Do you want the start menu in Windows 8?


Do you want the start menu in Windows 8  

631 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you want the start menu in Windows 8?

    • Yes
      351
    • No
      280


Recommended Posts

I bought a new AiO yesturday (Envy23) and it appears all the new HP Win8 PCs (touch and non-touch) are shipping with their new 'Quick Start' that is basically a Start Menu replacement as well. While I can see it being as useless as Dell's 'dock', it still interesting when one of the biggest OEMs felt the need to add it too.

They shipped that crap with Windows 7 too, nothing new.

While the name is the same, the product is new.

"In Windows 8, the Start button and Start menu from previous versions of Windows has been replaced with the Start screen. As an alternative to using the new Windows 8 Start screen, HP Quick Start organizes your apps in a format that resembles the traditional Windows Start menu."

Again, that anyone is so opposed to something they would never use is mind numbing. Pokki and now HP have shown the outlines of what a 'modern', touch friendly, app integrated Start could be in the familiar Desktop environment. Even for the naysayers, are you really telling me that the classic Start menu is smaller than a phone? Funny, seems like that format is what started the new rage.

If we are really going to run with the 'Desktop as an app' metaphor, then why the frak do you care what the app contains?

Yeah, you're right, there is no rational thought to advancing technology. Who the **** am I kidding.

Since Win 8 was announced most of your posts have been about insulting other Neowinians for not agreeing with your vision of how the technology should advance. Sorry, but that's not rational.

  • Like 3

Since Win 8 was announced most of your posts have been about insulting other Neowinians for not agreeing with your vision of how the technology should advance. Sorry, but that's not rational.

And technology CAN advance EVEN if they give us an option to use the old style interface and never see the Start Screen or hot corners.

People here are acting like if an option was provided, the world would end.

NOTE: I am talking about the desktop version. Shouldn't the installer have the capability to detect if a touch-supported device is connected? If touch screen monitor is not found, give us the option on what type of interface we want. if a touch screen monitor is found, force it on us if it HAS to be forced.

But come on. Who are you (Dot and others) to tell me what I should do with my computer? I prefer the folders inside folders inside folders approach that the Start MENU had. I DO NOT like having all items visible and in my face every time I go to the All Apps portion of the Start Screen.

I do this same thing for papers and documents. Everything I have are in folders. If I need my Insurance information, I have a main Insurance folder, then a Health Insurance folder, and multiple folders for the company.

It is called being organized.

If you just throw your insurance papers with everything else, that is fine. But I am a very organized person. So I prefer the start menu. It is not because I am resistant to change, I have had Windows 8 since launch and still have it installed. But the Start Screen is not better in that respect. Those of you that say it is the same as the start menu only better ignore the fact that it is less organized.

Those of you saying it is the same as the start menu. The fact that the start menu has expandable and collapsable folders, and the start screen does not have something similar already means it is not the same....

And technology CAN advance EVEN if they give us an option to use the old style interface and never see the Start Screen or hot corners.

People here are acting like if an option was provided, the world would end.

NOTE: I am talking about the desktop version. Shouldn't the installer have the capability to detect if a touch-supported device is connected? If touch screen monitor is not found, give us the option on what type of interface we want. if a touch screen monitor is found, force it on us if it HAS to be forced.

But come on. Who are you (Dot and others) to tell me what I should do with my computer? I prefer the folders inside folders inside folders approach that the Start MENU had. I DO NOT like having all items visible and in my face every time I go to the All Apps portion of the Start Screen.

I do this same thing for papers and documents. Everything I have are in folders. If I need my Insurance information, I have a main Insurance folder, then a Health Insurance folder, and multiple folders for the company.

It is called being organized.

If you just throw your insurance papers with everything else, that is fine. But I am a very organized person. So I prefer the start menu. It is not because I am resistant to change, I have had Windows 8 since launch and still have it installed. But the Start Screen is not better in that respect. Those of you that say it is the same as the start menu only better ignore the fact that it is less organized.

Those of you saying it is the same as the start menu. The fact that the start menu has expandable and collapsable folders, and the start screen does not have something similar already means it is not the same....

