Anonymous hacks Federal Reserve, data compromised


Recommended Posts

lolll you really think all of them are script kiddies ?

Btw, the federal reserve are the one responsible for the ****ty economy that you have. You clearly have NO clue how they operate.

<Snipped>

Yes. Real freedom fighters do their work through politics and grassroots campaigning. Not through petty vandalism. I know Anonymous, I've seen people victimised by their stupidity, a friend of mine was falsely accused of being a pedophile thanks to them putting 2 and 2 together and getting 27. I reserve my respect and admiration for those that actually merit some. Petty vandals merit none.

Blaming your president(s) for the countries debt is also getting old.

If a company is losing millions of Dollars who gets the blame? The CEO. Just ask all of the ones that have been fired. Obama is like the CEO and he should be fired. He is the guy in charge. As Harry Truman once said the buck stops here-at the President's desk.

Blaming your president(s) for the countries debt is also getting old.

try not to delve into subjects you clearly do not understand. True: Obama's White house has never submitted a single budget since 2009 which is against the law.

The senate hasn't passed a budget which is controlled by the Democrats and headed by numskull Harry Reid.

there are CERTAIN things that you have to do.. they are NOT getting done.

  • Like 1

If a company is losing millions of Dollars who gets the blame? The CEO. Just ask all of the ones that have been fired. Obama is like the CEO and he should be fired. He is the guy in charge. As Harry Truman once said the buck stops here-at the President's desk.

Yes I understand that, however what happens when that CEO is landed with the debts and contracts from the previous CEO......... They need to be honoured, some times a CEO can be labeled as bad due to the collective actions of predecessors, just like running a country, It took more than one person to put your country in its current position.

  • Like 1

Democrats blame republican president... Republicans blame democrat president... People are too busy bitching at each other to ask the most difficult questions and actually get to the root of the problem. The cause doesn't rest on the head of any single president, it's a largely collective failure.

Yes I understand that, however what happens when that CEO is landed with the debts and contracts from the previous CEO......... They need to be honoured, some times a CEO can be labeled as bad due to the collective actions of predecessors, just like running a country, It took more than one person to put your country in its current position.

They are fired. Like I said look at the Deficit when Obama took Office and look at it now. The time for blaming Bush is long gone. The POTUS creates the Budget and sends it to Congress for approval. but to the OP, Anonymous is evil and should be stopped.

Yes I understand that, however what happens when that CEO is landed with the debts and contracts from the previous CEO......... They need to be honoured, some times a CEO can be labeled as bad due to the collective actions of predecessors, just like running a country, It took more than one person to put your country in its current position.

Let's for the sake of arguing say that Bush started all of this. Obama has since had the opportunity to take things into his own hands and handle the problem. He hasn't. He has dropped the ball. But that isn't the bad part. The bad part is that he doesn't care and is putting us further and further in the hole.

  • Like 2

They are fired. Like I said look at the Deficit when Obama took Office and look at it now. The time for blaming Bush is long gone. The POTUS creates the Budget and sends it to Congress for approval. but to the OP, Anonymous is evil and should be stopped.

Sure lets just keep firing them... its worked well so far..... Oh Wait no it hasn't.

Sure lets just keep firing them... its worked well so far..... Oh Wait no it hasn't.

Someone has to take the blame, it stops at the White House. Incompetency will not get you far in the Business world, so the CEO is normally canned. Are they supposed to ax the mail person??

Someone has to take the blame, it stops at the White House. Incompetency will not get you far in the Business world, so the CEO is normally canned. Are they supposed to ax the mail person??

Its all about blame isn't it....... Why isn't the system looked at? if the marketing or HR is failing then YES perhaps it is the mail person letting the team down.

Yes if the bank you bank at is FDIC insured.

They are not a bank for people but a bank for banks... and a bank where banks can get loans from they are supposed to make available to people. Which helps to stagnate or push the economy forward or drive it into the ground.

If you do your banking at a bank that is not FDIC insured , you and your money will soon part ways.

Someone has to take the blame, it stops at the White House. Incompetency will not get you far in the Business world, so the CEO is normally canned. Are they supposed to ax the mail person??

