Do you want the start menu in Windows 8?


Do you want the start menu in Windows 8  

631 members have voted

  1. 1. Do you want the start menu in Windows 8?

    • Yes
      351
    • No
      280


Recommended Posts

I bought a new AiO yesturday (Envy23) and it appears all the new HP Win8 PCs (touch and non-touch) are shipping with their new 'Quick Start' that is basically a Start Menu replacement as well. While I can see it being as useless as Dell's 'dock', it still interesting when one of the biggest OEMs felt the need to add it too.

They shipped that crap with Windows 7 too, nothing new.

While the name is the same, the product is new.

"In Windows 8, the Start button and Start menu from previous versions of Windows has been replaced with the Start screen. As an alternative to using the new Windows 8 Start screen, HP Quick Start organizes your apps in a format that resembles the traditional Windows Start menu."

Again, that anyone is so opposed to something they would never use is mind numbing. Pokki and now HP have shown the outlines of what a 'modern', touch friendly, app integrated Start could be in the familiar Desktop environment. Even for the naysayers, are you really telling me that the classic Start menu is smaller than a phone? Funny, seems like that format is what started the new rage.

If we are really going to run with the 'Desktop as an app' metaphor, then why the frak do you care what the app contains?

Yeah, you're right, there is no rational thought to advancing technology. Who the **** am I kidding.

Since Win 8 was announced most of your posts have been about insulting other Neowinians for not agreeing with your vision of how the technology should advance. Sorry, but that's not rational.

  • Like 3

Since Win 8 was announced most of your posts have been about insulting other Neowinians for not agreeing with your vision of how the technology should advance. Sorry, but that's not rational.

And technology CAN advance EVEN if they give us an option to use the old style interface and never see the Start Screen or hot corners.

People here are acting like if an option was provided, the world would end.

NOTE: I am talking about the desktop version. Shouldn't the installer have the capability to detect if a touch-supported device is connected? If touch screen monitor is not found, give us the option on what type of interface we want. if a touch screen monitor is found, force it on us if it HAS to be forced.

But come on. Who are you (Dot and others) to tell me what I should do with my computer? I prefer the folders inside folders inside folders approach that the Start MENU had. I DO NOT like having all items visible and in my face every time I go to the All Apps portion of the Start Screen.

I do this same thing for papers and documents. Everything I have are in folders. If I need my Insurance information, I have a main Insurance folder, then a Health Insurance folder, and multiple folders for the company.

It is called being organized.

If you just throw your insurance papers with everything else, that is fine. But I am a very organized person. So I prefer the start menu. It is not because I am resistant to change, I have had Windows 8 since launch and still have it installed. But the Start Screen is not better in that respect. Those of you that say it is the same as the start menu only better ignore the fact that it is less organized.

Those of you saying it is the same as the start menu. The fact that the start menu has expandable and collapsable folders, and the start screen does not have something similar already means it is not the same....

And technology CAN advance EVEN if they give us an option to use the old style interface and never see the Start Screen or hot corners.

People here are acting like if an option was provided, the world would end.

NOTE: I am talking about the desktop version. Shouldn't the installer have the capability to detect if a touch-supported device is connected? If touch screen monitor is not found, give us the option on what type of interface we want. if a touch screen monitor is found, force it on us if it HAS to be forced.

But come on. Who are you (Dot and others) to tell me what I should do with my computer? I prefer the folders inside folders inside folders approach that the Start MENU had. I DO NOT like having all items visible and in my face every time I go to the All Apps portion of the Start Screen.

I do this same thing for papers and documents. Everything I have are in folders. If I need my Insurance information, I have a main Insurance folder, then a Health Insurance folder, and multiple folders for the company.

It is called being organized.

If you just throw your insurance papers with everything else, that is fine. But I am a very organized person. So I prefer the start menu. It is not because I am resistant to change, I have had Windows 8 since launch and still have it installed. But the Start Screen is not better in that respect. Those of you that say it is the same as the start menu only better ignore the fact that it is less organized.

Those of you saying it is the same as the start menu. The fact that the start menu has expandable and collapsable folders, and the start screen does not have something similar already means it is not the same....

What's it going to advance to when you're still using a mouse? There's new PCs and devices coming to market that can't use the point and click UI of Windows past anymore. Point me to one source that is still developing point and click technology. Microsoft certainly isn't. They're hard at work with touch and Kinect technologies, heck they're even working with augmented reality technologies, along with Google, and other independent developers.

Look at all the forward thinking technologies and devices, and you'll see that the traditional point and click desktop UI doesn't have a shot at surviving on these things. That's where things are going.

