Why Steve Ballmer Is Ruining Microsoft


Recommended Posts

I think what he was getting at was that Windows developers feel somewhat lost at the moment and Microsoft aren't answering their questions, which is bad for the developers. That said, I can't agree or disagree with that statement as I'm not a developer and so don't know how much support Microsoft are providing at this time.

Me neither, but my friend is making an XNA game and he's rather annoyed about it. He tells me changing the code around won't even take all that long if he knew what he should be targeting.

I'm guessing everything will be built around WinRT in the future given all the platforms they've stopped developing recently, but that's still just a guess.

Me neither, but my friend is making an XNA game and he's rather annoyed about it. He tells me changing the code around won't even take all that long if he knew what he should be targeting.

I'm guessing everything will be built around WinRT in the future given all the platforms they've stopped developing recently, but that's still just a guess.

It must be extremely frustrating for some start ups for that reason. Look at Bastion, one of the greatest XNA games ever. Games like that don't come quickly or cheaply, but where is the studio supposed to move to for a new game? Perhaps they just have to move on to a new framework.

I like windows and Microsoft but I truly believe Linux like Ubuntu will be the future not now but in time. Look how far Linux has come over the last 10 years. And Microsoft has really done nothing at all same outdated kernel and registry lol registry . Times are changing fast. My Linux pc looks and performs 900000 times better then windiws 8 could ever dream of.

I'm running core I 7 with 8gigs ram and intelHD4000 graphics . I play games on all 3 consoles .

sorry, how far has Linux come, exactly? :laugh:

i mean, Linux's market share continues to be like .5% year-after-year. The average person has NO clue what Linux is.

when I see that video that they want Steve Ballmer out of Microsoft someday, do you know what do I mean?

I know what they mean, although they don't list their reasons all too well in the video.

But do I know what you mean? I can't be sure. Do you agree that they should remove Ballmer? If so, why?

Balmer is indeed ruining microsoft, windows RT is a disaster, it is missing so much functionality over win8. Win8 is a disaster, it forces you to use metro which is very unproductive compared to win7 for me due to the need for so many mouse clicks for simple tasks. Surface has sold around 400,000 units i read which is a flop. office 2013 has a default solid white colour everywhere which is a nightmare and most users don't know that they can change the colour to shades of black.

Office 2013 should have never shipped as white, office rt and windows rt should have been delayed until they had the full functionality of win8. Win8 should never have made metro mandatory and should have been delayed as it is very buggy and many of the applications on the start screen don't work as people want, you can't change the default photo viewer on the metro app for example, there's tons of other similar problems too.

Steve ballmer clearly doesn't realise that these things are hated, he isn't the right man to be CEO for those reasons.

Linux won't take off until there is a commercial competitor to adobe creative suite released for linux either by adobe themselves or by another company.

Windows 8 does not force you to use metro.

Office 2013 is the best office by miles.

You can change the default photo viewer to any application that supports viewing photos.

I still think Sinofsky would have been my pick for CEO. He did a great job of getting MS back on track. I really liked windows 7 and I really love windows 8 and the new direction MS is going. They have made so many improvements to the server division as well. Server 2012 is amazing. The enhancements put in both W8 and S2012 are awesome. People hated on him becuase he was labelled as a "control freak" however that personality was much needed at MS becuase MS was starting to slack off and you can even tell by going to each division's website that looked and felt like a different company made it and it was a mess! Sinofsky brought it all together and MS is stronger becuase Sinofsky had his **** together and got MS back on track.

Everyone hates people like him for no reason when people like him are desperatly needed in a world were people are slackers, and not giving a damn about quality and control. I really wish they kept him at Microsoft.

Everyone hates people like him for no reason when people like him are desperatly needed in a world were people are slackers, and not giving a damn about quality and control. I really wish they kept him at Microsoft.

I think Ballmer got rid of him because he was the one person who had a legit shot at taking Ballmer's job. The other reasons were just excuses.

I think Ballmer got rid of him because he was the one person who had a legit shot at taking Ballmer's job. The other reasons were just excuses.

