The Woz: We've Fallen Behind in Smartphones


Recommended Posts

If features aren't relevant to users, why do you think smartphones are so popular?

Apps.

I assumed you were talking about features of and options presented in the OS itself, not of applications running on the OS? Because the app ecosystem is hardly superior on Android, never mind that being "an empirical fact".

Matter of opinion. iOS users make the claim that Android apps are all crap, but in reality I find just as many if not more useless apps on Apple's store. The vast majority of the Android applications I have used have behaved just fine, in fact the iPod touch I used to own seemed to crash far more often than apps did on the Android phone I had at the time (HTC Desire).

If features aren't relevant to users, why do you think smartphones are so popular?

We could have different definitions of trolling, you have used it before like you are using now, but i don't see it as trolling. Sorry.

There is a point to where features stop being actually useful. For me, I believe my preference for IOS is because its my nature to be a minimalist. Just like my house, i don't have stuff just sitting on shelves for decoration. For me to have it, it has to have a purpose,and that purpose would be something why i have it. If I don't use it, then I don't need it. All of Androids hundreds of different settings FOR ME have no purpose. If Android could CLONE the IOS UI flow, UI look, UI feel, facetime, then yes, I would buy an Andriord. I would love to have the bigger screen. i believe both are equal in terms of quality. To me it wouldn't matter what i would use if the interface was the same.

Matter of opinion. iOS users make the claim that Android apps are all crap, but in reality I find just as many if not more useless apps on Apple's store. The vast majority of the Android applications I have used have behaved just fine, in fact the iPod touch I used to own seemed to crash far more often than apps did on the Android phone I had at the time (HTC Desire).

actually on this part i will disagree with you. I have both sitting in front of me. ICS on a galaxy s2x and iphone 4. The apps that i use, yes the IOS ones are defiantly more "finished"

Yeah, accusing me of being a mindless Google fan is trolling, sorry. And the whole point of Android is that it is Android. And the whole point of technology is that we offer products to suit everyone's needs. If you want to buy Apple products simply because the UI animations are a bit flashy and that it feels faster because it lacks advanced functionality, then as far as I'm concerned living with things like the smaller screen size is your problem not mine. I buy Android specifically because I don't want watered down crapware. Have a problem with the size of the iPhone's screen? complain to Apple rather than blaming Google for not dumbing down their product.

We could have different definitions of trolling, you have used it before like you are using now, but i don't see it as trolling. Sorry.

There is a point to where features stop being actually useful. For me, I believe my preference for IOS is because its my nature to be a minimalist. Just like my house, i don't have stuff just sitting on shelves for decoration. For me to have it, it has to have a purpose,and that purpose would be something why i have it. If I don't use it, then I don't need it. All of Androids hundreds of different settings FOR ME have no purpose. If Android could CLONE the IOS UI flow, UI look, UI feel, facetime, then yes, I would buy an Andriord. I would love to have the bigger screen. i believe both are equal in terms of quality. To me it wouldn't matter what i would use if the interface was the same.

actually on this part i will disagree with you. I have both sitting in front of me. ICS on a galaxy s2x and iphone 4. The apps that i use, yes the IOS ones are defiantly more "finished"

Witch features are useless if you look at Samsung Galaxy S III and Galaxy Note II?

Do you want iOS looks in Android?

No problem if you really like that kind of rainbow heaven colors: https://play.google....e=search_result

Facetime you say?

Tried something like this that isn't just limited to iOS devices?: https://play.google....S5yYWlkZXIiXQ..

Profit?

Witch features are useless if you look at Samsung Galaxy S III and Galaxy Note II?

Do you want iOS looks in Android?

No problem if you really like that kind of rainbow heaven colors: https://play.google....e=search_result

And you can make Linux look like Windows or make Windows look like a Mac. That doesn't turn them into Windows or make them a Mac. Neither does some Android skin turn it into iOS. Come on now. Get real... :rolleyes:

And you can make Linux look like Windows or make Windows look like a Mac. That doesn't turn them into Windows or make them a Mac. Neither does some Android skin turn it into iOS. Come on now. Get real... :rolleyes:

Question is, what is it with iOS apps that are so much better than the Android apps?

Android doesn't confuse peoples by having the back button places all over the places at random places like iOS apps does.

So that's one good reason to use Android over iOS.

Does iOS gives you the choices to use another SMS application over the stock one in iOS?

They don't. Thus you miss the ability to install awesome SMS apps like this like we have on Android: https://play.google....e=search_result

And don't even try to tell us that the stock SMS app in iOS or even Android is better than the SMS app i linked to over. This is the power of Android, you can choose something better that fits you better. The stock SMS app in iOS might work good for you, but don't come with the lie that there doesn't exist other SMS apps that will fit you much better. Because you can't try out another SMS app in iOS, so you can't say other SMS apps wont be better. It's that simple.