Also, I again ask why you are continuing to use the All Apps menu. You're just torturing yourself. Why not use Search? It's quicker, and doesn't "get in your face".

Also, I again ask why you are continuing to use the All Apps menu. You're just torturing yourself. Why not use Search? It's quicker, and doesn't "get in your face".

Start menu search is just as fast, doesn't take up your entire screen and gives you all of it's findings in 1 box, you don't have to click multiple categories to find what you want.

As far as point and click. When sitting at my desk doing book work with quickbooks, I do not want to have to be touching my screen. God NO! I'm very productive with my mouse and keyboard.

Next you will be telling us that desktop keyboards will be going away for desktop computers because on desktop computers you will just use onscreen keyboards.

Next you will be telling us that desktop keyboards will be going away for desktop computers because on desktop computers you will just use onscreen keyboards.

I specifically said "point and click UI". AKA using the mouse. Please stop putting words in my mouth.

I specifically said "point and click UI". AKA using the mouse. Please stop putting words in my mouth.

I didn't put words in your mouth. I said "Next you will be telling us" meaning you haven't said it yet! :D

Start menu search is just as fast, doesn't take up your entire screen and gives you all of it's findings in 1 box, you don't have to click multiple categories to find what you want.

Can the start menu search within apps? No it can't.

Here's an example, I can press the windows key, type in Neowin and press Chrome. Chrome opens up with a google search for Neowin.

Here's another one. Want to watch Top Gear on netflix? Win key -> Top Gear -> Click netflix. Netflix opens with top gear selected.

Can the start menu search within apps? No it can't.

Here's an example, I can press the windows key, type in Neowin and press Chrome. Chrome opens up with a google search for Neowin.

Here's another one. Want to watch Top Gear on netflix? Win key -> Top Gear -> Click netflix. Netflix opens with top gear selected.

It's called jump list and it does exist also in the start menu.

It's called jump list and it does exist also in the start menu.

Jump lists are hardly used by every app, at the most you only get a recent list of files you've opened with the app. That's hardly the same thing as the examples given.

What's it going to advance to when you're still using a mouse? There's new PCs and devices coming to market that can't use the point and click UI of Windows past anymore. Point me to one source that is still developing point and click technology. Microsoft certainly isn't. They're hard at work with touch and Kinect technologies, heck they're even working with augmented reality technologies, along with Google, and other independent developers.

Look at all the forward thinking technologies and devices, and you'll see that the traditional point and click desktop UI doesn't have a shot at surviving on these things. That's where things are going.

Also, I again ask why you are continuing to use the All Apps menu. You're just torturing yourself. Why not use Search? It's quicker, and doesn't "get in your face".

Bored of this rhetoric, do you have stocks in Microsoft or something?

Every thread that has even the smallest dig at Windows 8 and there you are jumping down everyones throats, it's getting boring.

Bored of this rhetoric, do you have stocks in Microsoft or something?

Every thread that has even the smallest dig at Windows 8 and there you are jumping down everyones throats, it's getting boring.

What rhetoric?

Can the start screen search within applications? No it can't.

Yeah, it can.

post-420821-0-67928300-1360840964.png

What rhetoric?

You do seem to want everyone to "see the light" that is Windows 8 and the metro apps. You like metro, that's fine. But I don't, and yet you consider the compromise of having the start menu and the start screen to be backwards thinking, rather than just agreeing that it would be a solution to this silly debate.

Look at the people here who have said, "I don't like that I can't do <X>." How many times have you replied to them saying, "Oh but you can! You just need to change the way you do it!"? While for you that change may be like learning multiplication after addition (i.e. a natural progression), for others it's more like learning to drink a glass of water while standing on their head; sure, they could do it, but what's the point when it worked for them the original way (in this analogy, by drinking the water standing normally)?

I'm not saying that you telling them how to do things the new way is bad. I'm just saying that you can spot the people who are against metro easily enough to know that any help that you offer in an attempt to convert them will not change their mind, so what's the point?

I just got back from a service call for someone who just got windows 8. The issue was they were in a Modern app and it crashed and all they had was a "blue screen". Because it's a modern all the menu bars were hidden. So I went over and showed them all the ins and outs of windows 8. She was having a REALLY hard time activating the charms bar and keeping it up long enough to click so I showed her the windows key + C command.

Later I was working on their XP laptop and I heard her on the phone talking to her daughter about this new Windows 8 HP laptop. She told her daughter "Windows 8 hides everything from you and you have to press buttons to find it" ...She's actually correct. Windows 8 does hide everything from you. In fact this was my first beef with windows 8 before it was even released. I still feel the same way I did back then.

