Can someone explain why I shouldn't get an AMD FX CPU?


Recommended Posts

Your phenom 2 is likely holding things back more than you think, especially with a gpu like that.

I've left a few different apps open during gaming to monitor my CPU load and I think GTAIV pulled the most from it, recently barely anything

But as I just said the 2500k and the 8350 are the SAME PRICE. It's not high end when the 2 products are the same price.

Ok, so offer OP a setup then !

We're not sizing d*cks here, we're trying to offer advice

Efficiency should not be undervalued. Less power consumption = less heat = less noise. I've recently built quite a powerful Ivy Bridge system for someone and even under full CPU load it was hardly audible. If AMD CPU's really can use 200W+ under load it'll be very noisy.

Ok, not 3x higher, but still a significant difference. More power consumption for less raw performance isn't an acceptable tradeoff regardless of how you pad the numbers.

Ok, so offer OP a setup then !

We're not sizing d*cks here, we're trying to offer advice

I am offering him advice... the advice that choosing a poorer performing option over a better option when paying the same money is bad :/

I am offering him advice... the advice that choosing a poorer performing option over a better option when paying the same money is bad :/

And if you read my posts, I promote Intel as the better option if you have the ?? or as you say, it is the same price, so long as you are happy to buy that setup and more or less be done with upgrading without buying a new socket board for their next CPU releases

There's absolutely no guarantee that AMD will stick to the same socket either, buying computer components on a basis of complete guesswork isn't rational. All I am trying to do is advise him to buy the product that will perform best in his price range. If it had been 2005 and the question had been AMD Opteron vs Pentium D I'd have advised the AMD option hands down, but this is 2012 and the Intel option will be his best bet for gaming. Yes, sockets are likely to change but that's nothing more than guesswork at the moment.

There's absolutely no guarantee that AMD will stick to the same socket either, buying computer components on a basis of complete guesswork isn't rational. All I am trying to do is advise him to buy the product that will perform best in his price range. If it had been 2005 and the question had been AMD Opteron vs Pentium D I'd have advised the AMD option hands down, but this is 2012 and the Intel option will be his best bet for gaming. Yes, sockets are likely to change but that's nothing more than guesswork at the moment.

Guesswork?

AMD have always done their best to provide backwards compatible hardware, I had an ancient AM2 board with this PII 965 I have now in my AM3+ board

Yes they will inevitably move to a new socket board which will require a new socket CPU, but do some research...

I have to agree with Javik. With all the benefits going to the 2500k and it being almost the same price, it would be ludicrous to not go for that over the AMD.

Not sure what Detection is going on about...

Should be /thread.

Hi All

Got Me a NEW System in June 2012, Spent months debating between AMD and Intel, In the End Choose an AMD APU based system with my budget could handle, and have to say it holds it's own in games, and other things I do, sure not the fastest machine I could've gotten, but it works for my needs.

Runs Metro 2033 Just fine, Battlefield 3, Crysis 3, Secondlife, and Photoshop and Windows 8 Pro 64bit

Thought about AMD Fx system for a bit there, but ended up being over budget for myself

Guesswork?

AMD have always done their best to provide backwards compatible hardware, I had an ancient AM2 board with this PII 965 I have now in my AM3+ board

Yes they will inevitably move to a new socket board which will require a new socket CPU, but do some research...

That approach might be cheaper but it also causes technology to stagnate. My motherboard was actually the most expensive part of my current build, even more so than the CPU but I was happy to pay it because it's a fantastic board. Even if the physical characteristics of a CPU socket stay the same, newer motherboards invariably bring some technological enhancements so staying with the same motherboard for years isn't necessarily a good thing anyway.

I have to agree with Javik. With all the benefits going to the 2500k and it being almost the same price, it would be ludicrous to not go for that over the AMD.

Not sure what Detection is going on about...

Should be /thread.

You could buy cheaper parts and overclock those unlike anything else that isn't K series which only allow for a very tiny increase.

