Recommended Posts

Apologies for the topic, but it was an area of interest for me. There weren't many Vista topics, so...

After using Vista on a newer machine, I didn't know what all the flak was about. The only issue I had was a missing driver after installation (of RTM), which is understandable since the computer was manufactured in late 2008.

Vista introduced so many nice features. In fact, Windows Vista is the only operating system to have six articles on the English version of Wikipedia dedicated to the new features it introduced!

What was your experience (assuming you had one) with the operating system? What was your initial impression after the first log in? What made you go "Wow!"?

i only had a few driver issues back in '06 and '07 (terratec and hp) but otherwise i loved Vista... basically it was the pinnacle of skeuporph designed OS, back in the day it was just beautiful, especially after XP which was a kids' playroom made out of plastic

aero glass had some grace and elegance, some of that gone with Win7 (which was a great system and looked good but for me Vista was more appealing)

i never had speed issues with it (granted, IE7 wasn't the best browser but after updating to IE8 that concern was gone too)

all in all, i liked Vista very much and found it quick, comfortable and a real eyecamdy :)

i only had a few driver issues back in '06 and '07 (terratec and hp) but otherwise i loved Vista... basically it was the pinnacle of skeuporph designed OS, back in the day it was just beautiful, especially after XP which was a kids' playroom made out of plastic

aero glass had some grace and elegance, some of that gone with Win7 (which was a great system and looked good but for me Vista was more appealing)

i never had speed issues with it (granted, IE7 wasn't the best browser but after updating to IE8 that concern was gone too)

all in all, i liked Vista very much and found it quick, comfortable and a real eyecamdy :)

I don't think you know what skeuomorph means.

i only had a few driver issues back in '06 and '07 (terratec and hp) but otherwise i loved Vista... basically it was the pinnacle of skeuporph designed OS, back in the day it was just beautiful, especially after XP which was a kids' playroom made out of plastic aero glass had some grace and elegance, some of that gone with Win7 (which was a great system and looked good but for me Vista was more appealing) i never had speed issues with it (granted, IE7 wasn't the best browser but after updating to IE8 that concern was gone too) all in all, i liked Vista very much and found it quick, comfortable and a real eyecamdy :)

What are you talking about? Windows 7 and Vista share the same Glass theme. The only difference I would say is Windows 7 dropped the shaded Taskbar. Also, the Glass theme in Windows 7 is more refined, compare the Start menu pane in Vista vs 7. Windows 7 Start menu has a certain glass and shine to it.

Personally, I don't have a problem with Windows Vista, still have it installed on a HP workstation where I keep my iTunes Library.

I ran it on my laptop and other desktops until Windows 7 beta came along. I will admit, even on a Core 2 Quad, 2 GBs of ECC RAM and 512 MB Quadro FX video card (state of the art for late 2008), Vista boots slow on it, takes long to compose the desktop. It just was not optimized. If Vista had the optimizations of Windows 7, it would not have the backlash it got.

A lot of the compatibility issues Vista initially experienced were resolved within the first two months of general availability.

I had installed it on the workstation beside me at work a few months ago since the machine has upgrade rights to Vista Business, as slow as it is, its still nice to use in some areas. To be honest though, I use Windows 8 everyday, today I had to back it up because the machines are being refreshed next week. So I was left to use Vista and I have to say, it felt weird. I work a lot with WordPad, the minute I opened it I felt weird, lack of Ribbon and just the garrish 90's feel of it.

I think if Microsoft had also updated some of the built in apps at the time too, it wouldn't be so bad. Overall, I readjusted and used as normal. I plan to keep Vista on the workstation I have at home until the machine dies. I don't really need to have Windows 7 or 8 on it since its doing what it needs to do. The eventual successor though is a iMac or MacBook Pro I will be purchasing later this year.

Sadly, my first impressions of Vista were not favorable to say the least. I had gotten it as a freebie from Microsoft's small business promotion which gave away 30k copies (remember that Neowin?) I also had gotten a free copy for my laptop which came with it as an upgrade. I installed that copy first which was Home Premium and it ran slower than reasonable for me. I tried business and it was still slow so I just stored them away and went back to XP at the time.

I think I was more disappointed with the removal of items from it that were promised which were indeed eye-candy such as transparent folders by default, animations when switching through them etc.. I think it was PDC 2003 or somwhere around that time. Not only that though, was also the delayed release. Remember when it was promised but never came but for a few more years later? I think that threw a lot of people off of it.

