Recommended Posts

Yeah because you can't be fit without BT 4 and some overpriced gadgets.....

If BT 4 is going to bring a tide of people with poor assumptions and high opinions of their fitness then I hope its not supported.

Don't be offended Osiris, it was an offensive reply to an offensive comment to an offensive fanatical member who stinks every thread he participates in.

Now addressing the content of your reply, yeah, it would bring lots of runners that use those devices around the world on Android and iPhone if that is important to them. It's the current Bluetooth standard and should be supported now, if only in the highest end phones. To have another major phone without it is not good. There are many things people want that aren't on WP. There's no magic, if they had all people want the share would grow faster.

I want everything Windows, but with some of the things lacking, I just can't stay. Developers want their products on Windows Phone and just can't get the support or good answers from MS as to why not. I've spoken to them. One of them think it's something architecturally with the platform and it can't.

As for aptX that one's trickier since there's a small license fee from CSR. Though its cheap enough to be in $7 nano USB BT 4.0 adapters. It would have been fantastic if it was in MS' default Bluetooth 4.0 stack for Win 8 as I prefer that always. CD quality sound over Bluetooth is a wonderful thing and one of many reasons I just went to the One X+ 64GB.

Unfortunately the lesson those designs get scratched to easily.

If it's made out of the same material as the surface tablets (magnesium), then it should be fairly scratch-proof.

  • Like 2

Maybe... I'm not sure how realistic this would be, but my one Android affair was the original Sprint HTC EVO (for 6 months, then I returned to Windows Phone!). The EVO had a kickstand on the back, and it was a nice feature to have. The newer EVO LTE has one as well, but it seems the kickstand will be going away since the ONE will be coming to all carriers with no modifications.

Maybe the Surface Phone could have a kickstand akin to the Surface tablet? It could be the bottom section of the back that flaps open so it can stand in either portrait or landscape mode. While it may not be EXTREMELY useful to have the phone in portrait standing, it's still a nice option I think... it could be useful in certain situations I suppose.

What do you think? Am I a loon for wondering about a kickstand?

this is getting a bit off topic now, but i just don't understand the whole super thin phone trend.

you'd rather have a really thin phone with a crappy battery then a slightly thicker phone that can last a couple days or so?

this is getting a bit off topic now, but i just don't understand the whole super thin phone trend.

you'd rather have a really thin phone with a crappy battery then a slightly thicker phone that can last a couple days or so?

I dont care either, unless it is really thick and makes it hard to fit in the pocket. Was just an observation

If it's made out of the same material as the surface tablets (magnesium), then it should be fairly scratch-proof.

fairly scratch proof is not good enough for a lens/lens cover. the micro scratches e can't see on a screen severely affects picture quality on a lens cover.

:s Drunk post?

I'm guessing that you've never handled a Surface before as they don't scratch easily.

no ipad, it likes to randomly ignore key presses and make up it's own mind what to replace it with.

and it was supposed to be "the lens on". or rather lens cover. as I said, it doesn't matter if they don't scratch easy, they do get micro scratches relatively easily, and while you can't see them, the camera can.

fairly scratch proof is not good enough for a lens/lens cover. the micro scratches e can't see on a screen severely affects picture quality on a lens cover.

I assumed you were talking about the phone itself rather than the lens cover. I've never had a phone with a scratched lens cover. Most are indented so it's pretty hard to scratch it from everyday use.

most don't have a lens cover that is flush with the surface. I think I can remember one phone that was designed that way and they never did it again, and all the ones I saw of that phone was scratched up.

and yes, most are indented, this one isn't, that was my point.

  • 2 weeks later...

most don't have a lens cover that is flush with the surface. I think I can remember one phone that was designed that way and they never did it again, and all the ones I saw of that phone was scratched up.

and yes, most are indented, this one isn't, that was my point.

I was reading an article and watching a video about sapphire crystal screens for smartphones. Right now, it's only used for ultra high-end "bling" phones like the Vertu Ti. Sapphire crystal is also used in the iPhone 5's lens cover and it's incredibly scratch resistant. The only thing that can scratch it is a diamond. If Microsoft wanted to make a high-end flagship Windows Phone device, then they could use a lens cover made of sapphire crystal.

