Recommended Posts

A homeless Florida man with a penchant for getting arrested when it's cold outside found an unlikely and humorous ally in a judge who called him "a regular."

Bruce Hodgson, 38, was arrested on at a Home Depot in Pompano Beach, Florida, on Monday. He "appeared intoxicated" and was "causing a disturbance inside the store" when the store manager approached a police officer, according to Hodgson's arrest affidavit.

The officer told Hodgson to leave the property and he did, but he returned 15 minutes later.

"Again he was warned to leave or face being arrested," according to the police report. "The def. [defendant] turned around and placed his hands behind his back and stated, 'Go ahead and arrest me.'"

Hodgson was arrested and taken to the Broward Sheriff's Office main jail.

On Tuesday, Hodgson appeared before Judge John Hurley in bond court.

"Hi, Bruce, good to see you again. How ya been?" Hurley asked him. "Bruce, you didn't try to get arrested this time, did you?"

Hodgson said he was just trying to go back for another cup of coffee.

"Come on, Bruce," Hurley said. "Did it get too cold out [and] you wanted to get arrested?"

"I don't know," Hodgson replied with a laugh. Laughs can be heard throughout the room during the exchange, posted on ABC News' Miami and Fort Lauderdale affiliate WPLG's website.

On Monday, Fort Lauderdale had a high temperature of 67 degrees and a low of 44 degrees.

"Yeah, I got it," Hurley said. "When I read this this morning, I read right through this. It got too cold out there and you wanted to get arrested. Am I right?"

Hodgson chuckled and looked away before saying, "Maybe."

"See, I knew it, Bruce," said Hurley. "Well, it's good to see you again. Sorry it had to be in jail."

Hurley then asked him if we wanted to postpone the hearing until Thursday and Hodgson shrugged.

"All right, Bruce, I'll reset this for Thursday in the afternoon," Hurley said. "I think we're going to get into the 70s this weekend. Take care."

Hodgson smiled, gave him a thumbs up and walked away.

"Yeah, Bruce is a regular," Hurley said. "I can read Bruce like a book."

Hodgson has been arrested 29 times since 2000, according to the Broward Sheriff's Office.

Sixteen of those arrests took place between November and March. The most recent nine times he was arrested in the winter, the average low temperature was 52 degrees, according to WPLG.

"Certainly, we don't want to jail the homeless," Broward Sheriff's Officer Dani Moschella told ABCNews.com today. "It's not a homeless shelter, but sometimes despite our best efforts, people end up in jail because they break the law."

It costs $116 per day to house an inmate in the Broward County Jail, according to Moschella. The jail was at 85 percent capacity on Wednesday.

"The deputy's hands are kind of tied in that situation. He was breaking the law," she said. "The judge's hands were tied as well. He has someone in front of him who is cold."

Moschella said that homeless shelters are available, but they often will not take in people who are intoxicated.

source

Link to comment
https://www.neowin.net/forum/topic/1140674-man-seeks-jail-to-escape-cold/
Share on other sites

The homeless situation in the USA is a disgrace. Ok, I know there are 'some' people out there who actually want to be homeless, for a variety of reasons. But I would still think there would be more our society could do to help out the ones who are wanting help.

Ghandi said "You can judge a society by how they treat their weakest members."

The homeless situation in the USA is a disgrace. Ok, I know there are 'some' people out there who actually want to be homeless, for a variety of reasons. But I would still think there would be more our society could do to help out the ones who are wanting help.

Ghandi said "You can judge a society by how they treat their weakest members."

It's bad in the UK too.

Articles like this make me sick:

Homeless man Daniel Gauntlett dies frozen on doorstep of empty bungalow in Aylesford

--------------------------

I don't blame the guy, I would probably do the same!

Not sure about the temperatures though... 6 degrees celsius (44F) is not that cold, I would walk around in a jumper in that kind of temperature.

Sometimes homelessness comes down to choosing it. Here in Canada, with every conceivable social program, there are still people that are homeless. There is help available if they want it, but they choose not to because of implied conditions. Somewhat like this story, the homeless shelter could take him but they don't take intoxicated people. That's HIM choosing to drink alcohol over a warm shelter, 100% his choice and no ones fault but his own. Its the same here, people just don't want to to accept conditions. I am hoping within 10 years, I myself too might be able to start a small local safety net to help people get on their feet. You will get free room, board, a specific appointed job with decent pay. Conditions? No smoking, no drinking, no drugs. Don't like it? Fine, I will help someone who wants help and is willing to change. Next person in line please.

Sometimes homelessness comes down to choosing it. Here in Canada, with every conceivable social program, there are still people that are homeless. There is help available if they want it, but they choose not to because of implied conditions. Somewhat like this story, the homeless shelter could take him but they don't take intoxicated people. That's HIM choosing to drink alcohol over a warm shelter, 100% his choice and no ones fault but his own. Its the same here, people just don't want to to accept conditions. I am hoping within 10 years, I myself too might be able to start a small local safety net to help people get on their feet. You will get free room, board, a specific appointed job with decent pay. Conditions? No smoking, no drinking, no drugs. Don't like it? Fine, I will help someone who wants help and is willing to change. Next person in line please.

For someone considering opening a homeless shelter, you show a considerable lack of understanding for people with addictions.

For someone considering opening a homeless shelter, you show a considerable lack of understanding for people with addictions.