/thread?

That approach might be cheaper but it also causes technology to stagnate. My motherboard was actually the most expensive part of my current build, even more so than the CPU but I was happy to pay it because it's a fantastic board. Even if the physical characteristics of a CPU socket stay the same, newer motherboards invariably bring some technological enhancements so staying with the same motherboard for years isn't necessarily a good thing anyway.

I never pay more than ?50 for a motherboard since I don't overclock, and also since motherboards don't affect system performance at all. As long as the motherboard has the right amount of ports for me, I'm happy.

I say go for AMD, difference is negligible nowadays in gaming, plus they are cheaper and normally better in multithreading task (most of newer games are like this), thin about it, you get nice hardware for less (plus a motherboard that will surely last longer that most of the intel builds)

You could buy cheaper parts and overclock those unlike anything else that isn't K series which only allow for a very tiny increase.

/thread?

And given that the 2500k is about the same price as the 8350 that argument is null and void and was before you even wasted the effort on typing.

I never pay more than ?50 for a motherboard since I don't overclock, and also since motherboards don't affect system performance at all. As long as the motherboard has the right amount of ports for me, I'm happy.

Complete fallacy. Motherboards absolutely have an effect on system performance.

That approach might be cheaper but it also causes technology to stagnate. My motherboard was actually the most expensive part of my current build, even more so than the CPU but I was happy to pay it because it's a fantastic board. Even if the physical characteristics of a CPU socket stay the same, newer motherboards invariably bring some technological enhancements so staying with the same motherboard for years isn't necessarily a good thing anyway.

You're just supporting his point. He was able to upgrade to the newest motherboard with all the "technological enhancements" and keep his old CPU.

And as stated, he'll be buying a new socket regardless of what he buys so that's completely irrelevant. Anyway, the facts have been presented. The 2500k is a better CPU than the 8350 for his needs, it's the same price, and it consumes less power. Those are the facts, and I am no longer going to waste my time with this as if the OP wants to take the advice of people that are advising him to basically waste his money that's his loss.

Please note... there is no post where Javik says actually something in favor of AMD, all what he tries to do is to promote Intel. (look at his post for it, it isn't the first time that he does that, even when persons only asks for AMD processors only)

And as stated, he'll be buying a new socket regardless of what he buys so that's completely irrelevant. Anyway, the facts have been presented. The 2500k is a better CPU than the 8350 for his needs, it's the same price, and it consumes less power. Those are the facts, and I am no longer going to waste my time with this as if the OP wants to take the advice of people that are advising him to basically waste his money that's his loss.

No, I said I would buy an 8350 CPU, which is the same socket as the motherboard I own

My upgrades are my choice

And given that the 2500k is about the same price as the 8350 that argument is null and void and was before you even wasted the effort on typing.

Complete fallacy. Motherboards absolutely have an effect on system performance.

How about the 8320? That one is cheaper and can be overclocked to 8350 levels and beyond.

As for motherboard performance, show some proof. Differences are less than 3% unless its defective.

No, what I'm doing is advising the guy to buy the product that fits his needs better in his price range. The 2500k is a better gaming CPU than the 8350 and it's the same price, which makes it a better choice for him. I've owned AMD and Intel products in the past so I am actually pretty objective here.

If there are 2 products in a price range and one performs better than another for a user's needs then it's not bloody rocket science, you advise the user to buy what suits their needs.

How about the 8320? That one is cheaper and can be overclocked to 8350 levels and beyond.

As for motherboard performance, show some proof. Differences are less than 3% unless its defective.

But, but, but... the FX chip runs at 9000+ watts moar than Intels!!

Don't you just love when people pull "facts" from their rear.

The Intel fanboyism is strong in this thread.

No, what I'm doing is advising the guy to buy the product that fits his needs better in his price range. The 2500k is a better gaming CPU than the 8350 and it's the same price, which makes it a better choice for him. I've owned AMD and Intel products in the past so I am actually pretty objective here.