EDIT: Apple tends to call their stuffs magical. Question is, WHAT is magical with their iOS devices?

If you really want to see some really good magic, then look at this.

Question is, what is it with iOS apps that are so much better than the Android apps?

I'm not going to try to convince you that they are. It's totally fine with me if you don't find them superior. Some of us are of a different opinion. There's really no need to convince the "other side". Like I said, enjoy what you have or take other options for a spin and then choose whichever you like best.

And you can make Linux look like Windows or make Windows look like a Mac. That doesn't turn them into Windows or make them a Mac. Neither does some Android skin turn it into iOS. Come on now. Get real... :rolleyes:

The guy posted saying he'd use Android if something could be provided somewhat analogous to iOS and I've given him an option. I never claimed it was the same as iOS so please quit the trolling.

I'm an Android user and I think almost all iOS apps look and work much better than their Android counterparts. However, the fact that developers in Android have much more freedom and because of that apps can actually provide more options and do more means that I personally prefer Android.

  • Like 1

The guy posted saying he'd use Android if something could be provided somewhat analogous to iOS and I've given him an option. I never claimed it was the same as iOS so please quit the trolling.

You see trolls everywhere, huh? I didn't even reply to your post.

I think almost all iOS apps look and work much better than their Android counterparts

In witch ways?

EDIT: Just to take a good example. Do you think the stock SMS app in iOS looks and works better than this SMS app to Android?

No it doesn't, not even by a mile.

Do you see why this is getting really ridiculous when you can't even change a simple thing like an SMS app in iOS?

The guy posted saying he'd use Android if something could be provided somewhat analogous to iOS and I've given him an option. I never claimed it was the same as iOS so please quit the trolling.

lol, the "troll" word again.

Facetime you say?

Tried something like this that isn't just limited to iOS devices?: https://play.google....S5yYWlkZXIiXQ..

I have BOTH devices in front of me. On each of them tried video test (on separate occasions too) with Skype, Google hangouts, Yahoo, and of course Facetime on the iPhone with another person using Ipod touch.. With each single test of each phone with EACH program, (obviously not facetime with the Galaxy) facetime is VERY much better, not just a bit better but DRASTICALLY better with VIDEO and SOUND.

This would not be the end all be all deciding factor. Just one of the many for me.

In witch ways?

EDIT: Just to take a good example. Do you think the stock SMS app in iOS looks and works better than this SMS app to Android?

No it doesn't, not even by a mile.

Do you see why this is getting really ridiculous when you can't even change a simple thing like an SMS app in iOS?

the stock messaging app on IOS works perfect for me. I don't recall in your previous posts, have you owned a iPhone?

I have BOTH devices in front of me. On each of them tried video test (on separate occasions too) with Skype, Google hangouts, Yahoo, and of course Facetime on the iPhone with another person using Ipod touch.. With each single test of each phone with EACH program, (obviously not facetime with the Galaxy) facetime is VERY much better, not just a bit better but DRASTICALLY better with VIDEO and SOUND.

This would not be the end all be all deciding factor. Just one of the many for me.

Maybe you should try out a phone like a Galaxy S III or Galaxy Note / Note II witch have a much much better front camera (2 Mpix on Galaxy Note and 1.9 Mpix on Galaxy S III and Note II) than the loltastic (1.2 Mpix) front camera the iPhone 5 have?

The sound quality on the Galaxy S III and Note / Note II is all fine. But then, a videocall is all about the video and video quality and not about the sound quality.

Given that Facetime still only even works over Wifi, i'd call it more of a gimmick than a feature. Call me back when Apple let you make calls over 3G without having to jailbreak the phone.

Maybe you should try out a phone like a Galaxy S III or Galaxy Note / Note II witch have a much much better front camera (2 Mpix on Galaxy Note and 1.9 Mpix on Galaxy S III and Note II) than the loltastic (1.2 Mpix) front camera the iPhone 5 have?

The sound quality on the Galaxy S III and Note / Note II is all fine. But then, a videocall is all about the video and video quality and not about the sound quality.

While I do agree that the video quality would improve with a better quality camera, the ratios should still be the same considering the test was done over 2 devices with same results. Aside clearer image, facetime was also less choppy. Not sure if its because of a more efficient codec? And when I stated sound I should have said more specifically said microphone input. Vocals were much clearer and cleaner. I remind you this is done on a 2 year old iphone 4, not a 4s.

Given that Facetime still only even works over Wifi, i'd call it more of a gimmick than a feature. Call me back when Apple let you make calls over 3G without having to jailbreak the phone.

