Recommended Posts

(CNN) -- Facebook's Mark Zuckerberg and his wife were the second-biggest charitable donors in the United States last year, appearing behind only billionaire Warren Buffett on a list of the nation's most generous philanthropists.

Zuckerberg, along with wife Priscilla Chan, gave roughly half a billion dollars ($498.8 million) to the Silicon Valley Community Foundation, according to The Chronicle of Philanthropy.

The group released its annual Philanthropy 50 over the weekend.

The Facebook founder and CEO was one of three tech-industry titans in the list's top five.

The Silicon Valley Community Foundation issues grants for a host of causes in the San Francisco area. In 2012, its charitable causes ranged from programs to teach immigrants English, to groups providing food and shelter to the needy, to funds for victims of the California wildfires.

Zuckerberg donated 18 million Facebook shares to the foundation in December.

Microsoft co-founder Paul Allen was fourth, with $309 million in contributions, mostly to the Allen Institute for Brain Science.

And Google co-founder Sergey Brin and wife Anne Wojcicki, co-founder of genetic-testing company 23andME, were fifth, putting $223 million into their Brin Wojcicki Foundation.

full story

... and not a single mention of Bill Gates?

Probably because Bill makes his donations largely through the B&MG Foundation, which then donates the money to other services. Bill doesn't directly donate that much money (as much as Mark Z. or Warren Buffett, anyway).

Probably because Bill makes his donations largely through the B&MG Foundation, which then donates the money to other services. Bill doesn't directly donate that much money (as much as Mark Z. or Warren Buffett, anyway).

But he owns that foundation, and to date he's given almost 37 billion to charity with another 65-70 billion going to it when he passes away.

Not to mention he actually goes out there and tries to help out, makes sure his money gets spent in worthwhile causes. Other people just throw money at a charity and do nothing else. Hence he deserves to get mentioned far more than a guy who just gave 18 million crappy shares of his own company to a charity.

The list is of commitments made in 2012, does not count previous pledges. Max Norris provides a link. Read it!!!

Read my entire post. I said Gates deserves a MENTION, not a ranking.

Very few of these billionaires who donate money actually go out there and try to make a difference. To most it's just a simple check, sent to a charity. Bill Gates DOES go out there.

But he owns that foundation, and to date he's given almost 37 billion to charity with another 65-70 billion going to it when he passes away.

Not to mention he actually goes out there and tries to help out, makes sure his money gets spent in worthwhile causes. Other people just throw money at a charity and do nothing else. Hence he deserves to get mentioned far more than a guy who just gave 18 million crappy shares of his own company to a charity.

Oh of course, most definitely I agree with you. The only problem there is that if we start including organisations, foundations and companies, these lists would probably be forever inundated with the American Red Cross and similar organisations.

Although to be fair this sounds like one big circle jerk anyway. Of course some of the wealthiest people in America make this list - their charitable tax breaks are going to be bigger then others! (Yes I realise this doesn't apply to everyone on this list, I was partially joking :p)

Oh of course, most definitely I agree with you. The only problem there is that if we start including organisations, foundations and companies, these lists would probably be forever inundated with the American Red Cross and similar organisations.

Ah but that's not how they add to that list ;)

The list only counts new donations or pledges, not donations made on past pledges. Bill Gates did donate something like $350 million but that was to a past pledge hence it doesn't count. However if he made a new pledge, he would have made the list. Rather stupid.

Read my entire post. I said Gates deserves a MENTION, not a ranking.

Very few of these billionaires who donate money actually go out there and try to make a difference. To most it's just a simple check, sent to a charity. Bill Gates DOES go out there.

I don't know why you think he would deserve a mention since this is for a list of 2012 pledges. I mean, if they made a list of worlds greatest living philanthropists, Bill, his wife and Warren would be at the top of that list.

I don't know why you think he would deserve a mention since this is for a list of 2012 pledges. I mean, if they made a list of worlds greatest living philanthropists, Bill, his wife and Warren would be at the top of that list.

See the problem is most people aren't going to read the philanthropy report on why Bill Gates didn't make the list. They're going to read the CNN news report and think oh Gates isn't that big a donor.

Hence...why I said he deserves a mention not a ranking, a mention in the news article (not the report). Sorry should have made that a bit clearer.

K, got it. I agree, it would be nice to make it more known for the general public of how generous they are but I have confidence that their eventual legacy will be well known. The Gates pledging over 95% of their wealth to their foundation. Buffet pledging 99% of his wealth, most to the Gate's foundation. That will amount to over $100 billion to the Gates Foundation add to that the current endowment of the foundation ($35+ billion). Nobody can ignore that when it comes.

See the problem is most people aren't going to read the philanthropy report on why Bill Gates didn't make the list. They're going to read the CNN news report and think oh Gates isn't that big a donor.

If Gates is doing it for the right reasons he wouldn't care if he got a mention or not. Right?