I understand them... but I would follow the 80/20 rule. As with most things, 80% of results are achieved in the first 20% of effort. I would want to help the most people possible. The die hard addicts would take up an disproportional amount of effort and time compared to someone willing to give substance addiction up. Instead of treating 5 hard luck addicts, I would help (over time) 25 hard luck non-addicts. For me, its about helping out the most people you can. Although it is possible for 10 years down the road to start helping out the ones I can't help now as money/business allows.

Otis-the-drunk.jpg

Otis: I got drunk just so I could come over here to be with you, so you could help me celebrate my birthday.

Andy: Aw, you didn't have to do that, Otis. Why, you would have been welcome, anyhow.

Otis: No, that's like going to a friend's store and not buying anything.

Otis telling Barney and Andy that he got drunk so they could arrest him and he would be with them for his birthday.

I understand them... but I would follow the 80/20 rule. As with most things, 80% of results are achieved in the first 20% of effort. I would want to help the most people possible. The die hard addicts would take up an disproportional amount of effort and time compared to someone willing to give substance addiction up. Instead of treating 5 hard luck addicts, I would help (over time) 25 hard luck non-addicts. For me, its about helping out the most people you can. Although it is possible for 10 years down the road to start helping out the ones I can't help now as money/business allows.

I was referring more to this part of your post:

"That's HIM choosing to drink alcohol over a warm shelter, 100% his choice and no ones fault but his own."

Some people have been through some pretty horrendous stuff and they drink/take drugs to block out the bad memories. I'm not saying that that's the best way to deal with such problems, but I can sympathise with it. I wouldn't say it's always as simple as CHOOSING to drink for some people.

  • Like 1

I was referring more to this part of your post:

"That's HIM choosing to drink alcohol over a warm shelter, 100% his choice and no ones fault but his own."

Some people have been through some pretty horrendous stuff and they drink/take drugs to block out the bad memories. I'm not saying that that's the best way to deal with such problems, but I can sympathise with it. I wouldn't say it's always as simple as CHOOSING to drink for some people.

totally true, but I choose to not deal with the reasoning, either way, I would choose someone else to help (if they didn't abide by the rules set forth).

totally true, but I choose to not deal with the reasoning, either way, I would choose someone else to help (if they didn't abide by the rules set forth).

I understand your reasons and can't really fault them... I'm just saying that saying "it's noone's fault but their own" is a little harsh without knowing the circumstances :p

Sometimes homelessness comes down to choosing it. Here in Canada, with every conceivable social program, there are still people that are homeless. There is help available if they want it, but they choose not to because of implied conditions. Somewhat like this story, the homeless shelter could take him but they don't take intoxicated people. That's HIM choosing to drink alcohol over a warm shelter, 100% his choice and no ones fault but his own. Its the same here, people just don't want to to accept conditions. I am hoping within 10 years, I myself too might be able to start a small local safety net to help people get on their feet. You will get free room, board, a specific appointed job with decent pay. Conditions? No smoking, no drinking, no drugs. Don't like it? Fine, I will help someone who wants help and is willing to change. Next person in line please.

Yeah, but in BC there are huge cuts going towards these social programs so the amount the Government has to spend is evaporating.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • I've been using MWB Premium for a number of years so that along with Windows updates and updated browser should be fine. Thanks for that.
    • For some reason I suddenly have the urge to go shopping at Sears.
    • So I did a quick test based on 3+ different public instances from the litany at searx.space ... and it spins everything rather differently. It seems that SearXNG is a meta-search engine (queries multiple search indexes rather than only Google's or Bing's or Wikipedia's or Reddit's) that operates in two modes: > public instances ... each instance opens itself to outside users who piggyback on its cached search history; this instance's own identity becomes known/tracked but end-users are hidden similar to an anonymization proxy; this instance's querying of major search indexes may be API based [rated limited, blocked, etc.]). > private instances ... your private install/instance that itself queries multiple (configurable) search indexes of crawled web content; every major Search Engine associates all traffic to your private instance (so your traffic is tracked via network usages) but client-side tracking (your own browser/computer specs) is flushed because it's a "server" doing the querying rather than your browser. My test asked the same 1 question to the 3+ engines and they all returned vastly different results: some had CAPTCHA failures against Google, some had failures against Wikipedia, and the actual results were also different -- some had auto-complete enabled, others returned a wikipedia highlighted excerpt despite the Wikipedia failure (hinting at results being cached from previous keyword matching), and others just gave an Are-You-Human non-CAPTCHA loop before returning random results. So this begs the caveat: Search query results will vary based on which instance is used because every instance queries the other search indexes separate (and thus its results are influenced on that instance's aggregate search history and index-access limitations). The major distinctions for SearXNG versus DDG or Brave: > The search UI is 'untracked' since no UI trackers are baked-in which would phone home or lay cookies into your browser (for DDG/Brave usage stats), > There is no 'crawler' that canvasses the Internet to discover fresh content (it leaves that to the major search indexes), > Queries multiple search indexes ("meta-search engine") based on the configurations and usage history of the server instance, > Privacy-friendly due to its ability to shield user tracking via standing up a non-local server instance connectable to major VPN providers: queries would all appear to come from general VPN/Proxy providers rather than your private instance (whether installed locally or on your own VPS in the cloud). PS: I've previously come across specialized search engines of this nature that indexes searches across media assets like YT, OF, etc. SearXNG seems to be a good backbone...if the rate-limiting/captcha/etc. issues were resolved.
  • Recent Achievements

    • Week One Done
      flexorcist earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Month Later
      Woland13 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Woland13 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • One Year In
      bernmeister earned a badge
      One Year In
    • Week One Done
      Scoobystu earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      490
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      225
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      147
    4. 4
      Steven P.
      74
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!