Do you want the start menu in Windows 8?


Do you want the start menu in Windows 8  

631 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you want the start menu in Windows 8?

    • Yes
      351
    • No
      280


Recommended Posts

If open the start screen you use the "Windows key' + Page up or Page down you can move the start screen from screen to screen. Only problem is I don't want it taking up ANY of my monitors.

Why not? That's what running multiple monitors was designed to do. They allow you secondary tasks - like opening Start - without distracting your main work.

Unless this is a beef with fullscreen in general.

Why not? That's what running multiple monitors was designed to do.

No. Multiple monitors are used to provide you with more space to have more documents open at the same time without having to flip back and forth. The start screen takes a step back in that regard, forcing one application to take up the whole screen which some people don't want.

No. Multiple monitors are used to provide you with more space to have more documents open at the same time without having to flip back and forth. The start screen takes a step back in that regard, forcing one application to take up the whole screen which some people don't want.

But Start doesn't stay open long enough to be a distraction in that regard. Search what your looking for, or click a tile, and you're done. It takes all but a few seconds.

If you hit the Windows Key on the keyboard, Start for me has always opened on the center "main" monitor. If your a big mouse user, which many here "claim" to be, then it should take you less than a second to move the mouse over to the other monitor and press the Start Corner.

The Start Screen & Charm Bar is not tied to any monitor when you use a corner click or touch to open it. However if you call on it via ctrl-escape, Windows key, or Windows Key + C or F or Q or W, it will always open on the monitor it was last in focus on. Its behavior is always consistent. I like its behavior in these regards because its quick and easy to change which monitor it defaults to.

Really, the only thing I absolutely hate is that i'm limited to one Modern UI session. It makes, for example, the Netflix app completely worthless to me. My wife and I use my computer as the central media hub. Monitor #1 is always Netflix, Hulu, dvd/bluray playback, etc. Monitor 2 is always my main workspace and normally primary start screen focus. Monitor 3 is normally VDI/RDP sessions.

I love the Netflix app vs the Netflix website. But unless I RDP into a RemoteFX session on monitor 1 to run it, the app is completely worthless to me. I'd love to actually be able to run two start screens at once so monitor 1 could run Netflix, and monitor 2 could run a modern UI game.

That all said, Microsoft absolutely has to fix volume control in the modern UI space vs desktop space. Everything in the modern space is horribly loud vs the desktop, and its impossible at this point in time to make the volume in that space lower than desktop. So if I play Netflix on the desktop, but Pac-Man in the modern UI, I have to disable all sound within the Pac-Man app or its simply impossible to play any other media.

The current start menu isn't disorganised :/ It displays folders in alphabetical order, and it has one big advantage over the start screen: folder support. I'd actually argue that it's the start screen with it's "splay icons all over the damn place" approach that's disorganised.

The current start menu isn't disorganised :/ It displays folders in alphabetical order, and it has one big advantage over the start screen: folder support. I'd actually argue that it's the start screen with it's "splay icons all over the damn place" approach that's disorganised.

Exactly when you show all programs on the start screen it looks like a conglomerate cluster ****. No seriously it does. For those who say "You can just start typing" ..well you can also do that in windows 7.

There have been ZERO individuals when shown the all programs list in Windows 8 thinks it looks better than the old start menu.

It's REALLY bad with Nero and it's plethora of help files. Those practically turn the start screen into a visual dumping ground.

  • Like 2

Because I feel the Start Screen is more useful than the Start Menu and going back to it would be a step backwards. Right now on my Start Screen I have my apps pinned into groups how I use them. This is better for me than a list that can only extend to the top of my screen. I have a 16:9 screen so thats not a lot of space to use. And the Programs listed in the Start Menu are either randomly generated by use or I have to pin them in a list. The programs I've pinned onto my Start Menu wouldn't fit on my Start Menu.

As I said, I don't have a problem with those who like the new layout. I don't like it though.

If the choice was there how does that make it a backward step?

You wouldn't have to enable it if you didn't want it.

I think all the people complaining about those who want it back are completely missing the point, End User Choice!

If you think that's a bad idea, I believe you have lost sight of what "Personal Computing" even means.

As I said, I don't have a problem with those who like the new layout. I don't like it though.

If the choice was there how does that make it a backward step?

You wouldn't have to enable it if you didn't want it.

I think all the people complaining about those who want it back are completely missing the point, End User Choice!

