Recommended Posts

HAGERSTOWN, MD (AP) ? The Washington County Sheriff?s Department says a suspected shoplifter is dead and another man is recovering after a head-on crash during a police chase on Interstate 81 near Hagerstown.

Sheriff Douglas Mullendore told The Herald-Mail that the crash Thursday claimed the life of David Adams, 58, of Hagerstown.

Mullendore says Adams was suspected of stealing clothing from a Sears store at Valley Mall and left the shopping center driving a vehicle that had been reported stolen. Authorities gave chase, with Adams ultimately going the wrong way up a highway access ramp.

Mullendore says Adams? hit a Volkswagen SUV driven by Richard McGrath, 61, of Smithsburg.

Adams had been released from jail in November after serving 10 months for vehicle theft.

source

post-37120-0-29168000-1360958959.jpg

Sheriff?s deputies said the nature of the call was similar to an individual who was in the Sears stealing items Monday, Tuesday and Wednesday, police said.

Deputies arrived at Sears and the man, who had stolen clothing, dropped the items in the parking lot, Mullendore said.

http://www.herald-mail.com/news/hm-emergency-service-officials-on-scene-of-accident-at-i81-and-us-40-20130214,0,6218861.story

Shoplifting 3 days in a row ? :huh: Must have been building up his Spring wardrobe ....

I hope the role of the police in the crash is going to be investigated, as all too often such incidents are the result of aggressive pursuits. Police pursuits shouldn't increase the risk to other motorists and pedestrians. It's why most countries don't pursue suspects as aggressively as the US.

Spot on, theyarecomingforyou. Yes, Adams was driving a stolen car, but this was a totally unnecessary death. I hardly feel he "deserved" to die for stealing a car and shoplifting. Did Richard McGrath deserve to be injured over such a minor crime? Jeez, the suspect took some clothing and a car. He would have been caught eventually, as he most certainly should have been in jail, but his crimes did not warrant an aggressive chase that put innocent folks at risk. Stupid.

Chris Dorner deserved to die. This bloke didn't.

  • Like 2

Spot on, theyarecomingforyou. Yes, he was driving a stolen car, but this was a totally unnecessary death. I hardly feel he "deserved" to die for stealing a car and shoplifting. Did Richard McGrath deserve to be injured over such a minor crime? When compared to more serious offenses, I mean. Jeez, he took some clothing and a car. He would have been caught eventually, as he most certainly should have been in jail, but his crimes did not warrant an aggressive chase that put innocent folks at risk. Stupid.

Chris Dorner deserved to die. This bloke didn't.

This perp was a habitual thief, I have no mercy for these type of people.

He was stealing, for a few days in a row, scumbag deserved everything he brought on himself.

What a ridiculous statement. What he deserved was to be apprehended and dealt the appropriate punishment for the crime. I know that incidents involving police chases are thoroughly investigated here in the UK - in fact there was such an incident earlier this week and an independent investigation has already begun.

I honestly think some of the people on these forums would be more at home in Saudi Arabia, where they cut off your hand if you're found guilty of thievery and stone you to death for adultery. All I know is that such ridiculous opinions are out of place in western society.

What a ridiculous statement. What he deserved was to be apprehended and dealt the appropriate punishment for the crime. I know that incidents involving police chases are thoroughly investigated here in the UK - in fact there was such an incident earlier this week and an independent investigation has already begun.

I honestly think some of the people on these forums would be more at home in Saudi Arabia, where they cut off your hand if you're found guilty of thievery and stone you to death for adultery. All I know is that such ridiculous opinions are out of place in western society.

In your mind they may be out of place, but I know of no-one that would cry a single tear for this person. I do not say that thieves deserve to die, but if they are stealing and then run (in a stolen vehicle), then they deserve all they get - whether it be arrest, or death by dangerous driving (their own driving).

In your mind they may be out of place, but I know of no-one that would cry a single tear for this person. I do not say that thieves deserve to die, but if they are stealing and then run (in a stolen vehicle), then they deserve all they get - whether it be arrest, or death by dangerous driving (their own driving).

And the other guy? Richard McGrath, 61, of Smithsburg who was in the car rammed by Adams. What did he do to be sent to the Hospital? Are you going to say he is collateral damage?

And the other guy? Richard McGrath, 61, of Smithsburg who was in the car rammed by Adams. What did he do to be sent to the Hospital? Are you going to say he is collateral damage?

He did nothing wrong. But there is nothing to say that the accident wouldn't have happened even if the police weren't chasing. But seeing as they were, and the accident did happen, it is still the fault of the original criminal.

