Diet Soda Increases the Risk of Diabetes


Recommended Posts

Source: http://shine.yahoo.c...-192600358.html

abwupCtv.jpg

Yet another study confirms what people have been saying for ages: Stop drinking diet soda. Like, right now. Drinking just one 12-ounce can of an artificially sweetened fizzy drink per week can increase your risk of Type 2 diabetes by 33 percent, French researchers found. And given that most people don't stop at a single weekly serving, your real risk for diabetes could actually be much higher.

Diet Soda May Increase Risk of Depression

The study, which was announced Thursday and will be published in the American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, was conducted by France's National Institute of Health and Medical Research and covered 66,118 middle-aged women whose dietary habits and health were tracked from 1993 to 2007.

Diet Soda May Be Making You Fat

The results were unexpected. Though it's well-known that people who consume a lot of sugar are more likely to develop diabetes, the researchers found that participants who drank "light" or "diet" soft drinks had a higher risk of developing Type 2 diabetes than those who drank regular, sugar-filled sodas. Those who drank 100 percent natural squeezed fruit juices instead had no additional risk.

Women who choose artificially flavored soft drinks usually drink twice as many of them as women who choose regular soda or juice?2.8 glasses per week compared to 1.6 glasses. "Yet when an equal quantity is consumed, the risk of contracting diabetes is higher for 'light' or 'diet' drinks than for 'non-light' or 'non-diet' drinks," the researchers, epidemiologists Francoise Clavel-Chapelon and Guy Fagherazzi, said in a statement. Women who drank up to 500 milliliters (about 12 ounces) of artificially sweetened beverages per week were 33 percent more likely to develop the disease, and women who drank about 600 milliliters (about 20 ounces) per week had a 66 percent increase in risk.

Drinking sweetened beverages increases the risk of becoming overweight, which is itself a risk factor in developing diabetes. But the study didn't find that the results were the same even among overweight women. So how can artificially sweetened drinks be making the problem worse if they're fat- and calorie-free?

"With respect, in particular, to 'light' or 'diet' drinks, the relationship with diabetes can be explained partially by a greater craving for sugar in general by female consumers of this type of soft drink," the researchers explained. "Furthermore, aspartame, one of the main artificial sweeteners used today, causes an increase in glycaemia and consequently a rise in the insulin level in comparison to that produced by sucrose."

Translation: Drinking artificially sweetened drinks makes you crave other sweet things (hello, chocolate!). And your body reacts to aspartame?also known as NutraSweet and Equal?much in the same way that it reacts to plain old sugar.

According to the American Diabetes Association, about 25.8 million children and adults in the United States have diabetes?about 8.3 percent of the population. The disease is the leading cause of new cases of blindness in people age 20 and older, and can also cause heart disease, stroke, high blood pressure, kidney disease, and damage to the nervous system. Type 2 diabetes?which can be controlled by diet and exercise rather than a daily insulin injection?is the most common form of diabetes in the United States.

The study's authors cautioned that more research was needed in order to prove a true causal link between diet sodas and Type 2 diabetes. "Information on beverage consumption was not updated during the follow-up, and dietary habits may have changed over time," they admitted in their report. "We cannot rule out that factors other than ASB [artificially sweetened beverages] are responsible for the association with diabetes."

Does'nt surprise me, basically putting chemicals into your body that arent supposed be there is going to have a adverse effect as body wont know how to handle em. Or handle them in a way it shouldnt. either way i think the whole diet/lighter food stuffs is rubbish anyway. want soemat fizzy get carbonated water + juice not someat thats jacked up with crap.

Both SSB consumption and ASB consumption were associated with increased T2D risk. We cannot rule out that factors other than ASB consumption that we did not control for are responsible for the association with diabetes, and randomized trials are required to prove a causal link between ASB consumption and T2D.

Yawn another article claiming aspartame/diet soda is the devil :rolleyes:

Diet sodas do not make you diabetic. It's the people who think it's ok to eat an entire chocolate cake with some diet soda (because it has 0 calories) who end up with diabetes. Just because you get a diet soda with your triple baconator doesn't suddenly make it a healthy meal.

Oh look the article links to another one that says:

There was one caveat: A healthy diet may help mitigate some of the effects of diet soda. Over 20 years, 20% of the men and women who followed a "prudent" diet (one rich with fruit, vegetables, whole grains, milk, nuts, and seeds) and drank diet soda developed metabolic syndrome, compared with 18% of those who followed the same eating style but didn't sip diet soft drinks. Most at risk were those adhering to a "Western" diet of fast food, meat, pizza, and snacks, all washed down with diet soda. By the end of the study, 32% of those folks had developed metabolic syndrome.

So how exactly can be diet sodas fault when people who drank it with a healthy diet weren't a higher risk for metabolic syndrome (2% can be attributed to statistical error)?

right,so drinking a zero calorie no sugar drink will give you diabetes, so will drinking soda full of sugar, but drinking the same amount of orange juice with the same amount of sugar wont give you diabetes? WHAT? this is the biggest joke I've ever heard. all these studies all bull****.

and type 2 diabetes is caused by not being active,simple as that. not being active enough will cause your cells not to react to insulin anymore. it has nothing to do with eating sugar. in fact,if you're not eating enough sugar,your body will make sugar from proteins and fat through a process called. glucogenesis. your body runs on glucose. if you eat too much sugar, then this sugar is converted to fat and stored.

the results of this study might be telling a different story than these simple minded folks made. maybe people who drink the diet soda are non active folks who know they aren't healthy so they try not to consume TEH SUGARZ. folks who drink soda are usually unhealthy. And people who drink freshly squeezed orange juice are health conscious people who exercise and look after themselves.