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I will keep my current devices for several years... no planning in upgrading until these devices stop working. Too pricey.
    • Apple raises MacBook and iPad prices as memory costs surge by Karthik Mudaliar Apple has raised the U.S. prices of several MacBook and iPad models, including the MacBook Neo, which it launched for $599 less than four months ago. The company’s cheapest laptop now starts at $699, while some MacBook Pro configurations have increased by $300. The changes affect the MacBook Neo, MacBook Air, MacBook Pro, iPad Air, and iPad Pro. Apple has not changed the hardware or storage included with these models, so customers are simply paying more for the same configurations. Here is how the new US pricing compares with the previous starting prices: Product Previous price New price Increase MacBook Neo $599 $699 $100 13-inch MacBook Air, 512GB $1,099 $1,299 $200 14-inch MacBook Pro, 1TB $1,699 $1,999 $300 16-inch MacBook Pro $2,699 $2,999 $300 11-inch iPad Air, 128GB $599 $749 $150 13-inch iPad Air, 128GB $799 $949 $150 11-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $999 $1,199 $200 13-inch iPad Pro, 256GB $1,299 $1,499 $200 The updated prices are already appearing on Apple’s U.S. online store. The MacBook Neo increase will probably attract the most attention. Apple introduced the laptop in March for $599, pitching it as a more affordable Mac for students and buyers considering Windows laptops or Chromebooks. It uses an A18 Pro processor and originally undercut Dell’s new $699 XPS 13 by $100. Following the increase, the two laptops now have the same starting price. The M5 MacBook Air has also lost the price Apple promoted when it launched in March. The 13-inch model arrived with 512GB of storage for $1,099, while Apple’s store now lists the MacBook Air range as starting at $1,299. The 14-inch MacBook Pro with an M5 chip and 1TB of storage has gone from $1,699 to $1,999. Apple has made similar changes to its iPads. The recently released M4 iPad Air, which launched at the same $599 starting price as its predecessor, now starts at $749 for the 11-inch version. The 13-inch version has risen from $799 to $949. The iPad Pro increases are larger in dollar terms. Apple’s 11-inch M5 iPad Pro now starts at $1,199, up from $999, while the 13-inch version has moved from $1,299 to $1,499. Both base models still include 256GB of storage. Apple blamed the increases on the rapidly rising cost of DRAM and NAND flash, which provide system memory and device storage. The company told Reuters that it had tried to shield customers from the increases but could no longer absorb them. “We have never seen a component price increase this much, this quickly,” Apple said. Tim Cook had already warned that price increases were coming. Cook said Apple’s existing component inventory had softened the immediate impact, but that higher memory costs would increasingly affect the company after the June quarter. Much of the pressure comes from the construction of AI data centers. Memory manufacturers are directing more production toward high-margin server products, leaving PC, tablet, and smartphone makers competing for the remaining supply. Apple has not said whether the new prices are temporary or whether further increases are planned. For now, the changes show that even Apple’s purchasing power has not been enough to keep the AI-driven memory shortage away from consumer devices.
    • Ventoy 1.1.16 is out.
    • This is a none story - these low volume Chinese models will always get new experimental features first because Apple and Samsung can't produce them in huge volume to meet demand.
    • Nvidia GeForce NOW gains support for Dark Scrolls, Empulse, and more by Pulasthi Ariyasinghe The final update of June for Nvidia's cloud gaming service GeForce NOW is now available, and it is touting support for six more games. The company is also drawing subscriber attention towards the summer sales kicking off across stores, so they can stock up on more cloud-supported titles. Of course, the Steam Summer Sale is the biggest promotion, which is kicking off later today. "Supported Steam games can be streamed across devices with GeForce NOW, making it easy to buy a game once, keep progress synced and pick up where the gameplay left off on PCs, Macs, handheld devices, phones, TVs and more," says the company. "In other words, the Steam Summer Sale brings the deals; GeForce NOW adds the flexibility." Don't forget that the GeForce NOW summer sale is still active as well. This limited-time offer drops the 12-month Performance membership from $99.99 to $64.99, saving members $35. At the same time, the 12-month Ultimate membership is currently going for $129.99, dropping the price by $70 from the original $199.99. Here are the games joining GeForce NOW's supported list this week: Dark Scrolls (New release on Steam, available June 22) SAND: Raiders of Sophie (New release on Steam, available June 22) Deer & Boy (New release on Steam, available June 23) EMPULSE (New release on Steam, available June 24) The Adventures of Elliot: The Millennium Tales (Steam) FATAL FURY: City of the Wolves (Steam) With the June expansions coming to an end, Nvidia should be announcing its July GeForce NOW plans next week. Keep in mind that, unlike subscription services like Game Pass or EA Play, a copy of a game must be owned by the GeForce NOW member (or at least have a license via PC Game Pass) to start playing via Nvidia's cloud servers. There is also a limit to how many hours subscribers can use the service per month.
  • Recent Achievements

    • First Post
      kinowa earned a badge
      First Post
    • Rookie
      krychek57 went up a rank
      Rookie
    • Grand Master
      Jaybonaut went up a rank
      Grand Master
    • One Year In
      Philsl earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      462
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      171
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      135
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      77
    5. 5
      Xenon
      77
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!