What's it going to advance to when you're still using a mouse? There's new PCs and devices coming to market that can't use the point and click UI of Windows past anymore. Point me to one source that is still developing point and click technology. Microsoft certainly isn't. They're hard at work with touch and Kinect technologies, heck they're even working with augmented reality technologies, along with Google, and other independent developers.

Look at all the forward thinking technologies and devices, and you'll see that the traditional point and click desktop UI doesn't have a shot at surviving on these things. That's where things are going.

Also, I again ask why you are continuing to use the All Apps menu. You're just torturing yourself. Why not use Search? It's quicker, and doesn't "get in your face".

Also, I again ask why you are continuing to use the All Apps menu. You're just torturing yourself. Why not use Search? It's quicker, and doesn't "get in your face".

Start menu search is just as fast, doesn't take up your entire screen and gives you all of it's findings in 1 box, you don't have to click multiple categories to find what you want.

As far as point and click. When sitting at my desk doing book work with quickbooks, I do not want to have to be touching my screen. God NO! I'm very productive with my mouse and keyboard.

Next you will be telling us that desktop keyboards will be going away for desktop computers because on desktop computers you will just use onscreen keyboards.

Next you will be telling us that desktop keyboards will be going away for desktop computers because on desktop computers you will just use onscreen keyboards.

I specifically said "point and click UI". AKA using the mouse. Please stop putting words in my mouth.

I specifically said "point and click UI". AKA using the mouse. Please stop putting words in my mouth.

I didn't put words in your mouth. I said "Next you will be telling us" meaning you haven't said it yet! :D

Start menu search is just as fast, doesn't take up your entire screen and gives you all of it's findings in 1 box, you don't have to click multiple categories to find what you want.

Can the start menu search within apps? No it can't.

Here's an example, I can press the windows key, type in Neowin and press Chrome. Chrome opens up with a google search for Neowin.

Here's another one. Want to watch Top Gear on netflix? Win key -> Top Gear -> Click netflix. Netflix opens with top gear selected.

Can the start menu search within apps? No it can't.

Here's an example, I can press the windows key, type in Neowin and press Chrome. Chrome opens up with a google search for Neowin.

Here's another one. Want to watch Top Gear on netflix? Win key -> Top Gear -> Click netflix. Netflix opens with top gear selected.

It's called jump list and it does exist also in the start menu.

It's called jump list and it does exist also in the start menu.

Jump lists are hardly used by every app, at the most you only get a recent list of files you've opened with the app. That's hardly the same thing as the examples given.

What's it going to advance to when you're still using a mouse? There's new PCs and devices coming to market that can't use the point and click UI of Windows past anymore. Point me to one source that is still developing point and click technology. Microsoft certainly isn't. They're hard at work with touch and Kinect technologies, heck they're even working with augmented reality technologies, along with Google, and other independent developers.

Look at all the forward thinking technologies and devices, and you'll see that the traditional point and click desktop UI doesn't have a shot at surviving on these things. That's where things are going.

Also, I again ask why you are continuing to use the All Apps menu. You're just torturing yourself. Why not use Search? It's quicker, and doesn't "get in your face".

Bored of this rhetoric, do you have stocks in Microsoft or something?

Every thread that has even the smallest dig at Windows 8 and there you are jumping down everyones throats, it's getting boring.

Bored of this rhetoric, do you have stocks in Microsoft or something?

Every thread that has even the smallest dig at Windows 8 and there you are jumping down everyones throats, it's getting boring.

What rhetoric?

Can the start screen search within applications? No it can't.

Yeah, it can.

post-420821-0-67928300-1360840964.png

What rhetoric?

You do seem to want everyone to "see the light" that is Windows 8 and the metro apps. You like metro, that's fine. But I don't, and yet you consider the compromise of having the start menu and the start screen to be backwards thinking, rather than just agreeing that it would be a solution to this silly debate.

Look at the people here who have said, "I don't like that I can't do <X>." How many times have you replied to them saying, "Oh but you can! You just need to change the way you do it!"? While for you that change may be like learning multiplication after addition (i.e. a natural progression), for others it's more like learning to drink a glass of water while standing on their head; sure, they could do it, but what's the point when it worked for them the original way (in this analogy, by drinking the water standing normally)?