If you think that's a bad idea, I believe you have lost sight of what "Personal Computing" even means.

It would have been a backwards step because holding onto the legacy baggage is what's getting Windows into trouble in the first place. Windows held on to so much legacy crap that it made it unable to work on newer devices. There comes a point where you have to let that go.

It wouldn't have taken long for some dip**** blogger to re-enable the menu and cry fowl that Windows sux0r for tablets.

No, what is getting them into trouble is trying to do everything by bastardising their products, then claiming that it's progress simply because it's a change. I don't know why some people seem to think that change automatically = better.

No, those who want the start screen can use that and those who want the start menu back can use startisback, Start8 or classic shell. I don't see Microsoft bringing back a nearly two decade old paradigm.

It would have been a backwards step because holding onto the legacy baggage is what's getting Windows into trouble in the first place. Windows held on to so much legacy crap that it made it unable to work on newer devices. There comes a point where you have to let that go.

It wouldn't have taken long for some dip**** blogger to re-enable the menu and cry fowl that Windows sux0r for tablets.

And again, how is choice a bad thing?

There are already 3rd party apps that achieve it without breaking your precious layout. Seems that history is starting to repeat itself. Everything that made windows what it is today (except for the OS itself) came about from 3rd parties making the system easier and nicer to use. Sound, mouse, more than 2 colours etc.

OT;

I remember laughing at my windows friends trying to play games using a keyboard. My lovely Amiga came with all that built in. Nearly 10 years before it was possible on windows.

I also sit 3 to 4 feet from my monitor, couldn't reach it if I tried. Unless I stand up of course.

Also, is 8 still able to have high contrast and low contrast stuff for those with bad eye sight? Why wasn't that removed if it is still there?

It's only one particular aspect that I want to see kept and you call it not keeping up! Give me a break. I haven't asked for anything to be removed that you like. Pity the same can't be said for the other side of this argument.

  • Like 1

In practice I find I rarely have to "scan" the apps screen much at all because the program icon usually just jumps out at me (which is a benefit of having all the icons right on the screen and not buried in subfolders) and then I can launch it with one click instead of having to click on each subfolder (and deal with the annoying expand/contract behavior, or the frustrating flyout bottlenecks in 9x/XP). If you do want to browse by folder you can zoom out, and this works better in *some* cases but IMO the *majority* of the time the flattened view is better (especially since if you don't know the name of the program - and so can't use search - there's a good chance you don't remember which subfolder it's in either), so it's the right default.

If icons were meant to be the scanning target, they would have used bigger sizes (a la LaunchPad). While I will give you that is easier when you can pull it off, its shooting a long 3 when a drive in the lane is a higher percentage shot. A flattened view is only better for people who don't take advantage of organization - ie most people who never liked the 95-2000 menu nor bothered to organize it.

Personally, I prefer no more than four columns usually (no more than 6-8" horizontal, at half screen height) so All.P crams in 60%+ useless information.

It really comes down to lack of any view options in Metro that we all have with Explorer, when is a symptomatic of Win8 at large. Its a conglomeration of half assed attempts and starts. It may be the future (which is fine with me), but the PRESENT is mediocre at best. We're simply betting on MS to fix it at a future point and that the paradigm will pan out.

Its good that MS decided to update the Start Menu, unfortunately they done such basic job and its just not a practical replacement, thats why people want the old one back. It feels like Im using a start menu replacement app, not the next great interface from Microsoft.

I just don't know why people are so accepting of removing choice and features simply because MS management decided it was time to ship. The WP8 XBM/Zune fiasco is the same root problem. They put out a **** poor replacment and killed the much more elegant, polished, and functional one.

I believe it is quite valid. I have my mouse speed at full and a 23 inch monitor, I find it quite annoying.

Users shouldn't have to reduce their precision to compensate for more travel since its even more pronounced on a trackpad, one of the mobility devices that are supposed to be the focus of the 'future'.

Additionally, the StartScreen being a full screen annoyance for searches isn't about focus, its about periphery. You can be aware (and quickly reposition to) of a Window while shifting focus to Start and back again.

I think all the people complaining about those who want it back are completely missing the point, End User Choice!

If you think that's a bad idea, I believe you have lost sight of what "Personal Computing" even means.

Amen

Those of you who want the start menu back, see if you can answer this:

If I were to hand you two tablets, one running Windows 8 and one running Windows 7, which would you choose?