And Sinofsky would be doing a way better job then Ballmer!

As I said on another forum, what MS is failing at right now is giving people clear direction on what they're doing.

http://ventspace.wor...-on-directxxna/

The way they basically just let XNA die without telling anybody was absolutely terrible and I believe it is one of their greatest mistakes for the new Windows 8 and Windows 8 Phone platforms. They just spent the last decade telling developers that C++ is a legacy technology and Windows developers should use .NET; XNA was the .NET-friendly framework to make games for all their platforms. Now they release these new platforms and don't give developers any easy way of making games in .NET; we're back to a COM-based API (DirectX) that can only be called by C++ code, and all the C++ hype ("Going Native") is sending the wrong message to .NET developers. I bet there would twice as many games for Windows 8 (Store) if they had updated XNA to work on it.

That said, I think the most fundamental issue with Microsoft's mobile platforms now is that it's just late to the party. Windows 8 could be twice as good as iOS in every respect, it still would only have a 100th of the applications, and no one would buy it because of that, and it's a vicious circle because developers won't spend money on supporting a platform that no else is supporting.

The way they basically just let XNA die without telling anybody was absolutely terrible and I believe it is one of their greatest mistakes for the new Windows 8 and Windows 8 Phone platforms. They just spent the last decade telling developers that C++ is a legacy technology and Windows developers should use .NET; XNA was the .NET-friendly framework to make games for all their platforms. Now they release these new platforms and don't give developers any easy way of making games in .NET; we're back to a COM-based API (DirectX) that can only be called by C++ code, and all the C++ hype ("Going Native") is sending the wrong message to .NET developers. I bet there would twice as many games for Windows 8 (Store) if they had updated XNA to work on it.

You can use C# for WinRT apps, and they use dx11 and have some of the former XNA API as well as I understand it. It actually cleaned up most of my concerns about .NETs inadequacy

It seems more like they wanted to merge all their various tech into one runtime instead of just having 5,000 different optional targets with vastly different capabilities as before.

You can use C# for WinRT apps, and they use dx11 and have some of the former XNA API as well as I understand it.

DirectX11 is a COM-based, C++ API like all versions of DirectX before it. I'm not aware of any official managed framework or wrapper on top of it that is supported for Windows Store apps. Shawn Hargreaves made a bunch of XNA-like helper classes, but those are also for C++, and all the managed wrappers and frameworks that I know (SlimDX, SharpDX, MonoGame, etc) are community projects. C++ is the only language ever mentionned in official documentation when it comes to games and DirectX for Windows Store.

The biggest problem is that in the case of Windows they really need to stop dicking around and make a decision to kill off win32, replace it with WinRT that allows the writing of desktop and metro applications. They then need to get all their own divisions in line - no use lecturing third parties when each division can't even abide by their user interface guidelines and having consistency between the different software titles they make. Most importantly they need to put out a coherent vision - not this scatter gun approach but a vision on how everything can fit together which once again Microsoft seem to be like Sun Microsystems in their inability to bring together their products and deliver it in a cohesive way for customers be they end users or in the enterprise.

DirectX11 is a COM-based, C++ API like all versions of DirectX before it. I'm not aware of any official managed framework or wrapper on top of it that is supported for Windows Store apps. Shawn Hargreaves made a bunch of XNA-like helper classes, but those are also for C++, and all the managed wrappers and frameworks that I know (SlimDX, SharpDX, MonoGame, etc) are community projects. C++ is the only language ever mentionned in official documentation when it comes to games and DirectX for Windows Store.

I see your point. Some people have managed to make it work though apparently http://www.codeproject.com/Articles/532582/DirectXplusandplusWinRTpluscontinued

I believe it still uses it to display either way, but I didn't realize it wasn't exposed directly.

The biggest problem is that in the case of Windows they really need to stop dicking around and make a decision to kill off win32, replace it with WinRT that allows the writing of desktop and metro applications. They then need to get all their own divisions in line - no use lecturing third parties when each division can't even abide by their user interface guidelines and having consistency between the different software titles they make. Most importantly they need to put out a coherent vision - not this scatter gun approach but a vision on how everything can fit together which once again Microsoft seem to be like Sun Microsystems in their inability to bring together their products and deliver it in a cohesive way for customers be they end users or in the enterprise.