I'm not saying that you telling them how to do things the new way is bad. I'm just saying that you can spot the people who are against metro easily enough to know that any help that you offer in an attempt to convert them will not change their mind, so what's the point?

I just got back from a service call for someone who just got windows 8. The issue was they were in a Modern app and it crashed and all they had was a "blue screen". Because it's a modern all the menu bars were hidden. So I went over and showed them all the ins and outs of windows 8. She was having a REALLY hard time activating the charms bar and keeping it up long enough to click so I showed her the windows key + C command.

Later I was working on their XP laptop and I heard her on the phone talking to her daughter about this new Windows 8 HP laptop. She told her daughter "Windows 8 hides everything from you and you have to press buttons to find it" ...She's actually correct. Windows 8 does hide everything from you. In fact this was my first beef with windows 8 before it was even released. I still feel the same way I did back then.

Never hide the most important menu's from the user, its bad UI design on a desktop.

All the pro Windows 8 users response to that is "Just use the shortcut keys". This user really didn't like that.

  • Like 2

That's an app, I'm talking about real applications...

Furthermore it only works 'cause MS offers a new API that allows hooking - something that would easily have been integrated into the start menu...

And it would have looked like a ridiculous mess since everytime you did a search you'd get a massive long list of everything without any way of sorting it. Not to mention most application developers would completely ignore it if was in the start menu.

People who use OS X like to talk about how they can preview documents in finder without having to open the app and how Windows should have that. Thing is, Windows has had that feature since XP and it has had the API for other programs to use it since XP too. How many programs have used it? Pretty much none aside from MS Office.

Chrome is a real application isn't it? But it does have a metro option too, I use the desktop version only and I can still use the search like I described. Not that hard for developers to link metro and it's APIs into their desktop apps.

She was having a REALLY hard time activating the charms bar and keeping it up long enough to click so I showed her the windows key + C command.

She was having a really hard time with moving her mouse downwards? You slide your mouse to the corner and then slide it down.

I agree that MS needs to make some of the stuff in Windows 8 more clear but they show you how to use the charms bar on your first boot...

Later I was working on their XP laptop and I heard her on the phone talking to her daughter about this new Windows 8 HP laptop. She told her daughter "Windows 8 hides everything from you and you have to press buttons to find it" ...She's actually correct. Windows 8 does hide everything from you. In fact this was my first beef with windows 8 before it was even released. I still feel the same way I did back then.

Windows 8 while using METRO apps will hide menus from you. Every other menu on every other win32 application, and even the Windows 8 desktop runs exactly like it did before.

Do these very same people complain when they buy a new car (or product) that things are different? Or do they take the time to learn it and use it. Why should computers be any different?

Did these people complain when command line was replaced with GUIs?

She was having a really hard time with moving her mouse downwards? You slide your mouse to the corner and then slide it down.

You've never seen an old person use a mouse before have you?

You've never seen an old person use a mouse before have you?

So like I said we should be judging how technology advances by how old people use it? Maybe we should drop the speed limits all around the world to like 20 because you've never seen an old person drive have you?

I'm sure old people were massively confused by computers when they cam out too. Maybe we should have just thrown them out the window and stuck with typewriters.