No, I don't want the start menu back. Back during the Consumer/Release Previews I hated the start screen and wanted the start menu back badly and immediately installed Start8 soon as I found out about it. However, you know what? I prefer the start screen now and it doesn't bother me. I'm happy with the start menu in Win7 and start screen in Win8. Long story short, most people will adapt and be fine in their own time. There will always be people who hate it for various reasons but that is life, we will never achieve a 100% consensus on what is better.

That doesn't answer the question.

Uh, what exactly are you trying to prove with that question? How about this question:

If I were to hand you a tablet running a version of Windows 8 that included the option to have a Start menu appear on the Desktop, would you really be any worse off than another guy getting a tablet running Windows 8 as it exists now?

Those of you who want the start menu back, see if you can answer this:

If I were to hand you two tablets, one running Windows 8 and one running Windows 7, which would you choose?

And that's where your assumptions fall apart, we're talking about the desktop not tablets.

To answer your question, neither as I don't use or want a tablet.

  • Like 2

And that's where your assumptions fall apart, we're talking about the desktop not tablets.

To answer your question, neither as I don't use or want a tablet.

Actually, I'm trying to prove that all of you who want the start menu back would choose the Windows 8 tablet and install a start menu replacement anyway, just like on your desktops and laptops.

Actually, I'm trying to prove that all of you who want the start menu back would choose the Windows 8 tablet and install a start menu replacement anyway, just like on your desktops and laptops.

Uh no...if I had a tablet the metro start thing would be perfectly acceptable. Start menu wouldn't be as handy because of its size on the smaller tablet.

Desktop though, the metro start thing....well...I echo pretty much everyone else out there that wants it but do not really want a 3rd party app. Which is why I test drove CP for a few months and went back to Win7.

  • Like 3

Yes, for a couple of reasons.

