Rumor: Google & Opera behind Microsoft's $730million Fine


Recommended Posts

A report from the Financial Times claims that Google and Opera "informally provided the tip-off" that led to the EU fining Microsoft over $730 million yesterday. The fine was levied because Microsoft failed to include a "browser ballot" screen that let European users choose what browser to use when setting up their Windows PC. The Financial Times cites "several people familiar with the case" as confirming that Microsoft's browser-making rivals were behind the tip, and claims that both companies also helped the EU throughout the investigation..

Although uncorroborated, this revelation makes sense: both Google and Opera benefited heavily from the inclusion of the browser ballot, and Opera has been a vocal opponent against Microsoft's tight integration of Internet Explorer with Windows for a long time. When asked for comment, Opera told the Financial Times it was "happy to see that the Commission is enforcing compliance with the commitment, which is critical to ensuring a genuine choice among web browsers for consumers." Google was also asked for comment, but declined.

http://www.theverge.com/2013/3/7/4074390/google-opera-tipped-eu-on-microsoft-antitrust-browser-ballot-mistake

Could this explain why MS did what it did in your previous thread

Dont think so since Ms has been giving it to Google for a while now. It was Microsoft's mistake so Google/Opera just snitched. While it would of been nice to give MS a heads up, if this is true, Google is just finally fighting back a little.

Personally I wish all this kind of crap will stop and companies just get back to innovating and producing good products. A companies sales/rep/whatever should be based of the products and services they provide..not off of what someone else claims they are doing and trash talking. I dont like to hear any trash whether it be from Google, Microsoft, Apple, Samsung, or Betty Crocker.

Honestly if I was Microsoft I'd throw up the option of not selling it in the EU. Would be interesting to see if they'd change their tune a bit. Every time I see something about the EU it usually involves a fine of some sort.

  • Like 2

Honestly if I was Microsoft I'd throw up the option of not selling it in the EU. Would be interesting to see if they'd change their tune a bit. Every time I see something about the EU it usually involves a fine of some sort.

MS: "yeah let's not sell any MS product in EU and loose billions, that will teach them!"

yeah...

Stupid crybabies. Especially Opera going all "boohoohoo, nobody uses our misdesigned turd, so we snitched MS and went Webkit, like it's going to change sh*t".

And Google is simply pushing their services - it appears that EU can be "lobbied" as well, even without moving huge piles of money.

Dont think so since Ms has been giving it to Google for a while now. It was Microsoft's mistake so Google/Opera just snitched. While it would of been nice to give MS a heads up, if this is true, Google is just finally fighting back a little.

Personally I wish all this kind of crap will stop and companies just get back to innovating and producing good products. A companies sales/rep/whatever should be based of the products and services they provide..not off of what someone else claims they are doing and trash talking. I dont like to hear any trash whether it be from Google, Microsoft, Apple, Samsung, or Betty Crocker.

Google is fighting back a little? They have been going at Microsoft for a while now.

- They complained about desktop search when it was introduced in Vista

- They complained about the browser monopoly in EU (which ultimately resulted in the ballot)

- They complained about Office document formats

These are the things I can remember of the top of my head, I am sure there have been more cases.

Yes, a little considering/compared to the amount of attacks from MS over the past year or so.

Uh Microsoft is fighting in a more visible manner whereas Google goes in a more underhanded way (blocking youtube/ maps on WP for example). There is no good guy here and I am find it amusing that you think Google is innocent or rather less evil compared to Microsoft.

Uh Microsoft is fighting in a more visible manner whereas Google goes in a more underhanded way (blocking youtube/ maps on WP for example). There is no good guy here and I am find it amusing that you think Google is innocent or rather less evil compared to Microsoft.

Never said Google was innocent and even made comments about them dropping Exchange support. I dont think any company is evil and never used that term towards a company.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I have a Motorola, one of the lower end ones, it works fine. It is possible to get rid of the Gemini app and also to disable googles assistant , but A.i is still apps. I try to avoid all LLM A.I, is i can, I use no Ai duck duck go.
    • Free Software Foundation Europe pushes EU to force Google to allow AI uninstalls on Android by Paul Hill Credit: Pexels Users should be able to fully uninstall AI-based features from Android devices and be able to access interoperability functions, free from Google’s verification requirements, the European Commission has heard as part of an Android interoperability consultation under the Digital Markets Act. These measures were proposed by the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE) last week when it submitted its documentation. The FSFE noted that Google had started silently installing AI models without telling users. It noted that the EU’s DMA requires companies like Google to allow users to uninstall pre-loaded software from their devices, but in the case of the AI models Google is installing, they reinstall if you delete them, contravening the DMA. To get Google back under control, the FSFE has told the European Commission that there needs to be improvements within the Android Open Source Project (AOSP). First, it said that users should be able to fully remove pre-loaded AI components from their devices, with companies being prohibited from silently reinstalling or reactivating them. Second, access to Android interoperability features should not be contingent on registration, authorization, or contractual relationships with Google. This pertains to Google’s attempt to force developers to register with Google, even to publish apps to alternative app stores like F-Droid. Discussing its submission, Lucas Lasota, FSFE Legal Programme Manager, said: Google is planning to roll out its Android Developer Certification in September 2026. This will force every Android app developer to register with Google before their software can be installed on certified Android devices, but it should affect those who have removed Google Apps from their device. The program is controversial because it entails the signing of contracts and payment of account fees to Google, as well as the handing over of the identities of developers. It said: The FSFE said that if the Commission’s draft measures remain unchanged, then Google will be allowed to make developers verify their identity. The FSFE believes that asking developers to register is contrary to the text and spirit of the law. In summary, the FSFE has told the Commission that no developer should need a Google account, a Play Store presence, or any agreement with Google to access Android’s interoperability features.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Conversation Starter
      sumytbe earned a badge
      Conversation Starter
    • One Year In
      B4dM1k3 earned a badge
      One Year In
    • One Year In
      DarkWun earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Dedicated
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • Dedicated
      JuvenileDelinquent earned a badge
      Dedicated
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      519
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      188
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      87
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      81
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      72
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!