When I look back at the eye-candy things and all the goodies that come with it, I tend to agree that anymore while it is quite amazing and fun to look at for the first few times, after that - it is quite old and you want to do anything to disable it. :) I experience the same thing on my Android anymore, it is all "OOOH!!! Eye-Candy!!!" then after about a day or two of looking at it, I switch the program's animations off. (Launchers mostly).

  • Like 1

I didn't really have any issues with Vista, even from day 1. Vista Ultimate Extras was a big flop, but I mainly used Home Premium anyway. The bulk of Vista's "issues" weren't even the fault of the OS itself, it was from hardware developers (most notably nVidia) not releasing proper drivers in time for Vista's launch, and Microsoft's mis-marketing of it. "Vista Capable" should never have existed. The only computers that should've been marketed as being able to run Vista were the ones that were marketed as "Vista Premium", with over a GB of RAM and a decent processor from the time. If nVidia had released Vista drivers on time and Microsoft never used "Vista Capable" as a marketing ploy, Vista would likely be remembered a lot more fondly by the masses.

i had no problem at all. worked on a dell inspiron 9400 and also on my acerferrari 5000. not a big microsoft fan but it was their only OS i bought online. i liked vista aero glass effects and besides that it was as good or bad as xp was.

still convinced most people were just fine with the OS but because it got such a bad press now everyone thinks it was bad.

/me hops into time machine and goes back to 2006.

On my Athlon 64 X2 system that I just built, Vista x64 actually has support for all of my devices out of the box. With XP x64, I had to mindlessly search for drivers (like video and networking) which I could never find. I really like the Aero Glass UI. It's a fresh change from XP's Luna interface.

/me travels back to present day.

I never had any problems with Vista. I used it from November 2006 until January 2010. It was a great OS for day-to-day use. I never had any outstanding problems with it. In fact, I wouldn't have any problems with still using it today, but I've grown to love Windows 7 and now 8.

Vista pre SP1 had issues. Which is to say, Vista before it'd been out about nine months had issues (SP1 actually came later, but included all those patches anyway.)

SP1 was still a bit glitchy but very stable and usable. SP2 cleared up most of the glitchiness.

I was seriously irritated with XP by the time Vista came out.

Some laptop makers (hint - Acer) also loved putting their builds in Power Saver mode which performed like *********.

  • Like 2

Vista had some genuine issues when it came out, probably the biggest issue for me was how slow it was to copy files, but there were other issues as well. I brought it on release day and, along with the slow file copying, experienced frequent Explorer crashes and blue screens.

Lousy drivers from hardware vendors (on release, and for a while afterward), a ton of software that was not designed to run under a non-admin account (that people blamed Microsoft for, not the actual developers of the software), the negative response people had to DX10 (exclusive to Vista, but with hardly any advantages), the joke that was Ultimate Extras, and the fact it had only a portion of the "cool stuff" Microsoft had been showing off for years with Longhorn, it gained a bad reputation that it never could get rid of (even after a myriad of patches fixed many of the bugs and performance problems).

Had Vista since Beta 2 in July 2006 - 2 months after its release of Beta 2 in May. Late, I know, but hey late is better than never lol.

Ran Vista from Beta 2 all the way to Vista SP2 before Windows 7 (well actually I had Win 7 since Beta in Jan 2009 tho)

I haven't had any problems with Vista and it only got better with Win 7. Love the Aero Glass theme - was disappointed to see the transparency gone in Win 8.

My experience with it is...low. My opinion of it is even lower. However, I should probably point out that I have a similar opinion of Window 7 at the moment. It's not that the OS is flawed, it's that they've made some silly decisions regarding user interaction, and I'm finding that it takes me twice as long to perform a simple task that I would have no problem with in XP.

At the time I tried it (pre SP2), explorer would constantly hang and crash for no reason. Graphics drivers kept crashing even years after release of Vista. Compatibility with so many apps was broken even with UAC disabled and compatibility mode.

PS: No memory errors and worked perfectly with XP.

Vista was necessary to iron out the bugs for SP1/Windows 7. If Vista didn't happen, Windows 7 would have faced the same issues. They needed to get it out there to make software developers realise that this change is real and can't sit on their ass hoping that compatibility issues with resolve themselves in time for the next release, software developers will have to fix it themselves.

Personally i loved Vista, it was a massive upgrade from Windows XP.