You still have the option of using a lesser capable video program like skype, yahoo, or google+ while not in wifi range. The good news is when you do get into wifi zone, you do have the option to utilize the higher quality of facetime.

While I do agree that the video quality would improve with a better quality camera, the ratios should still be the same considering the test was done over 2 devices with same results. Aside clearer image, facetime was also less choppy. Not sure if its because of a more efficient codec? And when I stated sound I should have said more specifically said microphone input. Vocals were much clearer and cleaner. I remind you this is done on a 2 year old iphone 4, not a 4s.

Again, have you tried the iPhone over Facetime and compared it to the quality you get with a Galaxy S III or Galaxy Note / Note II?

If not, then you have no reasons to say Facetime is better at anything.

In witch ways?

EDIT: Just to take a good example. Do you think the stock SMS app in iOS looks and works better than this SMS app to Android?

No it doesn't, not even by a mile.

I do prefer the iOS app here actually. I'm not a fan of Holo at all, I think it's too bland in many areas and the Tron colours aren't very professional. This is why I personally strongly prefer Sony's skin on Android over everything else. They manage to theme Android in a way that makes it look like an incredibly mature and good looking operating system.

Sony's design strategy is a bit of a mix between Google's and iOS, they call it dynamic minimalism. They did a lot of research to find out what their users do most on their smartphones. Then they design a very minimal interface that caters just to those most important needs. Then they add on extra functionality, but only if they can do it in a way to preserve the minimalism and quality of design of the basic version. This worked out really well and gives you a user interface that looks extremely clean, but once you enter the menus or long-press things gets extremely powerful. Google's apps (and most others on Android) lack in the 'retaining minimalism' department. iOS lacks in the adding powerful functionality department.

Look at the screenshots I just uploaded in this album. You have a very simple basic app view, but long-press on something or hit the menu button and you get a lot of very powerful features that don't exist in many applications. For the Walkman app that includes proper play queue management, full DLNA, automatic album art, equalizer, ... For the Gallery that means a very minimal basic UI, thumbnail scaling with full freedom, rich sharing and editing, proper folder management, ...

This is how I like my UI's and this is something only Android can provide right now: a good, clean UI with a lot of power when you need it. More and more apps are getting designed like this and I love it!

Given that Facetime still only even works over Wifi, i'd call it more of a gimmick than a feature. Call me back when Apple let you make calls over 3G without having to jailbreak the phone.