Never hide the most important menu's from the user, its bad UI design on a desktop.

All the pro Windows 8 users response to that is "Just use the shortcut keys". This user really didn't like that.

  • Like 2

That's an app, I'm talking about real applications...

Furthermore it only works 'cause MS offers a new API that allows hooking - something that would easily have been integrated into the start menu...

And it would have looked like a ridiculous mess since everytime you did a search you'd get a massive long list of everything without any way of sorting it. Not to mention most application developers would completely ignore it if was in the start menu.

People who use OS X like to talk about how they can preview documents in finder without having to open the app and how Windows should have that. Thing is, Windows has had that feature since XP and it has had the API for other programs to use it since XP too. How many programs have used it? Pretty much none aside from MS Office.

Chrome is a real application isn't it? But it does have a metro option too, I use the desktop version only and I can still use the search like I described. Not that hard for developers to link metro and it's APIs into their desktop apps.

She was having a REALLY hard time activating the charms bar and keeping it up long enough to click so I showed her the windows key + C command.

She was having a really hard time with moving her mouse downwards? You slide your mouse to the corner and then slide it down.

I agree that MS needs to make some of the stuff in Windows 8 more clear but they show you how to use the charms bar on your first boot...

Later I was working on their XP laptop and I heard her on the phone talking to her daughter about this new Windows 8 HP laptop. She told her daughter "Windows 8 hides everything from you and you have to press buttons to find it" ...She's actually correct. Windows 8 does hide everything from you. In fact this was my first beef with windows 8 before it was even released. I still feel the same way I did back then.

Windows 8 while using METRO apps will hide menus from you. Every other menu on every other win32 application, and even the Windows 8 desktop runs exactly like it did before.

Do these very same people complain when they buy a new car (or product) that things are different? Or do they take the time to learn it and use it. Why should computers be any different?

Did these people complain when command line was replaced with GUIs?

She was having a really hard time with moving her mouse downwards? You slide your mouse to the corner and then slide it down.

You've never seen an old person use a mouse before have you?

You've never seen an old person use a mouse before have you?

So like I said we should be judging how technology advances by how old people use it? Maybe we should drop the speed limits all around the world to like 20 because you've never seen an old person drive have you?

I'm sure old people were massively confused by computers when they cam out too. Maybe we should have just thrown them out the window and stuck with typewriters.