Yes it broke a lot of stuff in regards to drivers, however it was a needed change and it forced manufacturers to start pushing 64bit drivers too. I personally loved Windows Media Center, as i was a big fan of MCE 2005 in XP and it was a great upgrade in Vista. I loved the modern theme, widgets and improved start menu too. Everything appeared to get a fresh coat.

I think my only complaint is like Intrinsica mentioned it takes twice as many clicks to perform simple tasks compared to Windows XP. Sadly this trend has continued, especially in Windows 8 to the point where its just one big mess now going through system and user settings.

Could only tolerate that TOTAL POS OS just long enough to wipe it out and install good ol' XP!!

I bet since it was released, I've down graded AT LEAST 250 computers to XP or have upgraded them to Windows 7 now. The very vast majority of those poeple have asked me what MS did to actually make such a crappy OS!

I would've rather used Windows 95, 98 or even Me, over that crap a** OS! :x

I used vista with my former laptop, with only 1 gb of ram and even so... it ran smooth as silk (provided I installed all my programs and removed any kind of autostarting feature on them) SP1 made it faster... and continue to use it even after win 7 came out because of a weird BIOS problem that I only discovered months later (had to downgrade to the very frirst bios revision of my laptop to correct it) To be honest, I really have a lot of fond memories of it, this was because most of the people was so stuck in winxp because apparently it didn't ran fast enough on their computer, but for me it was great, win7 was just an speed performance of it.... I consider it even more "revolutionary" than windows 8.

Personally I liked Vista. It certainly wasn't perfect but the visual theme was a significant improvement from XP, gaming was great (performance was largely similar but it included DX10), driver handling was much improved (thanks to the online check) and stability and security were both improved also (people forget how insecure and unstable XP was). I was glad to upgrade to Windows 7 upon release but to me it was simply Vista 2.0 - I never understood how people could hate Vista but love Win7.

Contextually I think Vista was better than Windows 8, though Windows 8 is still the superior operating system.

PS - It should be noted that my systems tend to be at the top-end of the performance spectrum, so I didn't encounter the significant performance issues that affected people with lower spec machines.

I was beta-testing Vista. Even got a complimentary Vista Ultimate key for that. Yet I went back to XP not even six months after installing Vista RTM. Why? Main reason: my PC at the time was a lowly AMD Sempron 3000+ with 1 GB of RAM and a Geforce 6200. Suffice to say performance wasn't exactly stellar. Upgrading my hardware was not an option at the time, hence the downgrade.

Two months after downgrading to XP I bought an iMac only to see the first Windows 7 beta a year later and go 'damn, why did you switch to OS X again?' But I digress.

In terms of reliability I didn't have a lot of issues with Vista.

The only issue I had was a missing driver after installation (of RTM), which is understandable since the computer was manufactured in late 2008.

That was perfectly the time that there should have been drivers for it, Vista was released in 2007, Win 7 was released in 2009

2008 was Vistas limelight year

I can say that I really hated Vista. Because everyone hated it, I hated it too.

I had it on the laptop I'm writing... This was 4 years ago (September 30, 2008). Intel Core 2 Duo @ 2.4 GHz, Nvidia Geforce 8600m GT.

I had problems with DEP (Data Execution Prevention). I had to create exclusions with several programs.

Everything else worked good. Booting time (cold) was like 30 secs, with everything disabled (Startup, except the essentials).Most of the programs ran OK.

I can say that every problem I had with Vista could be atoned to the bad press (Mostly mentally).

I, as of today have a different stand. I believe Windows Vista is the most revolutionary OS ever created by Microsoft. From incredible UI improvements and simplicity, to modifying internals.

Hell, I can bet my butt that if it wasn't for Vista, we wouldn't have the monster PCs we had today. Vista forced Hardware vendors to create much powerful GPU, RAM, CPU.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Posts

