Has Neowin hit a all time low? If so, one day boycott


Recommended Posts

There is a lot of pro Microsoft bias amongst Neowin's staff but this particular question doesn't really cause any great harm although admittedly it could be classed as flamebait. There are perceptions of pro Microsoft anti Apple bias on Neowin and if anything this poll seems to be an attempt to discern how true that is.

A fan appreciates the product they use. A fanboy is out there to convince the universe that everything else is ****, ruins discussion for people who are using other stuff ...

Oh -- well in that case, I am just a fan.

Hopefully in the future Mods will stop calling me a 'fanboy' just because I say I like a given product. ;)

Wow, just wow. Not trying to be a dick here, but you have got to be kidding me right?

A technology related website makes a poll asking about the most hated and revered technology company currently out at the time, asking if their members indeed do hate them or not, and it is somehow an all time low? Seriously?

And just throwing this one out there, did you ever stop to think perhaps this is the precursor to a article written about why it seems people may hate/love Apple for good reason/no good reason at all. For example that article could start off "Earlier in the week, we conducted a poll to find out just how our members feel towards Apple, and 47% admitted to hating them..."

Or even more crazy, perhaps this was a way to find out if Neowin perhaps needs to drop their known association with being a Windows only site, and start providing even more coverage of Apple related products to boost up the member base? Perhaps they are looking to expand even more, and this was a way to gauge if that is indeed needed?

I could go on and on. It is a poll about if people love or hate the most loved and hated technology company out there right now pretty much. I see this being no different than a major gaming website starting a poll asking "Do you love or hate the XBox/PS3/Wii?"

Now thing is, I personally think it is absolutely silly for people to love or hate any corporate entity, I just do not believe in pledging ones allegiance to any company who at the end of the day is making money on the consumer itself, or for being that materialistic that you can have feelings for an piece of plastic with components inside it, however I do not think it is out of the ordinary, or an all time low, for any tech site, Neowin included, to ask its members if they happen to love or hate a company who many people in fact either love or hate.

What are your thoughts on the one about Microsoft? I think I saw one about "do you hate Microsoft". Is that one okay, while the one about Apple is bad? Geeze, stop being so sensitive and offended about stupid stuff.

It still amazes me the way humans will totally ignore important things going on, but will flip out about trivial, stupid things.

The one about Microsoft is a user created poll, and it just goes on to prove what kind of reaction the articles on the front page produce. It's not about which one is good or bad, you're completely missing the point, it's just very cheap, and while yes, these things truly unimportant, they produce chock-full of responses by the people who don't get that and ruin any other discussion.

  • Like 1

The problem is that it's the lowest form of click bait out there. And the second, larger problem is that it nurtures the fanboy mentality, instead of fighting it. This place has become horrible and there is basically no discussion anymore, it's just flamewar after flamewar. And it's not surprising in the least, when the idiots in charge post stuff like that on the front page.

And sure, I'm thinking of "ignoring" this site. It has turned to sh*t when it comes to front page news, and in turn it has turned the message board (the reason I'm here) into a cesspool of idiocy with a lot of long time members leaving the place because of it.

If you honestly don't see anything wrong with the poll, than I don't know what to say. This truly is a sad day for everyone who's been here for years, to witness Neowin scraping the bottom of the internet journalism barrel to get a few clicks.

To be honest, there are certain sub-forums I choose to ignore on a basis of not being what I wish to read. Yes it is an easy way to attract people to click on it, but it's just a little weekend casual debate, it's a hot topic and invokes discussion. I could say 'Do you hate X, discuss' and then there would be plenty of interesting discussion, those who break site rules in the process will be dealt with, and all should be well.

It's the sort of discussion that would arise in a group of people at the pub over a few pints, you could start a poll in the politics subforum with the same manner. These sort of polls also show us what our member base is primarily made up of ;)

Wow, just wow. Not trying to be a dick here, but you have got to be kidding me right?

A technology related website makes a poll asking about the most hated and revered technology company currently out at the time, asking if their members indeed do hate them or not, and it is somehow an all time low? Seriously?

Now thing is, I personally think it is absolutely silly for people to love or hate any corporate entity, I just do not believe in pledging ones allegiance to any company who at the end of the day is making money on the consumer itself, or for being that materialistic that you can have feelings for an piece of plastic with components inside it, however I do not think it is out of the ordinary, or an all time low, for any tech site, Neowin included, to ask its members if they happen to love or hate a company who many people in fact either love or hate.