1. I wish that search results were combined.

2. Users used to having it are confused by it not existing.

3. We don't have time to train users and can't/don't want to wait to deploy new OSs.

4. Why should my apps close down or disappear when I want to do a search or look at live tiles.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hello, Hope all is well. I am in UK.  
    • I'm not happy with myself for it, but I've gone and got hold of it. Just another 45 minutes and I'll be Bond, James Bond. In my defence, IO's Hitman series is awesome, and I'm a sucker for 007. So while it might seem a bit simplified compared to Hitman, I'm sure I'll be right at home.
    • Or just check the script yourself ^^. I hate having a Microsoft account tied to my windows install.
    • 007 First Light review: Satisfying spy adventure that James Bond needed by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe I have fond memories of classic James Bond games from the Electronic Arts era. Using high-tech gadgets, sneaking into parties, and dispatching bad guys were wildly exciting activities for my younger self. In recent years, Bond games have entirely disappeared, alongside the super spy genre. Fast forward to 2020, imagine my surprise when IO Interactive announced it had secured the Bond IP to make a game. Considering the studio’s Hitman history, this project is one I keenly kept an eye on. Six years later, 007 First Light is finally here, and after spending time inside this globe-trotting adventure, I can safely say that my excitement for this developer’s take on this universe was not unfounded. IO has taken lessons it has learned from Hitman and combined them with what I would expect from a directed cinematic experience like James Bond. I have refrained from mentioning major plot points to save you from story spoilers in this review. This is an original story that doesn’t tie into any movies, so there isn’t an expectation of knowing the backstory or the decades of movies either. Bond, James Bond When 007 First Light begins, Bond is just Bond. There isn’t a spy angle, fancy gadgets, or even a secret mission. The introductory mission is framed to show how James Bond handled himself and how he does not care about the odds when it comes to saving lives. It’s a gorgeous level as well, showing off an island scattered with cliffs in the middle of a storm. Looking back, this is probably the best-looking level in the game, with IO showing off all its abilities with its custom engine, Glacier. But my favorite ended up being the follow-up to this level. Once the United Kingdom's foreign intelligence agency, MI6, recruits our daring youngster into its super-spy “00” program, training begins. However, instead of treading through the same tutorial missions where the game teaches you to run and jump and drive, IO opted for a montage, and it’s amazing. The scenes cut between Bond practicing and improving his marksmanship, parkour, hand-to-hand combat, and driving as weeks go by in his training. What impressed me here was the lack of any loading screens or stutters as scenes instantly switched to different locations entirely, as if I was watching a movie. This creativity is a trend I noticed in most levels, where there is some sort of gameplay or choreography mechanic being introduced to keep things interesting. Soon, the rest of the cast is introduced, bringing other agents that our favorite secret agent will be working with, the scientists and engineers that build MI6’s spy gadgets, as well as higher-ranking officers that either appreciate or (at best) tolerate Bond’s rebellious attitude. It’s a tight cast, all with incredibly good voice acting and personalities that quickly grew on me. The casting for Bond himself is also an excellent one. From showing his iconic soft spot for women to the condescending smiles that get a rise out of enemies, I had no issues getting immersed into this universe as this new face of James Bond. The missions take place in a wide range of locations as MI6 sends Bond to tackle dangers that are growing everywhere from the UK to Africa. These aren’t unrelated adventures where MI6 is sending secret agents, which is an angle I would love to see in another game, but a part of a bigger conspiracy affecting the entire world. Some of the twists and turns were all too predictable, and the character that Lenny Kravitz played made me cringe a little too much. But all in all, I enjoyed the campaign’s storyline that sets the stage for this new agent joining the illustrious “00” program. Plenty of Possibilities The third-person style of IO Interactive fits this role quite well. Bond is presented as a master at hand-to-hand combat as well as firearms, while also having a knack for being stealthy when required. Most sections of missions have a lot of freedom. This means I could beat up every goon and security guard on the way to an objective, slip past them without sounding a single alarm, or do a mix of both. My sessions usually end up with the third option because I tend to be impatient about waiting for a patrol to move. Drawing from its Hitman genes, the developer almost always gives multiple routes for going through missions. Levels can be massive, sometimes sporting hundreds of NPCs going their own ways and having conversations. If my objective is to break into a security room on the third floor, I could look around for roof access, eavesdrop on conversations to find out where someone lost a key, create a distraction and pickpocket a guard for a keycard, sneak in through the vents, or simply kick down the offending door. I enjoyed the variety on offer, especially because the same solutions didn’t usually show up in different missions. Before heading out into a secret MI6 escapade, the gadget specialist of the branch walks Bond through the organization's latest and greatest achievements. This can be cool little devices like a laser built into the watch, a phone that fires poison darts, or a camera that emits a powerful shockwave. The choice of what can be taken into the mission is up to the player. I could usually find fresh routes or get out of tough situations with a punch or two, so I never had the feeling of missing out by not choosing the right equipment. It’s still a fun practice. Choosing the armaments before a mission enhanced the super spy feeling quite a bit. As I mentioned, stealth comes in as a very viable option for most of the missions, letting Bond sneak past foes or knock them out silently. While it is satisfying to clear entire areas of goons and walk away without any alarms, the way of accomplishing this could have been done better. Bond can lure enemies, sneak up and knock them out, or use a gadget to disorient them before dealing a nasty blow. Bodies cannot be moved or hidden afterward either. It’s a very simple system, which I wish were more exciting to pull off. Perhaps more stealth-orientated gadgets, distraction options, or multi-takedowns could have helped here, I think. Getting caught while attempting to be in stealth does not mean a game over. Other than getting into a fist fight, an interesting twist of 007 First