    • Glow 26.9 by Razvan Serea Glow provides detailed reporting on every hardware component in your computer, saving you valuable time typically spent searching for CPU, motherboard, RAM, graphics card, and other stats. With Glow, all the information is conveniently presented in one clean interface, allowing you to easily access and review the comprehensive hardware details of your system. Glow provides detailed information on various system aspects, including OS, motherboard, processor, memory, graphics card, storage, network, battery, drivers, and services. The well-organized format ensures easy access to the required information. You can export all the gathered data to a plain text file, facilitating sharing with others for troubleshooting purposes. No installation needed. Just decompress the archive, launch the executable, and access computer-related information. Glow runs on Windows 11 and Windows 10 64-bit versions. Glow 26.9 changelog: New Features The processor hardware detection engine has been significantly enhanced beyond traditional Intel and AMD architectures. Native support is now available for modern platforms such as Apple Silicon (M-Series) and the newly introduced NVIDIA Spark. In addition, all ARM-based processors can now be accurately distinguished between ARM32 and ARM64 architectures, providing precise hardware reporting. This marks a major milestone for Glow's hardware detection capabilities. The RAM manufacturer identification algorithm has been expanded. JEDEC vendor codes for popular brands such as Patriot, PNY, Team Group, GeIL, Lexar (Longsys), and Asgard/Gloway have been integrated into the database. This significantly reduces the likelihood of incorrect or "Unknown Manufacturer" results and improves overall hardware detection accuracy. New Public IP Address and Internet Service Provider (ISP) features have been added to the Network section. To ensure reliability, this information is retrieved from the trusted service ipwho.is. When Hiding Mode is enabled, no requests are sent and these features remain hidden, as they may expose sensitive information. The search engine used in the Installed Drivers, Installed Services, and Installed Applications sections has been enhanced. You can now perform more flexible and accurate searches using initials, partial matches, and loosely arranged character sequences. The TS Preloader loading bar has been rebuilt using our modern TS Custom Controls graphics library, developed entirely in-house. As a result of this infrastructure upgrade, the loading bar now features smooth rendering and rounded corners that align with the visual style of Windows 11. [TS Updater] A new validation algorithm has been added to check whether the target application is currently running before the update process begins. Bug Fixes Resolved a condition that could prevent TS Preloader from shutting down safely during rare application crash scenarios. Fixed a text alignment issue in the Network section affecting the display of DNS addresses. Alignment is now rendered correctly. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue that could prevent the updated application's executable "*.exe" file from being located after the update process. [TS Updater] Fixed a bug that could leave outdated "*.sha256" files in the application directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed a rare issue that could cause subfolders to be moved into the root directory after an update. [TS Updater] Fixed an issue during the first launch that could cause flickering and a temporary white window appearance due to Windows Defender interactions. Changes A small improvement has been made to the internet connectivity detection algorithm. Connectivity checks are now performed in the background with minimal impact on the user interface thread. The keyboard shortcuts in the top menu have been reorganized and simplified to provide a consistent experience across all Türkaysoft applications and to avoid potential conflicts with standard Windows shortcuts. The TS Preloader splash image has been updated with a Türkiye-themed stadium design to celebrate Türkiye's qualification for the 2026 FIFA World Cup—its first appearance in 24 years. Congratulations, Türkiye! The TS Custom Controls module has been updated to version 26.6, delivering improved stability and a more polished visual appearance. [TS Updater] The application icon has been redesigned to provide a more modern and refined look. Note: Always unzip the program before using it. Otherwise you may get an error. Download: Glow 26.9 | 1.8 MB (Open Source) Links: Glow Homepage | Screenshot | Github Get alerted to all of our Software updates on Twitter at @NeowinSoftware