^ Well said -- and there are middle grounds between hate and love. ;)

All it is, is a simple question.

It's a leading question. It's like Fox News asking "is climate change a conspiracy?" or "is black culture fundamentally un-American?" - the question is used to push an agenda.

It would have been more appropriate to ask: "What is your opinion of Apple as a company?", and to give more options: love them; like them; dislike them; hate them; no opinion.

It's a leading question. It's like Fox News asking "is climate change a conspiracy?" or "is black culture fundamentally un-American?" - the question is used to push an agenda.

It would have been more appropriate to ask: "What is your opinion of Apple as a company?", and to give more options: love them; like them; dislike them; hate them; no opinion.

Of course, if the poll was conducted as a research study then yes this would make more sense, but it's just aimed as a bit of silly weekend fun from what I've seen. It's just a shame that even though it's a very burning issue, many people take the idea of asking questions to heart, you could ask your friend this question and it would be fine, but asking the whole internet? Oh you just can't ask it simply, you have to justify the reason for it etc.

It isn't a research survey, or anything of the sort, it's a question that will get people to read and answer.

Wow, just wow. Not trying to be a dick here, but you have got to be kidding me right?

A technology related website makes a poll asking about the most hated and revered technology company currently out at the time, asking if their members indeed do hate them or not, and it is somehow an all time low? Seriously?

And just throwing this one out there, did you ever stop to think perhaps this is the precursor to a article written about why it seems people may hate/love Apple for good reason/no good reason at all. For example that article could start off "Earlier in the week, we conducted a poll to find out just how our members feel towards Apple, and 47% admitted to hating them..."

Or even more crazy, perhaps this was a way to find out if Neowin perhaps needs to drop their known association with being a Windows only site, and start providing even more coverage of Apple related products to boost up the member base? Perhaps they are looking to expand even more, and this was a way to gauge if that is indeed needed?

I could go on and on. It is a poll about if people love or hate the most loved and hated technology company out there right now pretty much. I see this being no different than a major gaming website starting a poll asking "Do you love or hate the XBox/PS3/Wii?"

Now thing is, I personally think it is absolutely silly for people to love or hate any corporate entity, I just do not believe in pledging ones allegiance to any company who at the end of the day is making money on the consumer itself, or for being that materialistic that you can have feelings for an piece of plastic with components inside it, however I do not think it is out of the ordinary, or an all time low, for any tech site, Neowin included, to ask its members if they happen to love or hate a company who many people in fact either love or hate.

The difference is in "Do you HATE Apple?" vs a poll that says "What do you think about Apple?". One is a mature way of asking the question for any of the reasons you mentioned, the second is the immature way. And it has to do with a lot more than just this article. I would love to think that this is somewhat of a research poll in a way for a larger article written on people's love or hate for a company, but again, it's in how the question was asked, and on top of that, this site doesn't even have writers that could write a piece like that. If a gaming website asked the question "Do you hate the PS3?" it would sound just as mature, I'd say no, and I'd say I think the Xbox is far better. Stop trying to emulate major media by having to make everything so sensationalist.

And yes, your first line is exactly what I thought when opening Neowin today.

  • Like 1

As long as equal platform is given to everyone including those that dislike MS I can't see an issue with it, if anything the moderation on Neowin does slowly seem to be getting a little less officious and I feel sites like this work best when people can express themselves and only receive punishment if they're a total ass.

Wow, just wow. Not trying to be a dick here, but you have got to be kidding me right?

A technology related website makes a poll asking about the most hated and revered technology company currently out at the time, asking if their members indeed do hate them or not, and it is somehow an all time low? Seriously?

And just throwing this one out there, did you ever stop to think perhaps this is the precursor to a article written about why it seems people may hate/love Apple for good reason/no good reason at all. For example that article could start off "Earlier in the week, we conducted a poll to find out just how our members feel towards Apple, and 47% admitted to hating them..."

Or even more crazy, perhaps this was a way to find out if Neowin perhaps needs to drop their known association with being a Windows only site, and start providing even more coverage of Apple related products to boost up the member base? Perhaps they are looking to expand even more, and this was a way to gauge if that is indeed needed?