That's kind of like suggesting .net 1.0 should've had all the features of .net 4.5. They had to start somewhere. Whether or not what you suggest will actually happen I couldn't say.

That's kind of like suggesting .net 1.0 should've had all the features of .net 4.5. They had to start somewhere. Whether or not what you suggest will actually happen I couldn't say.

There is a difference - Microsoft had road maps outlining where .NET was heading and as a developer you knew that if you started planning today that a feature not present in 1.0 would eventually be in there. Where is the road map for WinRT? that is what developers need - a road map for WinRT, where does win32 fit into the equation, where is the desktop going to be - legacy or are we talking about coexistence but Windows 9 will provide the refinement required to bring together a closer relationship between the 'Modern' and 'Traditional Desktop' world.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • A 13 billion year old secret about our Universe's origin was revealed by Sayan Sen Image by Pascal Küffer via Pexels Researchers at the Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik (MPIK) in Heidelberg had recreated a key chemical reaction from the early universe, producing results that could change scientists' understanding of how the first stars formed. The study focused on the helium hydride ion (HeH⁺), which is widely regarded as the first molecule to form in the universe. Scientists believe HeH⁺ appeared around 380,000 years after the Big Bang, when the universe had cooled enough for electrons and atomic nuclei to combine into neutral atoms in a period known as recombination. This marked the beginning of chemistry in the cosmos. Immediately after the Big Bang about 13.8 billion years ago, the universe was extremely hot and dense. As it expanded and cooled, hydrogen and helium became the dominant elements. Once neutral helium atoms formed, they could react with ionised hydrogen nuclei, or protons, to create helium hydride ions. Although simple in structure, HeH⁺ played an important role in the young universe. It was the first step in a chain of reactions that eventually produced molecular hydrogen (H₂), a molecule made up of two hydrogen atoms and now the most abundant molecule in the universe. Molecular hydrogen later became a key ingredient in the formation of the first stars. At the time, the universe had entered a phase often called the cosmological "dark age." Matter had become transparent to light following recombination, but there were still no stars or galaxies producing visible light. Several hundred million years would pass before the first stars appeared. For those first stars to form, large clouds of gas had to collapse under their own gravity. To do that, the gas needed to cool by releasing energy. While hydrogen atoms can help with this process at high temperatures, they become less effective below about 10,000 degrees Celsius. Molecules can continue the cooling process by releasing energy through rotational and vibrational motions. Scientists have long considered HeH⁺ a potentially important coolant because of its comparatively large dipole moment, a property that describes how electric charge is distributed within a molecule and allows it to release energy efficiently. The amount of helium hydride present in the early universe may therefore have influenced how easily the first stars could form. At the same time, HeH⁺ was constantly being destroyed. Under primordial conditions, its main destruction mechanisms were recombination with free electrons and chemical reactions with hydrogen atoms. These reactions ultimately helped produce molecular hydrogen, linking the formation and destruction of HeH⁺ to the chemistry that shaped the early universe. For many years, theoretical studies suggested that reactions between HeH⁺ and hydrogen atoms would become much slower at low temperatures. Scientists believed there was an energy barrier along the reaction pathway that reduced the chances of the reaction taking place in the cold conditions of the early universe. The new study suggests otherwise. To investigate the process, researchers recreated a closely related reaction using deuterium, a naturally occurring isotope of hydrogen that contains one proton and one neutron in its nucleus. When HeH⁺ collides with deuterium, it forms an HD⁺ ion and a neutral helium atom. This allows scientists to study the reaction in a controlled way while closely mimicking the behaviour of the original reaction involving hydrogen. The experiments were carried out at the Cryogenic Storage Ring (CSR) at MPIK, a specialised facility designed to recreate conditions similar to those found in space. Researchers stored HeH⁺ ions in the 35-metre storage ring for up to 60 seconds at temperatures just a few kelvins above absolute zero and merged them with a beam of neutral deuterium atoms. By adjusting the speeds of the two particle beams, the team