    • DWARF mini review: the world's smallest smart telescope for night and day sky captures by Steven Parker DWARFLAB reached out to me asking if I was interested in checking out the DWARF mini, which is a portable astronomy telescope designed for amateur astronomers. Why do I say it's for amateurs? Well, for starters, it's not what you'd call "high end"; it's more of a professional-grade starting point for amateurs serious about capturing what's up there in our night and day skies. A typical amateur astronomer is most likely thousands of dollars deep into the hobby, and I will make no claims that this DWARF mini (at a fraction of the cost) could replace it all, okay? Well, if you read on, it will be clearer what I am trying to convey. Disclosure: DWARFLAB provided a free sample without any editorial input or review pre-approval. I have always been interested in looking up and observing the night sky. I see satellites crossing the sky above my garden most nights, and I am always looking at the moon. Yeah, I have a 200MP camera on my phone, but at 200X zoom, AI takes over and makes the pretty moon pictures that I snap, the DWARF mini does not, you get an actual true picture of what you can barely see with the naked eye. Before we start, let's share the highlights of the DWARF mini in bite-sized format: Pocket-Sized & Ultra-Lightweight Weighing just 1.85 lbs (840g), the DWARF mini easily fits into a backpack or large pocket. Its all-in-one, compact design makes it the ultimate grab-and-go digital telescope for hiking, camping, or traveling to dark-sky locations. Intuitive App Control & Built-in Sky Atlas Go from unboxing to your first shot in just 3 minutes! The DWARFLAB App provides a seamless experience with an interactive star map. Simply select your target and start exploring without the steep learning curve of traditional setups. Auto GOTO & 360° Pivot Freedom Enjoy pinpoint automated tracking with full 360° rotation. Powered by a high-sensitivity Sony IMX662 sensor (1/2.8-inch, 2.9μm pixels), it captures amazing, low-noise astro details, bringing faint nebulas and star clusters to life with stunning clarity. Pro-Level EQ Mode & Long Exposure Unlock advanced deep-space imaging with Equatorial (EQ) Mode. Supporting impressive single-frame exposures up to 90 seconds and featuring built-in light pollution filters, it easily cuts through city glow to reveal intricate celestial structures. Smart Cloud Processing & All-Ages Fun Effortlessly enhance your raw data with integrated cloud processing for professional-grade results. Perfect for beginners, kids, and adults, this telescope makes exploring and sharing the wonders of the universe an exciting, family-friendly adventure. The packaging is a pretty minimal affair with the outer box opening like a flap to reveal the plastic mould of the DWARF mini sitting in it. Below, the Sun filter, charging cable, cleaning cloth, and documentation can be found. DWARFLAB also provided a Mini Hydraulic Tripod ($89.99), and I highly recommend getting it if you plan on purchasing the DWARF mini, as it fully supports the motorized tracking feature of the telescope; plus, at 840g, the weight of the telescope, you will need a tripod that supports more than the weight of a smartphone anyway. What's in the box DWARF Mini Smart Telescope × 1 Sun Filter x 1 Type-C to Type-C Cord x 1 Cleaning Cloth x 1 User Guide With that out of the way, here are the full specs: DWARF mini Dimensions (DWH): 60.70 mm x 100.38 × 183.61 (2.39" x 3.95" x 7.23") Weight: 840g (1.85lbs) Aperture diameter: 30 mm (telephoto), 3.4 mm (wide angle) Image Sensor: SONY IMX662 1/2.8" (Telephoto) OmniVision OS02K10 1/2.8" (Wide-angle) Focal length: 150 mm (telephoto), 6.7 mm (wide-angle) Equivalent focal length: 1016 mm (telephoto), 45 mm (wide-angle) Shutter Speed: Tele - 1/10000-90s, Wide - 1/10000-30s Maximum exposure time: 90s (telephoto & wide-angle), Both in EQ mode Rotation range: Lens: 225°, Base: 360° Effective Pixels: 2.07M Maximum Resolution: 1920 × 1080 (Telephoto & Wide-angle) Built-in filters: Astro, Dark, Duo-Band (Telephoto), Astro (Wide-angle) Output: JPG, FITS, TIFF, MP4 Shooting Mode: Photos, Videos, Astronomy, Burst Shooting, Time-lapse Photography Storage: 64 GB Battery: Built-in 7000 mAh, supports external USB charging Charging Port: Type-C NPU: 1 TOPS Features: WiFi, NFC NFC One-Touch Connection Astronomy Post-Processing/Appointment Shooting/Astronomy Mosaic Wi-Fi Transmission Range: 15m (open environment) Color: Black Compatibility: iOS & Android smartphones/tablets Warranty: 2-years (24-months) MSRP: $399 Design Charge port On/off button Lens On the DWARF mini itself, it is a pretty minimal affair. On one side, there is a Type-C USB port to charge the non-removable 7000 mAh battery, and on the other side, a large button to power on or off the telescope. The button is flanked by an LED that is green when connected via the DWARFLAB app, or lights up red when being powered off. Below the button, there are four LEDs that indicate battery power. The DWARF mini does not have any sharp edges as all sides are rounded off; it has a good heft to it, but the weight of it feels quite balanced in the hand, so it isn't top or bottom-heavy. On the front there is the DWARFLAB logo which is quite small and there are no other markings on it. The tripod offers full 360° rotation of the motorized base, which allows for tracking for the time-lapse mode, but also for the 90-second captures of nearer objects in the sky, such as the Sun or the moon. Usage To get started, simply power on the DWARF mini and open the DWARFLAB app, tap on Connect, and it will scan for the DWARF mini over the Wi-Fi network. The device supports both 2.4 GHz and 5 GHz Wi-Fi, as well as Bluetooth for discovery, so connection issues were minimal in my experience with it. As previously noted in the specs, the DWARF mini will stay connected with a phone or tablet up to 15 meters in an open environment, such as a backyard. Lighting status Powering on: The green circular light will rotate and breathe in turn Powering off: The red circular light is gradually extinguished Connecting: Green light