  • Like 3

how exactly the taste of those beverages if they abosulutely contain no sweetener at all (be it natural or artificial) ?

i like my non-sweetned tea, would non sweetened cokes/colas taste better?

Try drinking carbonated water. It tastes awful.

Just get pop with regular sugar and you'll be fine... artificial sweeteners are really bad for you.

They should just use stevia if they don't want sugar...

Just get pop with regular sugar and you'll be fine... artificial sweeteners are really bad for you.

They should just use stevia if they don't want sugar...

For 99% of people I totally agree, and it has beneficial effects on blood glucose levels beyond just being a sugar substitute, but there is that <1% who are allergic or get an upset tummy. Still, stevia's a great alternative especially for diabetics.

One caution though: if you take lithium (bipolar etc), blood pressure or diabetes meds their dose may have to be adjusted downwards as stevia can enhance their effect. For diabetics the reason is that it enhances insulin sensitivity.

Just get pop with regular sugar and you'll be fine... artificial sweeteners are really bad for you.

They should just use stevia if they don't want sugar...

The funny thing is the naturalistic fallacy causes people who fall for it to take a less safe sugar substitute.

Just get pop with regular sugar and you'll be fine... artificial sweeteners are really bad for you.

They should just use stevia if they don't want sugar...

Oh please. Aspartame is one the most studied chemicals in the world, and apart from fear mongering nothing really bad has come from it.

If you're in the US good luck getting soda with regular sugar (Costco sells them, it's called Mexican coke). Everything here has HFCS (high fructose corn syrup) thanks to corn lobbyists and government subsidies. Seriously, buy a bottle of mexican coke (or the coke that's sold worldwide since the US is the only one t ouse HFCS) and you can taste the difference.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Sorry I mean your back rest on your Herman, can you move the back say 2cm then lock it? Then realise 2cm isn’t enough and you want an extra 1cm then lock it into that position? Basically like in an older car seat, you turn the knob round until you get the back recline precisely where you want it, this is what I found the Herman wouldn’t do
    • WTF? I am not taking a video of myself to access a site or to create an account. What are they thinking? I don’t even have a webcam on my main desktop PC. The powers to be are really looking to normalize the taking of pics or submitting ID for everything. I afraid most people will end up just going along with it.
    • Free eBook: A Comprehensive Guide to the NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 (worth $126.95) by Steven Parker Claim your complimentary copy (worth $126.95) of "A Comprehensive Guide to the NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0" for free, before the offer ends on July 8. (link below) Description The National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Cybersecurity Framework, produced in response to a 2014 US Presidential directive, has proven essential in standardizing approaches to cybersecurity risk and producing an efficient, adaptable toolkit for meeting cyber threats. As these threats have multiplied and escalated in recent years, this framework has evolved to meet new needs and reflect new best practices, and now has an international footprint. There has never been a greater need for cybersecurity professionals to understand this framework, its applications, and its potential. A Comprehensive Guide to the NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 offers a vital introduction to this NIST framework and its implementation. Highlighting significant updates from the first version of the NIST framework, it works through each of the framework’s functions in turn, in language both beginners and experienced professionals can grasp. Replete with compliance and implementation strategies, it proves indispensable for the next generation of cybersecurity professionals. A Comprehensive Guide to the NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 readers will also find: Clear, jargon-free language for both beginning and advanced readers Detailed discussion of all NIST framework components, including Govern, Identify, Protect, Detect, Respond, and Recover Hundreds of actionable recommendations for immediate implementation by cybersecurity professionals at all levels A Comprehensive Guide to the NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 is ideal for cybersecurity professionals, business leaders and executives, IT consultants and advisors, and students and academics focused on the study of cybersecurity, information technology, or related fields. How to download for free Please ensure you read the terms and conditions to claim this offer. Complete and verifiable information is required in order to receive this free offer. If you have previously made use of these offers, you will not need to re-register. A Comprehensive Guide to the NIST Cybersecurity Framework 2.0 Was $126.95, but is now FREE | Above link offer expires on July 8. The below offers are also available for free in exchange for your (work) email: View our recent time-limited free eBook offers The Complete Free AI Learning: Master ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini & More ($21 Value) now FREE How to Build an AI Design Workflow with Gamma ($21 Value) now FREE The Ultimate Linux Newbie Guide – Featured free content Python Notes for Professionals – Featured free content Learn Linux in 5 Days – Featured free content Quick Reference Guide for Cybersecurity – Featured free content We post these because we earn commission on each lead so as not to rely solely on advertising, which many of our readers block. It all helps toward paying staff reporters, servers and hosting costs. Other ways to support Neowin The above deal not doing it for you, but still want to help? Check out the links below. Check out our partner software in the Neowin Store Buy a T-shirt at Neowin's Threadsquad Subscribe to Neowin - for $14 a year, or $28 a year for an ad-free experience Disclosure: An account at Neowin Deals is required to participate in any deals powered by our affiliate, StackCommerce. For a full description of StackCommerce's privacy guidelines, go here. Neowin benefits from shared revenue of each sale made through the branded deals site.
    • I'm not unblocking my camera for this crapola. Sorry, Google.
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Year In
      BA the Curmudgeon earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Conversation Starter
      rosiecharles earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      KMilenkoski1202 earned a badge
      First Post
    • First Post
      carols23 earned a badge
      First Post
    • One Month Later
      Tom Willson earned a badge
      One Month Later
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      520
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      264
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      96
    5. 5
      macoman
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!