Recommended Posts

(CNN) -- Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg and his wife were the second-biggest charitable donors in the United States last year, appearing behind only billionaire Warren Buffett on a list of the nation's most generous philanthropists.

Zuckerberg, along with wife Priscilla Chan, gave roughly half a billion dollars ($498.8 million) to the Silicon Valley Community Foundation, according to The Chronicle of Philanthropy.

The group released its annual Philanthropy 50 over the weekend.

The Facebook founder and CEO was one of three tech-industry titans in the list's top five.

The Silicon Valley Community Foundation issues grants for a host of causes in the San Francisco area. In 2012, its charitable causes ranged from programs to teach immigrants English, to groups providing food and shelter to the needy, to funds for victims of the California wildfires.

Zuckerberg donated 18 million Facebook shares to the foundation in December.

Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen was fourth, with $309 million in contributions, mostly to the Allen Institute for Brain Science.

And Google co-founder Sergey Brin and wife Anne Wojcicki, co-founder of genetic-testing company 23andME, were fifth, putting $223 million into their Brin Wojcicki Foundation.

full story

... and not a single mention of Bill Gates?

Probably because Bill makes his donations largely through the B&MG Foundation, which then donates the money to other services. Bill doesn't directly donate that much money (as much as Mark Z. or Warren Buffett, anyway).

Probably because Bill makes his donations largely through the B&MG Foundation, which then donates the money to other services. Bill doesn't directly donate that much money (as much as Mark Z. or Warren Buffett, anyway).

But he owns that foundation, and to date he's given almost 37 billion to charity with another 65-70 billion going to it when he passes away.

Not to mention he actually goes out there and tries to help out, makes sure his money gets spent in worthwhile causes. Other people just throw money at a charity and do nothing else. Hence he deserves to get mentioned far more than a guy who just gave 18 million crappy shares of his own company to a charity.

The list is of commitments made in 2012, does not count previous pledges. Max Norris provides a link. Read it!!!

Read my entire post. I said Gates deserves a MENTION, not a ranking.

Very few of these billionaires who donate money actually go out there and try to make a difference. To most it's just a simple check, sent to a charity. Bill Gates DOES go out there.

But he owns that foundation, and to date he's given almost 37 billion to charity with another 65-70 billion going to it when he passes away.

Not to mention he actually goes out there and tries to help out, makes sure his money gets spent in worthwhile causes. Other people just throw money at a charity and do nothing else. Hence he deserves to get mentioned far more than a guy who just gave 18 million crappy shares of his own company to a charity.

Oh of course, most definitely I agree with you. The only problem there is that if we start including organisations, foundations and companies, these lists would probably be forever inundated with the American Red Cross and similar organisations.

Although to be fair this sounds like one big circle jerk anyway. Of course some of the wealthiest people in America make this list - their charitable tax breaks are going to be bigger then others! (Yes I realise this doesn't apply to everyone on this list, I was partially joking :p)

Oh of course, most definitely I agree with you. The only problem there is that if we start including organisations, foundations and companies, these lists would probably be forever inundated with the American Red Cross and similar organisations.

Ah but that's not how they add to that list ;)

The list only counts new donations or pledges, not donations made on past pledges. Bill Gates did donate something like $350 million but that was to a past pledge hence it doesn't count. However if he made a new pledge, he would have made the list. Rather stupid.

Read my entire post. I said Gates deserves a MENTION, not a ranking.

Very few of these billionaires who donate money actually go out there and try to make a difference. To most it's just a simple check, sent to a charity. Bill Gates DOES go out there.

I don't know why you think he would deserve a mention since this is for a list of 2012 pledges. I mean, if they made a list of worlds greatest living philanthropists, Bill, his wife and Warren would be at the top of that list.

I don't know why you think he would deserve a mention since this is for a list of 2012 pledges. I mean, if they made a list of worlds greatest living philanthropists, Bill, his wife and Warren would be at the top of that list.

See the problem is most people aren't going to read the philanthropy report on why Bill Gates didn't make the list. They're going to read the CNN news report and think oh Gates isn't that big a donor.

Hence...why I said he deserves a mention not a ranking, a mention in the news article (not the report). Sorry should have made that a bit clearer.

K, got it. I agree, it would be nice to make it more known for the general public of how generous they are but I have confidence that their eventual legacy will be well known. The Gates pledging over 95% of their wealth to their foundation. Buffet pledging 99% of his wealth, most to the Gate's foundation. That will amount to over $100 billion to the Gates Foundation add to that the current endowment of the foundation ($35+ billion). Nobody can ignore that when it comes.

See the problem is most people aren't going to read the philanthropy report on why Bill Gates didn't make the list. They're going to read the CNN news report and think oh Gates isn't that big a donor.

If Gates is doing it for the right reasons he wouldn't care if he got a mention or not. Right?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Hello, Were you using a product or service from one of the companies affected by the Klue data breach?  See https://klue.com/blog/an-update-on-recent-klue-security-incident for the company's public statement.  That blog post does not list affected customer. From looking around at reports, I created this list: Gong HackerOne Huntress Insurity Jamf LastPass OneTrust Recorded Future ReliaQuest Salesforce Snyk Sprout Social Tanium It is likely there are other companies affected as well. Regards, Aryeh Goretsky  
    • SpaceX reportedly plans a Starlink mobile service for U.S. consumers by Karthik Mudaliar SpaceX reportedly wants to sell mobile phone plans directly to consumers in the United States as part of a wider expansion of Starlink. According to a report from the Financial Times, SpaceX president Gwynne Shotwell discussed the plan with investors during the company’s recent IPO roadshow. The company is also said to be considering building a terrestrial mobile network to complement Starlink’s satellite coverage. The plan is quite different from how Starlink currently operates in the U.S. mobile market. SpaceX already provides satellite connectivity for T-Mobile’s T-Satellite service, but T-Mobile remains responsible for the subscription, billing, and customer support. A Starlink-branded mobile service would give SpaceX control of the customer relationship instead. It could also turn the company from a partner of traditional mobile operators into a direct competitor. T-Mobile also began testing its Starlink-powered satellite service in early 2025. The beta was initially limited to text messaging and was also available to some AT&T and Verizon customers. The service has since expanded to support limited data access through selected apps, including WhatsApp, Google Maps, AccuWeather, and AllTrails. It is designed to provide a connection in areas where normal cell towers are unavailable, rather than replace a conventional mobile network. However, if SpaceX actually has a plan to serve nationwide, it needs to do more than just satellite networks and actually support on-ground operations. It can also partner up with existing carriers and become a mobile virtual network operator (MVNO). With that said, SpaceX has already spent heavily to support its mobile ambitions. Just last year, the company agreed to acquire wireless spectrum licences from EchoStar in deals worth a combined $19.6 billion. EchoStar's spectrum includes AWS-4, H-Block, and AWS-3 frequencies that could be used for both satellite and terrestrial communications. According to a SpaceX securities filing, the Federal Communications Commission approved the transaction in May 2026, although it is not expected to close until late 2027. There's no official statement by SpaceX for now. Pricing, availability, and other details remain unknown. Source: Financial Times
    • We had no idea as kids how much time and energy it took to be an adult 😅
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      xvvxcvv earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      xvvxcvv earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Enthusiast
      Xonos went up a rank
      Enthusiast
    • Conversation Starter
      Admir earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • First Post
      The_Focal_Point earned a badge
      First Post
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      400
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      170
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      127
    4. 4
      neufuse
      69
    5. 5
      Xenon
      66
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!