Police are there for a reason - to protect everyone, whether they be a business or a single person. If you have something stolen from your house/business/car, then you want the criminal caught.

In your mind they may be out of place, but I know of no-one that would cry a single tear for this person. I do not say that thieves deserve to die, but if they are stealing and then run (in a stolen vehicle), then they deserve all they get - whether it be arrest, or death by dangerous driving (their own driving).

What about his parents, siblings, children and loved ones? You act as if someone who commits a crime cannot be loved by anybody. And what about the other driver who could have been killed as a result of the police chase? Innocent people shouldn't be put at risk due to reckless police pursuits; I'm not saying that's the case here but it should certainly be investigated.

He started the chase, he did not have to steal the car and run. He and he alone is responsible for his death.

He didn't start the chase - by definition the police pursuing him did. And while his actions obviously precipitated his death that doesn't absolve the police of any responsibility. The police cannot be above the law and if their actions contributed to his death then the officers should be held accountable.

well he wanted that darwin award & he got it

The guy was 58, so if he was going to have children he likely would have already had them by now. He's certainly not a contender for a Darwin Award.

And the other guy? Richard McGrath, 61, of Smithsburg who was in the car rammed by Adams. What did he do to be sent to the Hospital? Are you going to say he is collateral damage?

He had to be sent to the hospital, for the actions of Adams.

What about his parents, siblings, children and loved ones? You act as if someone who commits a crime cannot be loved by anybody. And what about the other driver who could have been killed as a result of the police chase? Innocent people shouldn't be put at risk due to reckless police pursuits; I'm not saying that's the case here but it should certainly be investigated.

He didn't start the chase - by definition the police pursuing him did. And while his actions obviously precipitated his death that doesn't absolve the police of any responsibility. The police cannot be above the law and if their actions contributed to his death then the officers should be held accountable.

The guy was 58, so if he was going to have children he likely would have already had them by now. He's certainly not a contender for a Darwin Award.

So police should let any criminal who drives away from a crime get away? They all have families, be they criminals or police or innocent people. Each one is doing a job - criminals are stealing to support their family, policemen are trying to stop the criminals, and the families are usually the one who cry the loudest after the fact.

He did nothing wrong. But there is nothing to say that the accident wouldn't have happened even if the police weren't chasing.

That's why there should be an investigation into the incident to determine whether the police pursuit contributed to the crash, as it's entirely possible that without pursuit the incident wouldn't have occurred.

But seeing as they were, and the accident did happen, it is still the fault of the original criminal.

Not if the police could have used other means to apprehend the suspect without putting the public at risk. The police have access to helicopters and they can radio ahead to set-up roadblocks or to divert the suspect onto quieter roads where there is less risk to the public. There are countless other ways to deal with such crimes.

He had to be sent to the hospital, for the actions of Adams.

And if the police pursuit contributed to the crash then the police are also responsible.

So police should let any criminal who drives away from a crime get away?

The police should determine the best way to apprehend the suspect with minimal risk to the public. If there is significant risk to the public in a police pursuit then yes, it should be avoided but that doesn't mean the suspect should be allowed to get away. Surprisingly enough there are other methods of policing than high speed pursuits.

All I'm saying is that every incident like this should be investigated to ensure that the general public was not put at undue risk and that the police officers acted appropriately. The police need to be held accountable for their actions. I'm not saying the police even did anything wrong, just that it should be investigated to ensure they did not.

He did nothing wrong. But there is nothing to say that the accident wouldn't have happened even if the police weren't chasing. But seeing as they were, and the accident did happen, it is still the fault of the original criminal.

Police are there for a reason - to protect everyone, whether they be a business or a single person. If you have something stolen from your house/business/car, then you want the criminal caught.

Wrong, police are not there to protect... people, property maybe, but according to the courts, cops do NOT have to protect people.

So police should let any criminal who drives away from a crime get away? They all have families, be they criminals or police or innocent people. Each one is doing a job - criminals are stealing to support their family, policemen are trying to stop the criminals, and the families are usually the one who cry the loudest after the fact.

Well there is keeping a bigger distance to possibly slow him down, or you know, air support. Or waiting until the car is found on the side of a road and then using DNA found in the car after the fact. Sure not instant results, but they do work as a alternative.

Adams started the chase when he fled. If you get caught speeding and do not stop, they will pursue you, to a certain point. Adams and only Adams is responsible for this entire incident. Adams is a criminal. And now he is a dead Criminal. I am done arguing with bleeding hearts that are always on the side of the criminal./ But on a side note, many Police Departments would not pursue a shoplifter. Most go by the severity of the crime. But we only know what was reported, you do not know what else this guy may have done prior to this. There could have been an outstanding warrant.