This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
  • Posts

    • Indeed. But note that this has Wifi7, HDMI 2.1, BlueTooth 5.4, and 5G Ethernet, so even in the additional features list this bundle blows the Steam Machine away. And, with the money saved, one could improve this dramatically.
    • One of the strangest galaxies in our Universe could help answer some long overdue questions by Sayan Sen Image by Pixabay via Pexels | Not representative An international team of astronomers led by the Department of Astronomy at Tsinghua University has discovered an unusually metal-poor galaxy that may contain signs of first-generation star formation. The galaxy, named Metal-Pristine Galaxy COSMOS Redshift 3 (MPG-CR3), or CR3, was identified using observations from the James Webb Space Telescope (JWST), the Very Large Telescope (VLT), and the Subaru Telescope. The findings, published in The Astrophysical Journal Letters, describe CR3 as the most metal-poor galaxy known from the period known as "cosmic noon," around 11.5 billion years ago. Cosmic noon refers to a period when the universe was producing stars at its highest rate and galaxies were growing rapidly. In astronomy, "metals" refers to all elements heavier than helium, including oxygen, carbon, and iron. Because CR3 contains so few of these heavier elements, researchers say it closely resembles what scientists expect the earliest galaxies in the universe may have looked like. The discovery is significant because it could offer clues about Population III (Pop III) stars, the first generation of stars thought to have formed after the Big Bang. These stars are believed to have formed from gas made almost entirely of hydrogen and helium, before heavier elements were created inside stars and spread across the universe through supernova explosions. Hence this is why CR3 has been referred to as a "living fossil." Scientists have long believed that Population III stars existed only in the very early universe. As more generations of stars formed and died, they enriched surrounding gas with heavier elements, making the conditions needed for metal-free star formation increasingly rare. Because of this, researchers expected the formation of such stars to have largely ended after the epoch of reionization, a period when radiation from the first stars and galaxies transformed the neutral hydrogen filling the universe and made it largely transparent to ultraviolet light. CR3 appears to challenge that idea. The galaxy was observed at a redshift of z = 3.193 ± 0.016. Redshift measures how much light from a distant object has been stretched as the universe expands and helps astronomers determine how far back in time they are looking. In this case, the redshift corresponds to roughly 11.5 billion years ago during cosmic noon. Although the universe was already several billion years old by that point, CR3 shows characteristics more commonly associated with much earlier galaxies. Observations revealed exceptionally strong emissions from hydrogen and helium, including Lyα, Hα, and He I λ10830. Lyα, or Lyman-alpha emission, is a specific wavelength of light produced by hydrogen and is widely used to study distant galaxies. Hα emission is another hydrogen signature commonly used to trace active star formation, while He I λ10830 is produced by helium and can indicate the presence of very hot, young stars. The measured equivalent widths of EW₀(Lyα) = 822 ± 101 Å and EW₀(Hα) = 2814 ± 327 Å are among the highest ever observed in star-forming galaxies. Equivalent width is a measure of the strength of an emission line relative to the surrounding light, and such large values are typically associated with intense and very recent star formation. At the same time, researchers found no statistically significant detections of metal emission lines, including [O III] λλ4959, 5007 and C IV λλ1548, 1550. Emission lines act as chemical fingerprints that reveal which elements are present in a galaxy. Oxygen and carbon lines are commonly seen in galaxies that have already undergone significant chemical enrichment. Their absence in CR3 suggests an unusually pristine environment. Using abundance calibration methods developed with JWST observations, the team placed a 2σ upper limit on the galaxy's gas-phase metallicity of 12+log(O/H)<6.52, corresponding to less than 0.7% of the Sun's metallicity (Z < 7 × 10⁻³ Z⊙). Gas-phase metallicity measures the abundance of heavy elements in a galaxy's gas. A 2σ upper limit indicates that the true value is very unlikely to be higher than the quoted threshold. Even when accounting for uncertainties in the calibration methods, the most conservative limit remains 12+log(O/H)<6.95, making CR3 