SearXNG is a metasearch engine, meaning it taps other search engines, stripping your identifying data, such as IP address, user agent, and cookies, in the process. Your search query is sent to the other search engines you enable before aggregating the results. SearXNG has deployment flexibility. If you are a casual user or a mobile user and don’t want to run SearXNG locally, you can use a public instance that is hosted by someone else. The main problem with this is that you are putting trust in the maintainer of the instance regarding stuff like logs that they may keep; good hosts should have a privacy policy explaining their policies. If you are trying to use SearXNG, you can also install the software on your device and then head to 127.0.0.1:8080 in your browser and search from there. While you don’t have to worry about a third-party admin like the public instances, search engines could ultimately block your IP address if they frown on you pulling in their search results locally. If you want to run it locally, it’s a good idea to use proxies or VPNs to hide your actual IP. You don’t have to worry about this with a public instance, as search engines never see your IP address. The main privacy benefit of using SearXNG is that it isolates your identity from the underlying engines that it’s capable of searching, such as Google and Bing. These search engines will only see requests coming from a generic server, so they can’t profile you and create a bubble filter that influences what results you see. This also ensures that your search engine doesn’t turn into an echo chamber that prevents you from reading alternative points of view. As a free software project, you are allowed to inspect SearXNG to make sure there are no negative features bundled inside. This sets it apart from the privacy search engines mentioned earlier because you can’t check their source code. As a meta search engine, you are not restricted to getting results from one source. Due to the fact that it scrapes content from other websites, your SearXNG instance will periodically get blocked from different providers, so it’s good to select a range of sources as a backup. While enabling all of the services will give you great results, this can make searching slower. I am personally happy with slower searches for the best results, but you can always check which providers are slowing down your search from the search results page and disable them to speed things up. If you want decent results quickly, enable the main search providers such as Google, Brave, DuckDuckGo, Qwant, Bing, and Yahoo. This way, you get wide coverage without the latency. On the Engines tab in Preferences, do note that there are different tabs, such as General, Images, and Videos, with their own providers that can be toggled and are not covered by "Enable all" while on the General tab, so be sure to dig into each. Just a note, if you want to enable everything, press "Enable all" in one tab, then hit save at the bottom of the page, then do the next tab, and so on. If you press "Enable all", then do that in each tab, and then save, nothing will stick. When I had just some of the search engines enabled, I searched “define nefarious” and results came back with the definition of “define” - obviously that was a sucky result. However, when I had everything enabled, it found dictionary pages for the word “nefarious” and even had an inline definition on the sidebar, which is quite nice too - that was delivered by WolframAlpha for anyone wondering! Probably the worst thing about this meta search engine is that the engines you select are saved with a cookie, so you must enable them on every new device you use SearXNG on, including if you decide to go into incognito mode with your web browser. Honestly, I would say this is the most annoying aspect, and perhaps if your browser lets you choose a separate private browsing search engine, then it would be best to use DuckDuckGo for this portion of your browsing. Another weakness of SearXNG is the random blocking of it by search providers. When you are on the results page, expand the “Response time” box, and it will show things like “Suspended: too many requests” or “access denied”. This is why it is good to enable several providers so that there is always a fallback to get results from. I won’t pretend SearXNG will be for everyone, however, if you enable all of the providers and put up with the slower response time, the results can be really amazing. Even if you don’t want to use it as your daily driver, keeping a bookmark handy that links to it is a good idea if you ever feel like doing a deep dive into a niche topic where other search engines are just failing to bring up any good result, due to the amount of sources it looks on. If you’re interested in radical user control over the software you use, installing SearXNG locally can also be a good idea, but be prepared to be temporarily blocked from sites if you trigger bot sensors without a VPN. Personally, I’ve opted to use a public instance, rather than install it myself. If you want to use it via a public instance, head over to searx.space to find a provider. Let us know in the comments if you have used SearXNG or its predecessor, Searx. What do you think about the quality of the results?
    • Dear Neowin, If it is not too much trouble, can you start using the new-ish designations for Insider Preview? "Experimental" is different than "former Dev" as it can apply to different models, eg 26H1 or 26H2 etc, right? No need to seed confusion IMHO. And, please "finally" update your graphics. OK?
    • Did you see their FAQ, its quite good. Have a look in the Advanced section. https://delta.chat/en/help
    • Just install Linux Mint that is a real blessing and many times cheaper because you can continue using your old Windows computer/laptop with the latest Linux updates.
    • Interesting share -- however it does not make sense: Email messages get stored somewhere, so how is Delta Chat "based on email" and decentralized without actually storing anything? By Web3 standard practices, the various Relays would require dedicated storage to make messages available to the recipients (like a large series of message queue channels, akin to racks of traditional post office boxes)... and Contacts must be two-way confirmed in order for encryption keys to be exchanged (ostensibly every key-pair is uniquely bound between sender and recipient) and the Relays would preserve the public keys in order to facilitate message carriage... or every device stores all sorts of keys and contact info. All of this to say, decentralized messaging is like running Bluesky nodes except instead of discovering/browsing public feeds by various posters (at the given node) these Delta Chats would be relaying encrypted messages (via Relays) that only trusted recipients would have the appropriate decryption key (their own private key) to read it. But this doesn't solve the "it's like email" sales pitch. The only way it's like email is that there's encrypted binary stuff being transported from your app into the federated ether of Delta Chat Relays for others to decrypt (hopefully only the intended recipient)... but outside of this federated relays framework, it is absolutely nothing like email.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      tuben earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      502
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      226
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      158
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!