So why is it each side seems to wait until the other side's president is in office to apportion said blame? Pretty much all US politicians are idiots, on the left and the right. Instead of constantly blaming the other side and acting like your own side poops gold dust, followers of both parties need to stop whinging and actually do something about it.

  • Like 2

Its all about blame isn't it....... Why isn't the system looked at? if the marketing or HR is failing then YES perhaps it is the mail person letting the team down.

You do read these post do you not?

https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1135124-anonymous-hacks-federal-reserve-data-compromised/page__st__15__p__595506182#entry595506182

So why is it each side seems to wait until the other side's president is in office to apportion said blame? Pretty much all US politicians are idiots, on the left and the right. Instead of constantly blaming the other side and acting like your own side poops gold dust, followers of both parties need to stop whinging and actually do something about it.

You have to be joking. I thought they would tar and feather Bush while he was in Office. Look at all the money George Soros spent/wasted trying to get him out of office. I could show you videos of this but that would take this even further off topic. We need to stay on The FEd.

You do read these post do you not?

http://www.neowin.ne...#entry595506182

Yes and I saw this in the first line.

Then Congress reviews it to make sure the current laws on mandatory spending are met.

Congress is not just one person, why did they not raise the alarm after the review?

Yes and I saw this in the first line.

Then Congress reviews it to make sure the current laws on mandatory spending are met.

Congress is not just one person, why did they not raise the alarm after the review?

There is nothing that is not legal in the Budget. They just increased the spending caps.

It would be a huge problem if we went back on the Gold Standard. The fact that we are is so much debt is a big problem which Obama does not seem to care much about as he created most of it.

Find a source to back that one up. Please mark it with all outlays purely created and responsible during the Obama Administration. Feel free to include lost revenues created by renewal of the Bush tax cuts that he signed.

Find a source to back that one up. Please mark it with all outlays purely created and responsible during the Obama Administration. Feel free to include lost revenues created by renewal of the Bush tax cuts that he signed.

I will get right on that. Just look at the deficit now compared to when Bush left. This is the last post I am replying to that is not concerning the OP.

the problem is, the Congress back in 1913 committed a coup de tat with the establishment of the federal reserve act. The constitution says only the government shall have the power to coin money and has to be either silver or gold. the federal reserve prints fiat currency. the Rothschilds are the biggest ones on the inside.

After Anonymous posted sensitive credentials of over 4,600 banking executives to a government Web site on Super Bowl Sunday, the Federal Reserve acknowledged the attack in a Tuesday morning statement to affected individuals and press.

From Sunday to Tuesday is a long time. No wonder they got hit.

Meanwhile, back in the real world....

slowest-spending.png

Nice how you conveniently forget Obama giving Solyndra and other alternative now bankrupt companies money. He also gave GM money in bailouts for the saving of the company, however they are losing millions on the volt because they can't make cost on sales. no one can afford the volts, so they lower the price and lose $$$$ http://www.reuters.c...E88904J20120910

So yes, Obama has GIVEN taxpayer money for corrupt corporations who donated to his first campaign and subsequently failed and went bankrupt http://www.bloomberg...-exit-plan.html look here;