You don't need to use the charms bar to use windows 8, it just quick access to a few things but it's not the only (and sometimes not even the fastest) way to access them. If you need to search, bring up the start menu and start typing.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hello, Hope all is well. I am in UK.  
    • I'm not happy with myself for it, but I've gone and got hold of it. Just another 45 minutes and I'll be Bond, James Bond. In my defence, IO's Hitman series is awesome, and I'm a sucker for 007. So while it might seem a bit simplified compared to Hitman, I'm sure I'll be right at home.
    • Or just check the script yourself ^^. I hate having a Microsoft account tied to my windows install.
    • 007 First Light review: Satisfying spy adventure that James Bond needed by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe I have fond memories of classic James Bond games from the Electronic Arts era. Using high-tech gadgets, sneaking into parties, and dispatching bad guys were wildly exciting activities for my younger self. In recent years, Bond games have entirely disappeared, alongside the super spy genre. Fast forward to 2020, imagine my surprise when IO Interactive announced it had secured the Bond IP to make a game. Considering the studio’s Hitman history, this project is one I keenly kept an eye on. Six years later, 007 First Light is finally here, and after spending time inside this globe-trotting adventure, I can safely say that my excitement for this developer’s take on this universe was not unfounded. IO has taken lessons it has learned from Hitman and combined them with what I would expect from a directed cinematic experience like James Bond. I have refrained from mentioning major plot points to save you from story spoilers in this review. This is an original story that doesn’t tie into any movies, so there isn’t an expectation of knowing the backstory or the decades of movies either. Bond, James Bond When 007 First Light begins, Bond is just Bond. There isn’t a spy angle, fancy gadgets, or even a secret mission. The introductory mission is framed to show how James Bond handled himself and how he does not care about the odds when it comes to saving lives. It’s a gorgeous level as well, showing off an island scattered with cliffs in the middle of a storm. Looking back, this is probably the best-looking level in the game, with IO showing off all its abilities with its custom engine, Glacier. But my favorite ended up being the follow-up to this level. Once the United Kingdom's foreign intelligence agency, MI6, recruits our daring youngster into its super-spy “00” program, training begins. However, instead of treading through the same tutorial missions where the game teaches you to run and jump and drive, IO opted for a montage, and it’s amazing. The scenes cut between Bond practicing and improving his marksmanship, parkour, hand-to-hand combat, and driving as weeks go by in his training. What impressed me here was the lack of any loading screens or stutters as scenes instantly switched to different locations entirely, as if I was watching a movie. This creativity is a trend I noticed in most levels, where there is some sort of gameplay or choreography mechanic being introduced to keep things interesting. Soon, the rest of the cast is introduced, bringing other agents that our favorite secret agent will be working with, the scientists and engineers that build MI6’s spy gadgets, as well as higher-ranking officers that either appreciate or (at best) tolerate Bond’s rebellious attitude. It’s a tight cast, all with incredibly good voice acting and personalities that quickly grew on me. The casting for Bond himself is also an excellent one. From showing his iconic soft spot for women to the condescending smiles that get a rise out of enemies, I had no issues getting immersed into this universe as this new face of James Bond. The missions take place in a wide range of locations as MI6 sends Bond to tackle dangers that are growing everywhere from the UK to Africa. These aren’t unrelated adventures where MI6 is sending secret agents, which is an angle I would love to see in another game, but a part of a bigger conspiracy affecting the entire world. Some of the twists and turns were all too predictable, and the character that Lenny Kravitz played made me cringe a little too much. But all in all, I enjoyed the campaign’s storyline that sets the stage for this new agent joining the illustrious “00” program. Plenty of Possibilities The third-person style of IO Interactive fits this role quite well. Bond is presented as a master at hand-to-hand combat as well as firearms, while also having a knack for being stealthy when required. Most sections of missions have a lot of freedom. This means I could beat up every goon and security guard on the way to an objective, slip past them without sounding a single alarm, or do a mix of both. My sessions usually end up with the third option because I tend to be impatient about waiting for a patrol to move. Drawing from its Hitman genes, the developer almost always gives multiple routes for going through missions. Levels can be massive, sometimes sporting hundreds of NPCs going their own ways and having conversations. If my objective is to break into a security room on the third floor, I could look around for roof access, eavesdrop on conversations to find out where someone lost a key, create a distraction and pickpocket a guard for a keycard, sneak in through the vents, or simply kick down the offending door. I enjoyed the variety on offer, especially because the same solutions didn’t usually show up in different missions. Before heading out into a secret MI6 escapade, the gadget specialist of the branch walks Bond through the organization's latest and greatest achievements. This can be cool little devices like a laser built into the watch, a phone that fires poison darts, or a camera that emits a powerful shockwave. The choice of what can be taken into the mission is up to the player. I could usually find fresh routes or get out of tough situations with a punch or two, so I never had the feeling of missing out by not choosing the right equipment. It’s still a fun practice. Choosing the armaments before a mission enhanced the super spy feeling quite a bit. As I mentioned, stealth comes in as a very viable option for most of the missions, letting Bond sneak past foes or knock them out silently. While it is satisfying to clear entire areas of goons and walk away without any alarms, the way of accomplishing this could have been done better. Bond can lure enemies, sneak up and knock them out, or use a gadget to disorient them before dealing a nasty blow. Bodies cannot be moved or hidden afterward either. It’s a very simple system, which I wish were more exciting to pull off. Perhaps more stealth-orientated gadgets, distraction options, or multi-takedowns could have helped here, I think. Getting caught while attempting to be in stealth does not mean a game over. Other than getting into a fist fight, an interesting twist of 007 First Light is the bluffing