Light is the bluffing option. While an enemy is confused as to what you are doing in a restricted location, Bond has the option to improvise and persuade them that you are exactly where you’re supposed to be. These are fun little dynamic interactions with unique dialog depending on the mission and location, giving a few extra moments for Bond to go past suspicious guards smoothly. It’s the first time I’ve witnessed this system in a game, and I hope to see more. License to Kill Bond isn’t just dealing with security guards or civilians. From time to time, entire gangs of gun-toting mercenaries show up in levels looking to take down our protagonist. It is then that License to Kill mode is activated for Bond, letting him use firearms with no restrictions. I was surprised by just how tight gunplay is in 007 First Light. The weapons feel powerful and satisfying to fire, with single bullets capable of taking down an enemy with a headshot. Ammo is scarce, and enemies don’t drop weapons with full magazines most of the time. This forces a hectic kind of gameplay where I am always advancing towards enemies to take their weapons after they are downed. Things like shooting legs to immobilize, aiming at the hands to make their weapon go flying, blowing up nearby fire extinguishers for cover, and using gadgets to halt a goon in their tracks while I reload, make up enjoyable levels. I had to hold back my disappointment when the enemy count in these action sequences dropped to zero and I had to go non-lethal again. Speaking of action sequences, First Light isn’t just offering sandbox levels to complete at the player’s own leisure either. Each level comes with specific linear and directed scenes to move the story forward and put Bond in tight situations. These usually end up with high-octane chases or driving sections, offering the chance to witness chaining explosions, hails of gunfire, and scripted parkour scenes that remind me of Mission Impossible movies more than Bond. Elements like seeing James Bond jump out of a plane without a parachute or drive through buildings in London inside a trash truck were fantastic and always left me at a high point when finishing a mission. The classic James Bond theme is sprinkled in here too, which only happens a handful of times in the game, but at just the right moments. Visuals and Performance Compared to Unreal Engine 5 games we are seeing nowadays, 007 First Light isn’t flexing a huge amount of realism when it comes to graphics. The models, textures, and effects all feel a little dated, with the starting mission that I mentioned being the most visually striking. However, the complete lack of stutters, the hundreds of NPCs that can be on screen without a single hitch, massive sandbox levels, and smooth transitions between them all play a part in making this an immensely immersive and complex experience. The in-engine cutscenes are gorgeous as well, offering an upgraded visual style and model detail over the gameplay sections. Animations are one aspect that jumps out at me about any new game, and First Light has nailed what a third-person action game should feel like. Walking, sneaking, and running all have a heaviness to them that I appreciate. Whenever Bond moves past a wall or a ledge, his arms reach out to lightly hold those structures until he moves away. NPCs actually react to my character and move out of the way. Even during melee combat or takedown animations, the fists impacting a body or a head hitting a wall all have that same weight. Even the more frivolous animations, like catching a gun in midair or chucking an empty one at a goon (yes, you can do that), are satisfying to pull off. Of course, the in-engine cutscene animations are remarkably well done too, with facial animations and the upgraded model details improving my engagement with the characters. I have an AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT 16GB paired with an eight-core Ryzen 7 3700X and 32GB of RAM, with the game running at 1440p resolution. Deciding to completely max out all the graphics options gave me a range of frame rates between 60 and 100 depending on the scene and level. While I did try to enable AMD FSR, which bumped up the frame rates by a good 20% at Quality mode, IO Interactive’s implementation of the technology wasn’t that great. Every corner and edge in levels began shimmering, and I was also seeing smearing issues in fast-moving sections. The title seemingly uses the older generation FSR 3.1 and not the machine learning-assisted FSR 4, leading to these artifacts. Unfortunately, there isn't a way to manually upgrade this right now either. I opted to turn off the upscaling and play the game in native 1440p to avoid problems. I would say the FPS range I was getting was an acceptable one for a single-player action game for my setup. I do wish there were an FOV slider option in the settings. While the camera is far enough back for my tastes in most situations in this third-person adventure, at times the perspective is far too close. When trying to look around quickly and spot targets, I realized I was getting a slight headache at times due to the use of an almost over-the-shoulder close-up camera. Conclusion Being James Bond in 007 First Light is a treat. Traveling around the world chasing conspiracies, using high-tech gadgets disguised as everyday accessories, and improvising on the spot to fool foes all give a fantastic feeling of being a super spy. For an origin story, IO Interactive has done a great job at introducing the character and his motives for doing what he does. The satisfying combat animation and fantastic voice acting are definitely high points, with the License to Kill moments being my favorite. Not being able to move bodies and the simplistic stealth of mechanics does hurt its presentation a little. The NPC logic and intelligence is easy to manipulate and trick, repeating the same actions over and over again if I keep making distractions. The lack of an FOV slider was also a pain (quite literally) at times, and the FSR implementation is quite poor. These are things I hope the studio will improve upon with updates. Even with its faults, IO Interactive and James Bond are a match made in heaven. The studio knows how to make a main character that oozes charm and competency while also leaning heavily into its Hitman experience to make gigantic levels with what looks like hundreds of NPCs roaming around. Being an origin story, IO’s Bond has a way to go before he becomes the highly effective agent we see in the movie world. I am hoping the studio will continue this series alongside its Hitman ventures going forward, just so we get to experience the journey for longer. 007 First Light is available on PC (Steam, Epic Games Store, and Xbox PC), Xbox Series X|S, and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. This review was conducted on the PC version of the game provided by IO Interactive.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      271
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      75
    4. 4
      Skyfrog
      74
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!