If there are 2 products in a price range and one performs better than another for a user's needs then it's not bloody rocket science, you advise the user to buy what suits their needs.

Yeah..... no, you always say that in all your post.

How about the 8320? That one is cheaper and can be overclocked to 8350 levels and beyond.

As for motherboard performance, show some proof. Differences are less than 3% unless its defective.

I'd advise learning to read. The OP said he doesn't like to overclock which makes that completely irrelevant.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Hello, Hope all is well. I am in UK.  
    • I'm not happy with myself for it, but I've gone and got hold of it. Just another 45 minutes and I'll be Bond, James Bond. In my defence, IO's Hitman series is awesome, and I'm a sucker for 007. So while it might seem a bit simplified compared to Hitman, I'm sure I'll be right at home.
    • Or just check the script yourself ^^. I hate having a Microsoft account tied to my windows install.
    • 007 First Light review: Satisfying spy adventure that James Bond needed by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe I have fond memories of classic James Bond games from the Electronic Arts era. Using high-tech gadgets, sneaking into parties, and dispatching bad guys were wildly exciting activities for my younger self. In recent years, Bond games have entirely disappeared, alongside the super spy genre. Fast forward to 2020, imagine my surprise when IO Interactive announced it had secured the Bond IP to make a game. Considering the studio’s Hitman history, this project is one I keenly kept an eye on. Six years later, 007 First Light is finally here, and after spending time inside this globe-trotting adventure, I can safely say that my excitement for this developer’s take on this universe was not unfounded. IO has taken lessons it has learned from Hitman and combined them with what I would expect from a directed cinematic experience like James Bond. I have refrained from mentioning major plot points to save you from story spoilers in this review. This is an original story that doesn’t tie into any movies, so there isn’t an expectation of knowing the backstory or the decades of movies either. Bond, James Bond When 007 First Light begins, Bond is just Bond. There isn’t a spy angle, fancy gadgets, or even a secret mission. The introductory mission is framed to show how James Bond handled himself and how he does not care about the odds when it comes to saving lives. It’s a gorgeous level as well, showing off an island scattered with cliffs in the middle of a storm. Looking back, this is probably the best-looking level in the game, with IO showing off all its abilities with its custom engine, Glacier. But my favorite ended up being the follow-up to this level. Once the United Kingdom's foreign intelligence agency, MI6, recruits our daring youngster into its super-spy “00” program, training begins. However, instead of treading through the same tutorial missions where the game teaches you to run and jump and drive, IO opted for a montage, and it’s amazing. The scenes cut between Bond practicing and improving his marksmanship, parkour, hand-to-hand combat, and driving as weeks go by in his training. What impressed me here was the lack of any loading screens or stutters as scenes instantly switched to different locations entirely, as if I was watching a movie. This creativity is a trend I noticed in most levels, where there is some sort of gameplay or choreography mechanic being introduced to keep things interesting. Soon, the rest of the cast is introduced, bringing other agents that our favorite secret agent will be working with, the scientists and engineers that build MI6’s spy gadgets, as well as higher-ranking officers that either appreciate or (at best) tolerate Bond’s rebellious attitude. It’s a tight cast, all with incredibly good voice acting and personalities that quickly grew on me. The casting for Bond himself is also an excellent one. From showing his iconic soft spot for women to the condescending smiles that get a rise out of enemies, I had no issues getting immersed into this universe as this new face of James Bond. The missions take place in a wide range of locations as MI6 sends Bond to tackle dangers that are growing everywhere from the UK to Africa. These aren’t unrelated adventures where MI6 is sending secret agents, which is an angle I would love to see in another game, but a part of a bigger conspiracy affecting the entire world. Some of the twists and turns were all too predictable, and the character that Lenny Kravitz played made me cringe a little too much. But all in all, I enjoyed the campaign’s storyline that sets the stage for this new agent joining the illustrious “00” program. Plenty of Possibilities The third-person style of IO Interactive fits this role quite well. Bond is