Recommended Posts

PISCATAWAY, N.J. (WABC) -- A pit bull came to the rescue of a woman with Alzheimer's who had gotten lost and fell down in the snow.

"So we were standing about here when I heard the sticks cracking," said Cara Jones, dog owner.

It was late and dark and Cara Jones couldn't figure out why her 2-year-old pit bull named "Creature" kept leading her into the brush Thursday night.

"She looked back at me and then barked, and there I saw a figure laying," Jones said, "She was trying to get up and the sticks kept breaking on her, so she would fall back down."

Shivering on the wet, cold ground was 89-year-old Carmen Mitchell who suffers from Alzheimer's.

Mitchell had wandered away from her caretaker and somehow made it into the woods about a mile away.

She was lost for several hours.

"In just the blink of an eye she was gone, and I was so scared because she's a loving person," said Rochelle Wason, Mitchell's caretaker.

Rochelle Wason says she immediately called police and they responded in full-force with boots on the ground, K-9 units, and even a helicopter in the sky.

But still, they couldn't find Carmen Mitchell.

"All the searchers were out there, all the volunteers were out there, everyone was putting in their effort here," said Chief Richard Ivone, Piscataway Police Department

But ultimately, it was a spunky house pet who found the 89-year-old.

"I still couldn't believe it. I still couldn't believe it, but I was gleeful nonetheless," said Luke Stapleton, the victim's son-in-law.

Because of her Alzheimer's, Luke Stapleton says his mother-in-law, who was treated for hypothermia, has no memory of what happened.

Stapleton says he's grateful for Creature and says pit bulls get a bad rap.

"I know now that pit bulls are not just as they are described by other people," Stapleton said.

"I had a lot of people looking down on me for having a pit bull, and I'm glad that I have her," Jones said. :happy:

source

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1139572-pit-bull-comes-to-the-rescue/
Share on other sites

Dogs are amazing, they don't have a bad bone in their bodies unless they are forced into it, and even then it's not their choice, all they want is to be approved of and loved by their owners

I'm not a fan of people, but dogs I could be around 24/7 ;)

Dogs are amazing, they don't have a bad bone in their bodies unless they are forced into it, and even then it's not their choice, all they want is to be approved of and loved by their owners

I'm not a fan of people, but dogs I could be around 24/7 ;)

+10

With dogs you don't need to question motives or loyalty. Love & treat them right and you get it back tenfold. Maybe more.

Pretty much all dogs will be good to their owners. The concern is with how they tend to affect outsiders. For pitbulls it's not that they are the most likely to attack but rather that when they do, they inflict the most damage (strongest bite strength, most vicious bite style). Other dogs like rotties will be much more likely to bite, but they usually don't get as much coverage since the damage isn't as shocking. I have no opinion though on what should or shouldn't be done regarding the breed. We need more strict consequences for bad owners, but that's much more difficult to legislate.

Other dogs like Rottweilers will be much more likely to bite, but they usually don't get as much coverage since the damage isn't as shocking.
Every dog has the same tendency to bite if not properly trained. The reason why Pitt-bulls are so hyped in the news is because (1) there is a greater number of pit-bulls (2) their proverbial "ghetto dog" status.

Every dog has the same tendency to bite if not properly trained. The reason why Pitt-bulls are so hyped in the news is because (1) there is a greater number of pit-bulls (2) their proverbial "ghetto dog" status.

(3) with their bulldog + Old English Terrier linage they were (a) bred for powerful jaw muscles and to hang on (the bulldogs use in bull and bear baiting in England from 1500 - 1825) and (b) the Old English Terrier is a hunting breed with a strong prey pursuit instinct, so if they do bite it's a more severe one.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I have a Motorola, one of the lower end ones, it works fine. It is possible to get rid of the Gemini app and also to disable googles assistant , but A.i is still apps. I try to avoid all LLM A.I, is i can, I use no Ai duck duck go.
    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!