Adams started the chase when he fled. If you get caught speeding and do not stop, they will pursue you, to a certain point. Adams and only Adams is responsible for this entire incident. Adams is a criminal. And now he is a dead Criminal. I am done arguing with bleeding hearts that are always on the side of the criminal./

First of all, until he IS proven, (yes that means by the court systems), the police shouldn't be able to do more than to bring him in, obviously NOT AT ALL COSTS. Are you sure you are a supporter of the constitution? You are so gleeful in situations like this where people are having their rights attacked (due process), but it must be OK because YOU feel that legal process's do not need to be followed.

Second of all, officers are not required to pursue, in fact they are told to back down if it becomes too dangerous.

Third, life isn't black or white, pass or fail. You can be 51% at fault for something, which means that somewhere else there is 49% of the blame. Are you saying it should only matter who is MOST at fault?

The way you state things you could also be saying Adam's parents are at fault because if they didn't have a kid, non of this would have happened.

While I agree that a criminal who commits a petty crime does not deserve death for their crime, the circumstances that lead to their own death as a result of committing that crime are justified (eg: unintentionally die when they try to flee after committing said crime), which is when this happens. Sure it's harsh but that's the reality, they should not have done that crime leading to their death, and it is just one less scumbag for the community to worry about or pay for in the legal system because they were doing things that they shouldn't.

My concern is not with the scumbag who was chased but with the safety of the public. It is far more of a public danger to have a Police persuit in circumstances that could endanger the public than it is a public danger for the alleged to be stealing cloths from Sears. Head-on collision was just lucky that it was the alleged thief who was killed, and not the other driver. The other driver is "recovering" but he might have lifelong medical problems because of the collision, if the Police would have not been so aggressive with the persuit to push him into dangerous driving, then the innocent member of the public wouldn't need to be "recovering". They would have had security footage of him and a fair chance to know where he is going to strike next (the same store again), old fashioned Police work wouldn't go too far astray or for the Police to worry about more serious crimes than stealing cloths from Sears.