You don't need to use the charms bar to use windows 8, it just quick access to a few things but it's not the only (and sometimes not even the fastest) way to access them. If you need to search, bring up the start menu and start typing.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Does anyone here know if these updates are integrated into the UUP dump isos?
    • Motrix Next 3.9.4 by Razvan Serea Motrix Next is a modern, open-source cross-platform download manager built as the official next-generation successor to the original Motrix project. It has been completely rewritten using Tauri 2, Vue 3, TypeScript, and Rust, while still relying on the powerful Aria2 download engine for high-speed multi-protocol transfers. The app supports HTTP, HTTPS, FTP, BitTorrent, ED2K and magnet links, offering advanced features like multi-connection acceleration, task scheduling, bandwidth control, and batch download management. With a significantly reduced install size (around 20MB), it focuses on being lightweight, fast, and resource-efficient compared to traditional Electron-based download tools. Designed for Windows, macOS, and Linux, Motrix Next delivers a clean, modern UI inspired by Material Design 3 principles, with smooth animations and a minimal workflow. It improves usability through better download organization, system tray integration, and enhanced torrent handling including selective file downloads and tracker management. Motrix Next features: Multi-protocol downloads — HTTP, FTP, BitTorrent, Magnet, .torrent, ED2K, and Metalink tasks BitTorrent — Selective file download, DHT, peer exchange, encryption controls, metadata caching, GeoIP peer flags, and tracker probing Browser extension integration — Embedded Extension API with independent authentication, download confirmation, smart auto-submit, filename hints, referer/cookie forwarding, and real-time controls (Chrome Web Store · Edge Add-ons) Safe filename handling — Content-Disposition, RFC 2047, non-UTF-8, percent-encoded, and extensionless URL resolution with path traversal sanitization Download organization — Favorite and recent folders, optional file-type categorization, stale-record cleanup, and completed history backed by SQLite Concurrent downloads — Independent controls for active tasks, HTTP connections per server, segments per file, and BT peer limits Speed control — Global and per-task upload/download limits with day-of-week and time-of-day scheduling System integration — Tray operation, optional tray speed display, macOS Dock badge/progress, protocol handlers for magnet://, thunder://, and motrixnext:// Lightweight mode — Destroys the WebView on minimize-to-tray while Rust keeps the engine, task monitor, notifications, history, and extension routing alive Notifications and power options — Native task start/complete/failure notifications, keep-awake during downloads, and optional shutdown after completion Network controls — Scoped proxy support for downloads, app updates, and tracker updates, plus system proxy detection Auto-update channels — Stable, Beta, and Latest Across Channels policies with separate download and install phases Diagnostics — Structured logs, exportable diagnostic ZIPs, database integrity checks, automatic DB rebuild, and Linux GPU rendering fallback Personalization — Light/dark/system theme, 10 color schemes, 26 languages, and first-launch system language detection Motrix Next 3.9.4 changelog: Motrix Next 3.9.4 promotes the 3.9.4 beta cycle to stable. This release refreshes bundled engine binaries, improves task detail readability and copy actions, expands link handling for magnet and ED2K workflows, polishes responsive navigation and text wrapping, updates browser extension documentation, and refines network preference controls. New Features Task Detail copy actions — Added copyable values for task metadata and reusable render functions for long text fields. Magnet and ED2K lifecycle support — Added task lifecycle handling for magnet and ED2K links. History cleanup for deleted tasks — Deleted tasks can now remove matching history records. User-Agent management — Added user-agent management and improved related network preference controls. Browser extension documentation — Added the Firefox Add-ons link for the Motrix Next extension. Improvements Engine binaries — Updated bundled binaries for supported architectures. Task Detail readability — Long task names, URLs, tracker values, and copyable metadata now render more clearly. Deletion messaging — Refined localized task deletion text for clarity and consistency. Text wrapping — Improved URI input wrapping and task name multiline display. Navigation layout — Improved sub-navigation responsiveness. Disk allocation default — Changed the default file allocation method to trunc. Proxy controls — Improved proxy button styling in network preferences. Download: Motrix Next 64-bit | ARM64 | macOS ~20.0 MB (Open Source) Links: Website | macOS / Linux | Screenshot Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • NVIDIA officially supports Ubuntu, as linked above with the GeForce NOW Hands on I did in collaboration with Paul Hill.
    • TO be clear I am not running linux today, however I keep thinking about it. And I want to make sure there are minimal obstacles if I decide to make that switch in the coming months.
    • Yes, I actually glossed over the Linux part from the OP. You could always go for a 9070 XT and if you really want to play Ray Traced games in the future, GeForce Now is pretty damn good on Linux https://www.neowin.net/news/nvidias-native-geforce-now-app-for-linux-bridges-the-gaming-gap-hands-on/
  • Recent Achievements

    • Proficient
      Eric Biran went up a rank
      Proficient
    • Dedicated
      Conjor earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Week One Done
      Windows Guy earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Dedicated
      Mark Spruce earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      479
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      252
    3. 3
      Steven P.
      72
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      69
    5. 5
      Skyfrog
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!