presented as a master at hand-to-hand combat as well as firearms, while also having a knack for being stealthy when required. Most sections of missions have a lot of freedom. This means I could beat up every goon and security guard on the way to an objective, slip past them without sounding a single alarm, or do a mix of both. My sessions usually end up with the third option because I tend to be impatient about waiting for a patrol to move. Drawing from its Hitman genes, the developer almost always gives multiple routes for going through missions. Levels can be massive, sometimes sporting hundreds of NPCs going their own ways and having conversations. If my objective is to break into a security room on the third floor, I could look around for roof access, eavesdrop on conversations to find out where someone lost a key, create a distraction and pickpocket a guard for a keycard, sneak in through the vents, or simply kick down the offending door. I enjoyed the variety on offer, especially because the same solutions didn’t usually show up in different missions. Before heading out into a secret MI6 escapade, the gadget specialist of the branch walks Bond through the organization's latest and greatest achievements. This can be cool little devices like a laser built into the watch, a phone that fires poison darts, or a camera that emits a powerful shockwave. The choice of what can be taken into the mission is up to the player. I could usually find fresh routes or get out of tough situations with a punch or two, so I never had the feeling of missing out by not choosing the right equipment. It’s still a fun practice. Choosing the armaments before a mission enhanced the super spy feeling quite a bit. As I mentioned, stealth comes in as a very viable option for most of the missions, letting Bond sneak past foes or knock them out silently. While it is satisfying to clear entire areas of goons and walk away without any alarms, the way of accomplishing this could have been done better. Bond can lure enemies, sneak up and knock them out, or use a gadget to disorient them before dealing a nasty blow. Bodies cannot be moved or hidden afterward either. It’s a very simple system, which I wish were more exciting to pull off. Perhaps more stealth-orientated gadgets, distraction options, or multi-takedowns could have helped here, I think. Getting caught while attempting to be in stealth does not mean a game over. Other than getting into a fist fight, an interesting twist of 007 First Light is the bluffing option. While an enemy is confused as to what you are doing in a restricted location, Bond has the option to improvise and persuade them that you are exactly where you’re supposed to be. These are fun little dynamic interactions with unique dialog depending on the mission and location, giving a few extra moments for Bond to go past suspicious guards smoothly. It’s the first time I’ve witnessed this system in a game, and I hope to see more. License to Kill Bond isn’t just dealing with security guards or civilians. From time to time, entire gangs of gun-toting mercenaries show up in levels looking to take down our protagonist. It is then that License to Kill mode is activated for Bond, letting him use firearms with no restrictions. I was surprised by just how tight gunplay is in 007 First Light. The weapons feel powerful and satisfying to fire, with single bullets capable of taking down an enemy with a headshot. Ammo is scarce, and enemies don’t drop weapons with full magazines most of the time. This forces a hectic kind of gameplay where I am always advancing towards enemies to take their weapons after they are downed. Things like shooting legs to immobilize, aiming at the hands to make their weapon go flying, blowing up nearby fire extinguishers for cover, and using gadgets to halt a goon in their tracks while I reload, make up enjoyable levels. I had to hold back my disappointment when the enemy count in these action sequences dropped to zero and I had to go non-lethal again. Speaking of action sequences, First Light isn’t just offering sandbox levels to complete at the player’s own leisure either. Each level comes with specific linear and directed scenes to move the story forward and put Bond in tight situations. These usually end up with high-octane chases or driving sections, offering the chance to witness chaining explosions, hails of gunfire, and scripted parkour scenes that remind me of Mission Impossible movies more than Bond. Elements like seeing James Bond jump out of a plane without a parachute or drive through buildings in London inside a trash truck were fantastic and always left me at a high point when finishing a mission. The classic James Bond theme is sprinkled in here too, which only happens a handful of times in the game, but at just the right moments. Visuals and Performance Compared to Unreal Engine 5 games we are seeing nowadays, 