  • Like 1
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Why it's almost impossible to produce a smartphone in the United States by Hamid Ganji If you look at the back of some Apple products, you can see the famous phrase “Designed by Apple in California, Assembled in China.” This phrase appears on products from one of the largest smartphone brands in the United States. These products are designed in the U.S., but their manufacturing takes place in China, India, Vietnam, or even Brazil. But why can’t Apple, as one of the largest American tech companies, produce its iPhones on U.S. soil? The idea for this topic came to me after the Trump Foundation launched a smartphone called the T1 and claimed that it was designed and built with American values in mind. However, this claim did not last long, as it was revealed that Trump’s phone was actually a rebranded HTC U24 Pro, with only a gold case and minor internal component changes. You see? Even a phone that is supposed to represent American values is manufactured in China. With a gross domestic product (GDP) exceeding $32 trillion, the United States is currently the world’s largest economy, while China ranks second with around $20 trillion. On the other hand, the United States is by a wide margin the global leader in various technological fields, and American companies spend hundreds of billions of dollars annually on research and development. From Apple and Google to Microsoft, Lockheed Martin, Boeing, and others, American tech and industrial giants lead their foreign competitors in many sectors. The United States also has no shortage of smartphone brands. Apple, Google, and Motorola are among the major brands in the smartphone market, collectively holding a significant share. However, the vast majority of their products are manufactured outside the United States. So why is it that the world’s largest economy, home to the most advanced technology companies and industrial powers, cannot produce a smartphone on its own soil? Let’s explore this question together. Even threats to impose tariffs won’t work After Trump entered the White House as the 47th President of the United States, his administration adopted strict tariff policies. One of these policies was the imposition of a 25% tariff on smartphones manufactured outside the United States. Trump said he “had a little problem” with Apple CEO Tim Cook over producing smartphones outside the U.S. So he thought that threatening a 25% tax on imported phones might force Apple to bring manufacturing back to the United States. “I have long ago informed Tim Cook of Apple that I expect their iPhones that will be sold in the United States of America will be manufactured and built in the United States, not India, or anyplace else,” Trump wrote on Truth Social. Image via The White House Although Apple currently manufactures some of the iPhone’s chips in the United States with TSMC's help, it still shows no willingness to shift full iPhone production to the country. At the time, renowned Apple supply chain analyst Ming-Chi Kuo wrote on X, “In terms of profitability, it’s way better for Apple to take the hit of a 25% tariff on iPhones sold in the US market than to move iPhone assembly lines back to the US.” However, manufacturing a smartphone in the United States is not as easy as it might seem, and many technical and economic barriers are involved. The lack of necessary manufacturing hubs There is a clear reason why many companies prefer to manufacture their products in China. China has established itself as the main global manufacturing hub for international companies, and over the past few decades, large contract manufacturers have emerged there, allowing companies like Apple to outsource production. One such example is Foxconn, which also manufactures some Apple products in India. Building the infrastructure required to produce smartphones in the United States would require tens of billions of dollars in new investment. Factories would need to be built, essential manufacturing equipment would have to be installed, and, most importantly, a skilled workforce capable of operating these systems would need to be recruited and trained. The United States currently lacks the core infrastructure needed to manufacture smartphones, and for this reason, many companies prefer to outsource production to Chinese contractors rather than spend tens of billions of dollars to build that infrastructure, which is significantly more economically efficient. Additionally, building such infrastructure in the United States could take up to a decade, ultimately leading to a significant increase in the product's final price for consumers. Shortage of trained labor in the U.S. compared to China Decades of serving as a global manufacturing hub have allowed China to build a massive talent pool in the production sector that is almost unmatched worldwide. Today, if a company chooses to manufacture its products in China, it can be confident that the workers involved in production have years of experience in their respective roles and are capable of producing high-quality goods with minimal errors. Even if we assume that tens of billions of dollars were invested in building smartphone manufacturing infrastructure in the United States, finding skilled workers would remain highly challenging. Apple CEO Tim Cook visiting the iPhone 6 assembly line in China in 2014. Image: Tim Cook on X In a 2015 interview on CBS’s 60 Minutes, Tim Cook said the main reason Apple isn’t producing in the US is a lack of skills. "China put an enormous focus on manufacturing, in what you and I would call vocational kind of skills. The US over time began to stop having as many vocational kinds of skills. I mean you could take every tool and die maker in the United States and probably put them in the room that we're currently sitting in. In China you would have to have multiple football fields,” Cook said. Also, in 2017, at the Fortune Global Forum in Guangzhou, Cook once again emphasized the importance of highly skilled Chinese workers. “China has moved into very advanced manufacturing, so you find in China the intersection of craftsman kind of skill, and sophisticated robotics and the computer science world. That intersection, which is very rare to find anywhere, that kind of skill, is very important to our business because of the precision and quality level that we like. The thing that most people focus on if they’re a foreigner coming to China is the size of the market, and obviously, it’s the biggest market in the world in so many areas. But for us, the number one attraction is the quality of the people,” Apple CEO said. Higher labor costs in the United States Producing almost any product in the United States is more expensive than in many other countries, and one of the main reasons is the higher cost of labor in the U.S. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, median weekly earnings of full-time workers in the United States were $1,235 in the first quarter of 2026. Meanwhile, the average annual salary in China's private sector in 2025 was RMB 71,590 (US$9,961). In many parts of the world, the weekly wage of an American worker is equivalent to several months of income. Another important factor to consider is that in the United States, the workforce capable of working on a smartphone assembly line is highly specialized and therefore commands higher-than-average wages. According to an estimate by Bank of America, producing an iPhone in the U.S. is technically possible, but “iPhone cost can increase 25% purely on higher labor cost in the U.S.” However, this 25% increase applies only if final assembly is performed in the United States while components are still sourced from China or elsewhere. In this case, the price of a base iPhone would rise from $799 to around $1,000. But in another scenario, if Apple were to produce the required components for the iPhone within the United States, production costs could increase by more than 90%. Trump’s dream for a “Made in the USA” iPhone might never come true In a free-market capitalist economy, one of the primary responsibilities of any CEO is to maximize profit. Using Apple as an example, Tim Cook’s role is to maximize the company’s profits so that it can fund research and development for new products and invest in areas such as artificial intelligence, while also keeping shareholders satisfied. Therefore, it is entirely understandable that Apple would choose not to bring its manufacturing back to the United States and instead keep production in countries where labor is cheaper, and products can be manufactured at a lower cost, thereby maximizing its profit margins. What is your opinion about manufacturing smartphones in the United States? If you are an American citizen, would you be willing to pay hundreds of dollars more for a smartphone made domestically in the USA? Let us know in the comments.
    • Cheers everyone for the replies. It's been very useful. 👍
    • Compared to the 7735HS it is around 25-30% slower in multi-threaded tasks (according to Google search) I did a review of the 7735HS Beelink SER6 Max in 2023, but thinking about it, it's not comparable to the 7730U. For the example you gave about how it will be used, the 7730U is actually an excellent choice for its power and battery efficiency.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Reacting Well
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Excellence2025 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      503
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      194
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      151
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      72
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      67
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!