Solyndra LLC, the failed solar-panel maker that received a $535 million U.S. Energy Department loan guarantee before going bankrupt, won approval of its plan to exit court protection over government objections.
$535 million of... taxpayer money because the taxpayers will have to pay that off too. add THAT to the debt too!
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • The proportion (or number of iterations) has nothing to with this aspect of Copyright I am describing. In short, it doesn't matter how many times the manager tells you to change something or how. Your work product is always YOURS until and unless you then assign that to the person representing the client/company, usually for financial compensation -- either in salary or as a subcontract work for hire payment. if iterations determined copyright, then businesses would have learned to just keep making changes until they could claim they owned the copyright, without having to compensate the artist for their work. And that would be BAD. The only place where the amount of changes does have a role is in how much does a human modify a previous public domain work (from any source) before it is considered fair use or their own work, etc. For example, if a human makes substantial changes to a public domain (re: AI, by definition) work, then they can then claim that derivative work as their own...but NEVER the original version, of course. That's why anyone can make a movie about Dracula, for example, as long as it is based on the public domain novel, but not if they take new ideas from copyrighted movies made afterwards. As one of the people who personally advised the US Copyright Office on their recent ruling on these very issues, be assured that I specifically used the terminology precisely -- though I made it simple enough for laymen to understand it. If I made this confusing by doing so, I apologize. But, to be clear regarding your assumption that I would agree to your second statement that I quoted above -- the answer is NO. If AI does the work, no matter how much "direction" you give it, it cannot be copyrighted. All AI generated content is in the Public Domain and therefore the copyright cannot be assigned to ANYONE, even you -- until and unless substantial modifications are made to it BY A HUMAN BEING (yourself or a contracted artist/writer/etc.) and then that copyright on the derivative work is legally (in writing) transferred to you. This is a critical distinction. And it is important that people, especially AI sloppers, understand this. For example, YouTube is not paying AI slop generators for the copyright, etc. of their AI slop. What YouTube is doing is sharing AD REVENUE for permission to publish your AI slop. Copyright/ownership/rights never come into it. Importantly, that means that anyone can copy any AI slopware on YouTube, etc. and rehost it anywhere they want, even back on YouTube, and there is nothing legal that YouTube can do about it with regards to copyright protections, ownership, DMCA, etc. Anyone is legally free to use any AI slopware in any way they want. When this ruling was pending, I warned Disney legal of all of this before they did their OpenAI deal -- that it would literally dilute their entire IP portfolio forever. They ignored that warning for the PR and stock bump. But that is why, when the ruling came down last year, Disney quickly extricated themselves from that OpenAI deal, even eating the initial upfront fees -- followed closely by OpenAI ending their entire AI video generating business model. They adjusted their PR release dates to make this less obvious to shareholders, of course. Phew. I hope that this clears up the key distinctions for you and anyone reading. If you have any additional questions or even hypotheticals about AI and Copyright, please feel free to ask.
    • Each of the devices displayed on this page now has a little volume meter next to it to show if there is audio actively playing. About time.
    • Owing to the nature of Windows feature enablement updates, it was distributed over Windows Update services as a complete system upgrade rather than as an ordinary cumulative update
    • Microsoft confirms Windows 11 26H2, urges IT admins to prepare for release by Usama Jawad Windows 11 typically follows an annual update cycle, but Microsoft recently broke that tradition a bit by releasing a "26H1" version in the first half of this year as a "scoped" build for select new silicon PCs only. This version was not available for customers using 24H2 and 25H2 builds, as Microsoft is busy preparing version 26H2 for them, confirmed officially for the first time. In a Windows IT Pro blog, Microsoft has urged IT admins to prepare for the upcoming release of Windows 11 version 26H2. The company has confirmed that this will be a small enablement package (eKB) that will simply light up certain disabled features that are already present in the operating system's code base. This means that the "refined" Windows update and deployment experience will be simpler and quicker, with minimal disruptions, as the feature update will simply toggle a few flags rather than performing a complete replacement. Microsoft has explained that this is all possible because the standard Windows 11 releases share the same servicing branch and hence, the same source code. However, this also means that Windows 11 26H1 users won't be able to upgrade to 26H2 as that is a different branch, but this is something we have known for a while now. Similar to previous annual feature updates, Windows 11 26H2 will offer the following support cycles: 24 months of support for Home, Pro, Pro EDU, and Pro for Workstations editions 36 months of support for Enterprise, Education, IoT Enterprise, and Enterprise Multi-session editions Microsoft has not confirmed a concrete release date for Windows 11 26H2, but noted that it is "coming soon". If we go by the ongoing release cadence, we can expect it to begin rolling out in early October 2026. As such, IT admins have been encouraged to begin validating Windows Insider releases in the Experimental Channel, plan rollout rings, and strategize the utilization of their existing deployment tools.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      ryansurfer98 went up a rank
      Collaborator
    • Week One Done
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Eurosoft10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Year In
      Skeet Campbell earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Month Later
      Sharbel earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      576
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      Michael Scrip
      79
    4. 4
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      77
    5. 5
      neufuse
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!