007 First Light isn’t flexing a huge amount of realism when it comes to graphics. The models, textures, and effects all feel a little dated, with the starting mission that I mentioned being the most visually striking. However, the complete lack of stutters, the hundreds of NPCs that can be on screen without a single hitch, massive sandbox levels, and smooth transitions between them all play a part in making this an immensely immersive and complex experience. The in-engine cutscenes are gorgeous as well, offering an upgraded visual style and model detail over the gameplay sections. Animations are one aspect that jumps out at me about any new game, and First Light has nailed what a third-person action game should feel like. Walking, sneaking, and running all have a heaviness to them that I appreciate. Whenever Bond moves past a wall or a ledge, his arms reach out to lightly hold those structures until he moves away. NPCs actually react to my character and move out of the way. Even during melee combat or takedown animations, the fists impacting a body or a head hitting a wall all have that same weight. Even the more frivolous animations, like catching a gun in midair or chucking an empty one at a goon (yes, you can do that), are satisfying to pull off. Of course, the in-engine cutscene animations are remarkably well done too, with facial animations and the upgraded model details improving my engagement with the characters. I have an AMD Radeon RX 9070 XT 16GB paired with an eight-core Ryzen 7 3700X and 32GB of RAM, with the game running at 1440p resolution. Deciding to completely max out all the graphics options gave me a range of frame rates between 60 and 100 depending on the scene and level. While I did try to enable AMD FSR, which bumped up the frame rates by a good 20% at Quality mode, IO Interactive’s implementation of the technology wasn’t that great. Every corner and edge in levels began shimmering, and I was also seeing smearing issues in fast-moving sections. The title seemingly uses the older generation FSR 3.1 and not the machine learning-assisted FSR 4, leading to these artifacts. Unfortunately, there isn't a way to manually upgrade this right now either. I opted to turn off the upscaling and play the game in native 1440p to avoid problems. I would say the FPS range I was getting was an acceptable one for a single-player action game for my setup. I do wish there were an FOV slider option in the settings. While the camera is far enough back for my tastes in most situations in this third-person adventure, at times the perspective is far too close. When trying to look around quickly and spot targets, I realized I was getting a slight headache at times due to the use of an almost over-the-shoulder close-up camera. Conclusion Being James Bond in 007 First Light is a treat. Traveling around the world chasing conspiracies, using high-tech gadgets disguised as everyday accessories, and improvising on the spot to fool foes all give a fantastic feeling of being a super spy. For an origin story, IO Interactive has done a great job at introducing the character and his motives for doing what he does. The satisfying combat animation and fantastic voice acting are definitely high points, with the License to Kill moments being my favorite. Not being able to move bodies and the simplistic stealth of mechanics does hurt its presentation a little. The NPC logic and intelligence is easy to manipulate and trick, repeating the same actions over and over again if I keep making distractions. The lack of an FOV slider was also a pain (quite literally) at times, and the FSR implementation is quite poor. These are things I hope the studio will improve upon with updates. Even with its faults, IO Interactive and James Bond are a match made in heaven. The studio knows how to make a main character that oozes charm and competency while also leaning heavily into its Hitman experience to make gigantic levels with what looks like hundreds of NPCs roaming around. Being an origin story, IO’s Bond has a way to go before he becomes the highly effective agent we see in the movie world. I am hoping the studio will continue this series alongside its Hitman ventures going forward, just so we get to experience the journey for longer. 007 First Light is available on PC (Steam, Epic Games Store, and Xbox PC), Xbox Series X|S, and PlayStation 5 for $69.99. This review was conducted on the PC version of the game provided by IO Interactive.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Collaborator
      conkir earned a badge
      Collaborator
    • Rising Star
      olavinto went up a rank
      Rising Star
    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      504
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      271
    3. 3
      +Edouard
      75
    4. 4
      Skyfrog
      74
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!