http://www.apple.com/uk/ios/whats-new/#facetime

Call me back when you know what you're talking about.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • For some reason I suddenly have the urge to go shopping at Sears.
    • So I did a quick test based on 3+ different public instances from the litany at searx.space ... and it spins everything rather differently. It seems that SearXNG is a meta-search engine (queries multiple search indexes rather than only Google's or Bing's or Wikipedia's or Reddit's) that operates in two modes: > public instances ... each instance opens itself to outside users who piggyback on its cached search history; this instance's own identity becomes known/tracked but end-users are hidden similar to an anonymization proxy; this instance's querying of major search indexes may be API based [rated limited, blocked, etc.]). > private instances ... your private install/instance that itself queries multiple (configurable) search indexes of crawled web content; every major Search Engine associates all traffic to your private instance (so your traffic is tracked via network usages) but client-side tracking (your own browser/computer specs) is flushed because it's a "server" doing the querying rather than your browser. My test asked the same 1 question to the 3+ engines and they all returned vastly different results: some had CAPTCHA failures against Google, some had failures against Wikipedia, and the actual results were also different -- some had auto-complete enabled, others returned a wikipedia highlighted excerpt despite the Wikipedia failure (hinting at results being cached from previous keyword matching), and others just gave an Are-You-Human non-CAPTCHA loop before returning random results. So this begs the caveat: Search query results will vary based on which instance is used because every instance queries the other search indexes separate (and thus its results are influenced on that instance's aggregate search history and index-access limitations). The major distinctions for SearXNG versus DDG or Brave: > The search UI is 'untracked' since no UI trackers are baked-in which would phone home or lay cookies into your browser (for DDG/Brave usage stats), > There is no 'crawler' that canvasses the Internet to discover fresh content (it leaves that to the major search indexes), > Queries multiple search indexes ("meta-search engine") based on the configurations and usage history of the server instance, > Privacy-friendly due to its ability to shield user tracking via standing up a non-local server instance connectable to major VPN providers: queries would all appear to come from general VPN/Proxy providers rather than your private instance (whether installed locally or on your own VPS in the cloud). PS: I've previously come across specialized search engines of this nature that indexes searches across media assets like YT, OF, etc. SearXNG seems to be a good backbone...if the rate-limiting/captcha/etc. issues were resolved.
    • For a guy who claims to hate Farage and the ignorant, gullible, rightwing racist skinheads sponsored by Putin that his lies represent, you sure are quoting them time and time and time again, mate. I guess you're conveniently ignoring the fact that your country and commonwealth just happened to work much better when it was still part of the E.U.? Denial isn't just a river in Egypt.
    • Do you live in the U.K? Do any of the people here that are against the UK leaving the E.U, live in the U.K? If not then why are you bothered? If you do live here then it is a different thing . Brexit was a good idea, should have done it years before, it was done badly, but the idea was good. You are saying the same thing as remainers do, oh we did what Putin wanted, we listened to the lies and Farage. I hate Farage and never believed most of what he said, certainly did not believe the £350m a week for the NHS. But we did pay a lot of money to the E.U and yes some of it came back, but what is the point of paying it out for only some of it to come back? Get out of the E.U, no money to them and in theory we can use the money to do things in the country. I said in theory, but our governments are a total and complete waste of space. No matter what colour rosette they wear. You and others say it was a mistake and yet the two main parties in the U.K are not looking at rejoining the EU, I wonder why that is? I was not tricked by anyone. Makes no odds now, we are out and have been for 10 years, what we need is a decent government to run the country. All they do is shout at each other like a load of kids and seems to do nothing and make this country more into a police and nanny state. Getting more like China all the time.
    • 4TB TEAMGROUP MP44Q, 2TB T-Force G50, and 2TB WD My Passport SSDs drop to great prices by Fiza Ali Prime Day may be over, but there are still worthwhile storage deals available, including discounts on SSDs for shoppers who missed the event or are looking to upgrade their storage solution. Particularly, 2TB Western Digital My Passport, 2TB TEAMGROUP T-Force G50, and 4TB TEAMGROUP MP44Q SSD are selling at great prices with up to 23% off. The 2TB TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 is an M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe SSD with sequential read speeds of up to 5,000MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 4,500MB/s. The drive has an endurance rating of 1,300 TBW (terabytes written) and features a DRAM-less design. The company specifies a mean time between failures (MTBF) of 3 million hours. The drive includes an "ultra-thin" graphene heat spreader that helps dissipate heat without significantly increasing the drive's thickness. It also supports S.M.A.R.T. monitoring, allowing compatible software to monitor drive health and operating status. The SSD is rated for operating temperatures from 0°C to 70°C, with a storage temperature range of -40°C to 85°C. The drive is backed by a five-year limited warranty as well. 2TB TEAMGROUP T-Force G50 SSD: $269.99 (Amazon US) The TEAMGROUP MP44Q is an M.2 2280 PCIe 4.0 x4 NVMe SSD that delivers sequential read speeds of up to 7,000MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 5,900MB/s. It uses 3D QLC NAND flash memory to provide 4TB of storage capacity for games, applications, media files, and other data. The drive has an endurance rating of 2,000 TBW and an MTBF of 1.6 million hours. The SSD features a DRAM-less design and supports TEAMGROUP's S.M.A.R.T. monitoring software, allowing users to monitor drive health, temperature, and remaining lifespan. For thermal management, the MP44Q also includes an "ultra-thin" graphene heat spreader. It is designed to operate at temperatures between 0°C and 70°C and can be stored at temperatures ranging from -40°C to 85°C. The SSD is also backed by a five-year limited warranty. 4TB TEAMGROUP MP44Q SSD: $478.99 (Amazon US) The 2TB WD My Passport SSD connects via a USB-C port using the USB 3.2 Gen 2 interface. It delivers sequential read speeds of up to 1,050MB/s and sequential write speeds of up to 1,000MB/s through NVMe technology. In terms of security features, the drive includes password protection with 256-bit AES hardware encryption. The SSD is also designed to resist shock and vibration and is rated to withstand drops from heights of up to 6.5 feet. The recommended operating temperature range is 5°C to 35°C, while the non-operating temperature range is -20°C to 65°C. This drive is also backed by a five-year limited warranty. 2TB Western Digital My Passport SSD: $279.99 (Amazon US) Good to know This Amazon deal is U.S. specific, and not available in other regions unless specified. We only use first-party seller links (at the time of article publishing); ensure that you purchase from a first-party seller link only. Check out Today's Deals on Amazon | or our recent tech deals. Become a Prime member (for Students or SNAP) via Neowin Get Prime Access - Prime for half price (for qualifying Medicaid, EBT, SNAP) Subscribe to Prime Video, Audible Plus, Music Unlimited or Kindle Unlimited via Neowin As an Amazon Associate, we earn from qualifying purchases.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      492
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      75
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!