the most metal-poor galaxy identified at cosmic noon. The galaxy also appears to contain very little dust. Researchers measured a Lyα/Hα flux ratio of 13.9 ± 2.5, a result that suggests negligible dust attenuation, meaning very little of the galaxy's light is being absorbed or scattered by cosmic dust. Because dust is usually produced by earlier generations of stars, this finding further supports the idea that CR3 has experienced very little chemical enrichment. Further analysis using spectral energy distribution modelling, a technique that compares observed light with theoretical models, suggests that CR3 contains an extremely young stellar population only around 2 million years old. The modelling, which used Population III stellar templates, also indicates the galaxy has a stellar mass of approximately 6.1 × 10⁵ M⊙. The symbol M⊙ represents one solar mass, or the mass of the Sun. One of the key questions raised by the discovery is how such a chemically primitive galaxy could exist in a universe that had already spent billions of years producing heavier elements. To investigate this, the researchers examined CR3's surroundings. Their analysis suggests the galaxy may lie in a slightly underdense environment, with a density contrast of roughly δ ≈ −0.12. An underdense region contains less matter and fewer galaxies than average. The team suggests that this relative isolation may have helped preserve pockets of pristine gas. Metal-rich material expelled from nearby galaxies may never have reached CR3, while the lower rate of galaxy mergers and interactions could have slowed the mixing of enriched gas into the system. If future observations confirm these findings, CR3 could provide some of the strongest evidence yet that first-generation star formation continued well after the epoch of reionization. Such a result would challenge the conventional view that pristine star formation ended by z ≳ 6 and suggest that small pockets of metal-free gas survived much longer than previously thought. Researchers stress that more observations will be needed to determine the galaxy's true nature. Future spectroscopic studies with higher resolution and better signal quality could help confirm whether CR3 is genuinely hosting Population III star formation. The discovery is also expected to encourage searches for other similar galaxies, which could help astronomers better understand how the first stars formed and how galaxies evolved in the early universe. Source: Tsinghua University, IOPscience This article was generated with some help from AI and reviewed by an editor. Under Section 107 of the Copyright Act 1976, this material is used for the purpose of news reporting. Fair use is a use permitted by copyright statute that might otherwise be infringing.
    • "I think in the immediate absence of a partner to apply relief" In the words of Sterling Archer... "Phrasing!"
    • For me, the fundamental problems with these "smartglasses" is that they really don't work well for people with significant prescriptions and massively up the price if you use attached lenses if they have displays, and if they don't, then they're not actually "smart" anything, rather just connecting to your phone and relaying voice to an AI. In a few cases like this, they throw in small cameras to feed video to the AI. All around, these feel like both a solution looking for a problem, and the problems it tries to solve seem more easily solved by different approaches and designs. Oddly, if the rumours are true, Apple may actually have invented something for once and it kind of does this right: put cameras in ear buds and manage the interface to AI exactly as most of us do: tapping on an ear bud and saying "Hey Google" or "Hey Siri." That makes them compatible with almost everyone, can double up as a hearing assist device, an impaired vision assist device, a "smart" device... and answer your phone and play music. That just seems like a better solution all around.
    • Usually the bigger ones with many fixes/changes take a few, theyre an exception to the rule most likely
  • Recent Achievements

    • Dedicated
      HidekoYamamoto94 earned a badge
      Dedicated
    • One Month Later
      timbobit earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • One Month Later
      nates earned a badge
      One Month Later
    • Week One Done
      Almohandis earned a badge
      Week One Done
    • Rookie
      dorf went up a rank
      Rookie
  • Popular Contributors

    1. 1
      +primortal
      452
    2. 2
      +Edouard
      161
    3. 3
      PsYcHoKiLLa
      107
    4. 4
      Michael Scrip
      84
    5. 5
      Steven P.
      71
  • Tell a friend

    Love Neowin? Tell a friend!