I could go on and on. It is a poll about if people love or hate the most loved and hated technology company out there right now pretty much. I see this being no different than a major gaming website starting a poll asking "Do you love or hate the XBox/PS3/Wii?"

Now thing is, I personally think it is absolutely silly for people to love or hate any corporate entity, I just do not believe in pledging ones allegiance to any company who at the end of the day is making money on the consumer itself, or for being that materialistic that you can have feelings for an piece of plastic with components inside it, however I do not think it is out of the ordinary, or an all time low, for any tech site, Neowin included, to ask its members if they happen to love or hate a company who many people in fact either love or hate.

Agreed. It's a very blunt question, but its one that could easily provoke great discussion if you can wade through all the BS that will obviously come from it.

Im not an apple fan but i dont see why there needs to be a front page poll about it, saying that though this is the second thread i have replied to where people have complained about the front page news and i know what the end response will be... "We have ten years experience at running the site and nothing is going to change".

If you dont like the the articles on the front page then boycott the front page thats what ive been doing for the past few months when i said i would in the last thread like this. I dont feel that this place is where journalism looks professional at all so i go elsewhere for my daily tech news, i just use the forum but even thats been going down hill.

No doubt they have statistics that show how good the news section is doing if they see them numbers decrease then maybe they will actually listen to there readers until then, these threads are pointless.

  • Like 1

I found that one particular front page item very stupid. Isn't one of the rules of the forums to not open threads with the intention of a flamewar?

Neowin, in spite of its name, used to a be a nice 'tech' community. Now somehow they've taken a turn for the worse ever since windows 8 became such a dividing issue.

  • Like 1

I found that one particular front page item very stupid. Isn't one of the rules of the forums to not open threads with the intention of a flamewar?

Neowin, in spite of its name, used to a be a nice 'tech' community. Now somehow they've taken a turn for the worse ever since windows 8 became such a dividing issue.

Silly you, don't you know the rules only apply when they feel like applying them?

I suggest that those who feel this way mouse over the author's name on the post and report it.

Of course, if the poll was conducted as a research study then yes this would make more sense, but it's just aimed as a bit of silly weekend fun from what I've seen. It's just a shame that even though it's a very burning issue, many people take the idea of asking questions to heart, you could ask your friend this question and it would be fine, but asking the whole internet? Oh you just can't ask it simply, you have to justify the reason for it etc.

The trouble is that it's uncharacteristic of Neowin. I've seen forums posts get removed for doing less and yet this is on the frontpage - people are understandably a little annoyed. I know it was meant light-heartedly but because the question is so heavily slanted it is taken to represent the position of Neowin.

Personally it doesn't really bother me much but it was obvious that such a poll was going to create a lot of hostility, so I don't really see the point.

  • Like 1

A technology related website makes a poll asking about the most hated and revered technology company currently out at the time, asking if their members indeed do hate them or not, and it is somehow an all time low? Seriously?

The kind of people that actively "hate" a company, are usually trolls. So yeah, I guess a flame war bait on the front page IS a new low

I've seen forums posts get removed for doing less and yet this is on the frontpage - people are understandably a little annoyed.
I've seen people banned for less. This kind of stuff is normal. As long as it gets more page impressions or clicks for the ads it's all good for some people.

pzblCl.png

  • Like 2
See i told you neowin didnt care, they want to loose members of the community that disagree with them, totally idiotic.

1o6ccg.png

That's rather disappointing. :no:

  • Like 2

This is culmination of a long line of degradation occurring at Neowin. While they previously had a relatively unbiased viewpoint and reported news on a wide variety of topics they've devolved into reporting about every time someone at MS sneezes. They know their MS fan boy demographic and page views & comments seem to be their only aim at this point. I used to rely on Neowin to keep me informed of news other topic specific websites missed out but that time is long past. Their slogan shouldn't be 'Where unprofessional journalism looks better' but rather 'Windows 8, WP8, Microsoft...nuff said!'.

This is culmination of a long line of degradation occurring at Neowin. While they previously had a relatively unbiased viewpoint and reported news on a wide variety of topics they've devolved into reporting about every time someone at MS sneezes.

I don't think that's entirely fair. Most of the pro-Microsoft articles comes from a single member of staff - other than that Neowin is generally reasonably balanced. The frontpage "Do you hate Apple?" poll is certainly bad - and likely would have been deleted were it posted by a user in the forums - but I think that's more of a lapse of judgement rather than a general trend.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!