measured how the reaction rate changed with collision energy, which is directly related to temperature. The researchers found that the reaction rate remains almost constant as temperatures decrease. In other words, the reaction does not slow down at low temperatures as earlier models predicted. “Previous theories predicted a significant decrease in the reaction probability at low temperatures, but we were unable to verify this in either the experiment or new theoretical calculations by our colleagues,” explained Dr Holger Kreckel of MPIK. “The reactions of HeH⁺ with neutral hydrogen and deuterium therefore appear to have been far more important for chemistry in the early universe than previously assumed,” he continued. According to the researchers, the reaction appears to be barrierless, meaning there is no energy obstacle preventing it from taking place efficiently even at very low temperatures. The findings support recent theoretical work led by physicist Yohann Scribano, whose group identified an error in a widely used potential energy surface, a mathematical model used to describe how the energy of a system changes during a chemical reaction. The error appears to have caused previous studies to significantly underestimate reaction rates under primordial conditions. The new calculations closely match the experimental results. Together, they suggest that helium chemistry in the early universe may need to be re-evaluated. Because molecules such as HeH⁺ and molecular hydrogen played an important role in cooling primordial gas clouds, the findings could help scientists build more accurate models of how the first stars formed. By showing that helium hydride was likely destroyed more efficiently than previously thought, the study offers new insight into the chemical processes that shaped the universe during its earliest stages and helped set the conditions for the emergence of the first stars. Source: Max-Planck Institute, EDP Sciences This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "What an interesting smell you've discovered"
    • It could EASILY be 70 for the base game BUT + lots of FOMO to make it up to 100-120, like a few days Early Access, online money, pre-order bonus cars, weapons, missions, clothing, avatars or profile stuff, etc... And still WAY TOO MANY people would buy those and make Rockstar insane money.
    • Just to understand: your solution to getting rid of an online password manager is...another online password manager?
    • Cjam 2.5.0.0 by Razvan Serea Cjam is a lightweight and fast MP3 editor for Windows that lets you cut, join, and edit MP3 files without re-encoding. This means your audio quality remains untouched, and edits happen instantly. Cjam is ideal for quick, lossless edits—whether you're trimming music, combining tracks, or preparing audio for learning tools or podcasts. It features batch processing, scripting support, cue and playlist file handling, and a simple interface. Cjam is perfect for anyone who needs efficient MP3 editing without the complexity of full audio suites. Cjam requires a PC running Windows 10 or later and Microsoft .NET 6.0 or later. Key features for Cjam: No Re-encoding: Edit MP3 files without losing quality. Cut and Join MP3: Easily cut, trim, and combine MP3 tracks. Batch Processing: Edit multiple files at once for faster workflows. Scriptable Interface: Automate tasks with a custom command language. Cue and Playlist Support: Handle CUE and playlist files for seamless audio management. Fast and Lightweight: Quick processing with minimal system resources. Lossless Audio Editing: Ensure your edits don't affect audio quality. Simple User Interface: Clean, intuitive design for easy navigation. File Format Support: Works with MP3, Cjam-specific file formats (CJAMC, CJAMJ, CJAM). Cjam 2.5.0.0 changelog: Added clipboard-based import/export support for mp3DirectCut Added clipboard-based export support for REAPER Added support for naming IMP3 elements Changed the Reset behavior to preserve Undo/Redo history; use Shift key + Reset button to clear it Added a new command parameter (qcp) Added 8 new entries to lang.txt (main_c124-126, main_d150-151, main_m082, vme_c014, vme_d005) Fixed a bug where the il parameter was incorrectly applied when pasting VMP3s into the main list Fixed several other minor bugs Download: Cjam 2.5.0.0 | 1.4 MB (Freeware) Links: Cjam Home Page | Cjam Manual | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • First Post
      DrWankel earned a badge
      First Post
    • Reacting Well
      DrWankel earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • Week One Done
      Supreme Spray LV earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Genuinetonerink- Dubai earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      163
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      91
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      Michael Scrip
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!