strip rotating Connected: Green light strip solid/always on 4 lights 1= 0-25%, 2= 25-50%, 3= 50-75%, 4= 75-100% battery power To view the full lighting status, such as tracking mode and connection failure, you can check the user guide on the official DWARFLAB page. DWARFLAB app Above, you can see the steps undertaken to connect the DWARFLAB app to my Galaxy S26 Ultra. Weirdly, I got an alert that a firmware update failed to get uploaded to the DWARF mini the first time, but upon retrying, it worked. Then place the DWARF mini outside, make sure your smartphone or tablet is connected to it, and then head back inside, because you can manage it from the comfort of your home. Simply enter the Atlas tab in the app and search for what you want to capture, and then tap on the camera icon; the DWARF mini will then attempt to track the object and give you a live view right on your connected device. Results I've had the DWARF mini since April, but even though my garden is south-facing, I had a lot of trouble trying to capture a good image of the moon. In the end, it was possible after I took it with me on a trip to my parents in Southend, UK, at the end of May. Here is a capture of the moon, resulting from 20 stacked images over a 90-second exposure. What you are seeing here is not AI-assisted. A good example of what I mean is the latest flagships with their 200MP cameras claiming to capture things like closeups of the moon, and while they are not as good as the above example on the DWARF mini, the resulting image on smartphones is actually AI-assisted above 30X zoom. Here is an example of a similar shot at the moon at 200X zoom using an HONOR Magic8 Pro. The difference is clear. Next, here we have a shot of the daytime moon. Here is a shot of Arcturus, the red giant star, which is the fourth brightest in the night sky. As previously mentioned, it could be a bit clearer, but clouds passing in front of it muddied the shot a bit. The Sun The DWARF mini also ships with a sun filter, meaning you can take great shots of the sun as well. Tracking Sun Resulting (stacked) shot Live zoom The pictures themselves are limited to Full HD, and some of the examples actually came out in HD (1280x720), but this is because the standard telescopic result is in 720p while "Wide" is in 1080p. Above you can see how in the app the Sun is tracked, the resulting capture, and Live zoom. I have only scratched the surface of what is possible with this telescope; I found several examples online of shots of the Milky Way, among others, such as nebulae and galaxies. All of this requires patience and knowledge, although if you know what you are looking for, simply enter it in the Atlas tab in the DWARFLAB app, tap the camera icon, and the telescope will attempt to track it. Conclusion The good The DWARF mini definitely places itself in a price point that makes astrology accessible to anyone looking to get started in the hobby. Say you want to have a closer look at the moon, simply enter it in the Atlas, and the Live view also lets you zoom in and snap pictures. The bad Some issues I came across while operating the DWARF mini were that it sometimes failed to connect unless I held my smartphone right next to it, and finding and tracking sometimes took several attempts to get it calibrated. I discovered that it helped if I sort of positioned and pointed the telescope in the general area it was supposed to detect, but this obviously wouldn't work with objects you can't see with the naked eye; more testing is required for that. Another bit of advice is to ensure that the lens is clean. While making the examples of live zooming on the sun, I discovered that the telescope lens and sun filter were not completely clean, and only after cleaning with a microfiber cloth was I able to get a decent shot of the sun. Where to buy and a coupon Okay, $399 is not cheap for a side hobby, but nor is a $1,500 smartphone flagship that you'll most likely have for a couple of years. This is a one-time entrance into astrology, and it won't become obsolete in one year like a smartphone. It's a thumbs up from me. The DWARF mini is available to buy right now in the U.S. and U.K. at the links below. DWARF mini for $399 on the official site DWARF mini for $399 on Amazon U.S. Use the NEOWIN5OFF coupon code for an additional 5% off at checkout (expires June 21) As an Amazon Associate, I earn from qualifying purchases.
    • Adobe Acrobat Reader Dis Continued
    • The name, you mean? If so, it's actually the objects common name. There's another one called NGC 7293 which is also known as Helix Nebula (because we're looking at a helix structure top down) but other times also known as the Eye of God. You'll understand when you see it
    • Welcome to Neowin! Enjoy your stay!
  • Recent Achievements

    • One Month Later
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      lamborghiniv10 earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Reacting Well
      X-No-file earned a badge
      Reacting Well
    • One Month Later
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      pestcontrol46 earned a badge
      Week One Done
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      505
    2. 2
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      272
    3. 3
      Skyfrog
      74
    4. 4
      +Edouard
      71
    5. 5
      FloatingFatMan
      69
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!