option. While an enemy is confused as to what you are doing in a restricted location, Bond has the option to improvise and persuade them that you are exactly where you’re supposed to be. These are fun little dynamic interactions with unique dialog depending on the mission and location, giving a few extra moments for Bond to go past suspicious guards smoothly. It’s the first time I’ve witnessed this system in a game, and I hope to see more. License to Kill Bond isn’t just dealing with security guards or civilians. From time to time, entire gangs of gun-toting mercenaries show up in levels looking to take down our protagonist. It is then that License to Kill mode is activated for Bond, letting him use firearms with no restrictions. I was surprised by just how tight gunplay is in 007 First Light. The weapons feel powerful and satisfying to fire, with single bullets capable of taking down an enemy with a headshot. Ammo is scarce, and enemies don’t drop weapons with full magazines most of the time. This forces a hectic kind of gameplay where I am always advancing towards enemies to take their weapons after they are downed. Things like shooting legs to immobilize, aiming at the hands to make their weapon go flying, blowing up nearby fire extinguishers for cover, and using gadgets to halt a goon in their tracks while I reload, make up enjoyable levels. I had to hold back my disappointment when the enemy count in these action sequences dropped to zero and I had to go non-lethal again. Speaking of action sequences, First Light isn’t just offering sandbox levels to complete at the player’s own leisure either. Each level comes with specific linear and directed scenes to move the story forward and put Bond in tight situations. These usually end up with high-octane chases or driving sections, offering the chance to witness chaining explosions, hails of gunfire, and scripted parkour scenes that remind me of Mission Impossible movies more than Bond. Elements like seeing James Bond jump out of a plane without a parachute or drive through buildings in London inside a trash truck were fantastic and always left me at a high point when finishing a mission. The classic James Bond theme is sprinkled in here too, which only happens a handful of times in the game, but at just the right moments. Visuals and Performance Compared to Unreal Engine 5 games we are seeing nowadays, 007 First Light isn’t flexing a huge amount of realism when it comes to graphics. The models, textures, and effects all feel a little dated, with the starting mission that I mentioned being the most visually striking. However, the complete lack of stutters, the hundreds of NPCs that can be on screen without a single hitch, massive sandbox levels, and smooth transitions between them all play a part in making this an immensely immersive and complex experience. The in-engine cutscenes are gorgeous as well, offering an upgraded visual style and model detail over the gameplay sections. Animations are one aspect that jumps out at me about any new game, and First Light has nailed what a third-person action game should feel like. Walking, sneaking, and running all have a heaviness to them that I appreciate. Whenever Bond moves past a wall or a ledge, his arms reach out to lightly hold those structures until he moves away. NPCs actually react to my character and move out of the way. Even during melee combat or takedown animations, the fists impacting a body or a head hitting a wall all have that same weight. Even the more frivolous animations, like catching a gun in midair or chucking an empty one at a goon (yes, you can do that), are satisfying to pull off. Of course, the in-engine cutscene animations are remarkably well done too, with facial animations and the upgraded model details improving my engagement with the characters. I have an AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT 16GB paired with an eight-core Ryzen 7 3700X and 32GB of RAM, with the game running at 1440p resolution. Deciding to completely max out all the graphics options gave me a range of frame rates between 60 and 100 depending on the scene and level. While I did try to enable AMD FSR, which bumped up the frame rates by a good 20% at Quality mode, IO Interactive’s implementation of the technology wasn’t that great. Every corner and edge in levels began shimmering, and I was also seeing smearing issues in fast-moving sections. The title seemingly uses the older generation FSR 3.1 and not the machine learning-assisted FSR 4, leading to these artifacts. Unfortunately, there isn't a way to manually upgrade this right now either. I opted to turn off the upscaling and play the game in native 1440p to avoid problems. I would say the FPS range I was getting was an acceptable one for a single-player action game for my setup. I do wish there were an FOV slider option in the settings. While the camera is far enough back for my tastes in most situations in this third-person adventure, at times the perspective is far too close. When trying to look around quickly and spot targets, I realized I was getting a slight headache at times due to the use of an almost over-the-shoulder close-up camera. Conclusion Being James Bond in 007 First Light is a treat. Traveling around the world chasing conspiracies, using high-tech gadgets disguised as everyday accessories, and improvising on the spot to fool foes all give a fantastic feeling of being a super spy. For an origin story, IO Interactive has done a great job at introducing the character and his motives for doing what he does. The satisfying combat animation and fantastic voice acting are definitely high points, with the License to Kill moments being my favorite. Not being able to move bodies and the simplistic stealth of mechanics does hurt its presentation a little. The NPC logic and intelligence is easy to manipulate and trick, repeating the same actions over and over again if I keep making distractions. The lack of an FOV slider was also a pain (quite literally) at times, and the FSR implementation is quite poor. These are things I hope the studio will improve upon with updates. Even with its faults, IO Interactive and James Bond are a match made in heaven. The studio knows how to make a main character that oozes charm and competency while also leaning heavily into its Hitman experience to make gigantic levels with what looks like hundreds of NPCs roaming around. Being an origin story, IO’s Bond has a way to go before he becomes the highly effective agent we see in the movie world. I am hoping the studio will continue this series alongside its Hitman ventures going forward, just so we get to experience the journey for longer. 007 First Light is available on PC (Steam, Epic Games Store, and Xbox PC), Xbox Series X|S, and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. This review was conducted on the PC version of the game provided by IO Interactive.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      271
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      75
    4. 4
      Skyfrog
      74
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!